Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol ; 32(1): 23-32, 2021 Feb 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32732188

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Anaphylaxis is an acute, life-threatening, multiorgan hypersensitivity reaction. Objective: The aim of this study was to identify the causes of anaphylaxis in Portugal in order to improve our knowledge of epidemiology and management. METHODS: We implemented a nationwide notification system for anaphylaxis over a 10-year period, with voluntary reporting by allergists. Data on 1783 patients with anaphylaxis were included. Etiopathogenesis, manifestations, and clinical management were characterized in detail for both children and adults. RESULTS: The mean age was 32.7 (20.3) years, and 30% were under 18 years of age; 58% were female. The mean age at the first anaphylaxis episode was 27.5 (20.4) years (ranging from 1 month to 88 years). The main culprits of anaphylaxis were foods (48%), drugs (37%) (main trigger in adults, 48%), and hymenoptera venom (7%). The main culprit foods were shellfish (27%), fresh fruit (17%), cow's milk (16%), tree nuts (15%), fish (8%), egg (7%), and peanut (7%). The main drugs were nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (43%), antibiotics (39%), and anesthetic agents (6%). Other causes included exercise (3%), latex (2%), cold-induced anaphylaxis (2%), and idiopathic anaphylaxis (2%). Most patients (80%) were admitted to the emergency department; only 43% received adrenaline. Anaphylaxis recurred in 41% of patients (21% with ≥3 anaphylactic episodes); 7% used an adrenaline autoinjector device. CONCLUSION: Food is the leading cause of anaphylaxis in Portugal, while drugs were the main elicitors in adults. We emphasize undertreatment with adrenaline and recurrent episodes, highlighting the need to improve diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to anaphylaxis.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Adolescente , Adulto , Alérgenos/uso terapêutico , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/tratamento farmacológico , Anafilaxia/epidemiologia , Animais , Bovinos , Epinefrina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/diagnóstico , Humanos , Leite , Sistema de Registros
2.
Allergy ; 71(7): 931-43, 2016 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27060567

RESUMO

An anaphylactic reaction due to a Hymenoptera sting is a clinical emergency, and patients, their caregivers as well as all healthcare professionals should be familiar with its recognition and acute management. This consensus report has been prepared by a European expert panel of the EAACI Interest Group of Insect Venom Hypersensitivity. It is targeted at allergists, clinical immunologists, internal medicine specialists, pediatricians, general practitioners, emergency department doctors, and any other healthcare professional involved. The aim was to report the scientific evidence on self-medication of anaphylactic reactions due to Hymenoptera stings, to inform healthcare staff about appropriate patient self-management of sting reactions, to propose indications for the prescription of an adrenaline auto-injector (AAI), and to discuss other forms of medication. First-line treatment for Hymenoptera sting anaphylaxis is intramuscular adrenaline. Prescription of AAIs is mandatory in the case of venom-allergic patients who suffer from mast cell diseases or with an elevated baseline serum tryptase level and in untreated patients with a history of a systemic reaction involving at least two different organ systems. AAI prescription should also be considered in other specific situations before, during, and after stopping venom immunotherapy.


Assuntos
Alérgenos/imunologia , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Anafilaxia/terapia , Himenópteros/imunologia , Mordeduras e Picadas de Insetos/complicações , Automedicação , Animais , Epinefrina/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Injeções Subcutâneas , Automedicação/métodos
5.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24765880

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Drug-induced anaphylaxis is an unpredictable and potentially fatal adverse drug reaction. The aim of this study was to identify the causes of drug-induced anaphylaxis in Portugal. METHODS: During a 4-year period a nationwide notification system for anaphylaxis was implemented, with voluntary reporting by allergists. Data on 313 patients with drug anaphylaxis were received and reviewed. Statistical analysis included distribution tests and multiple logistic regression analysis to investigate significance, regression coefficients, and marginal effects. RESULTS: The mean (SD) age of the patients was 43.8 (17.4) years, and 8.3% were younger than 18 years. The female to male ratio was 2:1.The main culprits were nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (47.9% of cases), antibiotics (35.5%), and anesthetic agents (6.1%). There was a predominance of mucocutaneous symptoms (92.2%), followed by respiratory symptoms (80.4%) and cardiovascular symptoms (49.0%). Patients with NSAID-induced anaphylaxis showed a tendency towards respiratory and mucocutaneous manifestations. We found no significant associations between age, sex, or atopy and type of drug. Anaphylaxis recurrence was observed in 25.6% of cases, and the risk was higher when NSAIDs were involved. CONCLUSIONS: NSAIDs were the most common cause of anaphylaxis in this study and were also associated with a higher rate of recurrence. We stress the need for better therapeutic management and prevention of recurring episodes of drug-induced anaphylaxis.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia/induzido quimicamente , Anafilaxia/imunologia , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade/imunologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anafilaxia/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Portugal/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
8.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 36(2): 113-6, 2008.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18479664

RESUMO

The use of pine nuts, the seeds of Pinus pinea, is on the increasing in the modern Mediterranean diet. Little more than 20 cases of allergy to this tree nut have been published, and cross-reactivity with pine pollen, peanut and almond has already been reported. We describe the case of a young boy with several episodes of anaphylaxis after pine nut ingestion. Specific IgE to pine nut and Artemisia vulgaris was demonstrated by skin prick tests and in vitro determination of specific IgE, although no IgE to pine pollen or other nuts was detected. Immunoblotting of Artemisia vulgaris and pine nut revealed two matching diffuse bands, just below 14 kDa and 30 kDa. The ImmunoCAP inhibition assays showed complete inhibition of pine nut specific IgE after serum incubation with Artemisia vulgaris extract. As far as we know, this is the first reported case of documented cross-reactivity between pine nut and Artemisia vulgaris.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia/imunologia , Artemisia/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade a Noz/imunologia , Pinus , Adolescente , Idade de Início , Anafilaxia/sangue , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Reações Cruzadas , Dermatite Atópica/complicações , Dermatite Atópica/imunologia , Humanos , Imunização , Imunoglobulina E/sangue , Masculino , Hipersensibilidade a Noz/complicações , Testes Cutâneos , Urticária/imunologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa