The Effect of Surgical Approach and Hip Offset Reconstruction on Gait Biomechanics Following Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to examine how hip offset (HO) and surgical approach affect gait biomechanics following total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: There were 55 THA patients assigned to 3 groups based on surgical approach (ANT: anterior, LAT: lateral, or POS: posterior) and HO difference (large HO: >5 millimeters (mm), small HO; <5 mm, or normal; between +3 mm and -3 mm). Kinematics and kinetics were recorded using motion capture and force plate data. Group differences were assessed using statistical parametric mapping. RESULTS: The ANT group demonstrated more normal sagittal plane kinematics and kinetics. No frontal plane kinematic differences were found, but the LAT group displayed more normal frontal plane kinetics. The LAT group displayed a slower walking speed than the ANT group, and the LAT and POS groups used a shorter stride/step length than the control group. The large HO group showed fewer differences in sagittal plane kinematics and kinetics than the small HO and normal groups. No frontal plane kinematic differences were observed, but the normal group demonstrated more significant differences than the large HO and small HO groups. No significant differences were found between any of the HO patient groups. CONCLUSION: Anterior and lateral approaches led to more normal gait biomechanics in sagittal kinematics and frontal kinetics, respectively, but only the ANT group exhibited spatiotemporal gait parameters within normal ranges. Hip offset differences greater or less than 5 mm do not significantly change gait patterns. Surgical approach plays a greater role than HO reconstruction in producing more normal gait biomechanics following THA.

Test-Retest Reliability and the Effects of Walking Speed on Stride Time Variability During Continuous, Overground Walking in Healthy Young Adults.

Studies have investigated the reliability and effect of walking speed on stride time variability during walking trials performed on a treadmill. The objective of this study was to investigate the reliability of stride time variability and the effect of walking speed on stride time variability, during continuous, overground walking in healthy young adults. Participants completed: (1) 2 walking trials at their preferred walking speed on 1 day and another trial 2 to 4 days later and (2) 1 trial at their preferred walking speed, 1 trial approximately 20% to 25% faster than their preferred walking speed, and 1 trial approximately 20% to 25% slower than their preferred walking speed on a separate day. Data from a waist-mounted accelerometer were used to determine the consecutive stride times for each trial. The reliability of stride time variability outcomes was generally poor (intraclass correlations: .167-.487). Although some significant differences in stride time variability were found between the preferred walking speed, fast, and slow trials, individual between-trial differences were generally below the estimated minimum difference considered to be a real difference. The development of a protocol to improve the reliability of stride time variability outcomes during continuous, overground walking would be beneficial to improve their application in research and clinical settings.

Lower limb inter-joint coordination in individuals with osteoarthritis before and after a total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty is the most common treatment for severe knee osteoarthritis. Coordination and variability analyses are effective measures of the injury stage or rehabilitation process. This study compared the inter-joint coordination before and after arthroplasty, compared to controls. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients were evaluated before and 12 months after surgery, compared to 27 controls. Coordination and variability in the sagittal plane between the hip-knee and knee-ankle were calculated using vector coding and circular statistics. Coordination was categorized as in-phase, anti-phase, or distal or proximal joint-phase. The gait cycle was divided into sub-phases for the coordination, variability, and range of motion results. FINDINGS: Coordination and range of motion differed significantly between the patient groups and controls, while small differences between pre- and post-operative groups were also detected. The hip-knee showed a reduced in-phase frequency in the patient group compared to control during stance, particularly mid-stance: pre-operative 24.3% ± 33.9, post-operative 29.5 ± 29.7, and controls 70.7 ± 17.0. This difference was compensated for by increasing proximal-phase (hip) frequency in the patient groups. For knee-ankle coordination, the patient groups showed higher distal-phase (ankle) frequency during the early and mid-stance. Coordination variability was higher post-operatively during swing and terminal swing phases, compared to controls. INTERPRETATION: The results indicated reduced degrees of freedom for the knee during stance phase with a reduced capacity to move the knee and hip in opposing directions before and one year after surgery. The patient group after the surgery increased knee range of motion and coordination compared to pre-operative during swing phase.