An assessment of the uses of homologous interactions.

MOTIVATION: Protein-protein interactions have proved to be a valuable starting point for understanding the inner workings of the cell. Computational methodologies have been built which both predict interactions and use interaction datasets in order to predict other protein features. Such methods require gold standard positive (GSP) and negative (GSN) interaction sets. Here we examine and demonstrate the usefulness of homologous interactions in predicting good quality positive and negative interaction datasets. RESULTS: We generate GSP interaction sets as subsets from experimental data using only interaction and sequence information. We can therefore produce sets for several species (many of which at present have no identified GSPs). Comprehensive error rate testing demonstrates the power of the method. We also show how the use of our datasets significantly improves the predictive power of algorithms for interaction prediction and function prediction. Furthermore, we generate GSN interaction sets for yeast and examine the use of homology along with other protein properties such as localization, expression and function. Using a novel method to assess the accuracy of a negative interaction set, we find that the best single selector for negative interactions is a lack of co-function. However, an integrated method using all the characteristics shows significant improvement over any current method for identifying GSN interactions. The nature of homologous interactions is also examined and we demonstrate that interologs are found more commonly within species than across species. CONCLUSION: GSP sets built using our homologous verification method are demonstrably better than standard sets in terms of predictive ability. We can build such GSP sets for several species. When generating GSNs we show a combination of protein features and lack of homologous interactions gives the highest quality interaction sets. AVAILABILITY: GSP and GSN datasets for all the studied species can be downloaded from http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~deane/HPIV.

Protein protein interactions, evolutionary rate, abundance and age.

BACKGROUND: Does a relationship exist between a protein's evolutionary rate and its number of interactions? This relationship has been put forward many times, based on a biological premise that a highly interacting protein will be more restricted in its sequence changes. However, to date several studies have voiced conflicting views on the presence or absence of such a relationship. RESULTS: Here we perform a large scale study over multiple data sets in order to demonstrate that the major reason for conflict between previous studies is the use of different but overlapping datasets. We show that lack of correlation, between evolutionary rate and number of interactions in a data set is related to the error rate. We also demonstrate that the correlation is not an artifact of the underlying distributions of evolutionary distance and interactions and is therefore likely to be biologically relevant. Further to this, we consider the claim that the dependence is due to gene expression levels and find some supporting evidence. A strong and positive correlation between the number of interactions and the age of a protein is also observed and we show this relationship is independent of expression levels. CONCLUSION: A correlation between number of interactions and evolutionary rate is observed but is dependent on the accuracy of the dataset being used. However it appears that the number of interactions a protein participates in depends more on the age of the protein than the rate at which it changes.

Predicting protein-protein interactions in the context of protein evolution.

Here we review the methods for the prediction of protein interactions and the ideas in protein evolution that relate to them. The evolutionary assumptions implicit in many of the protein interaction prediction methods are elucidated. We draw attention to the caution needed in deploying certain evolutionary assumptions, in particular cross-organism transfer of interactions by sequence homology, and discuss the known issues in deriving interaction predictions from evidence of co-evolution. We also conject that there is evolutionary knowledge yet to be exploited in the prediction of interactions, in particular the heterogeneity of interactions, the increasing availability of interaction data from multiple species, and the models of protein interaction network growth.