Thoracic de-kyphosis for revision surgery of a failure case of endoscopic discectomy: a case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Indications and clinical outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic thoracic discectomy(PETD) in treating thoracic disc herniation is rarely reported and still controversial. We reported an unsatisfied recovery of thoracic disc herniation with PETD, treated by a second posterior thoracic laminectomy and Ponte osteotomy. CASE DESCRIPTION: A male presented with lower extremity weakness and stagger caused by T3/4 intervertebral disc herniation. The upper thoracic curve was in excessive kyphosis with T2-5 Cobb angle of 34.3 degrees. The preoperative ODI score was 34 and Roelzs's JOA score was 14. Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic thoracic discectomy (PETD) from a posterior lateral approach was performed. At five-month follow-up, his thoracic back pain and staggering gait did not improve. The postoperative T2-5 Cobb angle was 32.1 degrees, the ODI score was 24 and Roelzs's JOA score was 14. A second posterior thoracic decompression this time with fixation was performed, but no disc herniation was detected. A Ponte osteotomy was performed to correct the kyphosis. One month after the second surgery, muscle strength of the lower limbs was improving with the T2-5 Cobb angle decreased to 19.4 degrees, the ODI score decreased to 10 and Roelzs's JOA score increase to 16. Six month later, the ODI score decreased to 0 and Roelzs's JOA score improved to 18. In review of the literature, PETD doesn't guarantee the patient a satisfactory neurological recovery for kyphotic thoracic disc herniation. Posterior decompression with Ponte osteotomy may be beneficial to release the tension and decompression of the spinal cord tension. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracic disc herniation with kyphosis angle >20 degrees (T2-5), percutaneous endoscopic thoracic discectomy is not likely to get good neurologic results. Posterior laminectomy with ponte osteotomy might be beneficial for these patients to induce dorsal drifting of the spinal cord from anterior herniation.

Bi-needle technique versus transforaminal endoscopic spine system technique for percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy in treating intervertebral disc calcification: a propensity score matched cohort analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical results of a Bi-needle technique and conventional transforaminal endoscopic spine system (TESSYS) technique for percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) in treating patients with intervertebral disc calcification (IDC). BACKGROUND: PELD has gained acceptance for treating patients with IDC. The Bi-needle technique was designed to improve the efficiency and safety of PELD. METHOD: Bi-needle and TESSYS group within each cohort were balanced using 1:1 propensity score matching. Finally, 32 patients with IDC treated by Bi-needle technique from December 2015 to September 2017 were enrolled and 25 patients treated by TESSYS technique from the same spine surgery center between January 2013 and October 2017 were enrolled as controls. RESULTS: Propensity score matching generated 22 Bi-needle and 22 TESSYS patients. There were no significant differences in visual analog scale and lumbar Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores between Bi-needle and TESSYS group. Operative time and rate of complications in the Bi-needle was significantly better than the TESSYS group (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Both surgical methods achieved good clinical outcomes. However, compared with the TESSSY technique, operative time of the Bi-needle technique is shorter, and rate of complications is lower.

Efficacy of Bisphosphonates on Bone Mineral Density and Fracture Rate in Patients With Osteogenesis Imperfecta: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Epidemiological evidence suggests that bisphosphonates are the most promising drugs for patients with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI). However, data on this issue are controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of bisphosphonates on bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture rate in patients with OI. Electronic databases were searched to find relevant studies. Two reviewers independently identified relevant randomized controlled trials, which evaluated the efficacy of bisphosphonates in patients with OI. Outcome measures were fracture incidence and BMD changes in different skeletal sites. A total of 9 randomized controlled trials including 557 patients were identified. Meta-analysis demonstrated a beneficial effect of bisphosphonates on spine BMD Z-score and area BMD (in grams per square centimeter) %. Patients treated with bisphosphonates had a lower risk of fracture [risk ratio (RR) = 0.80; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66-0.97] compared with those in control groups. In children, bisphosphonates were efficacious in reducing fractures (RR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.66-0.97), where in adults, bisphosphonates seemed equivalent to placebo in that respect (RR = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.42-1.59), although no significant difference was noted between these 2 RRs (test of interaction, z = -0.07; P = 0.94). There was also no significant difference in reducing fractures between oral and intravenous bisphosphonates (P = 0.23). This study showed that bisphosphonates could increase the BMD and reduce the risk of facture in patients with OI. There was no enough evidence to identify any differences in efficacy between oral and intravenous bisphosphonates on fracture reduction, as well as between children and adults.

Timing of surgical decompression for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury.

PURPOSE: Although there have been numerous studies aimed at determining the effects and safety of early vs. late surgical decompression for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury, controversies still exist regarding the optimal timing of surgery for this serious spinal trauma. This study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of early vs. late surgical decompression for lower cervical spine trauma associated with spinal cord injury. METHODS: A retrospective review of was performed on consecutive patients who underwent surgical decompression for lower cervical (C3-C7) spine trauma associated with spinal cord injury at six institutions across China from January 2007 to January 2012. These patients were analysed according to the timing of surgical intervention. The early group comprised patients who underwent surgery within the first 72 hours after being injured, whilst the late group comprised patients who underwent surgery after the first 72 hours. For analysis of neurologic improvement, patients who had completed a follow-up of at least six months were assessed. Other outcomes analysed were hospitalisation periods, complications and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 595 patients were identified (456 men and 139 women at an average age of 41.4 years), with 212 in the early group and 383 in the late group. Patients in both groups had made a significant neurologic improvement in the final follow-up, but no statistically significant difference was noted between groups. Patients in the early group had a significantly shorter hospital stay (15.4 vs. 18.3 days, p <0.001) but realised no benefits in terms of intensive care unit length of stay and ventilator days. No significant differences were identified between groups with regards complications (pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, wound infection, sepsis and urinary tract infection). Compared with the late group, the early group had a significantly higher incidence of postoperative neurological deterioration (6.6 vs. 0.7 %, p <0.001) and mortality (7.1 vs. 2.1 %, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: The timing of surgery for patients sustaining traumatic lower cervical spine injury with neurological involvement did not affect neurological recovery. Early surgical intervention was associated with a higher incidence of mortality and neurological deterioration compared with late surgical intervention, indicating that surgery after the first 72 hours might be relatively safe.

Morphology of Herniated Disc as a Predictor for Outcomes of Posterior Percutaneous Full-endoscopic Cervical Discectomy in Treating Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy.

OBJECTIVE: To quantitively characterize the morphology of cervical disc herniation (CDH) causing cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR) and investigate whether the morphological features of CDH are associated with clinical outcomes in CSR patients treated by posterior percutaneous full-endoscopic cervical discectomy (PPECD). METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective study. Eighty-seven PPECD-treated patients meeting the inclusion criteria were included between May 2017 and May 2019. Based on preoperative T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), we designed and measured six morphological parameters of CDH for all patients to reflect its relative position to cervical spinal cord and protruding degree: DC-SC distance from the center of disc (DC) and the center of spinal cord (SC); DC-DP distance from the center of cervical disc (DC) to the peak of herniation (DP); internal diameter of the disc; axial length of CDH; central angle of CDH formed by central axes of CDH and spinal cord; the modified index of CDH. We recorded general information, neck disability index (NDI) scores, visual analog scale (VAS) scores of neck and arm of all patients preoperatively and postoperatively at 1-year follow-up. The association of preoperative general variables and morphological parameters with clinical outcomes were explored by utilizing logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: The preoperative neck-VAS, arm-VAS, and NDI were significantly decreased after PPECD and remained at a low value at follow-up. In regards to the morphological parameters of CDH, the mean value of DC-SC distance, DC-DP distance, internal diameter of the disc, axial length of CDH, central angle of CDH, and modified index of CDH were 1.61 ± 0.30 cm, 1.66 ± 0.32cm, 1.04 ± 0.21 cm, 0.63 ± 0.19cm, 39.38° ± 11.94°, and 0.39 ± 0.24, respectively. For patients grouped by difference in the recovery rate of NDI and arm-VAS (excellent improved group, EI; and limited improved group, LI), there were no differences in the age, gender, surgical segments, and morphological parameters, except for the central angle of CDH. According to binary logistic regression analysis, only the preoperative central angle of CDH was significantly associated with postoperative NDI recovery (odds ratio: 0.873; 95% confidence interval: 0.819-0.931, P = 0.002). ROC analysis showed the optimal cut-off value of the central angle of CDH for predicting the postoperative improvement of functional outcomes is 33.788°. CONCLUSION: Preoperative morphology of CDH is related to the outcomes of CSR patients after PPECD. Patients with a large central angle of CDH (>33.788°) have more likelihood of ameliorating neurological symptoms of CSR. There is the potential to select the central angle of CDH as a predictor for outcomes of PPECD in treating CSR.