Female non-obstetric urogenital fistula repair: long-term patient-reported outcomes and a scoping literature review.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate long-term and patient-reported outcomes, including sexual function, in women undergoing urogenital fistula (UGF) repair, addressing the lack of such data in Western countries, where fistulas often result from iatrogenic causes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis at a tertiary referral centre (2010-2023), classifying fistulas based on World Health Organisation criteria and evaluating surgical approaches, aetiology, and characteristics. Both objective (fistula closure, reintervention rates) and subjective outcomes (validated questionnaires) were assessed. A scoping review of patient-reported outcome measures in UGF repair was also performed. RESULTS: The study included 50 patients: 17 (34%) underwent transvaginal and 33 (66%) transabdominal surgery. History of hysterectomy was present in 36 patients (72%). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) operating time was 130 (88-148) min. Fistula closure was achieved in 94% of cases at a median (IQR) follow-up of 50 (16-91) months and reached 100% after three redo fistula repairs. Seven patients (14%) underwent reinterventions for stress urinary incontinence after transvaginal repair (autologous fascial slings). Patient-reported outcomes showed median (IQR) scores on the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Modules (ICIQ-FLUTS) of 5 (3-7) for filling symptoms, 1 (0-2) for voiding symptoms and 4.5 (1-9) for incontinence symptoms. The median (IQR) score on the ICIQ Female Sexual Matters Associated with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Module (ICIQ-FLUTSsex) was 3 (1-5). The median (IQR) ICIQ Satisfaction (ICIQ-S) outcome score and overall satisfaction with surgery item score was 22 (18.5-23.5) and 10 (8.5-10), respectively. Higher scores indicate higher symptom burden and treatment satisfaction, respectively. Our scoping review included 1784 women, revealing mixed aetiology and methodological and aetiological heterogeneity, thus complicating cross-study comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: Urogenital fistula repair at a specialised centre leads to excellent outcomes and high satisfaction. Patients with urethrovaginal fistulas are at increased risk of stress urinary incontinence, possibly due to the original trauma site of the fistula.

Outcome of patients with epithelialized cavity formation after excessive vesicourethral anastomotic leak post radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: Excessive vesicourethral anastomotic leak (EVAL) is a rare but severe complication after radical prostatectomy (RP). Epithelialized vesicourethral cavity formation (EVCF) usually develops during prolonged catheterization. To our knowledge, there is no description of postoperative outcomes, complications, or functional assessment of these patients who received conservative therapy after EVAL. METHODS: We identified 70 patients (0.56%) with radiographic evidence of EVCF out of 12,434 patients who received RP in 2016-2020 at our tertiary care center. Postoperative radiographic cystograms (CG) were retrospectively re-examined by two urologists individually. We assessed urinary continence (UC), the need for intervention due to anastomotic stricture formation, urinary tract infection (UTI), and symphysitis during the first year of follow-up post-RP. RESULTS: The median age was 66 years [interquartile range (IQR) 61-70 years], the median body mass index was 27.8 kg/m2 (IQR 25.5-30.3 kg/m2), and the median prostate specific antigen before RP was 7.1 ng/ml (IQR 4.7-11.8 ng/ml). The median catheter insertion time was 44.5 days (IQR 35.2-54 days). One-year continence follow-up was available for 27 patients (38.6%), of which 22 (81.5%) reported the use of ≤ one pad, two patients reported the use of two (7.4%) pads/24 h, and three (11.1%) patients reported use > two pads/24 h. Overall, four (5.7%) patients needed surgical reintervention for anastomotic stricture, eight (11.5%) patients presented with symphysitis, and 55 (77.1%) presented with UTI. CONCLUSION: UC in 81.5% 1-year post-RP suggests that conservative treatment in EVAL is a treatment option with an acceptable outcome on UC and should be considered before reintervention for anastomotic insufficiency.

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a point of view.

Adenocarcinoma of the prostate (CaP) is treated by surgery or irradiation, or both, with the type of treatment determined largely by local resources and referral patterns. Although the techniques employed by surgeons and radiation oncologists have improved and the morbidities associated with each have declined, for neither are they negligible. Epidemiologic data suggest that between 81% and 85% of men with CaP die of other causes, and a recent survey of untreated men arrived at a similar figure of 83%. Clinical reports, based upon postoperative tumor volume and grade, show that at least 5% of prostatectomies are unnecessary but the extent to which the other 95% benefit from this procedure is unclear. Some sense of these benefits is provided by a randomized, prospective clinical trial that compared prostatectomy with watchful waiting, and found only a 6% gain in overall survival after 8 years. These data call into question the promotion of highly complex and expensive radiation therapy equipment for the treatment of CaP when the prospects for increased life expectancies are at best small and unlikely to be distinguishable from results achieved by surgery, conventional external beam, or radioactive-seed implants.

Proton-beam therapy for prostate cancer.

The treatment options for prostate cancer include prostatectomy, external-beam irradiation, brachytherapy, cryosurgery, focused ultrasound, hormonal therapy, watchful waiting, and various combinations of these modalities. Because the prostate abuts the bladder and rectum, the dose distributions of external-beam irradiations and the accuracy of their placement play crucial roles in the probability of tumor cure and the incidence of posttreatment complications. Principal among the newer radiation technologies is proton-beam therapy (PBT), whose dose distributions make it possible to deliver higher tumor doses and smaller doses to surrounding normal tissues than from x-ray systems. However, as the 10-year cause-specific survival for early-stage disease treated by radiation therapy now exceeds 90%, and with severe late toxicities in the range of 2% to 3%, randomized clinical trials provide the only means to demonstrate improved outcomes from PBT. Short of the data provided by such trials, the efficacy of PBT can be gleaned only from reports in the clinical literature, and, to date, these reports are equivocal. In view of the current health care crisis and the higher costs of PBT for prostate cancer, it is reasonable to assess the viability of this in-vogue but not-so-new technology.