A cohort investigation of patient-reported function and satisfaction after the implementation of advanced practice occupational therapy-led care for patients with chronic hand conditions at eight Australian public hospitals.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort. INTRODUCTION: Patients referred to medical specialist outpatient clinics in Australian public hospitals often wait longer than the recommended timeframe for their first appointment. This study examines the use of advanced hand therapy practitioners to facilitate access to care for long-waitlisted patients with chronic hand conditions. PURPOSE OF STUDY: To examine patient-reported function and satisfaction outcomes with advanced practice hand therapy. METHODS: Data was collected from eight public hospital outpatient departments in Queensland, Australia. Patients with chronic hand conditions were screened from waitlists at each site and invited to participate in the hand therapy program while waiting to see a medical practitioner. RESULTS: A total of 1947 patients were screened from the waitlists, and 1116 patients completed advanced practice therapy. Patients completing hand therapy were older (P ≤ .001) and more likely to have more than one diagnosis (P ≤ .001). They reported a significant improvement in function using the Michigan Hand Questionnaire (P ≤ .001) and demonstrated increased grip strength (left injuries P = .016, right injuries P = .001). Ninety-three percent were satisfied or highly satisfied with hand therapy care. Some variation in Michigan Hand Questionnaire scores was observed across different diagnoses, with those with carpal tunnel syndrome and trigger finger reporting the best outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced practice hand therapy for long-waitlisted patients with chronic hand conditions was associated with improvements in patient function and satisfaction. Further research is warranted to study the specific response of different diagnostic groups to intervention using this model of care.

Evaluation of occupational therapy-led advanced practice hand therapy clinics for patients on surgical outpatient waiting lists at eight Australian public hospitals.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective cohort study. INTRODUCTION: Evidence is emerging that advanced practice hand therapy clinics improve patient outcomes. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study was to evaluate an advanced practice hand therapy model of care for patients with chronic hand conditions on surgical outpatient waiting lists at eight Australian public hospitals. METHODS: Nonurgent and semiurgent patients were screened and treated, as required, by an advanced practice hand therapist and then discharged from the surgical outpatient waiting list as appropriate. Outcomes included patient safety, impact on the waiting list, patient satisfaction, and patients' perception of change as measured by Global Rating of Change (GROC). The GROC score was also compared across diagnoses. The relationship between the waiting time and need for surgical review during hand therapy treatment was also assessed. As appropriate, T-tests and analysis of variance were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: A total of 37.2% of patients who commenced hand therapy were removed or discharged from the surgical outpatient waiting lists. Of the subset of patients who completed hand therapy (n = 1116), 28.4% were discharged without requiring surgical follow-up. A further 7.53% requested return to the waiting list despite discharge being recommended. The model of care was safe, and patient satisfaction was above 90%. The mean GROC score was +2.09 (±3.58) but varied across diagnoses with trigger finger or trigger thumb showing the greatest improvement (+4.21 ± 2.92, P < .01). Patients who did not require surgical consultation during hand therapy had a shorter wait time for their initial hand therapy appointment (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The advanced practice hand therapy model of care was safe and effective in reducing hospital surgical outpatient waiting lists. Patients reported high satisfaction.

Patient and multidisciplinary health professional perceptions of an Australian geriatric evaluation and management and rehabilitation hospital in the home service.

OBJECTIVES: Hospital in the Home models are rapidly expanding in response to increasing bed pressures. This study examined patient and multidisciplinary health professional perceptions of a new geriatric evaluation and management and rehabilitation hospital in the home service in Australia. The service was unique, as adults of all ages with a variety of rehabilitation or geriatric evaluation and management needs were within scope. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive approach was used with a consumer co-researcher and a consumer advisor being integral to decision-making. Patient feedback was collected via a paper-based patient satisfaction survey between August 2020 and February 2022. Additionally, interviews with current and past staff were conducted from July to November 2021. Reflexive thematic analysis was conducted for qualitative data and descriptive statistics used for quantitative data. RESULTS: Patient surveys were analysed (n = 199, 42.2% response rate) with 60.8% of participants aged 75 years or over and 26.6% speaking a language other than English. High satisfaction was expressed. Feelings of comfort, familiarity, convenience, and reassurance were voiced. A person-centred approach enhanced involvement in care. Challenges included carer burden and clear communication. Sixteen staff (33% response rate) were interviewed. In general, staff said the service was inclusive and responsive, and the home environment beneficial, particularly for patients from culturally diverse backgrounds. A strong hospital partnership and comprehensive multidisciplinary approach were vital. Challenges included fragmentation due to part-time roles and combining with a pre-existing acute hospital in the home service. CONCLUSIONS: This qualitative exploration of staff and patients' perceptions of a geriatrician-led, multidisciplinary geriatric evaluation and management and rehabilitation hospital in the home service demonstrated that it was person-centred and optimised patients' control and ownership of care. The inclusive service parameters ensured responsiveness to diverse needs whilst allowing earlier return home from hospital, both of which are vital for quality patient care.

Evaluation of a novel sub-acute Hospital in the Home model for providing inpatient geriatric and rehabilitation services.

ObjectiveTo report on the development and implementation of a multidisciplinary, sub-acute Geriatric Evaluation and Management Rehabilitation Hospital in the Home (GEMRHITH) model of care with the initial 2years' service outcome data (October 2019 - September 2021).MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted using hospital centralised data, and the GEMRHITH internal service database. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the patient population. Student's t-test was used for comparative data.ResultsOver 2years, GEMRHITH admitted 617 patients (13%, n=82 directly from the emergency department). Median age was 82years (range, 32-102 years), with 60.5% (n=373) being female and 39.5% (n=244) presenting with moderate frailty. Most patients (79.6%, n=491) entered from a medical speciality (28.5%, n=178 from neurology). Average GEMRHITH stay was 6days (range, 1-33 days). Average bed occupancy was 5.3 virtual beds. There was an average of 26 discharges per month with 97% of patients (n=598) discharged to their own home. Transfers back to the emergency department with the same diagnosis-related group were low (3.6%). The 7-28day re-admission rate was 2.3%. Service safety was high, with only eight hospital-acquired complications reported in seven patients. Significant improvements were noted for total and sub-scale Functional Independence Measure scores (P<0.001).ConclusionsThe addition of rehabilitation and geriatric care to traditional HITH services provides opportunities for multidisciplinary teams to support a larger cohort of patients with various medical and surgical conditions and functional abilities, to efficiently transition home from hospital settings. There were minimal complications and occupied bed stays were saved within a hospital.

Occupational Therapists, Physiotherapists and Orthopaedic Surgeons Agree on the Decision for Carpal Tunnel Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Therapist-led pathways have been proposed as waitlist management strategies prior to surgery for conditions such as carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in public hospitals. These models of care typically shift the initial care of patients and decision-making from surgeons to therapists and, have been shown to reduce the number of patients requiring surgery and improve wait-times. This occurs despite limited evidence of surgeon-therapist agreement on key decisions, such as the need for surgery. The purpose of this was study was to assess the agreement between therapists and orthopaedic surgeons regarding the need for surgery for patients who have CTS. METHODS: This blinded inter-rated agreement study was embedded in a multicentre randomised parallel groups trial of 105 patients with CTS referred to four orthopaedic departments and waitlisted for an appointment. The trial evaluated the effect of a therapist-led care pathway on the need for surgery and outcomes related to symptoms and function. Patients were randomised to either remain on the orthopaedic waitlist or receive group education, a splint and home exercises. The decision on the need for surgery at 6 months was made by a member of the orthopaedic consultant team or by one of the 14 participating therapists. The therapists and surgeons were blinded to each other's decision. Agreement was determined using percentage agreement, kappa coefficients (k), prevalence-adjusted and bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK), and Gwet's first-order agreement coefficient (AC1). RESULTS: Substantial agreement was seen between therapists and surgeons regarding the need for surgery (PABAK=0.74 (0.60-0.88)). Agreement was significantly associated with experience (P=.02). Therapists with advanced experience and scope of practice demonstrated perfect agreement with surgeons (PABAK=1.00 (95% CI: 1.00-1.00)). Mid-career therapists demonstrated substantial agreement (PABAK=0.67 (95% CI: 0.42-0.91)) and early-career therapists demonstrated fair agreement (PABAK=0.43 (95% CI: -0.04-0.90)). CONCLUSION: Therapists with advanced scope of practice make decisions that are consistent with orthopaedic surgeons.

Group education, night splinting and home exercises reduce conversion to surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome: a multicentre randomised trial.

QUESTION: In people with carpal tunnel syndrome who are waitlisted for surgical consultation, does a therapist-led care pathway involving education, splinting and exercises reduce the need for surgery and improve patient outcomes? DESIGN: A multicentre, randomised controlled trial with concealed allocation, blinded assessment and intention-to-treat analysis. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and five people with electrodiagnostically confirmed carpal tunnel syndrome on a waitlist for surgical consultation and recruited from four public hospitals in Australia. INTERVENTIONS: The experimental group (n = 52) received a one-off group session of education, splinting, and nerve and tendon gliding exercises. The control group (n = 53) continued on the waitlist without additional care. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measures were conversion to surgery by 24 weeks, the global rating of change (GROC) scale and patient satisfaction. Secondary outcomes included symptom severity and functional limitation. RESULTS: At 24 weeks, conversion to surgery was 59% in the experimental group and 80% in the control group (risk difference -0.21, 95% CI -0.38 to -0.03). More participants in the experimental group identified as improved at 6 weeks (20% vs 4%; risk difference 0.15, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.28) but not at 24 weeks (24% vs 10%; risk difference 0.14, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.29). The intervention was also estimated to be beneficial on some measures of satisfaction, symptom severity and functional limitation. The study's estimates of the benefits came with some uncertainty, which makes it unclear whether the wider population of people awaiting carpal tunnel surgery would consider that the benefits make the intervention worthwhile. No serious adverse effects were reported. CONCLUSIONS: A therapist-led pathway reduced conversion to carpal tunnel surgery and increased perceived improvement and satisfaction in people who were already on a waitlist for surgical consultation. REGISTRATION: ACTRN12613001095752.

Validity, reliability and ease of use of the disabilities of arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire in adults following stroke.

PURPOSE: The Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire is a patient reported outcome measure for evaluating upper limb function in people with musculoskeletal conditions. While the DASH has good psychometric properties when used with people with musculoskeletal conditions, it has not been tested with adults after stroke. METHODS: Data for n = 61 adults following stroke (aged 32-93 years, 44% male) were analyzed to test validity and reliability of the DASH for use with a stroke population. Data included demographic and clinical attributes, DASH scores (baseline and four weeks later) and Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) measures. RESULTS: Internal consistency was good (Cronbach alpha 0.92, SEM 6.65). Factor analysis and Rasch modeling suggested that the questionnaire comprised three subscales: pain, impact and function. Concurrent validity between the DASH and PRWE (Spearman's Rho rs = 0.41) was moderate. The scale was perceived by clinicians to be useful, quick and simple to administer. The DASH had low four-week test-retest reliability (ICC 0.56 [95% Cl 0.05-0.79]). CONCLUSIONS: The DASH is considered to have acceptable validity when used with adults following stroke. Test-retest reliability was low but further research is needed to establish whether this is a result of condition-related change or the stability of the measure. Implications for Rehabilitation The DASH questionnaire examines upper limb function in task performance and appears to be a useful tool, which is simple to administer in the clinical setting with adults following stroke. Upper limb function post stroke can be meaningfully assessed using the DASH as it has good internal consistency and moderate concurrent validity. Rasch analysis and factor analysis suggests that the tool appears to consist of three subscales: pain, impact and function. The total score of the DASH may be less meaningful than the totals of these subscales. The test-retest reliability of the DASH requires further research; over a four-week period DASH stability was poor in a group of people with moderate to severe upper limb impairment.

Education, night splinting and exercise versus usual care on recovery and conversion to surgery for people awaiting carpal tunnel surgery: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a prevalent upper limb condition that results in significant individual and socioeconomic costs. Large patient numbers, long outpatient waiting times and traditional referral pathways in public health systems create delays in accessing treatment for this condition. Alternative care pathways aimed at streamlining access to treatment and reducing the need for surgical intervention warrant further investigation. METHODS: A randomised, single-blind controlled clinical trial will be conducted. 128 participants aged 18-75 years with CTS will be recruited from the carpal tunnel surgery waitlists of participating public hospitals. Suitable participants will be stratified for severity and randomly allocated to either receive therapy (education, provision of splints and a home exercise programme) or standard care (continuing on the waitlist without hand therapy intervention for the duration of the study). Outcomes will be measured at baseline and after 6 weeks and 6 months. Primary outcomes are conversion to surgery ratio and perceived effect via the Global Rating of Change Scale.Secondary measures include patient satisfaction, and monitoring of symptoms and function using outcome measures including the Boston CTS Questionnaire, Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire, Patient-Specific Functional Scale, patient completed diagram of symptoms and Self-reported Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs pain scale. DISCUSSION: This paper outlines the design and rationale for a randomised controlled trial that aims to assess the efficacy of an alternative care pathway for the management of patients with CTS while on the surgery waitlist. It is anticipated that the outcomes of this study will contribute to improved and expedited management of this common condition in a public hospital setting. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was granted by the Princess Alexandra Hospital Centres for Health Research (HREC/13/QPAH/434-SSA/13/QPAH/447) and the Medical Research Ethics Committee at the University of Queensland. Results will be disseminated via conferences and peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12613001095752.

Do people with acquired brain impairment benefit from additional therapy specifically directed at the hand? A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the benefits of additional therapy specifically directed at the hand in people with acquired brain impairment. DESIGN: An assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Rehabilitation hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A sample of 39 adults with hand impairment following stroke (90%) or traumatic brain injury (10%). The median (interquartile) time since injury was 1.6 months (0.5-3.5 months). INTERVENTION: The experimental group (n = 20) received an additional one-hour session of task-specific motor training for the hand five times a week over a six-week period. The training was administered on a one-to-one basis. The control group (n = 19) received standard care which consisted of 10 minutes of hand therapy three times a week. Both groups continued to receive therapy directed at the shoulder and elbow. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were the Action Research Arm and Summed Manual Muscle Tests measured at the beginning and end of the six-week period. RESULTS: The mean (SD) Action Research Arm Test values for experimental participants improved from the beginning to the end of study from 10 points (15) to 21 points (23) and the equivalent values for the Summed Manual Muscle Test improved from 35% (33) to 49% (35). There were similar improvements in control participants. The mean between-group differences for the Action Research Arm and Summed Manual Muscle Tests were -6 points (95% confidence interval (CI), -20 to 8) and 3% (95% CI, -10 to 16), respectively. CONCLUSION: Hand and overall arm function of all participants improved over the six-week period, however there was not a clear benefit from providing additional hand therapy.