The Personal Impact of Daily Wound Care for Hidradenitis Suppurativa.

BACKGROUND: Recurring nodules, abscesses, and lesions characterise hidradenitis suppurativa (HS): a chronic, inflammatory skin disorder. Globally the prevalence of HS is estimated to be around 1% of the population. Leakage, pain, and odour from HS wounds require substantial management. Little is known of the personal burdens that routine wound management imposes on the patient. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate how routine HS wound management impacts patients in terms of the time spent changing dressings, the number of dressings required per day, pain experienced during dressing changes, and negative impact on various domains of their personal lives. METHODS: An anonymous online questionnaire was posted on closed social media patient support groups between April and May 2019. Pearson χ2 test was used to evaluate if Hurley stages influenced the personal impact of wound care routines on patients. Statistical significance was determined as p value <0.05. RESULTS: In total, 908 people from 28 countries responded. Of these, 81% (n = 734) reported that regular dressing changes negatively impacted on their quality of life. Most patients, 82% (n = 744), experience pain during dressing changes. 16% (n = 142) of patients required five or more dressings daily, and 12% (n = 108) spend over 30 min daily tending to wounds. Patients indicated high levels of dissatisfaction with currently available wound dressings. CONCLUSION: HS wound management imposes a substantial personal burden on patients. There is a clear unmet need for HS-specific wound dressings and wound care provisions, and a greater awareness of the condition and its impact is needed among clinicians.

Impact of hidradenitis suppurativa-specific wound dressing system on patient quality of life and dressing-related pain: pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: It is theorised that adhesive-free wound care developed specifically for patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) can improve their quality of life (QoL). Our study aimed to investigate the impact of a novel wound care device on Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores, and other factors related to experienced pain, time spent changing dressings, comfort, ease of use and body image. METHOD: A 21-day, single-arm, unblinded, pilot trial was conducted to assess ease of use and the impact of effective wound care on various aspects of wound management in patients with HS. Participants were provided two trial garments and trial dressings as required, to use over a 21-day period in the home setting. A seven-item questionnaire and the DLQI questionnaire was completed on days 0, 7, 14 and 21. RESULTS: All 15 participants were female, aged >18 years old and with a diagnosis of HS. Mean DLQI score at baseline (day 0) was 19.3, which was reduced to 4.53 on day 21, a significant improvement in 100% of participants (p<0.001). High levels of dressing-related pain, assessed using an 11-point Visual Analogue Scale, reduced from 5.53 at baseline to 0.8 on day 21. Other significant improvements in terms of patient comfort, time spent on changing dressings, body confidence and the dressing's ability to retain exudate were also noted. CONCLUSION: The results illustrated the improvement made to study participants' day-to-day activities and QoL when effective HS-specific wound care products were provided. Wound care is an essential component in the treatment journey of patients.

Stress Monitoring Using Wearable Sensors: A Pilot Study and Stress-Predict Dataset.

With the recent advancements in the field of wearable technologies, the opportunity to monitor stress continuously using different physiological variables has gained significant interest. The early detection of stress can help improve healthcare and minimizes the negative impact of long-term stress. This paper reports outcomes of a pilot study and associated stress-monitoring dataset, named the "Stress-Predict Dataset", created by collecting physiological signals from healthy subjects using wrist-worn watches with a photoplethysmogram (PPG) sensor. While wearing these watches, 35 healthy volunteers underwent a series of tasks (i.e., Stroop color test, Trier Social Stress Test and Hyperventilation Provocation Test), along with a rest period in-between each task. They also answered questionnaires designed to induce stress levels compatible with daily life. The changes in the blood volume pulse (BVP) and heart rate were recorded by the watch and were labelled as occurring during stress-inducing tasks or a rest period (no stress). Additionally, respiratory rate was estimated using the BVP signal. Statistical models and personalised adaptive reference ranges were used to determine the utility of the proposed stressors and the extracted variables (heart rate and respiratory rate). The analysis showed that the interview session was the most significant stress stimulus, causing a significant variation in heart rate of 27 (77%) participants and respiratory rate of 28 (80%) participants out of 35. The outcomes of this study contribute to the understanding the role of stressors and their association with physiological response and provide a dataset to help develop new wearable solutions for more reliable, valid, and sensitive physio-logical stress monitoring.

Improving outcomes among young adults with type 1 diabetes: the D1 Now pilot cluster randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The D1 Now intervention is designed to improve outcomes in young adults living with type 1 diabetes. It consists of three components: an agenda-setting tool, an interactive messaging system and a support worker. The aim of the D1 Now pilot cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) was to gather and analyse acceptability and feasibility data to allow (1) further refinement of the D1 Now intervention, and (2) determination of the feasibility of evaluating the D1 Now intervention in a future definitive RCT. METHODS: A pilot cluster RCT with two intervention arms and a control arm was conducted over 12 months. Quantitative data collection was based on a core outcome set and took place at baseline and 12 months. Semi-structured interviews with participants took place at 6, 9 and 12 months. Fidelity and health economic costings were also assessed. RESULTS: Four diabetes centres and 57 young adults living with type 1 diabetes took part. 50% of eligible young adults were recruited and total loss to follow-up was 12%. Fidelity, as measured on a study delivery checklist, was good but there were three minor processes that were not delivered as intended in the protocol. Overall, the qualitative data demonstrated that the intervention was considered acceptable and feasible, though this differed across intervention components. The agenda-setting tool and support worker intervention components were acceptable to both young adults and staff, but views on the interactive messaging system were mixed. CONCLUSIONS: Some modifications are required to the D1 Now intervention components and research processes but with these in place progression to a definitive RCT is considered feasible. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN (ref: ISRCTN74114336 ).

The multimorbidity collaborative medication review and decision making (MyComrade) study: a pilot cluster randomised trial in two healthcare systems.

BACKGROUND: While international guidelines recommend medication reviews as part of the management of multimorbidity, evidence on how to implement reviews in practice in primary care is lacking. The MyComrade (MultimorbiditY Collaborative Medication Review And Decision Making) intervention is an evidence-based, theoretically informed novel intervention which aims to support the conduct of medication reviews for patients with multimorbidity in primary care. AIM: The pilot study aimed to assess the feasibility of a definitive trial of the MyComrade intervention across two healthcare systems (Republic of Ireland (ROI) and Northern Ireland (NI)). DESIGN: A pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial was conducted (clustered at general practice level), using specific progression criteria and a process evaluation framework. SETTING: General practices in the ROI and NI. PARTICIPANTS: Eligible practices were those in defined geographical areas who had GP's and Practice Based Pharmacists (PBP's) (in NI) willing to conduct medication reviews. Eligible patients were those aged 18 years and over, with multi morbidity and on ten or more medications. INTERVENTION: The MyComrade intervention is an evidence-based, theoretically informed novel intervention which aims to support the conduct of medication reviews for patients with multimorbidity in primary care, using a planned collaborative approach guided by an agreed checklist, within a specified timeframe. OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility outcomes, using pre-determined progression criteria, assessed practice and patient recruitment and retention and intervention acceptability and fidelity. Anonymised patient-related quantitative data, from practice medical records and patient questionnaires were collected at baseline, 4 and 8 months, to inform potential outcome measures for a definitive trial. These included (i) practice outcomes-completion of medication reviews; (ii) patient outcomes-treatment burden and quality of life; (iii) prescribing outcomes-number and changes of prescribed medications and incidents of potentially inappropriate prescribing; and (iv) economic cost analysis. The framework Decision-making after Pilot and feasibility Trials (ADePT) in conjunction with a priori progression criteria and process evaluation was used to guide the collection and analysis of quantitative and qualitative data. RESULTS: The recruitment of practices (n = 15) and patients (n = 121, mean age 73 years and 51% female), representing 94% and 38% of a priori targets respectively, was more complex and took longer than anticipated; impacted by the global COVID-19 pandemic. Retention rates of 100% of practices and 85% of patients were achieved. Both practice staff and patients found the intervention acceptable and reported strong fidelity to the My Comrade intervention components. Some practice staff highlighted concerns such as poor communication of the reviews to patients, dissatisfaction regarding incentivisation and in ROI the sustainability of two GPs collaboratively conducting the medication reviews. Assessing outcomes from the collected data was found feasible and appropriate for a definitive trial. Two progression criteria met the 'Go' criterion (practice and patient retention), two met the 'Amend' criterion (practice recruitment and intervention implementation) and one indicated a 'Stop - unless changes possible' (patient recruitment). CONCLUSION: The MyComrade intervention was found to be feasible to conduct within two different healthcare systems. Recruitment of participants requires significant time and effort given the nature of this population and the pairing of GP and pharmacist may be more sustainable to implement in routine practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: ISRCTN, ISRCTN80017020 ; date of confirmation 4/11/2019; retrospectively registered.

A comparison of methods to generate adaptive reference ranges in longitudinal monitoring.

In a clinical setting, biomarkers are typically measured and evaluated as biological indicators of a physiological state. Population based reference ranges, known as 'static' or 'normal' reference ranges, are often used as a tool to classify a biomarker value for an individual as typical or atypical. However, these ranges may not be informative to a particular individual when considering changes in a biomarker over time since each observation is assessed in isolation and against the same reference limits. To allow early detection of unusual physiological changes, adaptation of static reference ranges is required that incorporates within-individual variability of biomarkers arising from longitudinal monitoring in addition to between-individual variability. To overcome this issue, methods for generating individualised reference ranges are proposed within a Bayesian framework which adapts successively whenever a new measurement is recorded for the individual. This new Bayesian approach also allows the within-individual variability to differ for each individual, compared to other less flexible approaches. However, the Bayesian approach usually comes with a high computational cost, especially for individuals with a large number of observations, that diminishes its applicability. This difficulty suggests that a computational approximation may be required. Thus, methods for generating individualised adaptive ranges by the use of a time-efficient approximate Expectation-Maximisation (EM) algorithm will be presented which relies only on a few sufficient statistics at the individual level.

Live implant dosimetry may be an effective replacement for postimplant computed tomography in localized prostate cancer patients receiving low dose rate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: To determine if Live Implant Dosimetry (LIDO) utilizing intraoperative transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) is equivalent to postimplant CT dosimetry (either day 0 or day 30) in patients with localized prostate cancer (PC) treated with low dose rate (LDR) prostate seed brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The treated population consisted of 628 men with localized (T1-T2) PC. All d'Amico risk categories (low, intermediate, and high) were included, and 437 patients were treated with monotherapy (160 Gy) [low and low tier intermediate], and the remainder (191) [high tier intermediate and high risk] with an implant boost (106 Gy) post external beam radiation, to a volume including the prostate and seminal vesicles (46 Gy). LIDO with intraoperative TRUS, postimplant CT (day 0 and day 30) were performed in all cases. Prostate volumes (V), V100 (prostate) and dose (D) D90 (prostate), D30 (urethra), and Rectum D2cc, were recorded. No urinary catheter was used on Day 30 CT. RESULTS: More than 91.33% of monotherapy patients reached the target D90 according to LIDO while only 82.99% of Day 0 CT and 92.82% of Day 30 CT achieved target D90. When considering V100, monotherapy patients recorded target dosimetry in 90.93%, 82.31%, and 92.02% of cases assessed by LIDO, Day 0 CT and Day 30 CT, respectively. Strong correlations are observed in D90, Rectum D2cc and Urethra D30 across imaging modalities but V100 and V150 were poorly correlated due to the relative quantification of this parameter and high degree of error in measurement. Of all monotherapy patients with satisfactory dosimetry on LIDO, 94.82% reached target D90 at day 30 CT and 94.19% reached target V100. CONCLUSIONS: LIDO and CT are both effective tools for assessing postimplant dosimetry. Patients with satisfactory LIDO dosimetry are highly likely to have equivalent dosimetry on CT at follow-up, indicating that postimplant CT may be eliminated in PC a patients implanted with this technique.

Intra-Tumour Heterogeneity Is One of the Main Sources of Inter-Observer Variation in Scoring Stromal Tumour Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Triple Negative Breast Cancer.

Stromal tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) are a strong prognostic marker in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Consistency scoring sTILs is good and was excellent when an internet-based scoring aid developed by the TIL-WG was used to score cases in a reproducibility study. This study aimed to evaluate the reproducibility of sTILs assessment using this scoring aid in cases from routine practice and to explore the potential of the tool to overcome variability in scoring. Twenty-three breast pathologists scored sTILs in digitized slides of 49 TNBC biopsies using the scoring aid. Subsequently, fields of view (FOV) from each case were selected by one pathologist and scored by the group using the tool. Inter-observer agreement was good for absolute sTILs (ICC 0.634, 95% CI 0.539-0.735, p < 0.001) but was poor to fair using binary cutpoints. sTILs heterogeneity was the main contributor to disagreement. When pathologists scored the same FOV from each case, inter-observer agreement was excellent for absolute sTILs (ICC 0.798, 95% CI 0.727-0.864, p < 0.001) and good for the 20% (ICC 0.657, 95% CI 0.561-0.756, p < 0.001) and 40% (ICC 0.644, 95% CI 0.546-0.745, p < 0.001) cutpoints. However, there was a wide range of scores for many cases. Reproducibility scoring sTILs is good when the scoring aid is used. Heterogeneity is the main contributor to variance and will need to be overcome for analytic validity to be achieved.

Visualising statistical models using dynamic nomograms.

Translational Statistics proposes to promote the use of Statistics within research and improve the communication of statistical findings in an accurate and accessible manner to diverse audiences. When statistical models become more complex, it becomes harder to evaluate the role of explanatory variables on the response. For example, the interpretation and communication of the effect of predictors in regression models where interactions or smoothing splines are included can be challenging. Informative graphical representations of statistical models play a critical translational role; static nomograms are one such useful tool to visualise statistical models. In this paper, we propose the use of dynamic nomogram as a translational tool which can accommodate models of increased complexity. In theory, all models appearing in the literature could be accompanied by the corresponding dynamic nomogram to translate models in an informative manner. The R package presented will facilitate this communication for a variety of linear and non-linear models.

Trends in the treatment of chronic kidney disease-associated anaemia in a cohort of haemodialysis patients: the Irish experience.

BACKGROUND: Anaemia among haemodialysis patients is treated with iron and erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs). ESAs reduce requirements for blood transfusions but are also expensive and overzealous use may be associated with adverse outcomes. Recent international trends have been characterised by reduced ESA doses and a greater reliance on intravenous (IV) iron. We determined trends in prescribing patterns of ESAs and IV iron for the treatment of anaemia in two representative Irish dialysis centres and correlated with current guidelines and international trends. METHODS: Patient data was accessed from the Kidney Disease Clinical Patient Management System (KDCPMS) for the period 2012 to 2014. We generated reports on ESA and iron doses, lab data (haemoglobin (Hb), transferrin saturation (TSAT) and ferritin) and patient population characteristics. We mapped the trends in ESA, iron dosing and lab parameters achieved. A linear mixed model determined the significance of these trends over time. RESULTS: ESA dosing became lower in the second, third and fourth quarters of 2014. Dosing of iron increased throughout but a large increase was seen in the third and fourth quarters of 2014. Ferritin levels decreased and TSAT and haemoglobin levels increased. Changes in iron dosing were significant with p value of < 0.05. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings are consistent with recent global trends toward increasing iron use. Such trends may have economic implications given the high cost of ESAs and the relative affordability of iron. In addition, the potential harm of excessive iron dosing may need to be considered.