Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 73
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Harefuah ; 161(4): 215-220, 2022 Apr.
Artigo em Hebraico | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35466604

RESUMO

AIMS: To describe the extent of prisoner/detainee cuffing and characterize cuffing methods. BACKGROUND: Thousands of prisoners and detainees receive medical treatment in Israeli hospitals every year. According to the Israeli law, cuffing during hospital stay should be an exceptional measure, to be considered only in cases of real threat of violence or escape, based on individual assessment. There is no documentation of cuffing rates in hospitals. METHODS: A multi-center study in 12 hospitals was performed during 2020-2021. Data were collected prospectively or retrieved retrospectively from security records, when available. RESULTS: A total of 1857 prisoners/detainees were documented, of whom 1794 (96.6%) were cuffed. Of the 241 hospitalized patients, 230 (95.4%) were cuffed. Details regarding cuffing methods were available for 185 hospitalized patients, revealing that at least 63 patients (68% of patients for whom details regarding cuffing to bed were available) were cuffed to the bed with opposite arm and leg in a cross position. Cuffing rates of prisoners under custody of the Prisons Authority, police and the Israeli Defense Forces, were 98.5%, 96.6%, and 83%, respectively. Impaired mobility for medical reasons was documented in 64 cases, of whom 85.9% were cuffed regardless. CONCLUSIONS: Cuffing of prisoners/detainees in Israeli hospitals is performed non-selectively, in violation of the law. During hospitalization, cuffing is usually performed in a cross position, severely impairing mobility. Our findings highlight the need for routine documentation of cuffing due to its medical consequences and the responsibility of medical staff towards patients according to rules of ethics and regulations.


Assuntos
Prisioneiros , Hospitais , Humanos , Israel/epidemiologia , Polícia , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
J Surg Res ; 265: 95-99, 2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33894454

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic drastically reduced learning opportunities for medical students. We sought to determine the cost and success of implementation of a podcast for a surgical department in a large academic hospital. METHODS: We created a podcast series for Israeli medical students during the COVID-19 epidemic based on the Medical Student Core Curriculum of the American College of Surgeons / Association for Surgical Education. Episodes were available for free download or streaming on a designated website and popular podcast platforms. Podcast analytics were used to measure public listeners and uptake. RESULTS: Total development time was 90 hours at an estimated cost of $7091 USD. A total of 10 episodes were released between March 21, 2020 and August 31, 2020. An average of 9 ± 1.26 h (range 2-6) was required to generate each episode, including 3.4 ± 1.26 h (2-6) for content review and 5.6 ± 2 h (4-10) for audio production. An average episode ran for 35.9 ± 4.3 min (28-42). Podcasts recorded a total of 5678 downloads, with an average of 228 and 336 downloads per episode in the first 30 and 90 days, respectively. The average daily downloads before the students returned to clinical rotations (March 21-April 30) was 48 ± 58.3 (7-283;) compared to 16 ± 7.4 after their return (1-38; P< 0.01). Estimated costs to produce a video-based education series would have been significantly more. CONCLUSION: Podcasts can serve as a cost-effective and quickly produced instructional tool to supplement online learning. Further research is required to determine the efficacy of podcasts versus video-based education modules.


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Educação Médica , Cirurgia Geral/educação , SARS-CoV-2 , Webcasts como Assunto , Custos e Análise de Custo , Humanos , Estudantes de Medicina
3.
Surg Endosc ; 35(4): 1521-1533, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33398560

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In the past decade, deep learning has revolutionized medical image processing. This technique may advance laparoscopic surgery. Study objective was to evaluate whether deep learning networks accurately analyze videos of laparoscopic procedures. METHODS: Medline, Embase, IEEE Xplore, and the Web of science databases were searched from January 2012 to May 5, 2020. Selected studies tested a deep learning model, specifically convolutional neural networks, for video analysis of laparoscopic surgery. Study characteristics including the dataset source, type of operation, number of videos, and prediction application were compared. A random effects model was used for estimating pooled sensitivity and specificity of the computer algorithms. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated by the bivariate model of Reitsma. RESULTS: Thirty-two out of 508 studies identified met inclusion criteria. Applications included instrument recognition and detection (45%), phase recognition (20%), anatomy recognition and detection (15%), action recognition (13%), surgery time prediction (5%), and gauze recognition (3%). The most common tested procedures were cholecystectomy (51%) and gynecological-mainly hysterectomy and myomectomy (26%). A total of 3004 videos were analyzed. Publications in clinical journals increased in 2020 compared to bio-computational ones. Four studies provided enough data to construct 8 contingency tables, enabling calculation of test accuracy with a pooled sensitivity of 0.93 (95% CI 0.85-0.97) and specificity of 0.96 (95% CI 0.84-0.99). Yet, the majority of papers had a high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: Deep learning research holds potential in laparoscopic surgery, but is limited in methodologies. Clinicians may advance AI in surgery, specifically by offering standardized visual databases and reporting.


Assuntos
Aprendizado Profundo/normas , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino
4.
Isr Med Assoc J ; 23(5): 269-273, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34024041

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) outbreak had an effect on healthcare. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the presentation and management of patients with acute appendicitis. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted of all patients presenting with acute appendicitis to the emergency department of a large tertiary center during March and April 2020. Clinical features, diagnostic workup, and management were compared. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients presented with acute appendicitis during the pandemic compared to 60 patients during the same time the year before. There were no significant differences in patient demographics: age (P = 0.65), gender (P = 0.73), smoking status (P = 0.48). During COVID-19 patients were more likely to complain of right lower quadrant pain (100% vs. 78.3%, P < 0.01). Rates of surgical treatment was similar (83.8% vs. 81.7%, P = 1); mean operative time was longer during COVID-19 (63 ± 23 vs. 52 ± 26 minutes, P = 0.03). There were no significant differences in intra-operative findings including the presence of appendiceal perforation (16.3% vs. 14.5%, P = 0.8), abscess (6.1% vs. 9.7%, P = 0.73), or involvement of cecum or terminal ileum (14.28% vs. 19.63%, P = 1). Postoperative treatment with antibiotics was more prevalent during COVID-19 (37.1% vs. 18%, P = 0.04). Length of stay (1.82 ± 2.04 vs. 2.74 ± 4.68, P = 0.2) and readmission rates (6% vs. 11.3%, P =0.51) were similar. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic did not significantly affect the presentation, clinical course, management, and outcomes of patients presenting with acute appendicitis.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Apendicectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Apendicite/epidemiologia , COVID-19 , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Apendicite/diagnóstico , Apendicite/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Adulto Jovem
5.
World J Surg ; 44(1): 78-83, 2020 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31602519

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The use of acronyms in medicine is widespread, aiming to simplify and condense communication. Online communication in social media platforms seems to enhance the use of acronyms, but their efficiency in message delivery may be negated by their abundance and unfamiliarity, causing more confusion than clarity. We analyzed the use of acronyms in a closed Facebook group dedicated to abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR), as the rapid recent development of this field has resulted in many new acronyms. Our aim was to classify the different acronyms and create a public reference. METHODS: The International Hernia Collaboration, a hernia-related Facebook group, now communicating more than 7500 surgeons from 99 countries, was studied, by extracting acronyms used since its inception in 2012. Acronyms were categorized and interpreted, to create a small dictionary comprised of several tables. RESULTS: Commonly used acronyms were identified, as well as commonly used prefixes that modify the acronyms' meaning. Tables were created, classifying acronyms by their subject: 1.Anatomy2.Diseases and clinical conditions3.Techniques and materials. CONCLUSION: The use of acronyms increased in social media-based communication. Aiming to simplify the language, the inflation of terms may have achieved the opposite, by adding a multitude of unfamiliar and confusing terms. We have created a public reference for AWR-related acronyms. Limiting the liberal creation of new acronyms is recommended, especially in a rapidly changing field as AWR.


Assuntos
Abreviaturas como Assunto , Parede Abdominal/cirurgia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Comunicação , Humanos , Idioma
6.
Isr Med Assoc J ; 22(9): 538-541, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33236550

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The safe completion of cholecystectomy is dependent on proper identification and secure closure of the cystic duct. Effecting this closure poses a great challenge when inflammatory changes obscure the anatomy. Subtotal cholecystectomy allows for near complete removal of the gallbladder and complete evacuation of the stones while avoiding dissection in the hazardous area. OBJECTIVES: To describe experience with laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy. METHODS: Subtotal cholecystectomy was performed when the critical view of safety could not be achieved. Surgical technique was similar in all cases and included opening the Hartmann's pouch, removing stones obstructing the gallbladder outlet, and identifying the opening of the cystic duct, as well as circumferential transection of the gallbladder neck, closure of the gallbladder stump, and excision of the gallbladder fundus. Data retrieved from patient charts included demographics, pre-operative history, operative and postoperative course, and late complications. No bile duct injuries were observed in this series. RESULTS: A total of 53 patients underwent laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy (2010-2018). Ten patients were operated during the acute course of the disease and 43 electively. Acute cholecystitis was the leading cause for gallbladder removal. Cholecystostomy tube was placed in 18 patients during acute hospitalization. The gallbladder remnant was closed and a drain was placed in most patients. Of the 53 patients, 42 had an uneventful postoperative course. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy is an effective surgical technique to avoid bile duct injury when the cystic duct cannot safely be identified. Subtotal cholecystectomy has acceptable morbidity and obviates the need for conversion in these difficult cases.


Assuntos
Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/métodos , Colecistite Aguda/cirurgia , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Israel , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias
7.
Isr Med Assoc J ; 22(4): 244-248, 2020 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32286029

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic injuries during nephrectomy are rare, despite the relatively close anatomic relation between the kidneys and the pancreas. The data regarding the incidence and outcome of pancreatic injuries are scarce. OBJECTIVES: To assess the frequency and the clinical significance of pancreatic injuries during nephrectomy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of all patients who underwent nephrectomy over a period of 30 years (1987-2016) in a large tertiary medical center. Demographic, clinical, and surgical data were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 1674 patients underwent nephrectomy during the study period. Of those, 553 (33%) and 294 patients (17.5%) underwent left nephrectomy and radical left nephrectomy, respectively. Among those, four patients (0.2% of the total group, 0.7% of the left nephrectomy group, and 1.36% of the radical left nephrectomy) experienced iatrogenic injuries to the pancreas. None of the injuries were recognized intraoperatively. All patients were treated with drains in an attempt to control the pancreatic leak and one patient required additional surgical interventions. Average length of stay was 65 days (range 15-190 days). Mean follow-up was 23.3 months (range 7.7-115 months). CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic injuries during nephrectomy are rare and carry a significant risk for postoperative morbidity.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Doença Iatrogênica , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Nefrectomia/efeitos adversos , Pâncreas/lesões , Pancreatopatias/etiologia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Estudos de Coortes , Tratamento Conservador/métodos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Israel , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nefrectomia/métodos , Pancreatopatias/mortalidade , Pancreatopatias/terapia , Reoperação/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Taxa de Sobrevida , Centros de Atenção Terciária
8.
Isr Med Assoc J ; 22(3): 160-163, 2020 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32147980

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Male breast cancer (MBC) is a rare disease that is poorly understood. Treatment protocols are widely extrapolated from breast cancer in women. OBJECTIVES: To review the experience with MBC of a single center in Israel over a period of 22 years. METHODS: This single center retrospective study evaluated all patients diagnosed with MBC over a period of 22 years (1993-2015). Data were extracted from patient medical charts and included demographics, clinical, surgical, and oncological outcomes. RESULTS: The study comprised 49 patients. Mean age at diagnosis was 64.1 ± 13.5 years. The majority were diagnosed at early stages (1A-2A) (54.4%), 30.6% were stage 3B mostly due to direct skin and nipple involvement, and 59.2% of the patients had node negative disease. All of the patients were diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma and 30.6% had concomitant ductal carcinoma in situ. Estrogen receptor (ER) status was predominantly positive and luminal B (HER2-) was the most common subtype. Of the patients, 18.4% were BRCA carriers. The majority of patients underwent mastectomy. Radiotherapy was delivered to 46.9% and hormonal therapy to 89.8%. Chemotherapy was administered to 42.9%. Overall survival was 79.6% with a median survival of 60.1 (2-178) months; 5- and 10-year survival was 93.9% and 79.6%, respectively. Progesterone receptor (PR)-negative patients had a significantly improved overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: MBC has increasing incidence. PR-negative status was associated with better overall survival and disease-free interval. Indications to radiotherapy and hormonal therapy need standardization and will benefit from prospective randomized control trials.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama Masculina/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Mama Masculina/terapia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/terapia , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Humanos , Israel/epidemiologia , Masculino , Mastectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
11.
Isr Med Assoc J ; 21(11): 728-731, 2019 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31713360

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of low rectal anastomosis is often recommended prior to ostomy closure, but the efficacy of such evaluations is uncertain. OBJECTIVES: To assess whether routine colonic preoperative evaluation has an effect on postoperative ileostomy closure results. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study evaluating all patients who underwent ileostomy closure over 9 years. Patient demographics, clinical, surgical details, and surgical outcomes were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: The study comprised 116 patients who underwent ileostomy closure, of them 65 were male (56%) with a mean age of 61 years (range 20-91). Overall, 98 patients (84.4%) underwent colonic preoperative evaluation prior to ileostomy closure. A contrast enema was performed on 61 patients (62.2%). Abnormal preoperative results were observed in 12 patients (12.2%). The overall complication rate was 35.3% (41 patients). No differences in postoperative outcome was observed in patient gender (P = 1), age (P = 0.96), body mass index (P = 0.24), American Society of Anesthesiologists score (P = 0.21), and the Charlson Comorbidity Index score (P = 0.93). Among patients who had postoperative complications, we did not observe a difference between patients who underwent preoperative evaluation compared to those who did not (P = 0.42). No differences were observed among patients with preoperative findings interpreted as normal or abnormal (P = 1). The time difference between ileostomy creation and closure had no effect on the ileostomy closure outcome (P = 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal findings in preoperative colonic evaluation prior to ileostomy closure were not associated with worse postoperative outcome.


Assuntos
Colo/anormalidades , Ileostomia , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anastomose Cirúrgica , Colonoscopia , Enema , Feminino , Humanos , Israel/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
12.
Harefuah ; 158(4): 239-243, 2019 Apr.
Artigo em Hebraico | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31032556

RESUMO

AIMS: The purpose of this study was to portray and analyze the inter-relationship between the use of HRT, mammographic breast density and the finding of any mammographic abnormality that prompted further investigation such as core needle biopsy or additional imaging testing, while controlling for obstetric and relevant demographic data. BACKGROUND: Mammographic breast density has been associated with higher risk of breast cancer and decrease in its sensitivity, while hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) in turn, has been implicated in increasing mammographic density and is considered a risk factor for breast cancer by itself. The inter-relationship between HRT, breast density and any mammographic or sonographic finding requiring further investigation has not been fully investigated. METHODS: A total of 2,758 consecutive, screening mammograms performed during one year in a single academic medical center in Israel were analyzed. Each mammogram was supplemented by high resolution ultrasound. Density was measured by a visual, semi-quantitative, 5-grade scale, based on Boyd's classification and grouped into low density mammograms (LDM) (1-3) and high density mammograms (HDM) (4-5). Demographic and obstetric data, personal and family history of breast cancer, and the use of HRT were entered into the database. These parameters were correlated with breast density and any detected abnormality that prompted further investigation. Univariate and multivariate analyses as well as multivariate logistic regression were performed using SAS 9.2. RESULTS: A significant difference in density was observed between pre- and post-menopausal women (p = 0.0001). However, the use of HRT in post-menopausal women was not associated with higher incidence of HDM (18.6%, n=110/592) compared to post-menopausal women without HRT (15.4%, n=211/1370) (p=n.s). Mammographic abnormality was more likely to occur in post-menopausal women without HRT (52%, n=711/1370) compared with women on HRT (38.7% n=229/592) (p = 0.0001). This held true for solid lump (p=0.0001), tissue irregularity (p=0.016) and calcifications (p=0.0005). Menopause was associated with higher likelihood (48%) of any mammographic finding compared with 41.6% in pre-menopausal women (p = 0.0017). A total of 266 women with mammographic findings prompting histological assessment were identified, revealing 105 malignant lesions. HRT in post-menopausal women was associated with lower incidence (28%) of malignancy compared to post-menopausal women without HRT (50%). CONCLUSIONS: The present study, portraying the inter-relationship between mammographic breast density, any abnormal finding in screening mammograms, and the use of HRT has not found such treatment to be associated neither with increased density, nor with higher probability of finding malignancy. Furthermore, a lower incidence of mammographic abnormality was noted in HRT users. Albeit, further and larger studies are required to substantiate these findings. The results of this study do not support the notion that HRT increases the likelihood of malignancy or affects breast density.


Assuntos
Densidade da Mama , Neoplasias da Mama , Terapia de Reposição Hormonal , Mama , Densidade da Mama/efeitos dos fármacos , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Humanos , Israel , Mamografia , Fatores de Risco
13.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 61(11): 1316-1319, 2018 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30239390

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Full-thickness rectal prolapse has a significant negative impact on quality of life. The therapeutic options, specifically in elderly patients, are imperfect. Perineal stapled rectal prolapse resection is a novel operation for treating external rectal prolapse. Long-term follow-up following this procedure is lacking. In our study, we report a long-term follow-up of 30 patients, analyzing the long-term recurrence rate, morbidity, and functional outcome. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the long-term results of perineal stapled rectal resection in a population unfit for prolonged general anesthesia. DESIGN: This was a cohort study with a prospective follow-up. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a single tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing perineal stapled rectal resection from January 2010 to June 2013 were included. INTERVENTIONS: Perineal stapled rectal prolapse resection was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measured was prolapse recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients underwent the surgical intervention. The median follow-up period was 61 months (range, 37-65). No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred. Six patients (20%) had recurrent rectal prolapse, and continence was not achieved in any of the patients. Two patients who had recurrence underwent a redo perineal stapled rectal resection. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by the small cohort of selected patients. CONCLUSIONS: Frail patients that can only endure a short procedure under regional anesthesia should be considered for perineal stapled rectal prolapse resection. The lack of mortality and morbidity, specifically in this population, along with the low long-term recurrence rates, make this a favorable surgical alternative. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A745.


Assuntos
Colectomia , Efeitos Adversos de Longa Duração , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Qualidade de Vida , Prolapso Retal , Grampeamento Cirúrgico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Colectomia/efeitos adversos , Colectomia/métodos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Israel/epidemiologia , Efeitos Adversos de Longa Duração/diagnóstico , Efeitos Adversos de Longa Duração/psicologia , Masculino , Períneo/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/psicologia , Prolapso Retal/epidemiologia , Prolapso Retal/psicologia , Prolapso Retal/cirurgia , Recidiva , Grampeamento Cirúrgico/efeitos adversos , Grampeamento Cirúrgico/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
14.
Clin Exp Nephrol ; 22(2): 448-452, 2018 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28913721

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: It is recommended that systemic prophylactic antibiotics be given immediately prior to peritoneal catheter insertion. This administration requires intravenous access and could be inconvenient in dynamic and unpredictable operation room schedule. Intraperitoneal antibiotics could be an alternative simple way for prevention of postoperative peritoneal catheter infections. METHODS: Medical records from 109 patients undergoing permanent PD catheter placement procedures were reviewed retrospectively. Group I patients (66 patients) received intraperitoneal cefazolin through the inserted Tenckhoff catheter in operation room. Group II (43 patients) received intravenous cefazolin 2 h prior to the surgery. The effect of prophylactic antibiotics on the occurrence of peritonitis and exit site infection in the 14 days following surgical peritoneal dialysis catheter placement was evaluated. RESULTS: During the follow-up period, one patients from group II (2.3%) and none from group I developed peritonitis (P = 0.3945). One patient from each group developed exit site infection (P = 1.000). CONCLUSION: It was found that intraperitoneal antibiotics have the similar efficacy compared with intravenous antibiotics for postoperative peritoneal catheter-related infections' prevention. It does not require intravenous access and overcome the issue of unpredictable operation room schedule.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/prevenção & controle , Cateterismo/efeitos adversos , Cateteres de Demora/efeitos adversos , Cefazolina/administração & dosagem , Diálise Peritoneal/efeitos adversos , Peritonite/prevenção & controle , Administração Intravenosa , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/diagnóstico , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/microbiologia , Cateterismo/instrumentação , Cefazolina/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Prontuários Médicos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Diálise Peritoneal/instrumentação , Peritonite/diagnóstico , Peritonite/microbiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
15.
Dig Surg ; 35(5): 442-447, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29130989

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Preoperative preparation of patients with Crohn's disease is challenging and there are no specific guidelines regarding nutritional support. The aim of this study was to assess whether preoperative nutritional support influenced the postoperative outcome. METHODS: A retrospective, cohort study including all Crohn's disease patients who underwent abdominal surgery between 2008 and 2014 was conducted. Patients' characteristics and clinical and surgical data were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients were included in the study. Thirty-seven patients (42.5%) received preoperative nutritional support (mean albumin level 3.14 vs. 3.5 mg/dL in the non-optimized group; p < 0.02) to optimize their nutritional status prior to surgery. Preoperative albumin level, after adequate nutritional preparation, was similar between the 2 groups. The 2 groups differ neither in demographic and surgical data, overall post-op complication (p = 0.85), Clavien-Dindo score (p = 0.42), and length of stay (p = 0.1). Readmission rate was higher in the non-optimized group (p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: Nutritional support can minimize postoperative complications in patients with low albumin levels. Nutritional status should be optimized in order to avoid hazardous complications.


Assuntos
Doença de Crohn/cirurgia , Nutrição Enteral , Nutrição Parenteral , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Albumina Sérica/metabolismo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
16.
Isr Med Assoc J ; 20(3): 176-181, 2018 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29527857

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis (AA) is one of the most common indications for emergency abdominal surgery. OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic and prognostic value of serum bilirubin and liver enzyme levels in the management of acute appendicitis. METHODS: Consecutive emergency department patients referred for a surgical consult for suspected AA were prospectively enrolled in the study. Data regarding demographic, clinical and laboratory results were recorded. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was performed for all evaluated parameters. Clinical and laboratory markers were evaluated for diagnostic accuracy and correlation to the clinical severity, histology reports, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: The study was comprised of 100 consecutive patients. ROC curve analysis revealed white blood cell count, absolute neutrophils count (ANC), C-reactive protein, total-bilirubin and direct-bilirubin levels as significant factors for diagnosis of AA. The combination of serum bilirubin levels, alanine transaminase levels, and ANC yielded the highest area under the curve (0.898, 95% confidence interval 0.835-0.962, P<0.001) with a diagnostic accuracy of 86%. In addition, total and direct bilirubin levels significantly correlated with the severity of appendicitis as described in the operative and pathology reports (P < 0.01). Total and direct bilirubin also significantly correlated with the length of hospital stay (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Serum bilirubin levels, alone or combined with other markers, may be considered as a clinical marker for AA correlating with disease existence, severity, and length of hospital stay. These findings support the routine use of serum bilirubin levels in the workup of patients with suspected AA.


Assuntos
Apendicite/diagnóstico , Bilirrubina/sangue , Proteína C-Reativa/análise , Contagem de Leucócitos , Fígado/enzimologia , Adulto , Apendicite/sangue , Biomarcadores/sangue , Estudos de Coortes , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Neutrófilos , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adulto Jovem
17.
Surg Endosc ; 31(11): 4697-4704, 2017 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28409379

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Measurement of bowel length is an essential surgical skill for laparoscopic and open gastrointestinal surgery in order to achieve favorable outcomes and avoid long-term complications. Variations in accuracy between the two surgical approaches may exist. However, only few studies have tried to assess these differences. Our aim was to assess reliability and inter-rater variability of small bowel length assessment during laparoscopy in an in vivo porcine model. METHODS: This is a single-institution, double-blinded, technical assessment study in a porcine in vivo model. Fourteen participants (ten senior surgeons with >1000 laparoscopic procedures and four junior surgeons) had to assess and mark lengths of small bowel in both laparoscopic and open surgical approaches. Each participant was assigned to measure and mark specific, randomized distances (range 25-197 cm) in both laparoscopic and open approaches using color-coded vessel loops. Actual participant-marked distances were compared to the assigned distances followed by Bland-Altman plots and linear regression analysis to determine accuracy and proportional error trends. Study data were further compared to available data sets from previously published studies. RESULTS: Laparoscopy measurements were significantly shorter than required (difference 33.8 ± 28.7 cm, P < 0.001, 95% CI 17.8-49.7). The measuring error was proportional to the length of the measured segment (63% of the required distances, IQR 58.9-79.0%, P = 0.02). At laparotomy, mean difference and standard deviation were lower (1.5 cm ± SD 15 cm) and not statistically significant (P = 0.7). Re-analysis of previously published data sets validated the observed errors in laparoscopic bowel measurement (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Small bowel length assessment during laparoscopy is inaccurate and associated with substantial variability. There is a need to develop a standardized laparoscopic technique for measuring small bowel length which is simple, reproducible, and easy to learn.


Assuntos
Intestino Delgado/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Laparotomia/métodos , Animais , Competência Clínica/estatística & dados numéricos , Precisão da Medição Dimensional , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Cirurgiões , Suínos
20.
Isr Med Assoc J ; 24(5): 332, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35598059
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa