Primary gastric rhabdomyosarcoma. A rare cause of an upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Adenocarcinoma accounts for 90% of malignant gastric tumours. Lymphomas, gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) and other less frequent tumours account for 10%. However, rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) remains a rare cause within the broad differential diagnosis of gastric lesions. Most cases of gastrointestinal RMS in adults are metastatic disease so primary RMS is extremely rare. A few cases reports of esophageal and gastric RMS have been published. This is a 76-year-old patient with a history of oncological oncology of poorly differentiated lung adenocarcinoma T2N1M0 in 2008 treated with surgery with no signs of recurrence. She presented to emergency with occasional episodes of melena and iron deficiency anemia for the last 3 months. The laboratory findings showed moderated anemia. Gastroscopy was performed and a prominent submucosal and ulcerated bulge was observed at the posterior wall of the gastric body and fundus. A histologic examination reveled tissue fragments composed of small round spindle-shaped cells. Tumor cells had atypical nuclei showing dense chromatin ad pale to eosinophilic cytoplasm. Immunohistochemically, the tumor was positive for AE1/3, desmin, myogenin and CD56. Patient was diagnosed with primary gastric RMS. Thoraco-abdominopelvic CT showed a locally advanced stage (T2 N1M0).

Management of cytomegalovirus reactivation in patient with immunotherapy-induced gastritis.

We present the case of a 52-year-old woman diagnosed with stage IV clear cell renal cell carcinoma who received combination of surgery and systemic therapy with nivolumab (anti-PD1) and ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4). During treatment, patient presented oral intolerance, vomiting and abdominal pain. Computed tomography (CT) and gastroscopy (EGD) were performed, identifying findings suggestive of severe gastro-duodenitis with friability and diffuse oedema of the mucosa and deep ulcers. A gastrointestinal immunotherapy-induced toxicity was suspected so patient was managed with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and intravenous corticosteroids 1mg/Kg. Three weeks later, corticosteroid treatment failed. EGD was repeated and gastric biopsies were taken for histological and microbiological tests. Gastric biopsies revealed the presence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) inclusion bodies by immunohistochemistry (IHC). CMV viral load by quantitative PCR in plasma was 2,000 IU/mL so intravenous ganciclovir was prescribed. Then, the patient presented poor clinical course with persistent vomiting due to a failure of first-line corticosteroid and antiviral treatment. Another EGD was performed. Last IHC reveals a low CMV viral load. Second-line treatment with Anti-TNF was performed using a single-dose regimen of intravenous infliximab 5 mg/Kg. Finally, the patient presented a clinical and endoscopic response and a negative CMV DNA test in the blood after completing the antiviral treatment.

Secondary uncovered versus fully-covered metal stents for the management of occluded stent in unresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) have been widely placed for unresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction (UDMBO). However, the dysfunction rate is 19-40% and its treatment is controversial. We aimed asses the efficacy and safety of a secondary biliary stents (uncovered (UC) versus fully-covered (FC) stent) for the management of occluded SEMS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2015 and June 2023, 41 patients with UDMBO underwent secondary biliary stent placement as "stent-in-stent" (20 FCSEMS and 21 UCSEMS). The primary outcomes were technical and clinical success of SEMS placement. Secondary outcomes included adverse events (AEs), patency and survival. Patients were prospectively followed until death or loss of follow-up. RESULTS: Technical (100% vs 85.5%) and clinical (100% vs 95.2%) success rates were similar in FCSEMS and UCSEMS groups. The median follow-up period was 510 days (range 290-630). The median duration of stent patency of FCSEMS (220 days, IQR 137.5-442.5) was longer than UCSEMS (150 days, IQR 110-362.5) (P=0.395), although stent dysfunction within 6 months was not different between groups. Multivariate analysis indicated that sex (HR=0.909, 0.852-0.970), antitumor treatment (HR=0.248, 0.032-0.441), stent patency (HR=0.992, 0.986-0.998) and clinical success (HR=0.133, 0.026-0.690) were significant factors for overall survival. There were no remarkable differences in AEs. CONCLUSIONS: The placement of additional biliary stent using the stent-in-stent method is an effective and safe rescue treatment for patients with UDMBO and occluded stent. In addition, the use of FCSEMS compared UCSEMS has unclear benefits regarding stent patency and overall survival.

AMA-positive hepatitis induced by the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.

We present the case of a 56-year-old female admitted to our centre for hepatitis. She had recieved the first dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 10 days before the admission. Etiologic study was negative. The patient was diagnosed with vaccine-induced hepatitis.

Impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on pancreatic cancer: diagnosis and short-term survival.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has delayed medical consultation, possibly leading to the diagnosis of gastrointestinal cancer. The aim of the study was to analyze the impact of SARS-Cov-2 pandemic on new diagnosis and short-term survival of patients with pancreatic cancer (PC). METHODS: All consecutive patients who had a suspected diagnosis of pancreatic lesion before (from March to September 2019) and during COVID 19 pandemic (from March to September 2020). Demographics, clinical and treatment were collected and compared. Short-term survival was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 25 patients (n=13 men) with diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas and a median age of 70 years (IQR 62-74) were included. An increase was observed in the number of patients with newly diagnosed PC (n= 12 [19.1%] versus n=13 [20.9%]; P= 0.603). The subgroup analysis revealed a tendency toward a longer diagnosis (11 versus 12 days; P= 0.219) and treatment (28 versus 44; P= 0.375) delay for patients with PC during COVID-19 pandemic. A significant increase was observed for number of cases of advanced stage III and IV (n=4 [30.8%] versus n=7 [53.8%]; P= 0.006). Palliative treatment was the most frequent approach during COVID-19 period. During 1-year follow-up, 6 (50%) and 7 (61.5%) deaths were observed among patients diagnosed before and after COVID-19 (P= 0.449), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to delays in diagnosis and treatment in PC, which translates into an advanced staging and a worse prognosis. These data should stimulate health care provider to facilitate procedures for detection pancreatic cancer.