Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 21(6S): S3-S20, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38823952

RESUMO

This review focuses on the initial imaging in the reproductive age adult population with acute pelvic pain, including patients with positive and negative beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-hCG) levels with suspected gynecological and nongynecological etiology. For all patients, a combination of transabdominal and transvaginal pelvic ultrasound with Doppler is usually appropriate as an initial imaging study. If nongynecological etiology in patients with negative ß-hCG is suspected, then CT of the abdomen and pelvis with or without contrast is also usually appropriate. In patients with positive ß-hCG and suspected nongynecological etiology, CT of the abdomen and pelvis with contrast and MRI of the abdomen and pelvis without contrast may be appropriate. In patients with negative ß-hCG and suspected gynecological etiology, CT of the abdomen and pelvis with contrast, MRI of pelvis without contrast, or MRI of pelvis with and without contrast may be appropriate. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.


Assuntos
Dor Pélvica , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Dor Aguda/diagnóstico por imagem , Dor Aguda/etiologia , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Dor Pélvica/diagnóstico por imagem , Sociedades Médicas , Estados Unidos
2.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 19(5S): S114-S120, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35550796

RESUMO

Palpable scrotal abnormalities are caused by a variety of disorders, ranging from indolent benign conditions to aggressive tumors, and infectious and vascular processes. In these patients the diagnostic workup typically begins with a complete clinical, history, and physical examinations, including analysis of risk factors. If imaging is required, ultrasound examination is the diagnostic modality of choice. In few select patients with very large scrotal masses, MRI may be appropriate. However, the use of gadolinium-based contrast should be evaluated critically depending on specific patient factors. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.


Assuntos
Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Sociedades Médicas , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Diafragma da Pelve , Ultrassonografia , Estados Unidos
3.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 19(5S): S137-S155, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35550798

RESUMO

Pelvic floor disorders including pelvic organ prolapse (POP), urinary dysfunction, defecatory dysfunction, and complications after pelvic floor surgery are relatively common in the female population. Imaging tests are obtained when the initial clinical evaluation is thought to be incomplete or inconclusive or demonstrates findings that are discordant with patients' symptoms. An integrated imaging approach is optimal to evaluate the complex anatomy and dynamic functionality of the pelvic floor. Fluoroscopic cystocolpoproctography (CCP) and MR defecography are considered the initial imaging tests of choice for evaluation of POP. Fluoroscopic voiding cystourethrography is considered the initial imaging test for patients with urinary dysfunction. Fluoroscopic CCP and MR defecography are considered the initial imaging test for patients with defecatory dysfunction, whereas ultrasound pelvis transrectal is a complementary test in patients requiring evaluation for anal sphincter defects. MRI pelvis without and with intravenous contrast, MRI pelvis with dynamic maneuvers, and MR defecography are considered the initial imaging tests in patients with suspected complications of prior pelvic floor surgical repair. Transperineal ultrasound is emerging as an important imaging tool, in particular for screening of pelvic floor dysfunction and for evaluation of midurethral slings, vaginal mesh, and complications related to prior pelvic floor surgical repair. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.


Assuntos
Diafragma da Pelve , Sociedades Médicas , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Diafragma da Pelve/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia , Estados Unidos
4.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 18(5S): S119-S125, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33958106

RESUMO

Acute pelvic pain is a common presenting complaint in both the emergency room and outpatient settings. Pelvic pain of gynecologic origin in postmenopausal women occurs less frequently than in premenopausal women; however, it has important differences in etiology. The most common causes of postmenopausal pelvic pain from gynecologic origin are ovarian cysts, uterine fibroids, pelvic inflammatory disease, and ovarian neoplasm. Other etiologies of pelvic pain are attributable to urinary, gastrointestinal, and vascular systems. As the optimal imaging modality varies for these etiologies, it is important to narrow the differential diagnosis before choosing the initial diagnostic imaging examination. Transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound are the best initial imaging techniques when the differential is primarily of gynecologic origin. CT with intravenous (IV) contrast is more useful if the differential diagnosis remains broad. MRI without IV contrast or MRI without and with IV contrast, as well as CT without IV contrast may also be used for certain differential considerations. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.


Assuntos
Pós-Menopausa , Sociedades Médicas , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Humanos , Dor Pélvica/diagnóstico por imagem , Dor Pélvica/etiologia , Ultrassonografia , Estados Unidos
5.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 17(11S): S336-S345, 2020 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33153547

RESUMO

This publication summarizes the relevant literature for the imaging of patients with symptoms of abnormal uterine bleeding, including initial imaging, follow-up imaging when the original ultrasound is inconclusive, and follow-up imaging when surveillance is appropriate. For patients with abnormal uterine bleeding, combined transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound of the pelvis with Doppler is the most appropriate initial imaging study. If the uterus is incompletely visualized with the initial ultrasou2nd, MRI of the pelvis without and with contrast is the next appropriate imaging study, unless a polyp is suspected on the original ultrasound, then sonohysterography can be performed. If the patient continues to experience abnormal uterine bleeding, assessment with ultrasound of the pelvis, sonohysterography, and MRI of the pelvis without and with contrast would be appropriate. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.


Assuntos
Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Sociedades Médicas , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Ultrassonografia , Estados Unidos , Hemorragia Uterina/diagnóstico por imagem
6.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 17(5S): S113-S124, 2020 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32370955

RESUMO

The most common known causes of female infertility are male factor (26%), ovulatory failure (21%), and tubal damage (14%), while in 28% a couple's infertility remains unexplained. Female-specific causes of infertility include deterioration of oocyte quality with increasing maternal age; ovulatory disorders, most notably polycystic ovarian syndrome; history of salpingitis such as that caused by chlamydia infection; endometriosis; and uterine cavity abnormalities interfering with implantation causing inability to become pregnant or causing recurrent pregnancy loss. These potential causes of female infertility are discussed in this document and the appropriate imaging recommendations for each variant are provided. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.


Assuntos
Infertilidade Feminina , Sociedades Médicas , Diagnóstico por Imagem , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Humanos , Infertilidade Feminina/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Estados Unidos
7.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 17(11S): S459-S471, 2020 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33153557

RESUMO

Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) can be categorized as primary or early if occurring in the first 24 hours after delivery, whereas late or delayed PPH occurs between 24 hours and 6 weeks. Most of the causes of PPH can be diagnosed clinically, but imaging plays an important role in the diagnosis of many causes of PPH. Pelvic ultrasound (transabdominal and transvaginal with Doppler) is the imaging modality of choice for the initial evaluation of PPH. Contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen and pelvis and CT angiogram of the abdomen and pelvis may be appropriate to determine if active ongoing hemorrhage is present, to localize the bleeding, and to identify the source of bleeding. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.


Assuntos
Hemorragia Pós-Parto , Diagnóstico por Imagem , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Humanos , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/diagnóstico por imagem , Gravidez , Sociedades Médicas , Ultrassonografia , Estados Unidos
8.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 19(1): 35-8, 2006 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16492589

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol to oxytocin for the induction of labor in twin gestations. METHODS: All twin gestations that underwent induction of labor with misoprostol or oxytocin during a 4-year period were identified from the Mount Sinai obstetrical database. Only twins > or = 34 weeks with a vertex presenting twin A were included. Labor and delivery characteristics, maternal complications and neonatal outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Of 134 patients with twins, 57 initially received misoprostol and 77 received oxytocin. These groups had similar demographics, but women who received misoprostol had less cervical dilation (0.8 vs. 2.2 cm, p < 0.0001) and were less likely to be multiparous (19% vs. 44%, p = 0.003). There was a shorter length of induction to delivery (7.8 hours vs. 15.1 hours, p = 0.001) and a trend toward a lower cesarean section rate (16.9% vs. 31.6%, p = 0.06) in the oxytocin-only group. There were no cases of uterine rupture or maternal mortality in this series. There were no significant differences in neonatal outcomes between the two groups, but the sample size was underpowered to detect significant differences between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Misoprostol and oxytocin both appear to be safe and efficacious for use in inductions of labor in twins in this limited retrospective investigation. The safety of these agents with regard to neonatal outcomes should be confirmed by larger studies.


Assuntos
Trabalho de Parto Induzido/métodos , Misoprostol/uso terapêutico , Ocitócicos/uso terapêutico , Gravidez Múltipla , Administração Intravaginal , Adulto , Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Bases de Dados como Assunto , Feminino , Humanos , Primeira Fase do Trabalho de Parto/efeitos dos fármacos , Ocitocina/uso terapêutico , Paridade , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Gêmeos
9.
Prenat Diagn ; 26(1): 35-8, 2006 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16378331

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To compare the levels of pain and anxiety associated with amniocentesis (AC), transabdominal chorionic villus sampling (TA-CVS), and transcervical chorionic villus sampling (TC-CVS). METHODS: We prospectively administered a questionnaire about pain and anxiety to 124 women undergoing AC, 40 undergoing TA-CVS, and 24 undergoing TC-CVS for singleton pregnancies. The level of pain was quantified with numerical and pictorial scales and the degree of anxiety was quantified with a numerical scale (0-100 in increments of 10). RESULTS: The mean pain score for TA-CVS, 41.4 +/- 18.1, was significantly higher than that for TC-CVS, 26.4 +/- 25.3, p = 0.008. The mean pain score for AC, 35.1 +/- 27.6, was intermediate. A higher degree of anxiety was associated with younger maternal age and nulliparity. A higher degree of anxiety was associated with a higher level of pain. CONCLUSION: In general, each procedure is associated with a tolerable amount of pain. TA-CVS appears to be the most painful procedure while TC-CVS appears to be the least painful procedure. In certain groups of patients, the procedures may be associated with higher levels of pain and/or anxiety.


Assuntos
Amniocentese/efeitos adversos , Ansiedade/etiologia , Amostra da Vilosidade Coriônica/efeitos adversos , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Adulto , Ansiedade/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Medição da Dor , Dor Pós-Operatória/patologia , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa