RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAAION) is a major cause of blindness in individuals over 50 years of age, with no available effective treatment. The oral dual endothelin receptor antagonist, bosentan, increases retinal optic nerve head blood flow in healthy humans and glaucoma patients. The objective of this trial is to assess the efficacy of bosentan administered at the acute stage in improving outcomes in NAAION patients. METHODS: ENDOTHELION (ENDOTHELin antagonist receptor in Ischemic Optic Neuropathy) is a phase III, interventional, prospective, multicentre, placebo-controlled randomised double-blind clinical trial. The primary outcome is change in the visual field mean deviation (MD) at 3 months (Humphrey 30-2 SITA standard programme). Secondary outcomes include MD and visual acuity changes up to 24 months, changes in peripapillary retinal nerve fibre and macular ganglion cell layer thickness in the affected eye, as measured by optical coherence tomography, rate of NAAION bilateralisation at 2 years, and quality-of-life. Patients over 50 years of age presenting with typical NAAION of recent onset (less than 21 days) are randomly assigned to either 125 mg oral bosentan or placebo, twice a day, during 8 weeks. Besides visits during the treatment phase, patients attend follow-up visits at 2, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. The inclusion of patients began in August 2015 at five French University hospital ophthalmology departments and two specialised ophthalmology centres. It is planned to include 86 patients in this trial. To date we have included 72 patients and 49 have completed the full follow-up process. DISCUSSION: An endothelin receptor antagonist is a potential approach to improving the anatomical and functional prognosis of patients with NAAION. This multicentre double-blind randomised controlled trial is an opportunity to assess (1) the effect of bosentan on the structure and function of the optic nerve in NAAION, at 3 months, (2) the effect of bosentan on the bilateralisation rate at 24 months and (3) the tolerance profile of bosentan in this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02377271 . Registered on March 3, 2015.
Assuntos
Neuropatia Óptica Isquêmica , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neuropatia Óptica Isquêmica/diagnóstico , Neuropatia Óptica Isquêmica/tratamento farmacológico , Células Ganglionares da Retina , Bosentana/efeitos adversos , Antagonistas dos Receptores de Endotelina/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Receptores de Endotelina , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como AssuntoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Sildenafil is a type 5 phosphodiesterase inhibitor that has a theoretical ability to increase hyperemia following a short bout of ischemia. We tested if oral sildenafil increases skin PORH in healthy volunteers. METHODS: We assessed forearm skin PORH (occlusion of blood flow for five minutes) in ten healthy volunteers 120minutes following the oral administration of 50 or 100mg of sildenafil. Cutaneous blood flow on the forearm was monitored using LDF. RESULTS: The PORH peak, expressed as a percentage of baseline, was clearly increased with 100mg sildenafil: 746% (95% CI 447-1044) versus 484% (95% CI 354-613) with 50mg sildenafil, and 468% (95% CI 347-588) without sildenafil (p=0.03 for 100mg versus 50mg and control). Oral sildenafil at 50mg increased the AUC of PORH on the forearm compared with control: 4568PU.sec (95% CI: 2252-6883) with 50mg sildenafil versus 1030 PU.sec (95% CI 737-1322) without sildenafil (p=0.006). Likewise, 100mg sildenafil increased the AUC (5271PU.sec (95% CI -81-10,623), albeit bordering on significance (p=0.07). Neither dose increased maximal LTH. CONCLUSIONS: Acute sildenafil administration at 50 and 100mg enhances skin hyperemia following a short bout of ischemia.
Assuntos
Hiperemia/tratamento farmacológico , Hiperemia/fisiopatologia , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/administração & dosagem , Piperazinas/administração & dosagem , Pele/irrigação sanguínea , Sulfonas/administração & dosagem , Administração Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Velocidade do Fluxo Sanguíneo/efeitos dos fármacos , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Purinas/administração & dosagem , Citrato de Sildenafila , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
The Raynaud's condition score is a 11-point scale severity score used in Raynaud's phenomenon clinical trials since 1998. The Raynaud's condition score diary has been recommended for use in clinical trials assessing efficacy of interventions on scleroderma related Raynaud's phenomenon. However, this score has never been formally validated in French. We thus performed a translation and a linguistic validation of the Raynaud's condition score through a forward/backward translations process followed by an expert review and cognitive patient interviews. The translations led to a French version of the Raynaud's condition score that was linguistically valid, and conceptually equivalent to the original English version. This "Score de Raynaud" will be usable to perform and harmonize clinical trials in French-speaking patients with secondary Raynaud's phenomenon.
Assuntos
Técnicas de Diagnóstico Cardiovascular , Idioma , Avaliação de Resultados da Assistência ao Paciente , Doença de Raynaud/diagnóstico , Escleroderma Sistêmico/terapia , Tradução , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Cardiovascular/normas , França , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Linguística , Doença de Raynaud/patologia , Projetos de Pesquisa , Escleroderma Sistêmico/diagnóstico , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Kidney transplant Chronic Allograft Dysfunction (CAD), a major cause of long-term graft failure, is currently diagnosed at a late and irreversible stage by graft biopsies. Our goal was to identify predictive urinary biomarkers of CAD before renal lesions appeared by analysis of the urine proteomic profile. METHODS/METHODS: Twenty-nine urinary samples withdrawn three months post-transplant were analyzed by SELDI-TOF technology. CAD development was evaluated by serum creatinine level and confirmed by allograft biopsy one year after transplantation. Comparison of protein profile of both groups revealed 18 biomarkers predictive of CAD occurrence. RESULTS: The biomarker demonstrating the highest diagnostic performance was a protein of 8860 Da that predicted CAD with a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 65%. Moreover combination of these biomarkers in two multivariate analyses improved the diagnostic potential of CAD. Relevance of these individual biomarkers and a decisional algorithm constituted of 3 proteins was confirmed in an independent cohort of patients with undetermined CAD status one year post-transplant. CONCLUSIONS: These non invasive biomarkers, detected as soon as three months post-grafting, allowed identification of patients who would develop CAD as late as 4 years after graft. Systematic measurement of these biomarkers would greatly improve the management of immunosuppressive therapy of kidney grafted patients.