Arrhythmic Risk in Biventricular Pacing Compared With Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing: Results From the I-CLAS Study.

BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) may be associated with greater improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction and reduction in death or heart failure hospitalization compared with biventricular pacing (BVP) in patients requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy. We sought to compare the occurrence of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) and new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients undergoing BVP and LBBAP. METHODS: The I-CLAS study (International Collaborative LBBAP Study) included patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% who underwent BVP or LBBAP for cardiac resynchronization therapy between January 2018 and June 2022 at 15 centers. We performed propensity score-matched analysis of LBBAP and BVP in a 1:1 ratio. We assessed the incidence of VT/VF and new-onset AF among patients with no history of AF. Time to sustained VT/VF and time to new-onset AF was analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards survival model. RESULTS: Among 1778 patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (BVP, 981; LBBAP, 797), there were 1414 propensity score-matched patients (propensity score-matched BVP, 707; propensity score-matched LBBAP, 707). The occurrence of VT/VF was significantly lower with LBBAP compared with BVP (4.2% versus 9.3%; hazard ratio, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.29-0.74]; P<0.001). The incidence of VT storm (>3 episodes in 24 hours) was also significantly lower with LBBAP compared with BVP (0.8% versus 2.5%; P=0.013). Among 299 patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers (BVP, 111; LBBAP, 188), VT/VF occurred in 8 patients in the BVP group versus none in the LBBAP group (7.2% versus 0%; P<0.001). In 1194 patients with no history of VT/VF or antiarrhythmic therapy (BVP, 591; LBBAP, 603), the occurrence of VT/VF was significantly lower with LBBAP than with BVP (3.2% versus 7.3%; hazard ratio, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.26-0.81]; P=0.007). Among patients with no history of AF (n=890), the occurrence of new-onset AF >30 s was significantly lower with LBBAP than with BVP (2.8% versus 6.6%; hazard ratio, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.16-0.73]; P=0.008). The incidence of AF lasting >24 hours was also significantly lower with LBBAP than with BVP (0.7% versus 2.9%; P=0.015). CONCLUSIONS: LBBAP was associated with a lower incidence of sustained VT/VF and new-onset AF compared with BVP. This difference remained significant after adjustment for differences in baseline characteristics between patients with BVP and LBBAP. Physiological resynchronization by LBBAP may be associated with lower risk of arrhythmias compared with BVP.

Surpoint algorithm for improved guidance of ablation for ventricular tachycardia (SURFIRE-VT): A pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: The utility of ablation index (AI) to guide ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation in patients with structural heart disease is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess procedural characteristics and clinical outcomes achieved using AI-guided strategy (target value 550) or conventional non-AI-guided parameters in patients undergoing scar-related VT ablation. METHODS: Consecutive patients (n = 103) undergoing initial VT ablation at a single center from 2017 to 2022 were evaluated. Patient groups were 1:1 propensity-matched for baseline characteristics. Single lesion characteristics for all 4707 lesions in the matched cohort (n = 74) were analyzed. The impact of ablation characteristics was assessed by linear regression and clinical outcomes were evaluated by Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: After propensity-matching, baseline characteristics were well-balanced between AI (n = 37) and non-AI (n = 37) groups. Lesion sets were similar (scar homogenization [41% vs. 27%; p = .34], scar dechanneling [19% vs. 8%; p = .18], core isolation [5% vs. 11%; p = .4], linear and elimination late potentials/local abnormal ventricular activities [35% vs. 44%; p = .48], epicardial mapping/ablation [11% vs. 14%; p = .73]). AI-guided strategy had 21% lower procedure duration (-47.27 min, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-81.613, -12.928]; p = .008), 49% lower radiofrequency time per lesion (-13.707 s, 95% CI [-17.86, -9.555]; p < .001), 21% lower volume of fluid administered (1664 cc [1127, 2209] vs. 2126 cc [1750, 2593]; p = .005). Total radiofrequency duration (-339 s [-24%], 95%CI [-776, 62]; p = .09) and steam pops (-155.6%, 95% CI [19.8%, -330.9%]; p = .08) were nonsignificantly lower in the AI group. Acute procedural success (95% vs. 89%; p = .7) and VT recurrence (0.97, 95% CI [0.42-2.2]; p = .93) were similar for both groups. Lesion analysis (n = 4707) demonstrated a plateau in the magnitude of impedance drops once reaching an AI of 550-600. CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, an AI-guided ablation strategy for scar-related VT resulted in shorter procedure time and average radiofrequency time per lesion with similar acute procedural and intermediate-term clinical outcomes to a non-AI-guided approach utilizing traditional ablation parameters.

Procedural and Intermediate-term Results of the Electroanatomical-guided Cardioneuroablation for the Treatment of Supra-Hisian Second- or Advanced-degree Atrioventricular Block: the PIRECNA multicentre registry.

AIMS: Prior case series showed promising results for cardioneuroablation in patients with vagally induced atrioventricular blocks (VAVBs). We aimed to examine the acute procedural characteristics and intermediate-term outcomes of electroanatomical-guided cardioneuroablation (EACNA) in patients with VAVB. METHODS AND RESULTS: This international multicentre retrospective registry included data collected from 20 centres. Patients presenting with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent VAVB were included in the study. All patients underwent EACNA. Procedural success was defined by the acute reversal of atrioventricular blocks (AVBs) and complete abolition of atropine response. The primary outcome was occurrence of syncope and daytime second- or advanced-degree AVB on serial prolonged electrocardiogram monitoring during follow-up. A total of 130 patients underwent EACNA. Acute procedural success was achieved in 96.2% of the cases. During a median follow-up of 300 days (150, 496), the primary outcome occurred in 17/125 (14%) cases with acute procedural success (recurrence of AVB in 9 and new syncope in 8 cases). Operator experience and use of extracardiac vagal stimulation were similar for patients with and without primary outcomes. A history of atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and coronary artery disease was associated with a higher primary outcome occurrence. Only four patients with primary outcome required pacemaker placement during follow-up. CONCLUSION: This is the largest multicentre study demonstrating the feasibility of EACNA with encouraging intermediate-term outcomes in selected patients with VAVB. Studies investigating the effect on burden of daytime symptoms caused by the AVB are required to confirm these findings.

Comparison of radiofrequency ablation from the coronary cusps and endocardial left ventricular outflow tract for left ventricular summit ventricular arrhythmias in a porcine and infrared thermal model.

INTRODUCTION: The coronary cusps (CCs) are utilized as an alternative vantage point for radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of left ventricular summit ventricular arrhythmias but are sometimes a challenge despite favorable activation timing and pace mapping. METHODS: Ex vivo experiments were performed in 12 intact porcine hearts submerged in a 37°C saline bath. Radiofrequency (RF) applications were delivered with an irrigated contact force sensing catheter oriented 45° to the endocardial left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) surface and nadir of the CCs using different dosing parameters. Sections were stained in 2% triphenyltetrazolium chloride and lesion dimensions were measured. Thermal infrared imaging analysis was used to compare time-to-lethal tissue temperature and depth/area of lethal isotherms. RESULTS: A total of 60 RF applications were performed under different dosing parameters for (1) 30, 40, and 50 Watts (W) × 30 s and (2) 40 W × 30, 45, and 60 s. Lesion depth was greater with RFCA from LVOT than from the CCs (maximum depth 6.11 vs. 2.68 mm). Longer RF duration led to larger lesion volume in the CC group (40 W × 30 s: 8.1 ± 0.4 vs. 40 W × 60 s: 10.1 ± 0.96 mm; p = .002). One steam pop occurred in both the LVOT (50 W × 30 s) and CC groups (40 W × 60 s). Time-to-reach lethal temperature of 58°C was longer in the CC group than in the LVOT group (4.7 vs. 11.3 s; p = .02) CONCLUSIONS: RFCA from the CC led comparatively to shallower lesion depth than from the LVOT. Longer RF duration led to an increase in lesion volume during ablation from CCs.

Comparison of ablation index versus time-guided radiofrequency energy dosing using normal and half-normal saline irrigation in a porcine left ventricular model.

BACKGROUND: Ablation Index (AI) is a multiparametric quality marker to assess the durability of radiofrequency (RF) lesions. The comparative effectiveness and safety of AI versus time-based energy dosing for ablation of ventricular arrhythmias are unknown. OBJECTIVE: We compared AI and time-based RF dosing strategies in the left ventricles (LVs) of freshly harvested porcine hearts. METHODS: Ablation was performed in vitro with an open-irrigated ablation catheter (Thermocool ST/SF), 40 W, contact force 10-15 g. Tissue samples were stained in triphenyltetrazolium chloride for the measurement of lesion dimensions. RESULTS: A total of 560 lesions were performed (AI-group: [n = 360]; time-group: [n = 200]). Using normal saline (NS) (n = 280), growth in lesion depth slowed after 30 s and AI > 550 in comparison to width, volume, and magnitude of impedance drops which continued to increase with longer RF duration. Risk of steam pop (SP) was higher for RF > 30 s (RF < 30 s:1 SP [2.5%] vs. RF > 30 s: 15 SP [25%]; p = .002) or AI targets >550 (AI: 350-550: 2 SP [2%] vs. AI 600-750: 15 SP [19%]; p = .001). Using half-normal saline (HNS) (n = 280), lesion dimension and impedance drops were larger and growth in lesion depth slowed earlier (AI: 500). Risk of SPs was higher above AI 550 (AI: 350-550: 7 [7%] SPs vs. AI 600-750: 28 [35%] SPs; p < .00001). While codependent variables, correlation between AI and time was modest-to-strong but decreased with longer RF duration. CONCLUSION: In this ex vivo study, AI was a better predictor of lesion dimensions than ablation time and magnitude of impedance drop in the LV using NS and HNS irrigation. AI targets above 550 led to a higher risk of SPs. Future trials are required to verify these findings.

Feasibility and safety of laser balloon pulmonary vein isolation in patients with prior left atrial appendage occlusion device implantation.

INTRODUCTION: With the increasing adoption of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) procedures and the eligibility of patients for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) post device placement, we examined the feasibility and safety of laser balloon (LB) for PVI in patients with prior LAAO. METHODS: We retrospectively examined consecutive patients with paroxysmal or persistent, drug-resistant atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent LB PVI, after Watchman FLX device implantation at Rush University Medical Center between January 2020 and December 2021. RESULTS: Seven patients (four persistent and three paroxysmal) with a mean age of 64 ± 11 years, predominantly male sex (86%), were included in the study. Two (29%) patients had prior cryoablation PVI with recurrence of AF. The mean CHA2 DS2 VASc is 2.6 ± 0.5 and the mean HAS-BLED score is 3.4 ± 0.8. The mean follow-up duration was 10 ± 7 months. The mean duration between Watchman FLX device implantation and LB PVI was 592 days. Acute first pass left pulmonary vein (PV) isolation was achieved in 100% of the procedures. There were no periprocedural complications such as death, pericardial tamponade or effusion, phrenic nerve injury, PV stenosis, device perforation or embolization, or worsening peri-device leak in any of the patients. None of the patients had AF recurrence after the blanking period. CONCLUSION: LB PVI was safe and effective with 100% acute isolation of left-sided veins in patients with prior LAAO device.

Physiologic lead placement with electroanatomic mapping: A case series.

INTRODUCTION: His bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) have emerged as attractive alternatives to traditional biventricular pacing to achieve cardiac resynchronization therapy. Early reported results have been inconsistent, particularly amongst patients in whom initial placement with traditional approaches has been unsuccessful or those with complex anatomy or congenital abnormalities. In this report, we describe the use of three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping (EAM) in five selected cases. METHODS: Five patients from multiple clinical sites underwent EAM-guided HBP or LBBAP by highly trained electrophysiologists with significant experience with conduction system pacing. Each patient in this series underwent EAM-guided conduction system pacing due to complex anatomy and/or prior failed lead implantation. RESULTS: EAM-guided lead implantation was successful in all five cases. Capture thresholds were relatively low and patients continued to have evidence of successful lead implantation with minimum 1-month follow-up. The fluoroscopy time varied, likely owing to the variable complexity of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: The use of EAM, in combination with traditional intracardiac electrograms with or without fluoroscopy, allows more targeted and precise placement of leads for HBP and LBBAP pacing. Further investigation is needed to determine this strategy's long-term performance and to optimize patient selection.

Use of infrared thermography to delineate temperature gradients and critical isotherms during catheter ablation with normal and half normal saline: Implications for safety and efficacy.

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency (RF) ablation with half-normal saline (HNS) has shown promise as a bail-out strategy following failed ventricular tachycardia ablation using standard approaches. OBJECTIVE: To use a novel infrared thermal imaging (ITI) model to evaluate biophysical and lesion characteristics during RF ablation using normal saline (NS) and HNS irrigation. METHODS: Left ventricular strips of myocardium were excised from fresh porcine hearts. RF ablation was performed using an open-irrigated ablation catheter (Thermocool ST/SF) with NS (n = 75) and HNS (n = 75) irrigation using different power settings (40/50 W), RF durations (30/60 s), contact force of 10-15 g, and flow rate of 15 ml/min. RF lesions were recorded using an infrared thermal camera and border zone, lethal, 100° isotherms were matched with necrotic borders after 2% triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining. Lesion dimensions and isotherms (mm2 ) were measured. RESULTS: In total, 150 lesions were delivered. HNS lesions were deeper (6.4 ± 1.1 vs. 5.7 ±0.8 mm; p = .03), and larger in volume (633 ± 153 vs. 468 ± 107 mm3 ; p = .007) than NS lesions. Steam pops (SPs) occurred during 19/75 lesions (25%) in the NS group and 32/75 lesions (43%) in the HNS group (p = .34). Lethal (57.8 ± 6.5 vs. 36.0 ± 3.9 mm2 ; p = .001) and 100°C isotherm areas (16.9 ± 6.9 vs. 3.8 ± 4.2 mm2 ; p = .003) areas were larger and were reached earlier in the HNS group. CONCLUSIONS: RFA using HNS created larger lesions than NS irrigation but led to more frequent SPs. The presence of earlier lethal isotherms and temperature rises above 100°C on ITI suggest a potentially narrower therapeutic-safety window with HNS.

High-power short duration vs. conventional radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: We sought to compare the effectiveness and safety of high-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with conventional RFA in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: MEDLINE, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched until 15 May 2020 for relevant studies comparing HPSD vs. conventional RFA in patients undergoing initial catheter ablation for AF. A total of 15 studies involving 3718 adult patients were included in our meta-analysis (2357 in HPSD RFA and 1361 in conventional RFA). Freedom from atrial arrhythmia was higher in HPSD RFA when compared with conventional RFA [odds ratio (OR) 1.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10-1.90; P = 0.009]. Acute PV reconnection was lower (OR 0.56, P = 0.005) and first-pass isolation was higher (OR 3.58, P < 0.001) with HPSD RFA. There was no difference in total complications between the two groups (P = 0.19). Total procedure duration [mean difference (MD) -37.35 min, P < 0.001], fluoroscopy duration (MD -5.23 min, P = 0.001), and RF ablation time (MD -16.26 min, P < 0.001) were all significantly lower in HPSD RFA. High-power short-duration RFA also demonstrated higher freedom from atrial arrhythmia in the subgroup analysis of patients with paroxysmal AF (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.29-2.50; P < 0.001), studies with ≥50 W protocol in the HPSD RFA group (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.08-2.18; P = 0.02] and studies with contact force sensing catheter use (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.21-2.25; P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: High-power short-duration RFA was associated with better procedural effectiveness when compared with conventional RFA with comparable safety and shorter procedural duration.

His bundle pacing: Tips and tricks.

His bundle (HB) pacing is an established modality for achieving physiological pacing with a low risk of long-term lead-related complications. The development of specially designed lead and delivery tools has improved the feasibility and safety of HB pacing (HBP). Knowledge of the anatomy of HB region and the variations is essential for successful implantation. Newer delivery systems have further improved procedural outcomes. Challenging implant cases can be successfully performed by reshaping the current sheaths, using "sheath in sheath" technique or "two-lead implantation technique." Special attention to the lead parameters at implant, programming, and follow-up is necessary for successful long-term outcomes with HBP. Widespread use of HBP by electrophysiologists and further advances in dedicated delivery systems and leads are essential to further improve the effectiveness of the implantation.

Sensors for rate-adaptive pacing: How they work, strengths, and limitations.

Chronotropic incompetence is the inability of the sinus node to increase heart rate commensurate with increased metabolic demand. Cardiac pacing alone may be insufficient to address exercise intolerance, fatigue, dyspnea on exertion, and other symptoms of chronotropic incompetence. Rate-responsive (adaptive) pacing employs sensors to detect physical or physiological indices and mimic the response of the normal sinus node. This review describes the development, strengths, and limitations of a variety of sensors that have been employed to address chronotropic incompetence. A mini-tutorial on programming rate-adaptive parameters is included along with emphasis that patients' lifestyles and underlying medical conditions require careful consideration. In addition, special sensor applications used to respond prophylactically to physiologic signals are detailed and an in-depth discussion of sensors as a potential aid in heart failure management is provided.

A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing second-generation cryoballoon and contact force radiofrequency ablation for initial ablation of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: Cryoballoon ablation (CBA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are the preferred modalities for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Technological advances have improved procedural outcomes, warranting an updated comparison. We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CBA-2nd generation (CBA-2G) in comparison to RFA-contact force (RFA-CF) in patients with AF. METHODS: MEDLINE, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched until 03/01/2020 for relevant studies comparing CBA-2G versus RFA-CF in patients undergoing initial catheter ablation for AF. RESULTS: A total of 17 studies, involving 11 793 patients were included. There was no difference between the two groups in the outcomes of freedom from atrial arrhythmia (p = .67) and total procedural complications (p = .65). There was a higher incidence of phrenic nerve palsy in CBA-2G (odds ratio: 10.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.85 to 19.55; p < .001). Procedure duration was shorter (mean difference: -31.32 min; 95% CI: -40.73 to -21.92; p < .001) and fluoroscopy duration was longer (+3.21 min; 95% CI: 1.09 to 5.33; p = .003) in CBA-2G compared to RFA-CF. In the subgroup analyses of patients with persistent AF and >1 freeze lesion delivered per vein, there was no difference in freedom from atrial arrhythmia. CONCLUSIONS: In AF patients undergoing initial ablation, CBA-2G and RFA-CF were equally efficacious. The procedure duration was shorter, but with a higher incidence of phrenic nerve palsy in CBA-2G. In patients with persistent AF, there was no difference in the efficacy between CBA-2G or RFA-CF techniques.

Electrophysiological characteristics and clinical values of left bundle branch current of injury in left bundle branch pacing.

BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is emerging as a novel option for physiological ventricular pacing. The impact of current of injury (COI) at left bundle branch (LBB) has not been previously evaluated. METHODS: Consecutive patients with QRS duration less than 120 milliseconds referred for LBBP in whom LBB potentials were recorded were included from August 2018 to March 2019. We recorded LBB COI during LBBP and assessed its impact on the pacing parameters and complications during implantation and at short term follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 115 patients with an identifiable LBB potential at implant were included. LBB COI was confirmed in 77 (67.0%) of these patients. Three types of LBB COI were observed. LBB was captured in all patients at a pacing threshold less than 1.5 V/0.5 ms in COI(+) patients, while present in only 29 patients without an LBB COI(-) (100% vs 76.3%; P < .001). There was no significant difference between COI(+) and COI(-) patients in LBB bundle capture threshold (0.64 ± 0.24 vs 0.74 ± 0.26 V/0.5 ms). Selective LBBP was more common in COI(+) group than COI(-) group (54.5% vs 0%; P < .001). Pacing parameters were stable and no lead perforation or dislodgements were observed during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: LBB COI is commonly observed during LBBP in cases with an identifiable LBB potential and can be associated with a low LBB capture threshold and demonstrable selective capture of the LBB acutely and during follow-up. A COI does not preclude safe and stable LBBP pacing.

Electrophysiological parameters and anatomical evaluation of left bundle branch pacing in an in vivo canine model.

INTRODUCTION: Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP), a form of conduction system pacing in addition to His bundle pacing (HBP), can potentially maintain left ventricular electrical synchrony with better sensing and a low and stable capture threshold. METHODS: We performed both HBP and LBBP using a canine model (n = 3; male; weight 30-40 kg). The electrocardiogram (ECG), intracardiac electrogram characteristics, and pacing parameters were compared between HBP and LBBP. The hearts were isolated and stained by Lugol's iodine (5%) to assess the relative locations of the leads in relation to the conduction system. RESULTS: The average potential to ventricle interval was longer with HBP compared to LBBP (26.67 ± 3.06 ms vs 12.67 ± 1.15 ms; P = .002). There were also notable differences in the pacing parameters between HBP and LBBP: R-wave amplitude (2.67 ± 0.42 mV vs 11.33 ± 3.06 mV; P = .008), pacing impedance (423.3 ± 40.4 vs 660.0 ± 45.8; P = .003), and threshold (2.30 ± 0.66 V/0.4ms vs 0.67 ± 0.15 V/0.4 ms; P = .014). The paced morphology of ECG was similar to the intrinsic with HBP while a right bundle branch block pattern was noted with LBBP. The anatomical evaluation revealed the location of the leads and the average lead depth was significantly more with LBBP as compared to HBP (12.33 ± 1.53 mm vs1.83 ± 0.29 mm; P < .0001). Furthermore, with LBBP, the tip of the lead helix was noted to be around the LBB. CONCLUSION: This in vivo canine model study confirms the significant differences between HBP and LBBP. Furthermore, this model provides a precise anatomic evaluation of the location and the depth of the leads in relation to the conduction system.

Comparison between minimal fluoroscopy and conventional approaches for visually guided laser balloon pulmonary vein isolation ablation.

INTRODUCTION: Although balloon-based techniques, such as the laser balloon (LB) ablation have simplified pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), procedural fluoroscopy usage remains higher in comparison to radiofrequency PVI approaches due to limited 3-dimensional mapping system integration. METHODS: In this prospective study, 50 consecutive patients were randomly assigned in alternating fashion to a low fluoroscopy group (LFG; n = 25) or conventional fluoroscopy group (CFG; n = 25) and underwent de novo PVI procedures using visually guided LB technique. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in baseline characteristics or cross-overs between treatment groups. Acute PVI was accomplished in all patients. Mean follow up was 318 ± 69 days. Clinical recurrence of atrial fibrillation after PVI was similar between groups (CFG: 19% vs LFG: 15%; P = .72). Total fluoroscopy time was significantly lower in the LFG than the CFG (1.7 ± 1.4  vs 16.9 ± 5.9 minutes; P < .001) despite similar total procedure duration (143 ± 22 vs 148 ± 22 minutes; P = .42) and mean LA dwell time (63 ± 15 vs 59 ± 10 minutes; P = .28). Mean dose area product was significantly lower in the LFG (181 ± 125 vs 1980 ± 750 µGym2 ; P < .001). Fluoroscopy usage after transseptal access was substantially lower in the LFG (0.63 ± 0.43 vs 11.70 ± 4.32 minutes; P < .001). Complications rates were similar between both groups (4% vs 2%; P = .57). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that LB PVI can be safely achieved using a novel low fluoroscopy protocol while also substantially reducing fluoroscopy usage and radiation exposure in comparison to conventional approaches for LB ablation.

Novel left ventricular cardiac synchronization: left ventricular septal pacing or left bundle branch pacing?

It is well recognized that a high burden of right ventricular pacing results in deleterious clinical outcomes over the long term. His bundle pacing can achieve optimal ventricular synchronization; however, relatively high pacing thresholds, low R-wave amplitudes, and the long-term performance have been concerns. Recently, left ventricular (LV) septal endocardium pacing (LVSP) has demonstrated improved acute haemodynamics. Another novel technique of intraseptal left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) via transvenous approach has been adopted rapidly and has demonstrated its feasibility and effectiveness. This article reviews the clinical application and differences between LVSP and LBBP. Compared with LVSP, LBBP has strict criteria for left conduction system capture and lead location. In addition to LV septal capture it also stimulates the proximal left bundle branch, resulting in rapid and physiological LV activation. With a uniformity and standardization of the implant procedure and definitions, it may be possible to achieve widespread application of this form of physiological pacing.

Permanent His Bundle Pacing: A programming and troubleshooting guide.

Permanent His Bundle Pacing (HBP) has recently gained popularity. However, implanting physicians and those who perform the device checks must invest in additional education in order to accurately program these devices, identify changes in morphology and perform troubleshooting to help achieve the best outcomes for the patients. This paper reviews key aspects of HBP and provides the educational tools for successful HBP follow-up and troubleshooting.

A risk score model for predicting intraprocedural cardiac injury during implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation: Insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

BACKGROUND: Individual risk factors of intraprocedural cardiac injury (cardiac perforation and tamponade) during implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) placement have been documented. However, the prognostic impact of their coexistence has not been explored. OBJECTIVE: To develop a risk score model to identify patients at risk for intraprocedural cardiac injury. METHODS: We identified 438 679 patients from National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR)-ICD who underwent de novo ICD implantation between 2010 and 2015, split randomly into a derivation cohort (n = 220 000) and a validation cohort (n = 218 679). The generalized estimating equations (GEEs) analysis with quasilikelihood under the independence model criterion goodness-of-fit statistics were used to identify the predictors of intraprocedural cardiac injury and a risk scoring model was developed. Model discrimination was assessed by receiver-operator characteristic curve and C-statistic. RESULTS: The risk of intraprocedural cardiac injury in the overall cohort was 0.13%. GEE analysis yielded seven variables (points in parentheses) that were strongly associated with intraprocedural cardiac injury: age, greater than 75 years (1), female gender (1), body mass index, less than 18.5 kg/m 2 (1), hypertension (1), chronic lung disease (1), left bundle branch block (1), and continued warfarin use (1). Only prior history of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (-1) was associated with reduced risk. A risk scoring system was developed that had good discrimination with a C-statistic of 0.72. The risk of intraprocedural cardiac injury increased with the increase in risk score from low risk (0.03%) to high risk (1.37%). CONCLUSION: A practical risk score model can stratify patients into high- and low-risk groups for cardiac perforation or tamponade before undergoing ICD implantation.

How to perform electroanatomic mapping-guided cardiac resynchronization therapy using Carto 3 and ESI NavX three-dimensional mapping systems.

AIMS: To examine the feasibility and safety of a novel protocol for low fluoroscopy, electroanatomic mapping (EAM)-guided Cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D) implantation and using both EnSite NavX (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA) and Carto 3 (Biosense Webster, Irvine, CA, USA) mapping systems. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty consecutive patients underwent CRT implantation using either a conventional fluoroscopic approach (CFA) or EAM-guided lead placement with Carto 3 and EnSite NavX mapping systems. We compared fluoroscopy and procedural times, radiopaque contrast dose, change in QRS duration pre- and post-procedure, and complications in all patients. Fluoroscopy time was 86% lower in the EAM group compared to the conventional group [mean 37.2 min (CFA) vs. 5.5 min (EAM), P = 0.00003]. There was no significant difference in total procedural time [mean 183 min (CFA) vs. 161 min (EAM), P = 0.33] but radiopaque contrast usage was lower in the EAM group [mean 16 mL (CFA) vs. 4 mL (EAM), P = 0.006]. Likewise, there was no significant change in QRS duration with BiV pacing between the groups [mean -13 (CFA) vs. -25 ms (EAM), P = 0.09]. CONCLUSION: Electroanatomic mapping-guided lead placement using either Carto or ESI NavX mapping systems is a feasible alternative to conventional fluoroscopic methods for CRT-D implantation utilizing the protocol described in this study.

Permanent His-bundle pacing: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Aims: Permanent cardiac pacing of the His-bundle restores and retains normal electrical activation of the ventricles. Data on His-bundle pacing (HBP) are largely limited to small single-centre reports, and clinical benefits and risks have not been systematically examined. We sought to systematically examine published studies of patients undergoing permanent HBP and quantify the benefits and risks of the therapy. Methods and results: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for full-text articles on permanent HBP. Clinical outcomes of interest included implant success rate, procedural and lead complications, pacing thresholds, QRS duration, and ejection fraction at follow-up, and mortality. Data were extracted and summarized. Where possible, meta-analysis of aggregate data was performed. Out of 2876 articles, 26 met the inclusion criteria representing 1438 patients with an implant attempt. Average age of patients was 73 years and 62.1% were implanted due to atrioventricular block. Overall average implant success rate was 84.8% and was higher with use of catheter-delivered systems (92.1%; P < 0.001). Average pacing thresholds were 1.71 V at implant and 1.79 V at >3 months follow-up; although, pulse widths varied at testing. Average left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEFs) were 42.8% at baseline and 49.5% at follow-up. There were 43 complications observed in 907 patients across the 17 studies that reported safety information. Conclusion: Among 26 articles of permanent HBP, the implant success rate averaged 84.8% and LVEF improved by an average of 5.9% during follow-up. Specific reporting of our clinical outcomes of interest varied widely, highlighting the need for uniform reporting in future HBP trials.