Toxicity of high-dose radiotherapy combined with daily cisplatin in non-small cell lung cancer: results of the EORTC 08912 phase I/II study. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.

The purpose of this work was to study the feasibility of concurrent chemoradiation in patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). 40 patients with inoperable NSCLC were treated with escalating doses of radiotherapy and cisplatin (cDDP). The radiation dose was increased step by step from 60.5 to 66 Gy in daily fractions of 2.75 Gy. Chemotherapy was also increased step by step from 20 to 24 daily doses of cDDP 6 mg/m(2) and given concurrently with radiotherapy. A dose of 40 Gy/2 Gy/20 fractions (fx) was given to the EPTV (elective planning target volume) which included the gross tumour volume with a margin of 2 cm and part of or the entire mediastinum. During each session a boost dose of 0.75 Gy was given simultaneously to the BPTV (boost planning target volume), which encompassed the GTV (gross tumour volume) with a margin of 1 cm, for the first 20 fx, so the total dose to the tumour was 55 Gy. Cisplatin 6 mg/m(2) was given 1 h prior to radiotherapy at each fraction. From then on the dose of radiation to the BPTV and the dose of cDDP were increased step by step. In group I the BPTV was irradiated with two extra fractions of 2.75 Gy to a total dose of 60. 5 Gy without cDDP. In group II the same total dose of 60.5 Gy was given but the last two fractions were combined with cDDP. In group III four extra fractions of 2.75 Gy were given to the BPTV to a total dose of 66 Gy, only two of these fractions combined with cDDP. Finally, in group IV a total dose of 66 Gy was given in 24 fractions, all fractions combined with cDDP. All patients were planned by means of a CT-based conformal treatment planning. The maximal length of the oesophagus receiving >/=60.5 Gy was 11 cm. 40 patients were evaluable for acute and late toxicity and for survival. Acute toxicity grade >/=3 (common toxicity criteria, CTC) was rarely observed; nausea/vomiting in 3 patients (8%), leucopenia in 2 patients (5%), thrombocytopenia in 2 patients (5%), whilst 2 patients (5%) suffered from severe weight loss. Late side-effects (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, EORTC/RTOG) were: oesophageal toxicity >/=grade 3 in 2 patients (5%) and radiation pneumonitis grades 1 (3%) and 2 (3%) in 1 patient each. Overall actuarial 1- and 2-year survival was 53% and 40%, respectively. The 1- and 2-year local disease-free interval was 65% and 58% respectively. Radiotherapy at a dose of 66 Gy/2.75 Gy/24 fx combined with daily cDDP 6 mg/m(2) given over 5 weeks is feasible and results in a good local disease-free interval and a good survival rate. This treatment schedule is at present being tested as one of the two treatment arms of EORTC phase III study protocol 08972/22973.

High-precision prostate cancer irradiation by clinical application of an offline patient setup verification procedure, using portal imaging.

PURPOSE: To investigate in three institutions, The Netherlands Cancer Institute (Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Huis [AvL]), Dr. Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center (DDHC), and Dr, Bernard Verbeeten Institute (BVI), how much the patient setup accuracy for irradiation of prostate cancer can be improved by an offline setup verification and correction procedure, using portal imaging. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The verification procedure consisted of two stages. During the first stage, setup deviations were measured during a number (Nmax) of consecutive initial treatment sessions. The length of the average three dimensional (3D) setup deviation vector was compared with an action level for corrections, which shrunk with the number of setup measurements. After a correction was applied, Nmax measurements had to be performed again. Each institution chose different values for the initial action level (6, 9, and 10 mm) and Nmax (2 and 4). The choice of these parameters was based on a simulation of the procedure, using as input preestimated values of random and systematic deviations in each institution. During the second stage of the procedure, with weekly setup measurements, the AvL used a different criterion ("outlier detection") for corrective actions than the DDHC and the BVI ("sliding average"). After each correction the first stage of the procedure was restarted. The procedure was tested for 151 patients (62 in AvL, 47 in DDHC, and 42 in BVI) treated for prostate carcinoma. Treatment techniques and portal image acquisition and analysis were different in each institution. RESULTS: The actual distributions of random and systematic deviations without corrections were estimated by eliminating the effect of the corrections. The percentage of mean (systematic) 3D deviations larger than 5 mm was 26% for the AvL and the DDHC, and 36% for the BVI. The setup accuracy after application of the procedure was considerably improved (percentage of mean 3D deviations larger than 5 mm was 1.6% in the AvL and 0% in the DDHC and BVI), in agreement with the results of the simulation. The number of corrections (about 0.7 on the average per patient) was not larger than predicted. CONCLUSION: The verification procedure appeared to be feasible in the three institutions and enabled a significant reduction of mean 3D setup deviations. The computer simulation of the procedure proved to be a useful tool, because it enabled an accurate prediction of the setup accuracy and the required number of corrections.

[Local recurrence following breast-conserving treatment for breast carcinoma; treatment and prognosis in 82 patients]. / Lokaal recidief na borstsparende behandeling wegens mammacarcinoom; behandeling en prognose bij 82 patiënten.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the treatment and prognosis of 82 patients with local relapse in the breast as the first event after breast-conserving therapy of operable breast cancer. DESIGN: Descriptive and retrospective. SETTING: 17 general hospitals in southeast North-Brabant and North-Limburg. METHODS: Using the registries of the Comprehensive Cancer Centre South in Eindhoven (1981-1990) and the Bernard Verbeeten Institute in Tilburg (1981-1987), 82 patients were identified who had developed local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy. RESULTS: The mean age of the 82 patients at the time of detection of local recurrence was 51 years. 46 recurrences (56%) were localized at or near the site of the original tumour, 14 (17%) were detected elsewhere in the breast, 15 (18%) showed diffuse spread through the breast and seven (9%) were completely or partly localized in the skin. Nine recurrences (11%) were non-invasive. Of the 82 patients four received adjuvant systemic therapy only and no surgery. Of the 78 patients treated with surgery 72 underwent mastectomy, 6 local excision. After treatment, the actuarial five-year overall survival, distant recurrence-free survival and disease-free survival rates were 60%, 43% and 31% respectively. Local control, defined as survival without second local recurrence and without local progression of the disease, was 57% after five years. CONCLUSION: The five-year distant recurrence-free and disease-free survival rates for patients with local recurrence after breast conserving-therapy were low. The high proportion of second local recurrences and local progression of disease in this study underlines the difficulty of obtaining local control after treatment of local recurrence.

Feasibility of a randomized trial on adjuvant radio-iodine therapy in differentiated thyroid cancer.

BACKGROUND: Justification for adjuvant radio-iodine (I-131) therapy in differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) is purely based on retrospective data. This is true for ablative therapy and even more so for high-dosage adjuvant schedules. Randomized trials on the latter application are considered impossible due to anticipated formidable sample sizes required in a disease with an overall excellent prognosis like DTC. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a model that could stratify for risk of recurrence, rather than survival, as is usually done in prognostic indices, and secondly, to use this model to estimate the sample size required for a randomized trial. DESIGN, PATIENTS AND RESULTS: From databases of three large Dutch centres, we identified 342 consecutive patients without known residual DTC after (near-) total thyroidectomy. Using Cox proportional hazards analysis, a model was validated that clearly distinguished risk categories of recurrence using commonly available baseline variables. The model included age, N stage at presentation and T stage in papillary carcinoma. According to this stratification, a subset of patients at substantial risk for relapse (30-40%) was identified. They could be eligible for a trial assessing the impact of high-dose adjuvant I-131 on recurrence rates. Assuming a clinically relevant effect of 30% reduction of relapses, 290 patients would have to be entered in either arm (alpha 0.05, power 80%). CONCLUSION: We conclude that even though a randomized trial on this issue will be difficult to design and conduct, sample size is not the main problem.

Local recurrence after breast conservation therapy for early stage breast carcinoma: detection, treatment, and outcome in 266 patients. Dutch Study Group on Local Recurrence after Breast Conservation (BORST).

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists concerning the roles of mammography and physical examination in the detection of local recurrence after conservation therapy for breast carcinoma. In addition, the prognostic factors for and optimal treatment of patients with local recurrence are uncertain. METHODS: At eight radiotherapy institutes, two cancer institutes, and one surgical clinic in the Netherlands, regular follow-up of patients who underwent breast conservation therapy between 1980 and 1992 identified 266 patients with local recurrence in the breast. These patients exhibited no clinical signs of distant metastases at the time of diagnosis of the local recurrence. Data on the method of detection were available for 189 patients (72%). Local recurrence was diagnosed by mammography alone in 47 cases (25%). Of all patients, 85% underwent salvage mastectomy, 8% underwent local excision, 4% received systemic treatment only, and 3% remained untreated. Specimens of the primary tumor were available for review from 238 of the 266 patients (89%). RESULTS: Local recurrences detected by mammography alone were smaller than those detected by physical examination (P = 0.04). At 5 years from the date of salvage treatment, the overall survival rate for all 266 patients was 61% (95% confidence interval [CI], 55-67%), and the distant recurrence free survival rate was 47% (95% CI, 40-53%). For the 25 patients with noninvasive recurrence, these figures were 95% and 94%, respectively. Skin involvement, the extent of recurrence (< or = 10 mm vs. >10 mm), and both lymph node status and histologic grade of the primary disease were strong predictors for distant metastases in patients with invasive recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with invasive local recurrence more than 1 cm in size are at a substantial risk for distant disease. The better distant disease free survival for patients with recurrence measuring 1 cm or less may indicate that early detection can improve the treatment outcome. Recurrence with skin involvement should be considered generalized disease.