Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Heart Rhythm ; 18(4): 641-650, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33242669

RESUMO

There are an increasing number of cardiac electronic device implants and generator changes with a longer patient life expectancy along with concomitant increase in antiplatelet and anticoagulant regimens, which can increase the incidence of pocket hematomas. We have conducted an in-depth analysis on the relevant literature, which is rife with varying definition of hematomas, on ways to reduce pocket hematomas. We have analyzed studies on periprocedural medication management, intraprocedural use of prohemostatic agents, and postprocedure role of compression devices.


Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis/efeitos adversos , Hematoma/prevenção & controle , Marca-Passo Artificial/efeitos adversos , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Saúde Global , Hematoma/epidemiologia , Hematoma/etiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Fatores de Risco
2.
J Arrhythm ; 37(2): 400-406, 2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33850582

RESUMO

AIMS: Dermatologic evaluation for cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) has not been established. We sought to ascertain baseline wound scar features using quantifiable surgical tools and scar scales on post-CIED patients. METHODS: A single-center, prospective observational case-control study was performed where 92 study subjects (40 healthy volunteers and 52 post-CIED patients) completed the study. Durometer was used to quantify skin pliability before CIED placement, postprocedure, and 2 weeks postprocedure. Higher durometer readings signified reduced skin pliability. Durometer readings were compared to the patients' contralateral pectoral skin and to a healthy volunteer's cohort skin within the prepectoral region. Patient wounds were observed and graded using the Patient Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and Manchester Scar Scale (MSS). RESULTS: Baseline pectoral skin pliability readings were similar in healthy volunteers and CIED patient population. In comparison to preprocedural measurements, surgical site skin pliability decreased in postprocedural and 2 weeks follow-up time points (P-value .004 and <.001, respectively). The increases in durometer readings were higher in the older population (age >75 over time, P = .008). POSAS evaluations showed on average a thin painless hypopigmented scar with moderate stiffness. MSS scar evaluation showed a palpable scar with slight contour differences and color mismatch and appeared to be slightly better in the African American population. There was no difference in scar characteristics with preprocedural use of antiplatelet or anticoagulation or staple closure or gender. CONCLUSIONS: Serial measurements could be of value for development of new strategies for cosmesis and improved wound healing.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa