Evidence-Based Guidelines for Prehospital Pain Management: Literature and Methods.

INTRODUCTION: Emergency Medical Services (EMS) clinicians commonly encounter patients with acute pain. A new set of evidence-based guidelines (EBG) was developed to assist in the prehospital management of pain. Our objective was to describe the methods used to develop these evidence-based guidelines for prehospital pain management. METHODS: The EBG development process was supported by a previous systematic review conducted by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) covering nine different population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) questions. A technical expert panel (TEP) was formed and added an additional pediatric-specific PICO question. Identified evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework and tabulated into Summary of Findings tables. The TEP then utilized a rigorous systematic method, including the PanelVoice function, for recommendation development which was applied to generate Evidence to Decision Tables (EtD). This process involved review of the Summary of Findings tables, asynchronous member judging, and facilitated panel discussion to generate final consensus-based recommendations. RESULTS: The work product described above was completed by the TEP panel from September 2020 to April 2021. For these recommendations, the overall certainty of evidence was very low or low, data for decisions on cost effectiveness and equity were lacking, and feasibility was rated well across all categories. Based on the evidence, one strong and seven conditional recommendations were made, with two PICO questions lacking sufficient evidence to generate a recommendation. CONCLUSION: We describe a protocol that leveraged established EBG development techniques, the GRADE framework in conjunction with a previous AHRQ systematic review to develop treatment recommendations for prehospital pain management. This process allowed for mitigation of many confounders due to the use of virtual and electronic communication. Our approach may inform future guideline development and increase transparency in the prehospital recommendations development processes.

Evidence-Based Guidelines for Prehospital Pain Management: Recommendations.

This project sought to develop evidence-based guidelines for the administration of analgesics for moderate to severe pain by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) clinicians based on a separate, previously published, systematic review of the comparative effectiveness of analgesics in the prehospital setting prepared by the University of Connecticut Evidence-Based Practice Center for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). A technical expert panel (TEP) was assembled consisting of subject matter experts in prehospital and emergency care, and the development of evidence-based guidelines and patient care guidelines. A series of nine "patient/population-intervention-comparison-outcome" (PICO) questions were developed based on the Key Questions identified in the AHRQ systematic review, and an additional PICO question was developed to specifically address analgesia in pediatric patients. The panel made a strong recommendation for the use of intranasal fentanyl over intravenous (IV) opioids for pediatric patients without intravenous access given the supporting evidence, its effectiveness, ease of administration, and acceptance by patients and providers. The panel made a conditional recommendation for the use of IV non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) over IV acetaminophen (APAP). The panel made conditional recommendations for the use of either IV ketamine or IV opioids; for either IV NSAIDs or IV opioids; for either IV fentanyl or IV morphine; and for either IV ketamine or IV NSAIDs. A conditional recommendation was made for IV APAP over IV opioids. The panel made a conditional recommendation against the use of weight-based IV ketamine in combination with weight-based IV opioids versus weight-based IV opioids alone. The panel considered the use of oral analgesics and a conditional recommendation was made for either oral APAP or oral NSAIDs when the oral route of administration was preferred. Given the lack of a supporting evidence base, the panel was unable to make recommendations for the use of nitrous oxide versus IV opioids, or for IV ketamine in combination with IV opioids versus IV ketamine alone. Taken together, the recommendations emphasize that EMS medical directors and EMS clinicians have a variety of effective options for the management of moderate to severe pain in addition to opioids when designing patient care guidelines and caring for patients suffering from acute pain.

Impact of Race and Ethnicity on Emergency Medical Services Administration of Opioid Pain Medications for Injured Children.

BACKGROUND: Treatment with analgesics for injured children is often not provided or delayed during prehospital transport. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate racial and ethnic disparities with the use of opioids during transport of injured children. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of injured children transported to 1 of 10 emergency departments from July 2019 to April 2020. Emergency medical services (EMS) providers were surveyed about prehospital pain interventions during transport. Our primary outcome was the use of opioids. We performed multivariate regression analyses to evaluate the association of patient demographic characteristics (race, ethnicity, age, and gender), presence of a fracture, EMS provider type (Advanced Life Support [ALS] or non-ALS) and experience (years), and study site with the use of opioids. RESULTS: We enrolled 465 patients; 19% received opioids during transport. The adjusted odds ratios (AORs) for Black race and Hispanic ethnicity were 0.5 (95% CI 0.2-1.2) and 0.4 (95% CI 0.2-1.3), respectively. The presence of a fracture (AOR 17.0), ALS provider (AOR 5.6), older patient age (AOR 1.1 for each year), EMS provider experience (AOR 1.1 for each year), and site were associated with receiving opioids. CONCLUSIONS: There were no statistically significant associations between race or ethnicity and use of opioids for injured children. The presence of a fracture, ALS provider, older patient age, EMS provider experience, and site were associated with receiving opioids.

Design of a novel clinical trial of prehospital pediatric airway management.

Emergency Medical Services personnel are often the first to intervene in the care of critically ill children. Airway management is a fundamental step in prehospital resuscitation, yet there is significant variation in current prehospital airway management practices. Our objective is to present a methodologic approach to determine the optimal strategy for prehospital pediatric airway management. We describe the conceptual premise for the Pediatric Prehospital Airway Resuscitation Trial, a novel Bayesian adaptive sequential platform trial. We developed an innovative design to enable comparison of the three predominant prehospital pediatric airway techniques (bag-mask-ventilation, supraglottic airway insertion, and endotracheal intubation) in three distinct disease groups (cardiac arrest, major trauma, and other respiratory failure). We used a Bayesian statistical approach to provide flexible modeling that can adapt based on prespecified rules according to accumulating trial data with patient enrollment continuing until stopping rules are met. The approach also allows the comparison of multiple interventions in sequence across the different disease states. This Bayesian hierarchical model will be the primary analysis method for the Pediatric Prehospital Airway Resuscitation Trial. The model integrates information across subgroups, a technique known as "borrowing" to generate accurate global and subgroup-specific estimates of treatment effects and enables comparisons of airway intervention arms within the overarching trial. We will use this Bayesian hierarchical linear model that adjusts for subgroup to estimate treatment effects within each subgroup. The model will predict a patient-centered score of 30-day intensive care unit-free survival using arm, subgroup, and emergency medical services agency as predictors. The novel approach of Pediatric Prehospital Airway Resuscitation Trial will provide a feasible method to determine the optimal strategy for prehospital pediatric airway management and may transform the design of future prehospital resuscitation trials.

Critical Factors in Planning a Pediatric Prehospital Airway Trial.

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess factors influencing the design of a pediatric prehospital airway management trial, including minimum clinically significant differences for three clinical subgroups. Methods: We conducted a virtual consensus-conference among U.S. emergency medical services (EMS) agency medical directors and researchers in the Fall of 2020. This included (1) a preconference survey, (2) an interactive live videoconference, and (3) a postconference survey. Participants were identified through co-investigator relationships and by surveying "The Eagles," a consortium of medical directors from large urban EMS systems and, subsequently, through follow up email contact based on survey responses. Results: Twenty-seven of the 34 (80%) EMS agencies we invited responded to the prewebinar survey. Of the 27 agencies, 27 (100%) use BMV, 19 (70%) use endotracheal intubation (ETI), 21 (78%) use supraglottic airways (SGA). SGA use included 14 (52%) who use the iGel, 8 (30%) who use the King laryngeal tube (LT), and 2 (7%) who use a laryngeal mask airway (LMA). Three agencies use more than one of the available SGAs. Twenty (74%) of the EMS agencies indicated they had access to an SGA suitable for pediatric patients, and 9 (33%) agencies have access to pediatric video laryngoscopy. The majority of agencies indicated that the minimum clinically significant difference for survival to change practice was 1% for cardiac arrest patients with a baseline survival assumption of 7%, 4% for respiratory failure with a baseline survival assumption of 73%, and 3% for trauma with a baseline survival assumption of 42%. Overall, these agencies responded that BVM vs. SGA is the most important comparison that would change their practice. Conclusions: This virtual consensus conference provided a new perspective on current airway management practice and identified specific factors likely to drive change in pediatric prehospital airway management. This information will be leveraged in future trial design to ensure impactful clinical trials.

A Novel Use of NEMSIS to Create a PECARN-Specific EMS Patient Registry.

Background: Research networks need access to EMS data to conduct pilot studies and determine feasibility of prospective studies. Combining data across EMS agencies is complicated and costly. Leveraging the National EMS Information System (NEMSIS) to extract select agencies' data may be an efficient and cost-effective method of providing network-level data. Objective: Describe the process of creating a Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) specific NEMSIS data set and determine if these data were nationally representative. Methods: We established data use agreements (DUAs) with EMS agencies participating in PECARN to allow for agency identification through NEMSIS. Using 2019 NEMSIS version 3.4.0 data for EMS events with patients 18 years old and younger, we compared PECARN NEMSIS data to national NEMSIS data. Analyzed variables were selected for their ability to characterize events. No statistical analyses were utilized due to the large sample, instead, differences of ±5% were deemed clinically meaningful. Results: DUAs were established for 19 EMS agencies, creating a PECARN data set with 305,188 EMS activations of which 17,478 (5.7%) were pediatric. Of the pediatric activations, 17,140 (98.1%) were initiated through 9-1-1 and 9,487 (55.4%) resulted in transport by the documenting agency. The national data included 36,288,405 EMS activations of which 2,152,849 (5.9%) were pediatric. Of the pediatric activations 1,704,141 (79.2%) were initiated through 9-1-1 and 1,055,504 (61.9%) were transported by the documenting agency. Age and gender distributions were similar between the two groups, but the PECARN-specific data under-represents Black and Latinx patients. Comparison of EMS provider primary impressions revealed that three of the five most common were similar with injury being the most prevalent for both data sets along with mental/behavioral health and seizure. Conclusion: We demonstrated that NEMSIS can be leveraged to create network specific data sets. PECARN's EMS data were similar to the national data, though racial/ethnic minorities and some primary impressions may be under-represented. Additionally, more EMS activations in PECARN study areas originated through 9-1-1 but fewer were transported by the documenting agency. This is likely related to the type of participating agencies, their ALS response level, and the diversity of the communities they serve.

Multicenter Evaluation of Prehospital Seizure Management in Children.

BACKGROUND: Seizures are a common reason why emergency medical services (EMS) transports children by ambulance. Timely seizure cessation prevents neurologic morbidity, respiratory compromise, and mortality. Implementing recommendations from an evidence-based pediatric prehospital guideline may enhance timeliness of seizure cessation and optimize medication dosing. OBJECTIVE: We compared management of pediatric prehospital seizures across several EMS systems after protocol revision consistent with an evidence-based guideline. METHODS: Using a retrospective, cross-sectional approach, we evaluated actively seizing patients (0-17 years old) EMS transported to a hospital before and after modifying local protocols to include evidence-based recommendations for seizure management in three EMS agencies. We electronically queried and manually abstracted both EMS and hospital data at each site to obtain information about patient demographics, medications given, seizure cessation and recurrence, airway interventions, access obtained, and timeliness of care. The primary outcome of the study was the appropriate administration of midazolam based on route and dose. We analyzed these secondary outcomes: frequency of seizure activity upon emergency department (ED) arrival, frequency of respiratory failure, and timeliness of care. RESULTS: We analyzed data for 533 actively seizing patients. Paramedics were more likely to administer at least one dose of midazolam after the protocol updates [127/208 (61%) vs. 232/325 (71%), p = 0.01, OR = 1.60 (95% CI: 1.10-2.30)]. Paramedics were also more likely to administer the first midazolam dose via the preferred intranasal (IN) or intramuscular (IM) routes after the protocol change [(63/208 (49%) vs. 179/325 (77%), p < 0.001, OR = 3.24 (2.01-5.21)]. Overall, paramedics administered midazolam approximately 14 min after their arrival, gave an incorrect weight-based dose to 130/359 (36%) patients, and gave a lower than recommended dose to 94/130 (72%) patients. Upon ED arrival, 152/533 (29%) patients had a recurrent or persistent seizure. Respiratory failure during EMS care or subsequently in the ED occurred in 90/533 (17%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an evidence-based seizure protocol for EMS increased midazolam administration. Patients frequently received an incorrect weight-based dose. Future research should focus on optimizing administration of the correct dose of midazolam to improve seizure cessation.

Factors associated with destination of pediatric EMS transports.

OBJECTIVE: Pediatric patients comprise 13% of emergency medical services (EMS) transports, and most are transported to general emergency departments (ED). EMS transport destination policies may guide when to transport patients to a children's hospital, especially for medical complaints. Factors that influence EMS providers 'decisions about where to transport children are unknown. Our objective was to evaluate the factors associated with pediatric EMS transports to children's hospitals for medical complaints. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of a large, urban EMS system over a 12-month period for all transports of patients 0-17 years old. We electronically queried the EMS database for demographic data, medical presentation and management, comorbidities, and documented reasons for choosing destination. Distances to the destination hospital and nearest children's and community hospital (if not the transport destination) were calculated. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine the association between independent variables and the transport destination. RESULTS: We identified 10,065 patients, of which 6982 (69%) were for medical complaints. Of these medical complaints, 3518 (50.4%) were transported to a children's hospital ED. Factors associated with transport to a children's hospital include ALS transport, greater transport distance, protocol determination, developmental delay, or altered consciousness. Factors associated with transport to general EDs were older age, unknown insurance status, lower income, greater distance to children's or community hospital, destination determined by closest facility or diversion, abnormal respiratory rate or blood glucose, psychiatric primary impression, or communication barriers present. CONCLUSIONS: We found that younger patient age, EMS protocol requirements, and paramedic scene response may influence pediatric patient transport to both children's and community hospitals. Socioeconomic factors, ED proximity, diversion status, respiratory rate, chief complaints, and communication barriers may also be contributing factors. Further studies are needed to determine the generalizability of these findings to other EMS systems.

Validity of the Pediatric Early Warning Score and the Bedside Pediatric Early Warning Score in Classifying Patients Who Require the Resources of a Higher Level Pediatric Hospital.

Introduction: The pediatric early warning score (PEWS) and the bedside pediatric early warning score (BPEWS) are validated tools that help determine the need for critical care in children with acute medical conditions. These tools could be used by EMS and have not been evaluated outside of the hospital. This study retrospectively tested the validity of these tools in the prehospital setting to identify children who needed a hospital with higher level pediatric resources. Methods: This was a multi-center retrospective validation of screening tools using prehospital and in-hospital data obtained from 3 EMS agencies. EMS patient records from April 1, 2013 to April 30, 2015 were used to identify subjects for this analysis. Pediatric patients were retrospectively classified using the PEWS based on the clinical information documented in the EMS medical record. Those with PEWS scores greater than 4 were matched to a subject with scores less than 4 based on age, gender, and paramedic primary impression. Hospital medical record review was then used to determine whether the patient required a hospital with higher level pediatric resources. These classifications were used to calculate sensitivity, specificity, and resultant 95% confidence intervals. The analysis was repeated for included subjects who had sufficient data to calculate BPEWS. Results: There were 386 patients enrolled. A PEWS ≥ 4 demonstrated a sensitivity of 62.8 (95% CI 53.6-71.4) and a specificity of 55.9 (95% CI 49.6-61.9) in identifying a patient who required a hospital with higher level pediatric resources. There were 44 pairs of patients that had sufficient EMS data documented to calculate a BPEWS. A BPEWS ≥ 7 demonstrated a sensitivity of 46.4 (95% CI 27.5-66.1) and a specificity of 76.7 (95% CI 64.0-86.6) to correctly classify a patient who required a hospital with higher level pediatric resources. Conclusion: In the prehospital setting neither PEWS nor BPEWS exhibited sufficient sensitivity for clinical use to accurately identify children who need a hospital with higher level pediatric resources. Further research should be conducted to identify variables that are captured by prehospital care providers and are associated with children who need a hospital with higher level pediatric resources.

Pediatric Readiness in Emergency Medical Services Systems.

This is a joint policy statement from the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Emergency Physicians, Emergency Nurses Association, National Association of Emergency Medical Services Physicians, and National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians on pediatric readiness in emergency medical services systems.

Ready for Children: Assessing Pediatric Care Coordination and Psychomotor Skills Evaluation in the Prehospital Setting.

Objective: Pediatric patients represent low frequency but potentially high-risk encounters for emergency medical services (EMS) providers. Scant information is available from EMS agencies on the frequency of pediatric skill evaluation and the presence of pediatric emergency care coordination, both which may help EMS systems optimize care for children. The objective of our study was to assess the frequency and type of methods used to assess psychomotor skills competency using pediatric-specific equipment and pediatric care coordination in EMS ground transport agencies. Methods: A web-based assessment was sent to EMS agency directors in 58 states/territories to determine the presence of pediatric care coordination defined as an individual who oversees pediatric issues (Pediatric Care Coordinator or PECC) and the process for evaluating psychomotor skills of EMS providers using of pediatric equipment. Basic demographic information of each agency was collected. Descriptive statistics, odds ratios, and 95% confidence intervals were used for analyses. Results: The response rate was 78% (8,166/10,463 agencies). Almost 80% of agencies respond to fewer than 100 pediatric calls a year; over half of the agencies are located in urban areas and provide Advanced Life Support care. Twenty-three percent (23%) of EMS agency administrators report having a PECC and 28% have plans or interest in adding one. Of those agencies with a PECC, 26% report sharing the position among several agencies. Almost half (47%) of EMS agencies evaluate pediatric psychomotor skills at least twice a year. Agencies with a PECC, those with a medium to medium high pediatric call volume and agencies located in urban areas are more likely to evaluate psychomotor skills at least twice a year. Conclusions: Although few EMS agencies currently have a PECC, there is interest among EMS agency administrators to integrate one into their system. Pediatric-specific psychomotor skills testing is more common in EMS agencies that respond to a higher pediatric call volume and have a PECC. For EMS agencies that infrequently treat children, the presence of a PECC may enhance the frequency of pediatric psychomotor skills evaluation. The presence of a PECC can potentially increase provider confidence and safety for all pediatric prehospital patients regardless of volume and location.

Paramedic-Identified Enablers of and Barriers to Pediatric Seizure Management: A Multicenter, Qualitative Study.

Background: Seizures have the potential to cause significant morbidity and mortality, and are a common reason emergency medical services (EMS) are requested for a child. An evidence-based guideline (EBG) for pediatric prehospital seizures was published and has been implemented as protocol in multiple EMS systems. Knowledge translation and protocol adherence in medicine can be incomplete. In EMS, systems-based factors and providers' attitudes and beliefs may contribute to incomplete knowledge translation and protocol implementation. Objective: The purpose of this study was to identify paramedic attitudes and beliefs regarding pediatric seizure management and regarding potential barriers to and enablers of adherence to evidence-based pediatric seizure protocols in multiple EMS systems. Methods: This was a qualitative study utilizing semi-structured interviews of paramedics who recently transported actively seizing 0-17 year-old patients in 3 different urban EMS systems. Interviewers explored the providers' decision-making during their recent case and regarding seizures in general. Interview questions explored barriers to and enablers of protocol adherence. Two investigators used the grounded theory approach and constant comparison to independently analyze transcribed interview recordings until thematic saturation was reached. Findings were validated with follow-up member-checking interviews. Results: Several themes emerged from the 66 interviewed paramedics. Enablers of protocol adherence included point-of-care references, the availability of different routes for midazolam and availability of online medical control. Systems-level barriers included equipment availability, controlled substance management, infrequent pediatric training, and protocol ambiguity. Provider-level barriers included concerns about respiratory depression, provider fatigue, preferences for specific routes, febrile seizure perceptions, and inaccurate methods of weight estimation. Paramedics suggested system improvements to address dose standardization, protocol clarity, simplified controlled substance logistics, and equipment availability. Conclusions: Paramedics identified enablers of and barriers to adherence to evidence-based pediatric seizure protocols. The identified barriers existed at both the provider and systems levels. Paramedics identified multiple potential solutions to overcome several barriers to protocol adherence. Future research should focus on using the findings of this study to revise seizure protocols and to deploy measures to improve protocol implementation. Future research should also analyze process and outcome measures before and after the implementation of revised seizure protocols informed by the findings of this study.

Implementation of a Prehospital Protocol Change For Asthmatic Children.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory distress due to asthma is a common reason for pediatric emergency medical services (EMS) transports. Timely initiation of asthma treatment, including glucocorticoids, improves hospital outcomes. The impact of EMS-administered glucocorticoids on hospital-based outcomes for pediatric asthma patients is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of an evidence-based pediatric EMS asthma protocol update, inclusive of oral glucocorticoid administration, on time to hospital discharge. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of children (2-18 years) with an acute asthma exacerbation transported by an urban EMS system to 10 emergency departments over 2 years. The investigators implemented an EMS protocol update one year into the study period requiring glucocorticoid administration for all patients, with the major change being inclusion of oral dexamethasone (0.6 mg/kg, max. dose = 10 mg). Protocol implementation included mandatory paramedic training. Data was abstracted from linked prehospital and hospital records. Continuous data were compared before and after the protocol change with the Mann-Whitney test, and categorical data were compared with the Pearson χ2 test. RESULTS: During the study period, 482 asthmatic children met inclusion criteria. After the protocol change, patients were more likely to receive a prehospital glucocorticoid (11% vs. 18%, p = 0.02). Median total hospital time after the protocol change decreased from 6.1 hours (95% CI: 5.4-6.8) to 4.5 hours (95% CI: 4.2-4.8), p < 0.001. Total care time, defined as time from ambulance arrival to hospital discharge, also decreased [6.6 hours (95% CI: 5.8-7.3) vs. 5.2 hours (95% CI: 4.8-5.6), p = 0.01]. Overall, patients were less likely to be admitted to the hospital (30% vs. 21%, p = 0.02) after the change. Those with more severe exacerbations were less likely to be admitted to a critical care unit (82% vs. 44%, p = 0.02) after the change, rather than an acute care floor. CONCLUSIONS: Prehospital protocol change for asthmatic children is associated with shorter total hospital and total care times. This protocol change was also associated with decreased hospitalization rates and less need for critical care in those hospitalized. Further study is necessary to determine if other factors also contributed.

Determinants of Pediatric EMS Utilization in Children with High-Acuity Conditions.

BACKGROUND: Underutilization of emergency medical services (EMS) for children with high-acuity conditions is poorly understood. Our objective was to identify differences in demographic factors and describe caregivers' knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes regarding EMS utilization for children with high-acuity conditions. DESIGN/METHODS: This was a mixed-methods study of children with high acuity conditions, defined as requiring immediate medical or surgical intervention and intensive care admission, over a one year period. Demographic data were collected through a retrospective chart review. Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews from a purposive sample of caregivers was conducted until thematic saturation was achieved. RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-four charts were reviewed; 19 caregivers were interviewed (17 in-person, 2 via telephone). The 232 (62%) children not arriving by EMS tended to be younger (1.58 years vs. 2.31 years, p = 0.02), privately insured (30% vs. 19%, p = 0.04), and lived further from the hospital (16.80 miles vs. 12.45 miles, p = 0.001). Patient gender, ethnicity, comorbidities and caregiver language were not associated with EMS underutilization. Immediate invasive medical interventions were more often required for EMS utilizers (85% vs. 60%, p < 0.001). EMS utilizers were more likely to require intubation (78% vs. 47%, p < 0.001) and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (26% vs. 2%, p < 0.001), and had shorter hospital stays (4.70 vs. 8.16 days; p-value < 0.001). Three principal themes determined EMS utilization: expectations, knowledge, and perceived barriers. Three principal themes determined EMS utilization: expectations, knowledge, and perceived barriers. Caretakers expected EMS would provide timely, safe transportation that expedited medical care and emotional support. Medical knowledge and prior experience with EMS influenced decision-making about arrival mode. Timeliness, cost, socioeconomic and demographic characteristics, loss of autonomy, and the logistics of EMS activation and transport were the most commonly reported barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Young age, private insurance status, and greater distance from the hospital were associated with EMS underutilization. Understanding caregiver expectations, knowledge, and perceived barriers may have important implications for the use of EMS for children. These findings reveal opportunities for improved public education on EMS systems to enhance appropriate EMS utilization for children with high acuity conditions.

Improving Prehospital Protocol Adherence Using Bundled Educational Interventions.

BACKGROUND: Seizures and anaphylaxis are life-threatening conditions that require immediate treatment in the prehospital setting. There is variation in treatment of pediatric prehospital patients for both anaphylaxis and seizures. This educational study was done to improve compliance with pediatric prehospital protocols, educate prehospital providers and decrease variation in care. OBJECTIVE: To improve the quality of care for children with seizures and anaphylaxis in the prehospital setting using a bundled, multifaceted educational intervention. METHODS: Evidence-based pediatric prehospital guidelines for seizures and anaphylaxis were used to create a curriculum for the paramedics in the EMS system. The curriculum included in-person training, videos, distribution of decision support tools, and a targeted social media campaign to reinforce the evidence-based guidelines. Prehospital charts were reviewed for pediatric patients with a chief complaint of anaphylaxis or seizures who were transported by paramedics to one of ten hospitals, including three children's hospitals, for 8 months prior to the intervention and eight months following the intervention. The primary outcome for seizures was whether midazolam was given via the preferred intranasal (IN) or intramuscular (IM) routes. The primary outcome for anaphylaxis was whether IM epinephrine was given. RESULTS: A total of 1,402 pediatric patients were transported for seizures by paramedics to during the study period. A total of 88 patients were actively seizing pre-intervention and 93 post-intervention. Of the actively seizing patients, 52 were given midazolam pre-intervention and 62 were given midazolam post-intervention. Pre-intervention, 29% (15/52) of the seizing patients received midazolam via the preferred IM or IN routes, compared to 74% (46/62) of the seizing patients post-intervention. A total of 45 patients with anaphylaxis were transported by paramedics, 30 pre-intervention and 15 post-intervention. Paramedics administered epinephrine to 17% (5/30) patients pre-intervention and 67% (10/15) patients post-intervention. CONCLUSION: The use of a bundled, multifaceted educational intervention including in-person training, decision support tools, and social media improved adherence to updated evidence-based pediatric prehospital protocols.

Prehospital Providers' Perceptions on Providing Patient and Family Centered Care.

BACKGROUND: A gap exists in understanding a provider's approach to delivering care that is mutually beneficial to patients, families, and other providers in the prehospital setting. The purpose of this study was to identify attitudes, beliefs, and perceived barriers to providing patient and family centered care (PFCC) in the prehospital setting and to describe potential solutions for improving PFCC during critical pediatric events. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative, cross-sectional study of a purposive sample of Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) and paramedics from an urban, municipal, fire-based EMS system, who participated in the Pediatric Simulation Training for Emergency Prehospital Providers (PediSTEPPS) course. Two coders reviewed transcriptions of audio recordings from participants' first simulation scenario debriefings and performed constant comparison analysis to identify unifying themes. Themes were verified through member checking with two focus groups of prehospital providers. RESULTS: A total of 122 EMTs and paramedics participated in 16 audiotaped debriefing sessions and two focus groups. Four overarching themes emerged regarding the experience of PFCC by prehospital providers: (1) Perceived barriers included the prehospital environment, limited manpower, multi-tasking medical care, and concern for interference with patient care; (2) Providing emotional support comprised of empathetically comforting caregivers, maintaining a calm demeanor, and empowering families to feel involved; (3) Effective communication strategies consisted of designating a family point person, narration of actions, preempting the next steps, speaking in lay terms, summarizing during downtime, and conveying a positive first impression; (4) Tactics to overcome PFCC barriers were maintaining a line of sight, removing and returning a caregiver to and from the scene, and providing situational awareness. CONCLUSIONS: Based on debriefings from simulated scenarios, some prehospital providers identified the provision of emotional support and effective communication as important components to the delivery of PFCC. Other providers revealed several perceived barriers to providing PFCC, though potential solutions to overcome many of these barriers were also identified. These findings can be utilized to integrate effective communication and emotional support techniques into EMS protocols and provider training to overcome perceived barriers to PFCC in the prehospital setting.

Resource Document: Coordination of Pediatric Emergency Care in EMS Systems.

BACKGROUND: Citing numerous pediatric-specific deficiencies within Emergency Medical Services (EMS) systems, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommended that EMS systems appoint a pediatric emergency care coordinator (PECC) to provide oversight of EMS activities related to care of children, to promote the integration of pediatric elements into day-to-day services as well as local and/or regional disaster planning, and to promote pediatric education across all levels of EMS providers. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was undertaken to describe the evidence for pediatric coordination across the emergency care continuum. The search strategy was developed by the investigators in consultation with a medical librarian and conducted in OVID, Medline, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases from January 1, 1983 to January 1, 2016. All research articles that measured a patient-related or system-related outcome associated with pediatric coordination in the setting of emergency care, trauma, or disaster were included. Opinion articles, commentaries, and letters to the editors were excluded. Three investigators independently screened citations in a hierarchical manner and abstracted data. RESULTS: Of 149 identified titles, nine were included in the systematic review. The nine articles included one interventional study, five surveys, and three consensus documents. All articles favored the presence of pediatric coordination. The interventional study demonstrated improved documentation, clinical management, and staff awareness of high priority pediatric areas. CONCLUSION: The current literature supports the identification of pediatric coordination to facilitate the optimal care of children within EMS systems. In order for EMS systems to provide high quality care to children, pediatric components must be integrated into all aspects of care including day-to-day operations, policies, protocols, available equipment and medications, quality improvement efforts, and disaster planning. This systematic review and resource document serves as the basis for the National Association of EMS Physicians position statement entitled "Physician Oversight of Pediatric Care in Emergency Medical Systems."

Prehospital Opioid Administration in the Emergency Care of Injured Children.

OBJECTIVE: Prior studies have identified provider and system characteristics that impede pain management in children, but no studies have investigated the effect of changing these characteristics on prehospital opioid analgesia. Our objectives were to determine: 1) the frequency of opioid analgesia and pain score documentation among prehospital pediatric patients after system wide changes to improve pain treatment, and 2) if older age, longer transport times, the presence of vascular access and pain score documentation were associated with increased prehospital administration of opioid analgesia in children. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of pediatric patients aged 3-18 years assessed by a single EMS system between October 1, 2011 and September 30, 2013. Prior to October 2011, the EMS system had implemented 3 changes to improve pain treatment: (1) training on age appropriate pain scales, (2) protocol changes to allow opioid analgesia without contacting medical control, and (3) the introduction of intranasal fentanyl. All patients with working assessments of blunt, penetrating, lacerating, and/or burn trauma were included. We used descriptive statistics to determine the frequency of pain score documentation and opioid analgesia administration and logistic regression to determine the association of age, transport time, and the presence of intravenous access with opioid analgesia administration. RESULTS: Of the 1,368 eligible children, 336 (25%) had a documented pain score. Eleven percent (130/1204) of children without documented contraindications to opioid administration received opioids. Of the children with no documented pain score and no protocol exclusions, 9% (81/929) received opioid analgesia, whereas 18% (49/275) with a documented pain score ≥4 and no protocol exclusions received opioids. Multivariate analysis revealed that vascular access (OR = 11.89; 95% CI: 7.33-19.29), longer patient transport time (OR = 1.07; 95% CI: 1.04-1.11), age (OR 0.93; 95% CI: 0.88-0.98) and pain score documentation (OR 2.23; 95% CI: 1.40-3.55) were associated with opioid analgesia. CONCLUSIONS: Despite implementation of several best practice recommendations to improve prehospital pain treatment, few children have a documented pain score and even fewer receive opioid analgesia. Children with longer transport times, successful IV placement, and/or documentation of pain score(s) were more likely to receive prehospital analgesia.

Impact of High-Fidelity Pediatric Simulation on Paramedic Seizure Management.

BACKGROUND: A simulation-based course, Pediatric Simulation Training for Emergency Prehospital Providers (PediSTEPPs), was developed to optimize pediatric prehospital care. Seizures are common in Emergency Medical Services (EMS), and no studies have evaluated pediatric outcomes after EMS simulation training. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to determine if PediSTEPPs enhances seizure protocol adherence in blood glucose measurement and midazolam administration for seizing children. The secondary objective was to describe management of seizing patients by EMS and Emergency Departments (EDs). METHODS: This is a two-year retrospective cohort study of paramedics who transported 0-18 year old seizing patients to ten urban EDs. Management was compared between EMS crews with at least one paramedic who attended PediSTEPPs and crews that had none. Blood glucose measurement, medications administered, intravenous (IV) access, seizure recurrence, and respiratory failure data were collected from databases and run reports. Data were compared using Pearson's χ(2) test and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (categorical) and the Mann-Whitney test (continuous). RESULTS: Of 2200 pediatric transports with a complaint of seizure, 250 (11%) were actively seizing at the time of transport. Of these, 65 (26%) were treated by a PediSTEPPs-trained paramedic. Blood glucose was slightly more likely to be checked by trained than untrained paramedics (OR = 1.35, 95% CI 0.72-2.51). Overall, 58% received an indicated dose of midazolam, and this was slightly more likely in the trained than untrained paramedics (OR = 1.39, 95% CI 0.77-2.49). There were no differences in secondary outcomes between groups. The prevalence of hypoglycemia was low (2%). Peripheral IVs were attempted in 80%, and midazolam was predominantly given by IV (68%) and rectal (12%) routes, with 51% receiving a correct dose. Seizures recurred in 22%, with 34% seizing on ED arrival. Respiratory failure occurred in the prehospital setting in 25 (10%) patients in the study. CONCLUSION: Simulation-based training on pediatric seizure management may have utility. Data support the need to optimize the route and dose of midazolam for seizing children. Blood glucose measurement in seizure protocols may warrant reprioritization due to low hypoglycemia prevalence. KEY WORDS: seizure; emergency medical services; simulation; pediatrics.

Multicenter Evaluation of Prehospital Opioid Pain Management in Injured Children.

BACKGROUND: The National Association of Emergency Medical Services Physicians' (NAEMSP) Position Statement on Prehospital Pain Management and the joint National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and Emergency Medical Services for Children (EMSC) Evidence-based Guideline for Prehospital Analgesia in Trauma aim to improve the recognition, assessment, and treatment of prehospital pain. The impact of implementation of these guidelines on pain management in children by emergency medical services (EMS) agencies has not been assessed. OBJECTIVE: Determine the change in frequency of documented pain severity assessment and opiate administration among injured pediatric patients in three EMS agencies after adoption of best practice recommendations. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of children <18 years of age with a prehospital injury-related primary impression from three EMS agencies. Each agency independently implemented pain protocol changes which included adding the use of age-appropriate pain scales, decreasing the minimum age for opiate administration, and updating fentanyl dosing. We abstracted data from prehospital electronic patient records before and after changes to the pain management protocols. The primary outcomes were the frequency of administration of opioid analgesia and documentation of pain severity assessment as recorded in the prehospital patient care record. RESULTS: A total of 3,597 injured children were transported prior to pain protocol changes and 3,743 children after changes. Opiate administration to eligible patients across study sites regardless of documentation of pain severity was 156/3,089 (5%) before protocol changes and 175/3,509 (5%) after (p = 0.97). Prior to protocol changes, 580 (18%) children had documented pain assessments and 430 (74%) had moderate-to-severe pain. After protocol changes, 644 (18%) patients had pain severity documented with 464 (72%) in moderate-to-severe pain. For all study agencies, pain severity was documented in 13%, 19%, and 22% of patient records both before and after protocol changes. There was a difference in intranasal fentanyl administration rates before (27%) and after (17%) protocol changes (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The proportion of injured children who receive prehospital opioid analgesia remains suboptimal despite implementation of best practice recommendations. Frequency of pain severity assessment of injured children is low. Intranasal fentanyl administration may be an underutilized modality of prehospital opiate administration.