Research Education Program for Underrepresented Minority Students: Students' Perception of Academic Enrichment and Research Activities.

The Research Education Program (REP) is an NIH R25-funded training grant designed to increase the pipeline of underrepresented minority (URM) students entering graduate programs and pursuing biomedical research and health care careers. Each week, students participated in different academic enrichment activities during morning sessions. Research activities were during afternoon sessions. URM students presented their research findings in a local poster session with their peers, graduate medical students, and faculty members. They also attended national conferences to gain experience and expand their professional networks. Our participants included 14.3% rural, 42.85% suburban, and 42.85% urban students. Of this, 83.33% were females, while 16.67% were males. In addition, 100% of students indicated exceptional satisfaction in 64.0% of the academic enrichment activities offered by the REP, and 100% indicated exceptional satisfaction in 63.0% of the research activities. Future research will investigate the long-term effects of REP and graduate enrollments.

Improving Diabetes Control Through Remote Glucose Monitoring in a Diabetes Self-Management Program for Employees of a Health System.

IN BRIEF This study investigates the combination of diabetes education, telehealth, a wireless enabled meter, and medication algorithms to improve care for a targeted population of employees with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. After more than 2 years of follow-up, mean A1C was reduced by 1.8%, and a reduction was observed in cost of care, along with an increase in visits with the managing physician provider. Thus, this study showed improved diabetes control using new technologies to provide remote monitoring and telehealth augmenting the outreach and education provided in a diabetes self-management program.

The Multisystem effects of Long COVID Syndrome and Potential Benefits of Massage Therapy in Long COVID Care.

Background: A major complication of infection with Severe Acute Respiratory Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus responsible for COVID-19, is the potential for Long COVID Syndrome. While the pathophysiology of Long COVID Syndrome has yet to be described, the disease presentation is characterized by long-term symptoms with debilitating effects on human health. A better understanding of Long COVID symptomology may open up new avenues for patient treatment such as massage therapy. Methods: From the PubMed database, cohort studies that examined post-infection COVID sequelae published between January 1st, 2021 and April 30th, 2021 were selected to investigate patient demographics and symptoms. A review of massage therapy literature since 2000 in conjunction with identified Long COVID symptoms was performed. Results: This systematic review identified 17 cohort studies across the world that investigated the symptomatology of patients suffering from post-COVID sequelae in multiple organ systems. We identified the pulmonary and nervous systems to be the organ systems most affected with post-COVID sequelae, with PTSD, fatigue, dyspnea, cough, sleep disturbances, loss of smell, abdominal pain, and decreased appetite as the most common symptoms reported by >20% of Long COVID patients. Massage therapy was historically found to provide benefits to patients experiencing similar symptoms to those identified in Long COVID. Conclusions: Recognizing the need for new approaches to treatment for Long COVID Syndrome, we identify massage therapy as a potential therapeutic treatment to positively impact the organ systems affected by Long COVID, especially the high-incident symptoms, and improve patient quality of life.

Understanding the Values, Qualities, and Preferences of Patients in Their Relationships With Obstetrics and Gynecology Providers: Cross-Sectional Survey With a Mixed Methods Approach.

BACKGROUND: The patient-provider relationship in obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) is uniquely complex due to the sensitive nature of examinations and topics. Patients often prefer health care providers who share similar racial, ethnic, gender, or linguistic backgrounds, particularly in sensitive health care situations, to improve communication and comfort, though historically, specific gender preferences for OBGYNs have not been evident. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe the values, qualities, and preferences of patients in their relationships with OBGYN providers. METHODS: This cross-sectional survey, conducted from October 2019 to December 2019, involved 1039 US OBGYN patients and used a mixed methods approach, integrating quantitative responses and qualitative insights from open-ended questions. Recruitment was facilitated through targeted social media campaigns, and the survey aimed to capture detailed patient preferences and barriers to care by assessing responses on provider traits, patient experiences, and demographic factors. The study's rigorous data collection and analysis were designed to fill gaps identified in previous research on patient-provider relationships in OBGYN care. RESULTS: The findings underscore the paramount importance of trust and comfort, with listening skills identified as crucial. A notable finding is the marked preference for same-gender providers, observed in 80.7% (545/675) of participants. Primary barriers to seeking care reported included daily commitments, highlighting the need for accessible and flexible care options. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights a significant shift from previous scientific findings in patient preferences toward gender concordance and trust in OBGYN settings, diverging from previous research. These results emphasize the need for patient-centered care and tailored communication strategies to enhance patient experiences and outcomes. Future research should focus on diverse populations to broaden the findings' applicability and explore the impact of recent shifts in health care policies.

"I Don't Want to Go to Work": A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Healthcare Worker Experiences from the Front- and Side-Lines of COVID-19.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare workers (HCW) were categorized as "essential" and "non-essential", creating a division where some were "locked-in" a system with little ability to prepare for or control the oncoming crisis. Others were "locked-out" regardless of whether their skills might be useful. The purpose of this study was to systematically gather data over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic from HCW through an interprofessional lens to examine experiences of locked-out HCW. This convergent parallel mixed-methods study captured perspectives representing nearly two dozen professions through a survey, administered via social media, and video blogs. Analysis included logistic regression models of differences in outcome measures by professional category and Rapid Identification of Themes from Audio recordings (RITA) of video blogs. We collected 1299 baseline responses from 15 April 2020 to 16 March 2021. Of those responses, 12.1% reported no signs of burnout, while 21.9% reported four or more signs. Qualitative analysis identified four themes: (1) professional identity, (2) intrinsic stressors, (3) extrinsic factors, and (4) coping strategies. There are some differences in the experiences of locked-in and locked-out HCW. This did not always lead to differing reports of moral distress and burnout, and both groups struggled to cope with the realities of the pandemic.

Sex Differences in Demographic and Pharmacological Factors in Alzheimer Patients With Dementia and Cognitive Impairments.

Objective: The current study investigates sex differences associated with pharmacological and demographic characteristics in Alzheimer patients (AD) with dementia (ADD) or mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Method: A retrospective analytical approach was used to analyze data from 45,696 AD patients with MCI or ADD. The univariate analysis was used to determine differences in demographic, and pharmacological characteristics for male and female ADD and MCI-AD patients. Multivariate analysis was used to predict specific pharmacological and demographic factors that are associated with male and female MCI and ADD patients. Result: In the adjusted analysis for male patients, Hispanics [0.166,0.020 - 1.355, P = 0.094] or African Americans [OR = 2.380, 95% CI,2.120 - 2.674, P < 0.001], were more likely to have MCI-AD and be treated with galantamine [OR = 0.559, 95% CI, 0.382 - 0.818, P = 0.003], donepezil [OR = 1.639, 95% CI,1.503 - 1.787, P < 0.001], rivastigmine [OR = 1.394, 95% CI,1.184 - 1.642, P < 0.001], olanzapine [OR = 2.727, 95% CI,2.315 - 3.212, P < 0.001], risperidone [OR = 2.973, 95% CI,2.506 - 3.526, P < 0.001], present with increasing age [1.075,1.071 - 1.079, P < 0.001], and are on tobacco use [OR = 1.150, 95% CI,1.054 - 1.254, P = 0.002]. For female patients, buspirone [OR = 0.767, 95% CI, 0.683 - 0.861, P < 0.001] and a history of alcohol (ETOH) use [OR = 0.484, 95% CI, 0.442 - 0.529, P < 0.001] were associated with MCI-AD. Increasing age [OR = 1.096, 95% CI, 1.093 - 1.100, P < 0.001], donepezil [OR = 2.185, 95% CI, 2.035 - 2.346, P < 0.001], memantine [OR = 2.283, 95% CI, 2.104 - 2.477, P < 0.001] aripiprazole [OR = 1.807, 95% CI, 1.544 - 2.113, P < 0.001] olanzapine [OR = 2.289, 95% CI, 1.986 - 2.640, P < 0.001] risperidone [OR = 2.548, 95% CI, 2.246 - 2.889, P < 0.001] buspirone [OR = 0.767, 95% CI, 0.683 - 0.861, P < 0.001] escitalopram [OR = 1.213, 95% CI,1.119 - 1.315, P < 0.001] African Americans [OR = 1.395, 95% CI, 1.268 - 1.535, P < 0.001] and tobacco use [OR = 1.150, 95% CI, 1.073 - 1.233, P < 0.001] were associated with ADD. Conclusion: Our findings reveal that MCI-AD patients were more likely to be Hispanics or African American males treated with rivastigmine, olanzapine and citalopram. African American females were associated with ADD and more likely to be treated with buspirone and presented with a history of ETOH. This finding suggests the need for a pharmacological treatment approach encompassing sex-sensitive strategies for MCI-AD and ADD patients.

Patient engagement in fertility research: bench research, ethics, and social justice.

BACKGROUND: Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in research is increasingly being utilized to better connect patients and researchers. The Patient Engagement Studio (PES) supports PPI in research by working directly with researchers throughout various stages of their projects. Recently, two researchers presented to the PES for assistance with their project, Embryo+™. The purpose of Embryo+™ is to decrease miscarriage rates using RNA sequencing technology that screens for the most viable embryos. To date, no examples of PPI directly in the planning or implementation of bench research concerning in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer have been identified. MAIN BODY: Embryo+™ researchers met in-person with the PES two times (fall 2019; each meeting had 9 PES members in attendance) for initial feedback and protocol development. After these meetings, PES leadership and Embryo+™ researchers decided that the unique nature of the project merited a PPI evaluation. Subsequent evaluation of engagement efforts occurred by reviewing the PES reports for the Embryo+™ researchers, conducting two recorded web-based discussion meetings with the PES (summer 2020; meeting 1 n = 7; meeting 2 n = 6), and a brief survey (n = 13). The discussion meetings provided an opportunity for the PES members to define engagement themes through consensus via verbal agreement to the studio director's periodic summaries during the discussions. Combining survey results and PES themes allowed for a broad discussion for meaningful engagement. The Embryo+™ researchers established trust with the patients by changing some of their language in response to patient suggestions, allowing for unintended ethical conversations, and implementing the patient developed protocols. Overall, the patient experts thought this project was very meaningful and valuable, quantified by a mean loyalty score 89.43 (s.d. 10.29). CONCLUSION: Bench science researchers may need additional PPI training prior to engaging with patient groups. PPI in this project was successful in large part due to this training, where the director emphasized the importance of gaining trust with the patients. The researchers applied what they learned and several examples of how to develop trust with patients are discussed. If trust is established, PPI in an ethically charged, basic science research study can be both valuable and successful.

Patients are increasingly becoming involved in all stages of the research process. Patient and public involvement has been shown to answer questions that matter to patients, increase enrollment in studies, and improve the spread of research results to the public. However, there are limited evaluations of patient engagement in basic science research (research performed in a laboratory setting in various fields). Here, we provide an example of patients effectively involved in the planning and implementation of an ethically complex study in the field of Assistive Reproductive Technology. A Patient Engagement Studio, affiliated with an academic health center, directly connects patients and researchers through bi-monthly meetings. Recently, two researchers presented their project, Embryo+™, to the studio during the planning stage of their study. This project aims to use a new testing technology to reduce miscarriage rates. The researchers presented to the studio twice (fall 2019), and two follow-up meetings were conducted with the patients (summer 2020). Also, the patients completed a survey evaluating how engaged they felt with the project. Through the meetings, the researchers changed their language in response to patient feedback, and patients developed project protocols. Survey results showed that the patients thought this project was very meaningful and valuable. Overall, this evaluation shows that patients can add value to contentious bench science projects, particularly in the field of Assistive Reproductive Technology.

Emergency Medical Technician Training During Medical School: Benefits for the Hidden Curriculum.

PROBLEM: Medical schools are encouraged to introduce students to clinical experiences early, to integrate biomedical and clinical sciences, and to expose students to interprofessional health providers and teams. One important goal is for students to gain a better understanding of the patients they will care for in the future and how their social and behavioral characteristics may affect care delivery. APPROACH: To promote early clinical exposure and biomedical integration, in 2012 the University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville incorporated emergency medical technician (EMT) training into the curriculum. This report describes the program; outlines changes (made after year 1) to improve biomedical integration; and provides a brief analysis and categorization of comments from student reflections to determine whether particular themes, especially related to the hidden curriculum, appeared. OUTCOMES: Medical students wrote frequently about EMT-related experiences: 29% of reflections in the charter year (1.2 per student) and 38% of reflections in the second year (1.5 per student) focused on EMT-related experiences. Reflections related to patient care, professionalism, systems-based practice, and communication/interpersonal skills. The frequency of themes in student reflections may provide insight into a medical program's hidden curriculum. This information may serve to inform curricula that focus on biosocial elements such as professionalism and communication with the goal of enhancing future physicians' tolerance, empathy, and patient-centeredness. NEXT STEPS: The authors plan to conduct further qualitative analysis of student reflections to iteratively revise curricula to address gaps both in learning and in the differences between the explicit curriculum and actual experiences.