Factors Associated With Response to Biofeedback Therapy for Dyssynergic Defecation.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Biofeedback therapy is effective for dyssynergic defecation (DD), but it is not widely available or reimbursed, and is labor intensive. It is therefore important to select the appropriate patients for this treatment. We investigated symptoms and demographic, manometric, and other factors associated with outcomes of biofeedback therapy in patients with DD. METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of 2 prospective studies of biofeedback therapy in 127 adult outpatients (18-75 years old, 120 female) with chronic constipation who failed to respond to treatment with dietary fiber or laxatives (>1 year) and were diagnosed with DD based on standard criteria. In each study, patients received 1-hour, biweekly office biofeedback therapy (6 sessions) or home biofeedback therapy with a device. A therapist used visual feedback, postural, and diaphragmatic breathing techniques to teach subjects to improve defecation. Treatment success was defined by a composite of normalization of dyssynergia pattern and increase of 20 mm in baseline bowel satisfaction score. Factors were compared between the treatment success and failure groups. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed. RESULTS: Of the 127 patients enrolled, 77 (61%) had treatment success. Dyssynergia was corrected in 78% of patients and bowel satisfaction improved in 64% of patients. Baseline demographic features, constipation symptoms, manometric and sensory parameters, balloon expulsion time, and colonic transit results were similar between treatment failure and success groups. Patients with lower baseline bowel satisfaction score (P = .008) and patients who used digital maneuvers (P = .04) were more likely to have successful biofeedback therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Biofeedback therapy is successful in more than 60% of patients with DD. Patients who used digital maneuvers and patients with lower baseline levels of bowel satisfaction were more likely to have treatment success, whereas other factors were not associated with success. Biofeedback therapy should be offered to all patients with DD, irrespective of baseline symptoms or anorectal physiology findings.

Pill Properties that Cause Dysphagia and Treatment Failure.

BACKGROUND: Pills (tablets and capsules) are widely used to administer prescription drugs or to take supplements such as vitamins. Unfortunately, little is known about how much effort it takes Americans to swallow these various pills. More specifically, it is not known to what extent hard-to-swallow pills might affect treatment outcomes (eg, interfering with adherence to prescribed medications or causing clinical complications). It is also unclear which properties (eg, size, shape, or surface texture) Americans prefer or reject for their pills. To learn more about these issues, we interviewed a small group of individuals. METHODS: We invited individuals in waiting rooms of our tertiary health care center to participate in structured interviews about their pill-taking habits and any problems they have swallowing pills. We inquired which pill properties they believed caused swallowing problems. Participants scored capsules and pills of representative size, shape, and texture for swallowing effort and reported their personal preferences. RESULTS: Of 100 successive individuals, 99 participants completed the interview (65% women, mean age = 41 years, range = 23-77 years). Eighty-three percent took pills daily (mean 4 pills/d; 56% of those pills were prescribed by providers). Fifty-four percent of participants replied yes to the question, "Did you ever have to swallow a solid medication that was too difficult?" Four percent recounted serious complications: 1% pill esophagitis, 1% pill impaction, and 2% stopped treatments (antibiotic and prenatal supplement) because they could not swallow the prescribed pills. Half of all participants routinely resorted to special techniques (eg, plenty of liquids or repeated or forceful swallows). Sixty-one percent of those having difficulties cited specific pill properties: 27% blamed size (20% of problems were caused by pills that were too large whereas 7% complained about pills that were too small to sense); 12% faulted rough surface texture; others cited sharp edges, odd shapes, or bad taste/smell. Extra-large pills were widely loathed, with 4 out of 5 participants preferring to take 3 or more medium-sized pills instead of a single jumbo pill. CONCLUSIONS: Our survey results suggest that 4 out of 5 adult Americans take several pills daily, and do so without undue effort. It also suggests that half of today's Americans encounter pills that are hard to swallow. Up to 4% of our participants gave up on treatments because they could not swallow the prescribed pills. Up to 7% categorically rejected taking pills that are hard to swallow. Specific material properties are widely blamed for making pills hard to swallow; extra-large capsules and tablets are universally feared, whereas medium-sized pills with a smooth coating are widely preferred. Our findings suggest that health care providers could minimize treatment failures and complications by prescribing and dispensing pills that are easy to swallow. Industry and regulatory bodies may facilitate this by making swallowability an essential criterion in the design and licensing of oral medications. Such policies could lessen the burden of pill taking for Americans and improve the adherence with prescribed treatments.

Esophageal pressure topography, body position, and hiatal hernia.

INTRODUCTION: Whether body position affects lower esophageal sphincter (LES) function and detection of hiatal hernia is unknown. Moreover, the yield of high-resolution esophageal pressure topography (HREPT) when compared with endoscopy for detection of hiatal hernia is unclear. AIM: The aims of this study were to examine (a) the effects of body position (standing vs. supine) on LES function, and (b) to determine the diagnostic yield of HREPT and endoscopy for detection of hiatal hernia. METHODS: A total of 50 subjects underwent both HREPT and endoscopy. The manometric/topographic changes of LES were examined in both supine and standing positions. Endoscopy assessed presence and length of hiatal hernia. Diagnostic agreement was compared between HREPT and endoscopy. RESULTS: The resting LES pressure was higher (P=0.0001), its mean length was longer (P=0.0003), and length of high-pressure zone was longer (P=0.0001) in the standing position compared with the supine position. HREPT detected twice as many subjects with hiatal hernia in standing (P=0.0001) compared with supine position or endoscopy with significant new diagnostic information (79%). Endoscopy detection rate (34%) was similar to supine manometry with good diagnostic agreement (77%) between HREPT and endoscopy. Hiatal hernia length was longer (P=0.0001) with HREPT in standing position compared with endoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Body position significantly affects in the LES function and its measurements. HREPT when performed on standing position offers the best yield for detection of hiatal hernia and is superior to endoscopy or supine manometry.

[Schirmer's test and strip meniscometry : Comparative consideration in the diagnostics of dry eye]. / Streifenmeniskometrie und Schirmer-Test : Vergleichende Betrachtung in der Diagnostik des trockenen Auges.

BACKGROUND: As one alternative to the Schirmer test, strip meniscometry has been presented as a methodology which also seems to be suitable for quantifying a lack of tear volume. METHODS: In a randomized prospective clinical study 391 eyes from 201 subjects were assigned to 3 groups according to the severity of eye surface deficiency (group 0: 225 healthy eyes, f/m = 1.25, mean age = 50.1 ± 17.6 years; group 1: 112 eyes with mild keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS), f/m = 1.38, mean age = 58.7 ± 13.9 years; group 2: 54 eyes with manifest KCS, f/m = 2.375, mean age = 52.6 ± 14.1 years). Objective test parameters used were strip meniscometry, Schirmer's 1 test and the Jones-test. In order to determine the condition of the ocular surface and tear film more precisely, slit-lamp examination, the detection of lid-parallel conjunctival folds (LIPCOF) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) meniscometry were also performed. Subjective discomfort was objectified by using the Ocular Surface Disease Index questionnaire (OSDI). RESULTS: The results of strip meniscometry, Schirmer's 1 test, the Jones test and OCT meniscometry were significantly lower in KCS subjects than in healthy subjects (p < 0.001), whereas the OSDI score was significantly higher (p < 0.001). The parameters strip meniscometry, Schirmer's 1 test, the Jones test and OCT meniscometry scores correlated with each other. Sensitivity and specificity of strip meniscometry ranged from 0.79 to 0.89 and from 0.42 to 0.5. CONCLUSION: Strip meniscometry is suitable to detect a lack of tear volume. Advantageous is the rapid performance of the procedure (5 s per eye) and a good agreement with established tests (e.g. Schirmer's test). To improve the specificity, strip meniscometry must be combined with other examination methods.

Long-term efficacy of biofeedback therapy for dyssynergic defecation: randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Although biofeedback therapy is effective in the short-term management of dyssynergic defecation, its long-term efficacy is unknown. Our aim was to compare the 1-year outcome of biofeedback (manometric-assisted pelvic relaxation and simulated defecation training) with standard therapy (diet, exercise, laxatives) in patients who completed 3 months of either therapy. METHODS: Stool diaries, visual analog scales (VASs), colonic transit, anorectal manometry, and balloon expulsion time were assessed at baseline, and at 1 year after each treatment. All subjects were seen at 3-month intervals and received reinforcement. Primary outcome measure (intention-to-treat analysis) was a change in the number of complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBMs) per week. Secondary outcome measures included bowel symptoms, changes in dyssynergia, and anorectal function. RESULTS: Of 44 eligible patients with dyssynergic defecation, 26 agreed to participate in the long-term study. All 13 subjects who received biofeedback, and 7 of 13 who received standard therapy, completed 1 year; 6 failed standard therapy. The number of CSBMs per week increased significantly (P<0.001) in the biofeedback group but not in the standard group. Dyssynergia pattern normalized (P<0.001), balloon expulsion time improved (P=0.0009), defecation index increased (P<0.001), and colonic transit time normalized (P=0.01) only in the biofeedback group. CONCLUSIONS: Biofeedback therapy provided sustained improvement of bowel symptoms and anorectal function in constipated subjects with dyssynergic defecation, whereas standard therapy was largely ineffective.

Randomized controlled trial of biofeedback, sham feedback, and standard therapy for dyssynergic defecation.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Constipation is a common disorder, and current treatments are generally unsatisfactory. Biofeedback might help patients with constipation and dyssynergic defecation, but its efficacy is unproven, and whether improvements are due to operant conditioning or personal attention is unknown. METHODS: In a prospective randomized trial, we investigated the efficacy of biofeedback (manometric-assisted anal relaxation, muscle coordination, and simulated defecation training; biofeedback) with either sham feedback therapy (sham) or standard therapy (diet, exercise, laxatives; standard) in 77 subjects (69 women) with chronic constipation and dyssynergic defecation. At baseline and after treatment (3 months), physiologic changes were assessed by anorectal manometry, balloon expulsion, and colonic transit study and symptomatic changes and stool characteristics by visual analog scale and prospective stool diary. Primary outcome measures (intention-to-treat analysis) included presence of dyssynergia, balloon expulsion time, number of complete spontaneous bowel movements, and global bowel satisfaction. RESULTS: Subjects in the biofeedback group were more likely to correct dyssynergia (P < .0001), improve defecation index (P < .0001), and decrease balloon expulsion time (P = .02) than other groups. Colonic transit improved after biofeedback or standard (P = .01) but not after sham. In the biofeedback group, the number of complete spontaneous bowel movements increased (P < .02) and was higher (P < .05) than in other groups, and use of digital maneuvers decreased (P = .03). Global bowel satisfaction was higher (P = .04) in the biofeedback than sham group. CONCLUSIONS: Biofeedback improves constipation and physiologic characteristics of bowel function in patients with dyssynergia. This effect is mediated by modifying physiologic behavior and colorectal function. Biofeedback is the preferred treatment for constipated patients with dyssynergia.

Psychological profiles and quality of life differ between patients with dyssynergia and those with slow transit constipation.

BACKGROUND: Pathophysiological characteristics differ between slow transit constipation (STC) and dyssynergic defecation, but whether psychological profiles and quality of life (QOL) are altered and whether they differ among these constipation subtypes are unknown. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated psychological profiles and QOL in 76 patients with dyssynergia, 38 patients with STC, and 44 control subjects using the Revised 90-item Symptom Checklist and 36-item Short-Form Health Survey. In addition, we examined the correlations of psychological and QOL domains with constipation symptoms and pathophysiological subtypes. RESULTS: Symptom scores for hostility and paranoid ideation were higher (P<.001) in patients with dyssynergic defecation than in patients with STC and control subjects. Scores for other psychological domains were higher (P<.0001) in patients with dyssynergic defecation and those with STC than in control subjects. Most QOL subscores were impaired (P<.05) in patients with dyssynergic defecation and some were impaired in patients with STC as compared with control subjects, but the two patient groups did not differ on these. The QOL subscores were strongly correlated (r(c) approximately .9) with the psychological subscores in patients with dyssynergic defecation and those with STC, although more QOL subscores among patients with dyssynergic defecation and more psychological subscores among patients with STC primarily contributed to the canonical correlations. A set of six commonly reported constipation symptoms showed significant correlations with QOL and psychological subscores, more so among patients with STC than among patients with dyssynergic defecation. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with dyssynergic defecation had greater psychological distress and impaired health-related QOL as compared with patients with STC and control subjects. Both patient groups were also more affected as compared with the control group. There was a strong correlation between psychological dysfunction and impaired QOL, and both also correlated with constipation symptoms.

Investigation of fundo-antral reflex in human beings.

AIM: To examine the sensory and motor response(s) of the stomach following fundic distention and to assess whether cholinergic mechanisms influence these responses. METHODS: Fundic tone, gastric sensory responses and antral motility were evaluated in eight healthy volunteers after a probe with two sensors was placed in the antrum and a highly compliant balloon in the fundus. Isobaric balloon distentions were performed with a barostat. Study was repeated in six volunteers after intravenous atropine was given. RESULTS: Fundic distention induced large amplitude antral contractions in all subjects. The area under the curve was higher (P<0.05) during fundic distention. First sensation was reported at 12+/-4 mmHg, moderate sensation at 18+/-4 mmHg and discomfort at 21+/-4 mmHg. Discomfort was associated with a decrease in antral motility. After atropine was given, the area under the curve of pressure waves and fundic tone decreased (P<0.05). Sensory thresholds were not affected. CONCLUSIONS: Fundic balloon distention induces an antral motor response, the fundo-antral reflex, which in part may be mediated by cholinergic mechanisms.

Gastroduodenal motility.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The neuromuscular function of the stomach and duodenum provides the mechanical forces that drive digestion and are responsible for sensations of satiety and of dyspepsia. This article reviews (1) the neuroendocrine factors controlling upper gastrointestinal motility, (2) noninvasive techniques to evaluate gastroduodenal motility, and (3) the pathophysiology and treatment of gastroparesis. RECENT FINDINGS: Nutrients in the duodenum inhibit gastric emptying via a feedback pathway that involves release of cholecystokinin and serotonin (5-HT) from neuroendocrine cells; both act peripherally, cholecystokinin via cholecystokinin A receptors and serotonin via 5-HT3 receptors. The dorsal vagal complex plays a central role in the gastric inhibition mediated by tumor necrosis factor-alpha. The construction of maps that define intestinal movements in time and space has now been extended to the stomach. MRI compares favorably with the barostat in assessing gastric volume accommodation to meals and drugs and has the advantage of being noninvasive and showing contractions. Gastroparesis is increasingly recognized as a complication of end-stage liver disease; ascites plays no role in this, but portal hypertension stiffens the gastric walls and creates hypoxic conditions that may interfere with the neuromuscular functions of the stomach. Promising for the treatment of gastroparesis are clonidine, sildenafil, and intrapyloric botulinum toxin. Electrical stimulation triggers a vagally mediated relaxation of the stomach. SUMMARY: Drugs may be designed that specifically act on 5-HT3, cholecystokinin, or TNF-alpha receptors. Spatiotemporal maps should boost the diagnostic yield from dynamic imaging of motility using ultrasound, computed axial tomography scan, or MRI and the understanding of the mechanical forces driving digestion. Symptomatic benefit in gastroparesis may derive more from improved accommodation than gastric emptying.

Flow fields generated by peristaltic reflex in isolated guinea pig ileum: impact of contraction depth and shoulders.

The guinea pig ileum responds to distension with characteristic wall movements, luminal pressure gradients, and outflow (the peristaltic reflex). To date, little is known about whether the peristaltic reflex generates flow events other than laminar flow. Here we used a numerical method to solve for the flow generated by moving walls to assess occlusive contractions (case 1), nonocclusive contractions (case 2), and contractions with steep shoulders (case 3) for which visual parameters of wall movements are published. We found that all three contraction cases produced pressure differentials across the coapting segment, downstream and reverse flow, and vortical flow patterns that redistributed particles and mixed liquids. Contractions generated pressures and shear stresses, particularly along the moving section of the wall. The nonocclusive contraction was much less effective than the occlusive contraction with the steep shoulders; the occlusive contraction with flat shoulders had an intermediate effect. Our analysis shows that even peristaltic contractions produce not only laminar flow but also many flow events likely to promote digestion and absorption. The visual patterns of contractions impact the patterns of luminal flow, and precise definition of wall movements is critical to quantify the fluid mechanical consequences of intestinal contractions.

Fundic balloon distension stimulates antral and duodenal motility in man.

Distension of the intestine triggers the peristaltic reflex, which consists of orad contraction and aborad relaxation. Whether a similar response occurs in the human stomach is unclear. Our aim was to investigate the antral and duodenal motor response(s) to mechanical distension of the proximal stomach. In six healthy volunteers, a large compliant balloon was placed in the proximal stomach. Alongside this a water-perfused manometry probe with six sensors was placed to measure the antral and duodenal motility. Pressure activity was assessed before and during balloon distension. In five of six subjects, balloon distension triggered a salvo of antral pressure waves within 3-5 min, some of which propagated into the duodenum. The amplitude of waves was higher (P < 0.05) at the antrum than at the duodenum. The area under the curve of pressure waves was higher (P < 0.05) at the antrum than at the duodenum. In conclusion, distension of the proximal stomach, at or below the threshold for perception, evokes phasic motor activity in the antrum and duodenum. Thus, the gastric response to distension differs from that observed during the intestinal peristaltic reflex.

Ulcerative ileitis encountered at ileo-colonoscopy: likely role of nonsteroidal agents.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Ileoscopy is increasingly practiced, but it is unclear what diagnostic and management decisions should ensue if ulcerations are encountered. METHODS: The lead author identified 40 patients with ulcerative ileitis during 1900 consecutive ileoscopies in a community practice. We analyzed the clinical, endoscopic, and histopathologic findings in these patients and related them to drug usage. RESULTS: Although most patients were asymptomatic, ileitis likely contributed to blood loss in 14 and to right lower quadrant pain in one. Endoscopy revealed multiple, discrete, fibrin-covered ulcerations in the prevalvular segment with patches of erythematous stippling, normal intervening mucosa, and occasional mucosal scars or webs. Histologic findings included focal superficial neutrophilic infiltrates, edema, mucosal hemorrhage, lymphatic dilatation, fibromuscular hyperplasia, prominence of the muscularis mucosae, and antral and Paneth cell metaplasia. Granulomas, fissure ulcers, and apoptosis were notably absent. No specific disease process developed in a median follow-up of 3.2 years. Thirty-three patients admitted recently taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), notably: enteric-coated aspirin at 325 mg/day or less (19), selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors (5), and nonacetylated salicylates (3). Three fourths of nonsteroidal users were taking agents with low or intermediate gastroduodenal toxicity. Lesions disappeared after drug withdrawal, and reappeared on resumption. CONCLUSIONS: Ileoscopy during colonoscopy may identify an ulcerative ileitis. This lesion likely contributes to gastrointestinal blood loss and other clinical manifestations, and likely is caused by NSAID use, including those usually associated with low toxicity or at low doses. Features of NSAID-ileitis overlap with Crohn's ileitis, but differentiation of the 2 entities is critical for appropriate management.