Clinical characteristics and antimicrobial susceptibility of Fusobacterium species isolated over 10 years at a Japanese university hospital.

PURPOSE: Anaerobic bacteria, existing on human skin and mucous membranes, can cause severe infections with complications or mortality. We examined the clinical characteristics of patients infected with Fusobacterium spp. and assessed their antibiotic susceptibility. METHODS: Clinical data were collated from patients diagnosed with Fusobacterium infections in a Japanese university hospital between 2014 and 2023. Antibiotic susceptibility tests were conducted following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. RESULTS: We identified 299 Fusobacterium isolates. The median age was 61 years (range, 14-95 years), with females constituting 43.1% of the patients. Most infections were community-acquired (84.6%, 253/299). Multiple bacterial strains were isolated simultaneously in 74.6% of cases. One-fourth of the patients had solid organ malignancies (25.4%, 76/299), and 14.5% (11/76) of those had colorectal cancer. The 30-day mortality rate was 1.3%. Fusobacterium species were isolated from blood cultures in 6% (18/299) of the patients. Patients, aged 75 years or older, with cerebrovascular disease or hematologic malignancy exhibited significantly higher prevalence of blood culture isolates in univariate analysis. Each Fusobacterium species had its characteristic infection site. Approximately 5% F. nucleatum and F. necrophorum isolates showed penicillin G resistance. Moxifloxacin resistance was observed in varying degrees across strains, ranging from 4.6 to 100% of isolates. All isolates were sensitive to ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitors, carbapenems, and metronidazole. CONCLUSION: We show a link between Fusobacterium species and solid organ malignancies. We observed resistance to penicillin, cefmetazole, clindamycin, and moxifloxacin, warranting caution in their clinical use. This study offers valuable insights for managing Fusobacterium infections and guiding empirical treatments.

Comparison of incidence of hyponatremia between linezolid and vancomycin in neonates and infants.

A previous study reported that the incidence of hyponatremia after linezolid (LZD) use was higher than that with vancomycin (VCM) use in adults. However, hyponatremia due to LZD in neonates and infants was not investigated. This study aimed to compare the incidence of hyponatremia between LZD and VCM use in neonates and infants. The retrospective study was conducted at the Aichi Medical University Hospital. All patients who were cared for in NICU or GCU and received ≥3 days of LZD or VCM were included in this study. Hyponatremia was defined as serum sodium level ≤134 mEq/L and ≥5 % decrease from baseline after administration of LZD or VCM. A total of 76 patients (LZD, N = 36; VCM, N = 37) were included. There was no significant difference in the incidence of hyponatremia between the two groups (19.4 % vs 16.2 %, p = 0.72). The proportion of patients with a minimum value of serum sodium ≤134 mEq/L during treatment was 47.3 % in the LZD group and 35.1 % in the VCM group (p = 0.29), and the decrease in serum sodium level from baseline to the minimum value was 80.5 % and 78.4 %, respectively (p = 0.85). In conclusion, there was no significant difference in the incidence of hyponatremia between the LZD and VCM groups. Therefore, it is not necessary to avoid LZD use in neonates and infants because of the risk of hyponatremia.

Retrospective study to investigate appropriate duration of antibiotic treatment for uncomplicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in patients with immunodeficiency.

BACKGROUND: Since the appropriate antibiotic duration for uncomplicated Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) bacteremia (u-SAB) in an immunocompromised state is still unclear, physicians are likely to extend antibiotic therapy from 2 weeks to 4-6 weeks. To examine the appropriate duration of antibiotic therapy for u-SAB, we performed this study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed all patients with u-SAB at our institute seen between January 2020 and August 2023. A total of 51 patients were enrolled, and they were divided into the following two groups by antibiotic duration: longer duration group ≥28 days after blood culture negativity, and shorter duration group. Then, the patients were matched by a propensity score using the covariates of age, sex, qSOFA, and CCI. The primary outcome was to identify the prognosis by duration of antibiotic treatment. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, all-cause 30-day mortality was 0 % in both groups. Hence, there was no significant difference in all-cause 90 days mortality (19.0% vs 9.5%, p = 0.33) or recurrence (9.5%% vs 0%, p = 0.22). Before propensity-score matching, we found that a serum level of CRP 2.0 mg/dL and greater after intravenous antibiotic treatment was one of the poor prognostic factors. The cut-off value of serum CRP level was 2.0 mg/dL with a sensitivity of 82.1% and a specificity of 75.0%. CONCLUSION: We suggested that 4-6 weeks of antibiotic treatment for immunodeficient u-SAB patients was unnecessary. Moreover, the serum level of CRP after completion of IV antibiotic treatment could be a prognostic marker for u-SAB.

Epidemiological study of respiratory syncytial virus infection in adults during the pandemic of COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: While respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is one of the most common pathogens in adults admitted to the ICU due to respiratory diseases, no reports regarding the occurrence rate of RSV infections in adults in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic exist. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted this retrospective study to examine the exact occurrence rate of RSV infections in adults. We reviewed all patients (≥18 years) with any respiratory symptoms who received quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using nasopharyngeal samples for respiratory viruses by GeneLEAD at the Aichi Medical University Hospital between November 2022 and November 2023. RESULTS: A total of 541 adult patients who underwent PCR test were enrolled in this study. RSV was identified in 18 cases (3.3 %); 8 (1.5 %) upper and 10 (1.8 %) lower respiratory tract infections. Influenza A and SARS-CoV-2 were found in 10 (1.8 %) and 61 (11.3 %), respectively. Patients with RSV infections and COVID-19 had more comorbidities than those with Influenza virus infections. As for RSV-associated with lower respiratory tract infection cases, 10 developed acute respiratory failure, resulting in 1 fatal case due to pneumonia and 1 died of septic shock due to ileus. The 30-, 90-day mortality rates were 1 (6 %) and 2 (11 %) respectively. CONCLUSION: About 3 % of adults had RSV infections during the COVID-19 pandemic. The outcomes of RSV infections in adults were similar to those by COVID-19. Those with comorbidities should have a preventive method against RSV infections, the same as for COVID-19.

Systematic review and meta-analysis for impacts of oral antibiotic treatment on pregnancy outcomes in chronic endometritis patients.

BACKGROUND: Chronic endometritis is a persistent inflammatory condition of the endometrium that negatively affects pregnancy outcomes. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines recommend oral antibiotic treatment for chronic endometritis. However, a recent randomized controlled trial concluded that it was unclear whether antibiotic treatment improved pregnancy outcomes. Hence, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to validate the impact of oral antibiotic treatments on pregnancy outcomes among patients with chronic endometritis. METHODS: We systematically searched the PubMed, Scopus, Ichushi, CINAHL, and EMBASE databases until May 2021. We compared the pregnancy outcomes in patients with chronic endometritis with and without antibiotic treatment. We then focused on the implantation rate, intrauterine pregnancy rate, and live birth rate to evaluate pregnancy outcomes. RESULTS: Seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. Three hundred seventy-two patients were treated with antibiotics, while 1024 patients were not treated with antibiotics. Various antibiotic regimens were administered during the study period [14-21 days]. Antibiotic treatments for chronic endometritis did not increase the implantation rate (odds ratios [OR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78-1.33), intrauterine pregnancy rate (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.72-1.63), or live birth rate (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.65-1.97). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis proved that oral antibiotic treatment did not improve pregnancy outcomes in patients with chronic endometritis. Accordingly, further studies are needed to elucidate the treatment to improve pregnancy outcomes.

Could quick SOFA and SOFA score be a predictive tool for 30-day and in-hospital mortality in acute empyema?

While acute empyema is a critical infectious disease showing a high mortality rate, there are no prognostic tools to evaluate the disease severity and prognosis for patients. We conducted a retrospective cohort to determine whether quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) and SOFA score can predict the disease severity and prognosis of acute empyema. A total of 53 patients were enrolled in the study. The mean age was 69 years and 41 patients (77%) were male. Twenty-two patients (42%) had multiple underlying diseases with the Charlson comorbidity index ≥3. The-30 days, and in-hospital deaths were 7 (13%) and 10 (19%), respectively. The area under the ROC curve of SOFA score and CCI for 30-day and in-hospital deaths were 0.814 (p = 0.073) and 0.752 (p = 0.082), 0.848 (p = 0.07) and 0.762 (p = 0.011), respectively. Univariate analysis showed that qSOFA ≥2 and SOFA score ≥2, isolation of potentially drug-resistant (PDR) pathogen, high CCI (≥3), performance status of 2-4, surgical intervention, and anaerobic bacteria involvement were prognostic factors. Of these, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that qSOFA ≥2 and SOFA score ≥2 (p = 0.011), isolation of PDR pathogen (p = 0.005), and high CCI (≥3) (p = 0.015) were independently poor prognostic factors. We concluded that qSOFA and SOFA scores could predict the disease severity and prognosis in acute empyema. Additionally, isolation of PDR pathogens and high CCI could be poor prognostic factors for patients.

Efficacy and validity of guideline-concordant treatment according to the JRS guidelines for the managements of pneumonia in adults updated in 2017 for nursing and healthcare-associated pneumonia. A propensity-matching score analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with nursing and healthcare-associated pneumonia (NHCAP) commonly receive empiric antibiotic therapy according to the guideline's recommendation corresponding to the patient's deteriorated conditions. However, it is unclear whether guideline-concordant treatment (GCT) could be effective or not. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To evaluate the efficacy and validity of GCT according to the current guideline for pneumonia, we conducted this retrospective study. NHCAP patients who were admitted to our institute between 2014 and 2017 were enrolled. Based on the initial antibiotic treatment, these patients were divided into two groups, the GCT group (n = 83) and the non-GCT group (n = 146). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the baseline characteristics and potential confounders between the two groups. After PSM, patients' characteristics, microbial profiles, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Both groups were well-balanced after PSM, and 78 patients were selected from each group. There were no differences in patients' characteristics or microbial profiles between the two groups. As for outcomes, there were no differences in 30-day, in-hospital mortality rate, duration of antibiotic treatment, or admission. The severity of pneumonia was more severe in patients with the GCT group than those with the non-GCT group. Anti-pseudomonal agents as initial treatment were more frequently seen in patients with the GCT group than those in the non-GCT group. CONCLUSION: Unlike previous studies, GCT's recommendation for management of pneumonia by the JRS in 2017 would appear to be valid and does not increase the mortality rate.

Comparative study of SmartAmp assay and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction by saliva specimen for the diagnosing COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: The pandemic of a novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by a severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has been problematic worldwide. A new SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic test (SmartAmp) was licensed in Japan in July 2021. This method, which enables us to diagnose COVID-19 as well as a gene mutation on the virus, is promising to reduce medical costs and staff labor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To analyze the diagnostic accuracy of the SmartAmp assay for diagnosing COVID-19, we performed this retrospective study at our institute during April and May 2021. We compared the results of the SmartAmp assay and real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) using a saliva sample from individuals suspected as having COVID-19. RESULTS: Out of 70 samples tested, the SmartAmp assay had 50 (71%) positive and 20 (29%) negative results. Using rRT-PCR as a reference, the diagnostic accuracy displayed a sensitivity of 84%, a specificity of 95%, a positive predictive value of 97.7%, and a negative predictive value of 70.4%. On the other hand, false-negative cases were found in 7 (10%), and there was no significant difference of Ct-value between true positive and false negative cases (Mean Ct-value 25.2 vs. 27.5 cycles, p = 0.226 by Mann-Whitney U test). CONCLUSION: The SmartAmp assay is a valuable method to diagnose COVID-19 rapidly. However, the negative predictive value is not high enough to diagnose the disease, so that negative results should be considered for rRT-PCR testing if patients are suspected of having COVID-19.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of decontamination methods to prevent hospital environmental contamination and transmission of Clostridioidesdifficile.

The current guidelines suggest that hospital rooms previously occupied with Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) patients should be decontaminated with recommended decontamination methods because C. difficile can persist on surfaces despite adherence to the recommended procedures. Recently, ultraviolet (UV) light and hydrogen peroxide have increasingly been used as innovative decontamination methods. Hence, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate which decontamination methods are effective in reducing environmental C. difficile contamination. We systematically searched the EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Ichushi until March 11, 2021. We evaluated the efficacy of decontamination methods in terms of the frequency of C. difficile contamination on high-touch surfaces in hospital rooms and the incidence of hospital-acquired C. difficile infection. Among the 15 studies retrieved in our meta-analysis, eight evaluated decontamination methods with the frequency of C. difficile detection among samples after disinfection procedures, and eight reported the number of hospital-acquired CDI cases. Pooled analysis indicated that hydrogen peroxide significantly reduced the frequency of environmental C. difficile contamination, compared with hypochlorite (odds ratios [OR]: 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.07-0.23). Additionally, hydrogen peroxide reduced the incidence of hospital-acquired CDI compared to other methods (OR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.28-0.96). Decontamination with UV significantly reduced the incidence of hospital-acquired CDI compared to hypochlorite (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.28-0.96). The use of hydrogen peroxide and UV can help prevent environmental C. difficile contamination and transmission in healthcare facilities.

Comparison of mortality between echinocandins and polyenes for an initial treatment of candidemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend echinocandins for the initial treatment of candidemia. However, polyenes are often chosen in clinical settings because of their fungicidal and anti-biofilm effects. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate whether echinocandins are superior to polyenes in terms of mortality for the initial treatment of candidemia. METHODS: We systematically searched the Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, and CINAHL databases until July 1, 2020. We compared the mortality rates of patients who received echinocandins and polyenes. As a subgroup analysis, we compared the mortality rates following the use of echinocandins versus liposomal amphotericin B. RESULTS: Fifteen studies involving 854 patients were included. Various Candida species were detected, and the rates of resistance of echinocandins and polyenes against the overall detected isolates were 1.0% and 0%, respectively. The overall mortality recorded in 15 studies was 41.0%, and the mortality was significantly higher for polyenes than echinocandins (odd ratios [OR] 1.68, 95% confidential interval [CI] 1.17-2.42). Furthermore, liposomal amphotericin B showed higher mortality in the initial treatment than echinocandins (OR 1.42; 95% CI 0.84-2.39). CONCLUSIONS: We revealed an association between echinocandin treatment and reduced mortality in the initial treatment of candidemia when causative fungi were not considered. Our findings partially support current guidelines recommending echinocandins for the treatment of candidemia.

Meta-analysis of fluoroquinolones versus macrolides for treatment of legionella pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: Only a single meta-analysis has reported the clinical benefit of fluoroquinolones (FQs) for Legionella pneumonia; however, there is no robust data available to confirm this result, based on current guidelines. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing FQs with macrolides (MCs) on their efficacy and safety in Legionella pneumonia, using studies published until January 2020. The outcomes included mortality (overall; 30-day), clinical cure, time to apyrexia, length of hospital stay, and adverse events. RESULTS: Five RCTs and twelve retrospective studies were identified. Clinical cure was comparable between the treatment groups (risk rate (RR) 1.07, 95% confidential interval (CI) 0.86-1.31). Mortality was significantly higher for MCs than for FQs (overall, odd rate (OR) 0.59, 95% CI 0.35-0.98; 30-day, OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.20-0.85). FQs significantly reduced the length of hospital stay, compared to MCs (mean difference -3.58, 95% CI -5.48-1.69). Other outcomes were not significantly different between the treatment groups (time to apyrexia; mean difference -1.83, 95% CI -5.15-1.5, adverse events; OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.33-1.15). In subgroup analyses, levofloxacin significantly reduced the length of hospital stay over two specific MCs (azithromycin and clarithromycin) (mean difference -3.03, 95% CI -5.33-0.72), whereas mortality was not significantly different between the treatment groups (overall, OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.19-1.24; 30-day, OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.13-1.13). CONCLUSIONS: FQs exhibited superior effects in terms of mortality and length of hospital stay in Legionella pneumonia. These results support current guidelines recommending FQs for the treatment of Legionella pneumonia.

The combined score of quick SOFA and the charlson comorbidity index could be a poor prognostic indicator for in-hospital mortality among patients with necrotizing fasciitis.

INTRODUCTION: While necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a rare but rapidly progressive devastating soft tissue infectious disease showing a high in-hospital mortality rate of 20-30%, there are no evidence-based predictive tools. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For the purpose of examining which predictive tools could correctly reflect the severity and prognosis of NF, we retrospectively reviewed all patients who were diagnosed with NF at our institute. The disease severity was evaluated by quick SOFA (qSOFA), SOFA score, SIRS score, APACHE II score, LRINEC score and the combined score of qSOFA and CCI. RESULTS: A total of 27 patients were enrolled in this study. The median age was 68 years (range 39-96 years). With respect to the predictive values for in-hospital mortality among NF patients, the area under the ROC curve for qSOFA, SOFA score, APACHE II score, the combined score of qSOFA and CCI were 0.653 (p = 0.192), 0.588 (p = 0.12), 0.709 (p = 0.075) and 0.782 (p = 0.016) respectively. A univariate analysis showed that the combined score of qSOFA and CCI≥5 and the initial treatment failure were poor prognostic indicators for the in-hospital death among NF patients. The appropriate cut-offs of qSOFA and CCI were based on the Youden Index. CONCLUSION: We concluded that the combined score of qSOFA and CCI could reflect the severity and prognosis of NF for in-hospital death.

Ceftriaxone versus tazobactam/piperacillin and carbapenems in the treatment of aspiration pneumonia: A propensity score matching analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Aspiration pneumonia (AP) accounts for 5.0-53.2% of hospitalized pneumonia and the treatment commonly used is by broad-spectrum antibiotics to cover anaerobes. Since ceftriaxone (CTRX) could generally cover oral streptococcus and anaerobes implicated in AP, it could be a useful option in the treatment of AP, instead of piperacillin-tazobactam/(PIPC/TAZ) or Carbapenems. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For the purpose of examining whether CTRX is as effective as broad-spectrum antibiotics for the treatment of AP, this retrospective study included consecutive community-onset patients who were admitted to our institute between 2014 and 2017. These patients were divided into two groups, a CTRX group (n = 25) and a PIPC/TAZ or carbapenems group (n = 97) based on the initial antibiotic treatment. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the potential confounders, and 23 patients were selected from each group. Patients among CTXR group received CTRX, while those among PIPC/TAZ or carbapenems group received PIPC/TAZ, or carbapenems and/or other agents. RESULTS: Both groups were well-balanced after PSM. There were no differences in 30-day mortality, duration of hospital stay or antibiotic treatments in the between them. The medical costs were much more expensive in the PIPC/TAZ or carbapenems group than in the CTR group (35,582 v. s. 8678 Japanese yen, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: CTRX is one of the most useful antibiotic treatment for AP, which is not inferior to broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment. In addition, usage of CTRX in the treatment of AP is more economical than broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment, and could contribute to reduction of medical costs.

Efficacy and validity of automated quantitative chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay for SARS-CoV-2 antigen test from saliva specimen in the diagnosis of COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: The pandemic of a novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by a severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has been problematic worldwide. A new SARS-CoV-2 antigen test (LUMIPULSEⓇ) was licensed and widely used in Japan since May 2020. We conducted this study intending to whether the automated quantitative CLEIA antigen test using a saliva sample is effective and valid for the diagnosis of COVID-19. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed and compared the diagnostic accuracy of both the automated quantitative CLEIA antigen test and real-time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR) using a saliva sample from individuals suspected as having COVID-19. RESULTS: A total of 305 samples were collected and tested in Aichi Medical University Hospital and affiliated facilities from December 2020 until January 2021 at our institute. Using reverse-transcription PCR as a reference, the AUROC of the automated quantitative CLEIA antigen test was 0.903 (95% confidential interval 0.845-0.962, p < 0.001). The appropriate cut-off antigen level was 4.0 pg/mL and had a sensitivity of 77.8%, a specificity of 99.6%, a positive predictive value of 98%, and a negative predictive value of 94.5%. On the other hand, the diagnostic accuracy of the antigen test decreased among patients among patients with COVID-19 with threshold cycle (Ct-value)≥27, which shows the AUROC was 0.795 (95%CI 0.687-0.907, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: While the automated quantitative CLEIA antigen test from saliva specimen could be one of the most useful diagnostic tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19 in general practice, clinicians should know the limitations of the antigen test.

In vivo pharmacodynamics of lascufloxacin and levofloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae and Prevotella intermedia in a pneumonia mixed-infection mouse model.

This study aimed to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of a new quinolone, lascufloxacin, for the treatment of complicated pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae and Prevotella intermedia using a neutropenic mice pneumonia mixed-infection model. In this study, one S. pneumoniae and four P. intermedia isolates were utilized. Antimicrobial efficacy was calculated for each isolate as the reduction of the bacterial count comparatively to the non-treated mice (log10 colony forming units (cfu)/mL) obtained in the lungs of the treated mice after 24 h. Consequently, the bacterial densities of S. pneumoniae (KY-9) and P. intermedia (335) in the lungs of control animals were 8.20 ± 0.19 log10 cfu/mL and 5.26 ± 1.50 log10 cfu/mL, respectively. At human-simulated doses, lascufloxacin and levofloxacin showed high antimicrobial activities against not only S. pneumoniae (lascufloxacin: 1.88 ± 0.43 log10 cfu/mL, p < 0.001; levofloxacin 4.30 ± 0.75 log10 cfu/mL, p < 0.001), but also P. intermedia (lascufloxacin: 1.54 ± 0.57 log10 cfu/mL, p < 0.001; levofloxacin: 2.79 ± 0.55 log10 cfu/mL, p = 0.0102). Additionally, levofloxacin demonstrated attenuated antimicrobial efficacies against S. pneumoniae in the mixed-infection model compared with that in the single infection model. In contrast, lascufloxacin showed enhanced antimicrobial activities against S. pneumoniae and P. intermedia in the mixed-infection model. In conclusion, lascufloxacin resulted in enhanced efficacies against S. pneumoniae and P. intermedia, in both the single and mixed-infection models used. These data support the clinical utility of lascufloxacin for use against S. pneumoniae and P. intermedia in the treatment of pneumonia.

Retrospective study on clinical efficacy and safety for daptomycin intermittent doses with or without loading dose in renal failure patients.

This retrospective study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of daptomycin (DAP) intermittent doses and the effectiveness of DAP loading dose in renal failure patients received DAP intermittent doses. One hundred and ninety-seven patients received DAP for at least 3 days from 2014 to 2017. Clinical and microbiological outcomes and the safety were assessed. A total of 183 patients (93, 60 and 30 patients received DAP daily dose, every 48 h dose and thrice per week dose) were included. DAP intermittent doses, such as every 48 h dose (28.3%) and thrice per week dose (30.0%), showed significantly higher mortality rates than that of DAP daily dose (6.5%) (p = 0.0320). Especially for bacteremia patients, significantly higher mortality was admitted, compared with patients received DAP daily doses (p = 0.0160). Moreover, patients received DAP intermittent doses were admitted slower improvements of their inflammation after DAP therapy started, compared with patients received daily dose. Additionally, DAP loading dose for renal failure patients decreased their mortality and improved patients' inflammation early. Especially for patients received DAP thrice per week dose, they showed significantly lower mortality than patients received non-loading dose (p = 0.0306). Additionally, these clinical enhancements of DAP therapy with loading dose were admitted without any enhancements of its adverse effect risks, except alkaline phosphatase elevation, compared with non-loading dose. In conclusion, DAP intermittent doses showed poor clinical outcomes, compared with daily dose. Then, DAP loading dose would be better clinical option for patients received DAP intermittent doses.

Relationship between cytopenia and gestational age in infants and neonates treated with linezolid therapy.

BACKGROUND: Linezolid has been the common antimicrobial treatment for Gram-positive infection even in neonates and infants. Major adverse events associated with linezolid treatment is cytopenia. However, there were few reports about the relationship between cytopenia and gestational age. Primary objective of this study was to compare the relationship between cytopenia in infants and neonates treated with linezolid therapy and gestational age. METHODS: In total, 44 patients were divided into two groups depend on their gestational age [<180 days; low gestational age group (20 patients); >180 days group; high gestational age group (24 patients)]. All patients treated with linezolid from April 2014 to March 2018 at NICU or GCU of Aichi Medical University Hospital. Investigation items were as follows; sex, age, weight, duration of treatment, Apgar score, laboratory data, rate of patients with blood transfusion, concomitant medications, hematologic abnormalities during linezolid treatment. RESULTS: The incidence of overall cytopenia in low gestational age group was significantly higher than high gestational age group (65.0 % vs. 25.0 %; p < 0.05). Of note, the incidence of thrombocytopenia in low gestational age group showed significantly higher than high gestational age group (45.0% vs. 8.3%, p < 0.05). Then, the proportion of patients occurred thrombocytopenia who received linezolid 10 mg/kg every 8 h were higher than 10 mg/kg every 12 h in both groups. CONCLUSION: In cases linezolid is administered three times a day should be more carefully of thrombocytopenia in patients with gestational days less than 180 days.

The SOFA score could predict the severity and prognosis of infective endocarditis.

INTRODUCTION: Although infectious endocarditis (IE) is a potentially severe infectious disease, there are no prognostic tools for in-hospital mortality for IE patients. This is the first report documenting that the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score could evaluate the severity and outcome among IE patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2007 to 2018, we reviewed all patients who were diagnosed as having IE at our institue. Patients diagnosed as definite IE according to the modified Duke criteria or by surgical procedure were included in this study. RESULTS: A total of 66 IE patients were enrolled in this study. They were 45 males (68%) and the median age was 70 years. As for prognostic factors for in-hospital death among IE patients, SOFA score ≥6, CCI ≥3, surgical procedure, heart failure, immunological phenomena and detection of S. aureus as a causative pathogen were identified as prognostic factors by univariate analysis. Of these 6 factors, SOFA score ≥6 (OR 7.6, 95%CI 1.3-46.6, p = 0.029), heart failure (OR 9.7, 95%CI 1.1-86.1, p = 0.042), surgery (OR 0.1, 95%CI 0-0.8, p = 0.037) and immunological phenomena (OR 0.1, 95%CI 0-0.9, p = 0.042) were independent prognostic factors for in-hospital mortality among IE by logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSION: The SOFA score could be a good prognostic tool to use for IE patients. Also, SOFA score ≥6, surgery, immunological phenomena and heart failure were independent prognostic factors for in-hospital mortality among IE patients.

The evaluation of frequency of nephrotoxicity caused by liposomal amphotericin B.

BACKGROUND: Liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) was developed to reduce nephrotoxicity and maximize the therapeutic utility of amphotericin B in the treatment of invasive fungal infections. However, there is little investigation into the safety of L-AmB in patients with several renal functions. Therefore, we retrospectively evaluated the clinical safety of L-AmB among patients with several renal functions. METHODS: We divided patients treated with L-AmB from April 2014 to September 2016 into 4 groups (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)≥60, 60 > eGFR≥30, eGFR<30 and hemodialysis). The main endpoint was the incidence of nephrotoxicity and the difference in the serum creatinine values at the end of L-AmB treatment as compared with baseline. RESULTS: The incidence of nephrotoxicity was not significantly different among four groups (eGFR≥60; 27.0%, 60 > eGFR≥30; 30.8%, eGFR<30; 50.0%, hemodialysis; 40.0%, p = 0.56).Only one group of patients with eGFR≥60 admitted the significant increase of serum creatinine value after L-AmB treatment started (p < 0.01). Patients admitted 0.5 mg/dL or more of increase in serum creatinine values until 9 days from the L-AmB therapy started (eGFR≥60; 5.0 days [3.0-8.0 days], 60 > eGFR≥30; 5.0 days [4.0-9.0 days], eGFR<30; 4.5 days [3.0-5.0 days], hemodialysis; 5.5 days [4.0-7.0 days], p = 0.46). CONCLUSION: Take previous clinical study results together, our data suggested that L-AmB is safer agent than amphotericin B for the treatment of fungal infections in patients with eGFR<60 and hemodialysis patients at the start of treatment. Also, especially, we should use L-AmB more carefully until 9 days from the treatment started.

Comparative study on safety of linezolid and vancomycin in the treatment of infants and neonates for Gram-positive bacterial infections.

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin has been the common antimicrobial treatment for Gram-positive infection even in neonates and infants, while it is difficult to adjust blood concentration. Linezolid is also effective for Gram-positive infection, and is not necessary to monitor drug blood concentration. Primary objective of this study was to compare the safety of linezolid and vancomycin in infants and neonates for resistant Gram-positive infections. METHODS: In total, 68 patients [linezolid group (32 patients); vancomycin group (36 patients)] treated with antimicrobials at Aichi Medical University Hospital between April 2014 and March 2017. Investigation items were as follows; sex, age, gestational age, birth weight, body weight, duration of treatment, Apgar score, laboratory data, rate of patients with blood transfusion, serum levels of vancomycin, disease type, concomitant medications, clinical isolates, adverse effects during antimicrobial treatment, antimicrobial susceptibility of isolated Gram-positive bacteria. RESULTS: Any substantially abnormal laboratory values were admitted in linezolid 40.6% (13/32) and vancomycin 41.7% (15/36) groups, respectively (p = 0.93). Platelet count was significantly decreased in only linezolid group (p = 0.03). Any adverse events during antimicrobial treatment were admitted in linezolid 46.9% (15/32) and vancomycin 58.3% (21/36) groups, respectively (p = 0.34). CONCLUSION: There were no notable differences in safety of linezolid and vancomycin groups even in neonates and infants. However, platelet count was significantly decreased in only linezolid group. The careful monitoring of platelet count would be required for infants and neonates receiving linezolid treatment.