Effect of Delayed Parathyroidectomy on Risk of Future Cardiovascular and Nephrolithiasis Interventions in Adults with Primary Hyperparathyroidism [Original Study].

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the timing of parathyroid surgery impacts the risk of renal stone retreatment and cardiovascular interventions. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Long-term, untreated primary hyperparathyroidism is associated with significant morbidity including nephrolithiasis and cardiovascular disease. METHODS: We conducted a Population-based Cohort study of New York and California state-wide data from 2000-2020. Adult patients who underwent renal stone treatment and subsequently diagnosed with primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) and underwent parathyroidectomy (PTX) were included. Patients were excluded if PTX was prior to index stone procedure, they underwent second stone treatment within 6 months, with stage V CKD, with secondary or tertiary hyperparathyroidism, with prior kidney transplant or hemodialysis, or with prior cancer diagnosis. Rate of renal stone retreatment and cardiovascular interventions after PTX in pHPT patients with nephrolithiasis who underwent parathyroid surgery at ≤ 2 years and >2 years after index stone procedure was measured. RESULTS: We identified 2,093 patients who underwent first-time stone treatment and subsequent PTX. The median time to PTX was 560 days (IQR 187-1477) and follow-up was 7.4 years (IQR 4.5-13.1). Delaying PTX for more than 2 years increased the risk of renal stone retreatment by 59% (HR 1.59; P<0.001), increased the risk of experiencing coronary disease or associated interventions by 118% (HR=2.18; P=0.01), and increased the risk of experiencing an overall cardiovascular event by 52% (HR 1.52; P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In symptomatic pHPT, delaying PTX significantly increases the risk of requiring future stone retreatment and cardiac/vascular surgical interventions. This highlights the importance of early surgical referral and multidisciplinary approaches to optimize outcomes and resource utilization in pHPT.

Short-Term Out-of-Pocket and Total Costs of Care After Ablation, Resection, or Transplant for Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A National SEER-Medicare Cost Comparison.

Background: Differences in survival and morbidity among treatment options (ablation, surgical resection, and transplant) for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have been well-studied. Additional understanding of the costs of such care would help to identify drivers of high costs and potential barriers to care delivery. Objective: To quantify total and patient out-of-pocket costs for ablation, surgical resection, and transplant in the management of early-stage HCC and to identify factors predictive of these costs. Methods: This retrospective U.S. population-based study used the SEER-Medicare linked dataset to identify a sample of 1067 Medicare beneficiaries (mean age, 73 years; 674 men, 393 women) diagnosed with early-stage HCC (size ≤5 cm) treated with ablation (N=623), resection (N=201), or transplant (N=243) between January 2009 and December 2016. Total costs and patient out-of-pocket costs for the index procedure as well as for any care within 30 days and 90 days post-procedure were identified and stratified by treatment modality. Additional comparisons were performed among propensity-score matched subgroups of patients treated by ablation or resection (each N=172). Multivariable linear regression models were used to identify factors predictive of total costs and out-of-pocket costs for index procedures as well as for 30-day and 90-day post-procedure periods. Results: For ablation, resection, and transplant, median index-procedure total cost was $6689, $25,614, and $66,034; index-procedure out-of-pocket cost was $1235, $1650, and $1317; 30-day total cost was $9456, $29,754, and $69,856; 30-day out-of-pocket cost was $1646, $2208, and $3198; 90-day total cost was $14,572, $34,984, and $88,103; and 90-day out-of-pocket cost was $2138, $2462, and $3876, respectively (all p<.001). In propensity-matched subgroups, ablation and resection had median index-procedure, 30-day, and 90-day total costs of $6690 and $25,716, $9995 and $30,365, and $15,851 and $34,455, respectively. In multivariable analysis adjusting for socioeconomic factors, comorbidities, and liver-disease prognostic indicators, surgical treatment (resection or transplant) was predictive of significantly greater costs compared with ablation at all time points. Conclusion: Total and out-of-pocket costs for index procedures as well as for 30-day and 90-day post-procedure periods were lowest for ablation, followed by resection and then transplant. Clinical Impact: This comprehensive cost analysis could help inform future cost-effectiveness analyses.

Contemporary Assessment of Adhesiolysis and Resection for Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction in the State of New York.

BACKGROUND: Adhesive small bowel obstruction (aSBO) is a common surgical problem, with some advocating for a more aggressive operative approach to avoid recurrence. Contemporary outcomes in a real-world setting were examined. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was performed using the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative database to identify adults admitted with aSBO, 2016-2020. Patients were stratified by the presence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and cancer history. Diagnoses usually requiring resection were excluded. Patients were categorized into four groups: non-operative, adhesiolysis, resection, and 'other' procedures. In-hospital mortality, major complications, and odds of undergoing resection were compared. RESULTS: 58,976 patients were included. 50,000 (84.8%) underwent non-operative management. Adhesiolysis was the most common procedure performed (n = 4,990, 8.46%), followed by resection (n = 3,078, 5.22%). In-hospital mortality in the lysis and resection groups was 2.2% and 5.9% respectively. Non-IBD patients undergoing operation on the day of admission required intestinal resection 29.9% of the time. Adjusted odds of resection were highest for those with a prior aSBO episode (OR 1.29 95%CI 1.11-1.49), delay to operation ≥3 days (OR1.78 95%CI 1.58-1.99), and non-New York City (NYC) residents being treated at NYC hospitals (OR1.57 95%CI 1.19-2.07). CONCLUSION: Adhesiolysis is currently the most common surgery for aSBO, however nearly one-third of patients will undergo a more extensive procedure, with an increased risk of mortality. Innovative therapies are needed to reduce the risk of resection.

Creating the Future of (Endoluminal) GI Interventions.

Major innovation into how we pursue diagnosis and therapies for gastrointestinal (GI) diseases is urgently needed to seek better, less invasive, and less costly innovations in diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the GI tract. Learning from prior paradigm shifts in cardiac and vascular we present here several initial steps we have undertaken to follow the endoluminal path, using advanced imaging methods, including endoscopy, and data management with avoidance of entry into a body cavity when possible. We will review the benefit and ease of incorporating routine fluoroscopy with endoscopy to improve safety and efficiency. We describe the development of "hybrid" procedure rooms for GI interventions and rationale for their use. We also emphasize the importance of collaborating with interventional radiologists, software engineers, and data specialists. We predict major improvement in outcomes in both diagnosis and treatment will follow.

Mixed reality in interventional radiology: a focus on first clinical use of XR90 augmented reality-based visualization and navigation platform.

INTRODUCTION: Augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) are emerging tools in interventional radiology (IR), enhancing IR education, preprocedural planning, and intraprocedural guidance. AREAS COVERED: This review identifies current applications of AR/VR in IR, with a focus on studies that assess the clinical impact of AR/VR. We outline the relevant technology and assess current limitations and future directions in this space. We found that the use of AR in IR lags other surgical fields, and the majority of the data exists in case series or small-scale studies. Educational use of AR/VR improves learning anatomy, procedure steps, and procedural learning curves. Preprocedural use of AR/VR decreases procedure times, especially in complex procedures. Intraprocedural AR for live tracking is accurate within 5 mm live patients and has up to 0.75 mm in phantoms, offering decreased procedure time and radiation exposure. Challenges include cost, ergonomics, rapid segmentation, and organ motion. EXPERT OPINION: The use of AR/VR in interventional radiology may lead to safer and more efficient procedures. However, more data from larger studies is needed to better understand where AR/VR is confers the most benefit in interventional radiology clinical practice.

Developing a Coordinated Registry Network for devices used for acute ischemic stroke intervention: basilar artery occlusion quality assessment pilot.

BACKGROUND: Real-world data can be helpful in evaluating endovascular therapy (EVT) in ischemic stroke care. We conducted a pilot study to aggregate data on basilar artery occlusion (BAO) EVT from existing registries in the USA. We evaluated the availability, completeness, quality, and consistency of common data elements (CDEs) across data sources. METHODS: We harmonized patient-level data from five registry data sources and assessed the availability, completeness (defined by the presence in at least four data sources), and consistency of CDEs. We assessed data quality based on seven pre-defined critical domains for BAO EVT investigation: baseline patient and disease characteristics; time metrics; description of intervention; adjunctive devices, revascularization scores, complications; post-intervention National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores; discharge disposition; 30-day and 90-day mortality and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores. RESULTS: The aggregated dataset of five registries included 493 BAO procedures between January 2013 and January 2020. In total, 88 CDEs were screened and 35 (40%) elements were considered prevalent. Of these 35 CDEs, the majority were collected for >80% of cases when aggregated. All seven pre-defined domains for BAO device investigation could be fulfilled with harmonized data elements. Most data elements were collected with consistent or compatible definitions across registries. The main challenge was the collection of 90-day outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot shows the feasibility of aggregating and harmonizing critical CDEs across registries to create a Coordinated Registry Network (CRN). The CRN with partnerships between multiple registries and stakeholders could help improve the breadth and/or depth of real-world data to help answer relevant questions and support clinical and regulatory decisions.

Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Total Knee Arthroplasty With or Without Antibiotic Bone Cement.

Importance: Despite increased use of antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) in joint arthroplasty over recent decades, current evidence for prophylactic use of ALBC to reduce risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is insufficient. Objective: To compare the rate of revision attributed to PJI following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using ALBC vs plain bone cement. Design, Setting, and Participants: This international cohort study used data from 14 national or regional joint arthroplasty registries in Australia, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Italy, New Zealand, Norway, Romania, Sweden, Switzerland, the Netherlands, the UK, and the US. The study included primary TKAs for osteoarthritis registered from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2020, and followed-up until December 31, 2021. Data analysis was performed from April to September 2023. Exposure: Primary TKA with ALBC vs plain bone cement. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was risk of 1-year revision for PJI. Using a distributed data network analysis method, data were harmonized, and a cumulative revision rate was calculated (1 - Kaplan-Meier), and Cox regression analyses were performed within the 10 registries using both cement types. A meta-analysis was then performed to combine all aggregated data and evaluate the risk of 1-year revision for PJI and all causes. Results: Among 2 168 924 TKAs included, 93% were performed with ALBC. Most TKAs were performed in female patients (59.5%) and patients aged 65 to 74 years (39.9%), fully cemented (92.2%), and in the 2015 to 2020 period (62.5%). All participating registries reported a cumulative 1-year revision rate for PJI of less than 1% following primary TKA with ALBC (range, 0.21%-0.80%) and with plain bone cement (range, 0.23%-0.70%). The meta-analyses based on adjusted Cox regression for 1 917 190 TKAs showed no statistically significant difference at 1 year in risk of revision for PJI (hazard rate ratio, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.89-1.52) or for all causes (hazard rate ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.89-1.40) among TKAs performed with ALBC vs plain bone cement. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, the risk of revision for PJI was similar between ALBC and plain bone cement following primary TKA. Any additional costs of ALBC and its relative value in reducing revision risk should be considered in the context of the overall health care delivery system.