Hearing Loss in Older People With Schizophrenia: Audiologic Characteristics and Association With Psychosocial Functioning.

OBJECTIVE: The severity and impact of hearing deficits among adults with schizophrenia spectrum disorders may become increasingly relevant with advancing age. This study evaluated hearing ability and associated psychosocial functioning among older adults aged 50-70. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis. SETTING: Four outpatient psychiatry clinics in New York City. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals aged 50-70 years with diagnoses of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. MEASUREMENTS: Unaided pure tone air conduction audiometry conducted using a portable audiometry system determined the pure tone average (PTA) hearing threshold across four frequencies: 500, 1k, 2k, and 4k Hz. Better ear PTA defined the hearing threshold. Audiometry data retrieved from the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey aided interpretation of sample hearing loss rates. Standard measures evaluated psychiatric symptoms, perceived impact of hearing impairment, loneliness, and quality of life. RESULTS: Among audiometry completers (N = 40), 35% (n = 14) demonstrated subclinical hearing loss (16-25 dB) and 35% (n = 14) had mild or worse hearing loss (≥26 dB). Rates were higher than expected based on age-based population data. Those who perceived hearing handicap rated it moderate (12.2%) or severe (7.3%); those who perceived tinnitus rated the impact as mild to moderate (12.2%) or catastrophic (2.4%). Neither psychiatric symptoms nor interviewer-rated quality of life was associated with hearing ability. Greater loneliness was significantly correlated with worse audiologic performance (r = 0.475, p <0.01) and greater perceived hearing handicap (r = 0.480, p <0.01). CONCLUSION: Identifying the need for hearing loss treatment among aging adults with schizophrenia spectrum disorders is important given the potential implications for social functioning, cognitive, and mental health.

Cognitive remediation in large systems of psychiatric care.

IntroductionWith the increasing enthusiasm to provide cognitive remediation (CR) as an evidence-based practice, questions arise as to what is involved in implementing CR in a large system of care. This article describes the first statewide implementation of CR in the USA, with the goal of documenting the implementation issues that care providers are likely to face when bringing CR services to their patients. METHODS: In 2014, the New York State Office of Mental Health set up a Cognitive Health Service that could be implemented throughout the state-operated system of care. This service was intended to broadly address cognitive health, to assure that the cognitive deficits commonly associated with psychiatric illnesses are recognized and addressed, and that cognitive health is embedded in the vocabulary of wellness. It involved creating a mechanism to train staff to recognize how cognitive health could be prioritized in treatment planning as well as implementing CR in state-operated adult outpatient psychiatry clinics. RESULTS: By 2017, CR was available at clinics serving people with serious mental illness in 13 of 16 adult Psychiatric Centers, located in rural and urban settings throughout New York state. The embedded quality assurance program evaluation tools indicated that CR was acceptable, sustainable, and effective. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive remediation can be feasibly implemented in large systems of care that provide a multilevel system of supports, a training program that educates broadly about cognitive health and specifically about the delivery of CR, and embedded, ongoing program evaluation that is linked to staff supervision.

Personalised treatment for cognitive dysfunction in individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders.

Cognitive deficits are a well-recognised issue for individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Despite positive group findings for the use of cognitive remediation (CR) interventions, there are substantial individual differences in response to treatment. In addition, the aggregate CR literature reports low moderate effect sizes for cognitive and functional outcomes. Based on personalised medicine theory, this paper uses extant CR literature to examine the individual characteristics determined to predict treatment response. These characteristics, which fall into the broad categories of cognitive, psychological, and biological can be used as tailoring variables to personalise CR to an individual's unique profile. Personalisation through the use of these tailoring variables has the potential to improve the delivery of CR to maximise treatment outcomes.

Cognitive Skills Training for Homeless Transition-Age Youth: Feasibility and Pilot Efficacy of a Community Based Randomized Controlled Trial.

Cognitive impairments are common in homeless youth and negatively impact academic and vocational outcomes. We examined the feasibility and efficacy of cognitive interventions provided to 18- to 22-year-old homeless youth living in urban supportive housing. Ninety-one homeless youth were randomized to receive either targeted cognitive training (cognitive remediation) or general cognitive activation (computer skills training). Cognitive and psychological outcomes were assessed at baseline, after 13 and 26 sessions, and 1 month postintervention. A high dropout rate highlighted the feasibility challenges of treating this population. Intent-to-treat analysis found significant improvements across groups in specific and global measures of cognition and psychological distress, with no significant group differences. Transition-age homeless youth show improvements in cognitive and psychological functioning when engaged in interventions that address their cognitive development. This speaks to the malleability of cognitive skills in this cohort and lays the groundwork for future research to address their cognitive health.

Integrating psychopharmacology and cognitive remediation to treat cognitive dysfunction in the psychotic disorders.

Cognitive deficits are a prominent and enduring aspect of schizophrenia, which pose a significant barrier to achieving functional goals. The most promising intervention for treating cognitive impairment is cognitive remediation (CR), a behaviorally based therapy associated with medium effect sizes for cognitive and functional outcomes. However, there is a sizeable group of nonresponders whose CR outcomes become limited when the therapeutic approach fails to address individual differences in baseline cognition, motivation variables, and the extent to which CR offers opportunities for generalization. This speaks to a need to develop cognitive interventions that are both personalized and scalable. Emerging data suggest that specific pharmacological agents have the potential to enhance and accelerate behaviorally based CR effects. This article will review the rationale and preliminary evidence to support combining CR and pharmacotherapy. We will review crucial aspects of cognitive interventions that offer the most promise for improving not only cognitive outcomes, but also for enhancing improvement in real-world functioning. Finally, we will address methodological issues to be considered for future research on combined pharmacological and CR interventions.

Implementation of Cognitive Health Services in Large Systems of Care: Highlights From Coordinated Specialty Care for First Episode Psychosis.

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: With increasing recognition of the importance of cognitive health for recovery in people with psychosis, questions arise as to how to implement cognitive health services in large systems of care. This paper describes the implementation of cognitive health services in OnTrackNY (OTNY), a network of clinics delivering a Coordinated Specialty Care treatment model for early psychosis, with the goal of documenting the processes, challenges, and useful adaptations. STUDY DESIGN: In 2018, OTNY piloted a Cognitive Health Toolkit for implementation across 18 affiliated clinics. The toolkit intended to identify the cognitive health needs of individuals early in the course of psychosis and to integrate cognitive health into the vocabulary of wellness and recovery. Implementation involved creating mechanisms for staff training and support to, in turn, help participants improve how they use cognitive skills in daily life. STUDY RESULTS: The toolkit was disseminated to all 28 OTNY programs throughout New York state by 2023. When simple assessment and decision-making tools were embedded in routine care practices, the majority of participants identified that improving memory, attention, and critical thinking skills would be helpful. Consistently, about 70% of those asked wanted to learn more about how to better their cognitive health. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive health services can be implemented in large systems of care that provide a multi-level system of implementation supports. Organizational facilitators of implementation include a training program to educate about cognitive health and the delivery of cognitive health interventions, and embedded quality assurance monitoring and improvement activities.

Psychiatric and functional correlates of stigma associated with cognitive impairment in schizophrenia.

Schizophrenia is the most strongly stigmatized psychiatric diagnosis, with negative stereotypes including assumptions of incompetence and inability to recover. Individuals with cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia (CIAS) have reported stigma experiences, suggesting that CIAS carries stigma in addition to the stigma associated with schizophrenia as a diagnostic label. While research has established that mental illness stigma more generally is linked with poor psychiatric and functional outcomes, no research has explored correlates of CIAS stigma. This study evaluated cognitive, psychiatric, and functional correlates of CIAS stigma among 54 individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders participating in a cognitive remediation trial. Participants with greater estimated cognitive decline reported higher levels of CIAS stigma experiences. Participants who reported higher levels of CIAS stigma also scored higher on a measure of depressive symptom severity. No significant associations were found between CIAS stigma and positive and negative psychosis symptoms or general psychopathology ratings. CIAS stigma was not associated with performance-based functional capacity or ratings of community functioning. Findings suggest that CIAS stigma is linked with the degree of cognitive decline and depressive symptom severity among individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Additional research is needed to elucidate directionality and the relationship between CIAS stigma and functioning outcomes.

Perceived Stigma Toward Cognitive Impairment Among People With Schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVE: Stigma toward schizophrenia spectrum disorders is pervasive and negatively influences service access and delivery. Cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia (CIAS) is common, but its association with stigma is unknown. In this study, the authors examined whether individuals with CIAS receiving cognitive remediation treatment report experiencing CIAS-related stigma and sought to establish associations between CIAS-related stigma and recovery-relevant outcomes. METHODS: Data from 48 individuals with schizophrenia spectrum diagnoses were drawn from a larger study evaluating cognitive remediation. Participants completed measures of CIAS-related stigma, internalized mental illness stigma, self-perceived cognitive impairment, cognitive performance, and interviewer-rated quality of life. RESULTS: CIAS-related stigma was commonly reported and significantly positively associated with internalized stigma and self-perceived cognitive impairment. CIAS-related stigma was also significantly negatively associated with motivation to engage in goal-directed behavior and daily activities. CONCLUSIONS: CIAS-related stigma exists and warrants additional exploration with regard to implications for psychiatric service delivery.

Feasibility and Acceptability of Providing Cognitive Remediation in a Large USA System of Coordinated Specialty Care for Early Psychosis.

INTRODUCTION: Multinational treatment guidelines support providing cognitive remediation to people recently diagnosed with schizophrenia, but the feasibility of implementing the treatment on a large scale is less well understood. METHODS: This study took place between 2019 and 2023 at 14 clinics within a large network of programs providing early intervention services to people aged 16-30 experiencing nonaffective psychosis. Clinics were randomly assigned to deliver cognitive remediation as twice-weekly clinician-led groups (N = 5), cognitive remediation as once-weekly clinician-led groups with homework (N = 6), or treatment as usual (N = 3). All clinics screened for cognitive health need to guide treatment planning. Clinical teams (N = 11) received training to provide cognitive remediation. Program evaluation data were analysed for feasibility and acceptability. RESULTS: Screening for cognitive health needs was completed on 77% of the 1193 participants enrolled at the 11 clinics offering cognitive remediation. Clinicians identified cognitive difficulties in 53.9% (n = 496) of screened participants and referred 27% (n = 134) of these participants to cognitive remediation. Of referred participants, 77.6% (n = 104) initiated treatment, and n = 41 completed the treatment. The rate of referral was nearly double, and treatment initiation was significantly higher at programs delivering once-weekly (84.3%) than twice-weekly (64.4%) treatment but the difference in the rate of treatment completion was statistically nonsignificant. Satisfaction among treatment completers was high. CONCLUSIONS: Referrals to cognitive remediation required systemic support of a feasible cognitive health screening process. About a quarter of people with clinician-identified cognitive health needs were referred to cognitive remediation. Feasibility data suggest a flexible model of treatment delivery may facilitate implementation in this service setting.

Hearing Loss Among People With Schizophrenia: Implications for Clinical Practice.

OBJECTIVE: The authors characterized hearing loss among individuals diagnosed as having schizophrenia to inform provision of routine behavioral health services to this population. METHODS: Audiometry data collected between October 2019 and December 2021 from 84 community-dwelling adults with schizophrenia and 81 age-matched participants without the condition were analyzed. Rates of hearing loss were identified within groups and across age decades (20-50 years). Hearing threshold and rates of hearing loss were compared between groups. RESULTS: Participants with schizophrenia had significantly higher mean hearing thresholds (p=0.006), indicating worse hearing. This difference remained significant after controlling for age (p=0.01). A significantly larger proportion of participants with schizophrenia had mild hearing loss (24%) compared with age-matched participants (6%) (p=0.002), with higher rates of mild hearing loss observed across all ages. CONCLUSIONS: Screening for and detection of hearing loss among adults with schizophrenia may be an unmet need. Hearing loss is a treatable source of cognitive and psychosocial disability, warranting scalable assessment and intervention practices.

Correlates of hearing loss among adults with schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Hearing loss (HL) is associated with adverse cognitive, mental, and physical health outcomes. There is evidence that across age groups HL is more prevalent in people with schizophrenia than the general population. Given that people with schizophrenia may already be vulnerable to cognitive and psychosocial disability, we sought to examine how hearing ability relates to concurrent levels of cognitive, mental and daily functioning. METHODS: Community-dwelling adults with schizophrenia (N = 84) ages 22-50 completed pure tone audiometry assessments. Hearing threshold (in decibels) was defined as the lowest detectable pure tone at 1000 Hz. Pearson correlation was used to test the hypothesis that higher hearing thresholds (worse hearing) would be significantly associated with poorer performance on the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS). Additional analyses explored the relationships between audiometric threshold and functional capacity measured with the Virtual Reality Functional Capacity Assessment Tool (VRFCAT) and symptoms severity rated on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). RESULTS: Hearing threshold was inversely and significantly correlated with the BACS composite score (r = -0.27, p = 0.017). This relationship was reduced but remained significant after controlling for age (r = -0.23, p = 0.04). Hearing threshold was not associated with VRFCAT or psychiatric symptom measures. CONCLUSIONS: While schizophrenia and HL are independently associated with cognitive impairment, the magnitude of impairment in this sample was greater among those with poorer hearing. Findings warrant further mechanistic study of the relationship between hearing impairment and cognition and have implications for addressing modifiable health risk factors for higher morbidity and mortality in this vulnerable population.

Early auditory processing dysfunction in schizophrenia: Mechanisms and implications.

Schizophrenia is a major mental disorder that affects approximately 1% of the population worldwide. Cognitive deficits are a key feature of the disorder and a primary cause of long-term disability. Over the past decades, significant literature has accumulated demonstrating impairments in early auditory perceptual processes in schizophrenia. In this review, we first describe early auditory dysfunction in schizophrenia from both a behavioral and neurophysiological perspective and examine their interrelationship with both higher order cognitive constructs and social cognitive processes. Then, we provide insights into underlying pathological processes, especially in relationship to glutamatergic and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) dysfunction models. Finally, we discuss the utility of early auditory measures as both treatment targets for precision intervention and as translational biomarkers for etiological investigation. Altogether, this review points out the crucial role of early auditory deficits in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia, in addition to major implications for early intervention and auditory-targeted approaches.

Dose-Dependent Augmentation of Neuroplasticity-Based Auditory Learning in Schizophrenia: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Target Engagement Clinical Trial of the NMDA Glutamate Receptor Agonist d-serine.

BACKGROUND: Patients with schizophrenia show reduced NMDA glutamate receptor-dependent auditory plasticity, which is rate limiting for auditory cognitive remediation (AudRem). We evaluate the utility of behavioral and neurophysiological pharmacodynamic target engagement biomarkers, using a d-serine+AudRem combination. METHODS: Forty-five participants with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were randomized to 3 once-weekly AudRem visits + double-blind d-serine (80, 100, or 120 mg/kg) or placebo in 3 dose cohorts of 12 d-serine and 3 placebo-treated participants each. In AudRem, participants indicated which paired tone was higher in pitch. The primary outcome was plasticity improvement, operationalized as change in pitch threshold between AudRem tones [(test tone Hz - reference tone Hz)/reference tone Hz] between the initial plateau pitch threshold (mean of trials 20-30 of treatment visit 1) to pitch threshold at the end of visit(s). Target engagement was assessed by electroencephalography outcomes, including mismatch negativity (pitch primary). RESULTS: There was a significant overall treatment effect for plasticity improvement (p = .014). Plasticity improvement was largest within the 80 and 100 mg/kg groups (p < .001, d > 0.67), while 120 mg/kg and placebo-treated participants showed nonsignificant within-group changes. Plasticity improvement was seen after a single treatment and was sustained on subsequent treatments. Target engagement was demonstrated by significantly larger mismatch negativity (p = .049, d = 1.0) for the 100 mg/kg dose versus placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate sufficient proof of principle for continued development of both the d-serine+AudRem combination and our target engagement methodology. The ultimate utility is dependent on the results of an ongoing larger, longer study of the combination for clinically relevant outcomes.

Intrinsic motivation as a predictor of work outcome after vocational rehabilitation in schizophrenia.

Intrinsic motivation is a construct commonly used in explaining goal-directed behavior. In people with schizophrenia, intrinsic motivation is usually subsumed as a feature of negative symptoms or underlying neurocognitive dysfunction. A growing literature reflects an interest in defining and measuring motivational impairment in schizophrenia and in delineating the specific role of intrinsic motivation as both an independent predictor and a mediator of psychosocial functioning. This cross-sectional study examined intrinsic motivation as a predictor of vocational outcomes for 145 individuals with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder participating in a 6-month work rehabilitation trial. Correlation and mediation analyses examined baseline intrinsic motivation and negative symptoms in relation to work hours and work performance. Data support a significant relationship between intrinsic motivation and negative symptoms and significant correlations with outcome variables, such that lower negative symptoms and greater intrinsic motivation were associated with better work functioning. Moreover, in this sample, intrinsic motivation fully mediated the relationships between negative symptoms, work productivity, and work performance. These results have significant implications on the design of work rehabilitation interventions for people with schizophrenia and support a role for targeting intrinsic motivation directly to influence vocational functioning. Future directions for research and intervention are discussed.

Addressing cognitive health in coordinated specialty care for early psychosis: Real-world perspectives.

AIM: Addressing cognitive health during the early phase of psychosis has the potential to enhance recovery outcomes, yet methods to assess and treat cognitive problems are not a systematic part of Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC) in the United States. We sought to understand how CSC providers perceive cognitive health and gauge the acceptability and appropriateness of cognitive interventions to inform the development and implementation of a cognitive health toolkit for OnTrackNY, a CSC program. METHODS: Electronic surveys were sent to clinicians from 22 OnTrackNY teams. One unstructured and 10 structured questions assessed knowledge and beliefs about cognition, current cognitive health practices, the likelihood of adopting new practices, perceived facilitators, and barriers to assessing and treating cognitive health. RESULTS: Fifty-three clinicians responded. Clinicians identified a range of terms associated with cognitive impairment with specific neurocognitive deficits cited most frequently. The majority perceived the evidence for cognitive impairment at the time of first episode to be moderate to strong, that specific interventions for cognition are warranted, and that there is a significant link between cognition and community functioning. While current practices vary, 88% indicated a high likelihood of integrating tools to address cognitive problems if provided. Compensatory approaches to aid cognitive functioning were viewed most favourably. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that addressing cognitive health is acceptable and appropriate for OnTrackNY but there is a need for systematic training to integrate empirically supported interventions with existing recovery-oriented practices. Piloting a cognitive health toolkit will inform the potential uptake of assessment and treatment practices more broadly.

Toolkit for assessing and addressing cognitive health in early psychosis: Evaluation of feasibility and utility in a coordinated specialty care setting.

AIM: Methods to identify and harness individual cognitive strengths while addressing relative weaknesses have the potential to complement recovery services for first-episode psychosis but systematic implementation is needed. We developed a cognitive health toolkit, trained teams from OnTrackNY, a network of coordinated specialty care (CSC) programs and examined toolkit feasibility and clinical utility during the first year of roll-out. METHODS: The toolkit includes a clinician manual, assessment and decision-making tools, and a menu of cognitive health service options. Assessment uses the WRAT5-Reading subtest and a new Self-Assessment of Cognitive Functioning which, together, determine participant- and clinician-perceived cognitive health need. Program-level data were analysed for rates of assessment, identification of cognitive health needs and cognitive health service provision. RESULTS: Data from 18 OnTrackNY teams included 933 participants, including 310 new admissions. Across teams, 43.9% of newly admitted participants received a WRAT5-Reading and 41.3% received a self-assessment. Of all assessments completed in the study period, 50.7% were at or within 3-months of admission and 69.1% were within the first year of program participation. Cognitive health need was identified by self-report (57.6%) and clinician-report (69.9%) and led to provision of specific services, including psychoeducation, compensatory skills training and in some cases restorative cognitive training. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary feasibility data are encouraging but barriers to assessment need to be identified and addressed. Rates of identified cognitive health need warrant further study of the implementation process and outcomes so that cognitive health assessment and treatment practices may ultimately be disseminated to CSC programs more broadly.

Predicting response to cognitive training for schizophrenia using results from two studies with different outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Collaborative data sharing between research groups provides an opportunity to explore the basis for the heterogeneity in cognitive training outcomes reported in the schizophrenia literature. The current analyses focused on the contribution of site and participant characteristics to these heterogeneous outcomes. METHODS: Data from two independent studies, from New York (NY) and Los Angeles (LA), were combined to yield a sample of 132 outpatient adults with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder. While similar treatment doses, cognitive exercises and outcome measures were used, sites differed in use of coaching, group discussion and compensation. Between-site differences in participant demographic and baseline clinical characteristics were tested. Regression examined predictors of change in cognition (MCCB) and functional capacity (UPSA) which could explain site differences in treatment effects. RESULTS: Medium to large treatment effect size differences in MCCB and UPSA favored the NY site over LA. When the studies were combined, the effect of site was significant for both outcomes with a medium effect size difference. After controlling for background characteristics, the effect of site was reduced for both outcomes, but remained significant for cognition. Improvement in UPSA was associated with better baseline MCCB (p < 0.001), lower baseline UPSA (p < 0.001) and younger age (p = 0.019). The overall model with site, baseline scores, and participant background characteristics explained about 30% to 40% of the variance in outcomes. DISCUSSION: Participant and treatment characteristics are both predictive of outcomes, but treatment characteristics may be more consequential to cognitive gain, while participant characteristics may be more consequential to change in functional capacity.

Feasibility and acceptability of remotely accessed cognitive remediation for schizophrenia in public health settings.

Cognitive remediation (CR) is an evidence-based therapy used to improve cognition in people with schizophrenia. However, it often requires multiple in-person clinic sessions per week, which can limit scalability. This mixed methods study considered the feasibility and acceptability of a hybrid approach, which allowed for half the sessions to be conducted remotely as homework, without the clinician present. Individuals with schizophrenia were randomized to either all in-clinic or hybrid conditions and completed questionnaires and individual interviews about their experience. CR clinicians provided feedback in complement. Because of limited access to technology, most Hybrid CR participants had to come to clinic to access computers and often sought clinician support to do their homework. Participants in the two conditions were equally satisfied per the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire, and the majority reported perceived benefit and enjoyment. Both CR participants and clinicians identified access to technology as a barrier to program feasibility, while availability of clinician support positively impacted acceptability. Suggestions to improve CR highlighted adopting a flexible approach to providing CR that accounts for participant access to technology, potential benefit from peer interaction, and need for clinician support.

How does awareness of cognitive impairment impact motivation and treatment outcomes during cognitive remediation for schizophrenia?

BACKGROUND: There is concern that awareness of cognitive deficit among people with schizophrenia receiving Cognitive Remediation (CR) might undermine motivation, engagement, and CR outcomes. We therefore examined the relationship of subjective awareness of cognitive deficit to aspects of motivation and cognitive learning during an efficacious CR program. METHODS: Individuals with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder who completed 30 sessions of CR (N = 67) were evaluated on cognitive performance, self-reported cognitive difficulties, intrinsic motivation and perceived competency for cognitive training tasks at the beginning and end of treatment. RESULTS: We found no relationship between actual and perceived cognitive functioning when measured cross-sectionally or as difference scores, pre/post treatment. Greater awareness of cognitive problems was associated with lower perceived competency for cognitive tasks at treatment beginning and end-point (p-values < .05). The significant relationship between awareness of cognitive problems and perceived value of the treatment at end-point was fully mediated by perceived competency. While greater perceived competency was associated with shorter time to treatment completion (p = .0025), it was intrinsic motivation measured at end-point that was associated with cognitive change (p = .02). DISCUSSION: While awareness of cognitive problems may not be a prerequisite for cognitive improvement during CR, it could impact engagement in, and how one values treatment via its effect on perceived competency. Results also highlighted the importance of intrinsic motivation for doing cognitive learning activities, given its relationship to cognitive gain. Further study is needed to understand how best to assess and address awareness of cognitive abilities within the CR setting.

The cognitive training version of the MUSIC® model of motivation inventory: A follow-up validity study.

Further validation of the MUSIC® Model of Motivation Inventory (MMI) for use in Cognitive Remediation (CR) for schizophrenia is needed. The MMI was compared to the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory - Schizophrenia Research and Perceived Competency Scale following early treatment exposure in a CR clinical trial. MMI Usefulness, Success, and Interest scales were significantly correlated with corresponding comparison scales. The MMI was not correlated with pre-morbid cognitive ability. Higher expectancy for success and perceived usefulness were significantly associated with greater intensity of session attendance. Results support the convergent, divergent, and predictive validity of the MMI for CR research and clinical use.