Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Molecules ; 28(3)2023 Jan 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36770634

RESUMO

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol-like particle bound to apolipoprotein(a). Increased Lp(a) levels are an independent, heritable causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) as they are largely determined by variations in the Lp(a) gene (LPA) locus encoding apo(a). Lp(a) is the preferential lipoprotein carrier for oxidized phospholipids (OxPL), and its role adversely affects vascular inflammation, atherosclerotic lesions, endothelial function and thrombogenicity, which pathophysiologically leads to cardiovascular (CV) events. Despite this crucial role of Lp(a), its measurement lacks a globally unified method, and, between different laboratories, results need standardization. Standard antilipidemic therapies, such as statins, fibrates and ezetimibe, have a mediocre effect on Lp(a) levels, although it is not yet clear whether such treatments can affect CV events and prognosis. This narrative review aims to summarize knowledge regarding the mechanisms mediating the effect of Lp(a) on inflammation, atherosclerosis and thrombosis and discuss current diagnostic and therapeutic potentials.


Assuntos
Aterosclerose , Doenças Cardiovasculares , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases , Humanos , Lipoproteína(a)/genética , Lipoproteína(a)/metabolismo , Aterosclerose/diagnóstico , Aterosclerose/tratamento farmacológico , Aterosclerose/genética , Fatores de Risco , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Inflamação/diagnóstico , Inflamação/tratamento farmacológico , Inflamação/complicações , Doenças Cardiovasculares/tratamento farmacológico
2.
J Clin Med ; 13(12)2024 Jun 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38929919

RESUMO

Background: The association of obesity with right ventricular function and the interplay between right heart and pulmonary circulation is incompletely understood. We evaluate the role of obesity as a determinant of right ventricular-pulmonary artery coupling (RVAC). Methods: We retrospectively studied consecutive subjects without overt cardiovascular or pulmonary disease. Subjects were stratified according to body mass index (BMI) as normal weight, overweight, or obese. A transthoracic echocardiographic study was used to assess left and right heart functional and structural parameters. RVAC was assessed using the ratio of peak systolic velocity of the tricuspid annulus to pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP). Results: A total of 145 subjects were enrolled with diabetes mellitus incidence higher in obese. There was no difference in left ventricular global longitudinal strain and in PASP or markers of right ventricular systolic function based on BMI. RVAC was significantly lower in the presence of obesity (normal weight: 0.52 (0.19) cm·(sec·mmHg)-1 vs. overweight: 0.47 (0.16) cm·(sec·mmHg)-1 vs. obese: 0.43 (0.14) cm·(sec·mmHg)-1, p = 0.03), even after adjustment for confounders (ß: -0.085, 95% confidence interval: -0.163, -0.009, p = 0.029). Conclusions: Our findings highlight the relationship between metabolic impairment and RVAC, suggesting additional mechanisms for heart failure development observed in obese subjects.

3.
Curr Pharm Des ; 28(39): 3225-3230, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36278445

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) is implicated in endotheliitis, which adversely affects cardiovascular events. The impact of vaccination with COVID-19 on the clinical outcome of patients is documented. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of vaccination with COVID-19 on the severe acute respiratory syndrome, coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection-related endothelial impairment. METHODS: We enrolled 45 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 (either vaccinated or not against SARS-CoV-2). Clinical and laboratory data were collected, and brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) was evaluated. Subjects without COVID-19 were used as the control group. RESULTS: There was no difference in age (64.7 ± 7.5 years vs. 61.2 ± 11.1 years vs. 62.4 ± 9.5, p = 0.28), male sex (49% vs. 60% vs. 52%, p = 0.71), control subjects, vaccinated, and unvaccinated subjects with COVID-19, respectively. Of the patients with COVID-19, 44% were vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. Unvaccinated COVID-19 patients had significantly impaired FMD compared to vaccinated COVID-19 patients and Control subjects (2.05 ± 2.41 % vs. 7.24 ± 2.52% vs. 7.36 ± 2.94 %, p <0.001). Importantly, post hoc tests revealed that unvaccinated COVID-19 patients had significantly impaired FMD from both Vaccinated COVID-19 subjects (p <0.001) and from Control subjects (p <0.001). There was no difference in FMD between the control group and the vaccinated COVID-19 group (p = 0.99). CONCLUSION: Hospitalized patients with COVID-19 present endothelial dysfunction in the acute phase of the disease. Endothelial function in unvaccinated patients with COVID-19 is impaired compared to control subjects as well compared to vaccinated patients with COVID-19. Vaccinated hospitalized subjects with COVID-19 do not show endothelial dysfunction, strengthening the protective role of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Doenças Vasculares , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa