Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ophthalmol Glaucoma ; 7(3): 260-270, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38266962

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To compare glaucoma tube outcomes of wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) eyes receiving anti-VEGF injections versus dry AMD eyes and no anti-VEGF. DESIGN: Retrospective clinical cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with wet AMD and a history of anti-VEGF within a year prior or after stand-alone glaucoma tube surgery and eyes with dry AMD and no history of anti-VEGF with at least 6 months of follow-up. Eyes with neovascular glaucoma or anti-VEGF for reason other than wet AMD were excluded. METHODS: A Kaplan-Meier analysis compared survival for wet versus dry AMD eyes. Failure was defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) > 21 mmHg or < 20% IOP reduction from baseline or IOP ≤ 5 mmHg for 2 consecutive postoperative visits starting at month 3, additional glaucoma surgery, or no light perception. Complete success was defined as no failure or medications at final follow-up. Hypertensive phase was defined for valved tubes as IOP > 21 mmHg within 3 months of surgery after a reduction to < 22 mmHg during the first postoperative week. Intraocular pressure, percent reduction in IOP, number of glaucoma medications, and early (< 1 year) and late (> 1 year) complications were compared through 5 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survival analysis, IOP, number of medications. RESULTS: Baseline IOP, number of medications, or tube type were not significantly different between wet (n = 24) and dry AMD eyes (n = 54). No wet AMD eyes failed versus 10 (18%) dry AMD eyes (P = 0.03). Five-year survival was estimated as 100% for wet AMD and 72% for dry AMD (P = 0.04). Wet AMD eyes had lower IOP (10.6 vs. 12.7 mmHg, P = 0.05), greater IOP reduction (60% vs. 49%, P = 0.04), fewer medications (1.2 vs. 2.1, P = 0.02), and more complete success (50% vs. 15%, P = 0.001) at final follow-up (32 vs. 36 months, P = 0.42). Fewer wet than dry AMD eyes experienced hypertensive phase (0/10 [0%] vs. 4/10 [40%], P = 0.04). There were no significant differences in early or late complications. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to anti-VEGF may influence postoperative wound healing and capsule formation which may improve glaucoma tube surgical outcomes. Prospective data is needed to consider perioperative administration of anti-VEGF for glaucoma tube surgery. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.


Assuntos
Inibidores da Angiogênese , Implantes para Drenagem de Glaucoma , Pressão Intraocular , Injeções Intravítreas , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular , Degeneração Macular Exsudativa , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pressão Intraocular/fisiologia , Feminino , Masculino , Inibidores da Angiogênese/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/antagonistas & inibidores , Degeneração Macular Exsudativa/tratamento farmacológico , Degeneração Macular Exsudativa/diagnóstico , Degeneração Macular Exsudativa/fisiopatologia , Seguimentos , Acuidade Visual , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Resultado do Tratamento , Bevacizumab/administração & dosagem , Bevacizumab/uso terapêutico , Ranibizumab/administração & dosagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa