Effects of Early Short-Course Corticosteroids on Immune-Related Adverse Events in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

INTRODUCTION: In real-world practice, most non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving combined immunochemotherapy are exposed to short-course corticosteroids following immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) infusion to prevent chemotherapy-related adverse events. However, whether this early short-course corticosteroid use prevents immune-related adverse events (irAEs) remains unknown. METHODS: Between January 1st, 2015, and December 31st, 2020, NSCLC patients who received at least one cycle of ICI with or without chemotherapy were enrolled. Early short-course corticosteroids were defined as corticosteroids administered following ICI injection and before chemotherapy on the same day and no longer than 3 days afterward. The patients were categorized as either "corticosteroid group" or "non-corticosteroid group" depending on their exposure to early short-course corticosteroid. The frequencies of irAEs requiring systemic corticosteroid use and irAEs leading to ICI discontinuation were compared between the two groups, and exploratory survival analyses were performed. RESULTS: Among 252 eligible patients, 137 patients were categorized as "corticosteroid group" and 115 patients as "non-corticosteroid group." The corticosteroid group enriched patients in the first-line setting (n = 75, 54.7%), compared to the non-corticosteroid group (n = 28, 24.3%). Thirty patients (21.9%) in the corticosteroid group and 35 patients (30.4%) in the non-corticosteroid group developed irAEs requiring systemic corticosteroid use (odds ratio [OR], 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-1.18; p = 0.15). Eight patients (5.8%) in the corticosteroid group, as compared with 18 patients (15.7%) in the non-corticosteroid group, permanently discontinued ICI due to irAEs (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.12-0.85; p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Early short-course corticosteroids following each ICI injection may reduce the rate of irAEs that lead to ICIs discontinuation, warranting further investigation of its prophylactic use to mitigate clinically significant irAEs.

Cross-site validation of lung cancer diagnosis by electronic nose with deep learning: a multicenter prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Although electronic nose (eNose) has been intensively investigated for diagnosing lung cancer, cross-site validation remains a major obstacle to be overcome and no studies have yet been performed. METHODS: Patients with lung cancer, as well as healthy control and diseased control groups, were prospectively recruited from two referral centers between 2019 and 2022. Deep learning models for detecting lung cancer with eNose breathprint were developed using training cohort from one site and then tested on cohort from the other site. Semi-Supervised Domain-Generalized (Semi-DG) Augmentation (SDA) and Noise-Shift Augmentation (NSA) methods with or without fine-tuning was applied to improve performance. RESULTS: In this study, 231 participants were enrolled, comprising a training/validation cohort of 168 individuals (90 with lung cancer, 16 healthy controls, and 62 diseased controls) and a test cohort of 63 individuals (28 with lung cancer, 10 healthy controls, and 25 diseased controls). The model has satisfactory results in the validation cohort from the same hospital while directly applying the trained model to the test cohort yielded suboptimal results (AUC, 0.61, 95% CI: 0.47─0.76). The performance improved after applying data augmentation methods in the training cohort (SDA, AUC: 0.89 [0.81─0.97]; NSA, AUC:0.90 [0.89─1.00]). Additionally, after applying fine-tuning methods, the performance further improved (SDA plus fine-tuning, AUC:0.95 [0.89─1.00]; NSA plus fine-tuning, AUC:0.95 [0.90─1.00]). CONCLUSION: Our study revealed that deep learning models developed for eNose breathprint can achieve cross-site validation with data augmentation and fine-tuning. Accordingly, eNose breathprints emerge as a convenient, non-invasive, and potentially generalizable solution for lung cancer detection. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is not a clinical trial and was therefore not registered.

Hope and its relationship with treatment/ physical related factors in lung cancer patients receiving immunotherapy.

BACKGROUNDPURPOSE: Immunotherapy is a new treatment option for patients with Lung Cancer (LC). However, relatively limited research has explored about patients' perception of hope and its associated factors during the process. This study aimed to examine level of perceived hope and the factors related to hope, with a particular focus on treatment and physically related factors, in LC patients receiving immunotherapy. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted and patients who had already received at least one immunotherapy cycle were recruited from two hospitals in northern Taiwan. The questionnaire included a background information form, the Herth's Hope Index, and the Symptom Severity Scale. Stepwise regression was applied to identify the most robust factors related to level of hope in the participants. RESULTS: A total of 130 patients were recruited. Overall, patients reported moderate to high levels of hope and mild symptoms. Fatigue, weakness, appearance changes, pruritus, and shortness of breath were identified as the most severe symptoms. Further regression analysis showed that patients with poor performance status, less immunotherapy cycles, higher level of fatigue, and more severe pruritus reported to have lower level of hope which explained 47% of the variances. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that lung cancer patients undergoing immunotherapy had moderate level of hope. Patients' performance status, selected symptoms and times of receiving immunotherapy were the robust factors related to hope. Systematic assessment of patients' symptoms and the development of appropriate interventions to reduce distress and enhance hope are strongly recommended for both clinical care and research.

Real-world evidence of lorlatinib therapy in Taiwanese patients with advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Lorlatinib is a brain-penetrant, third-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor indicated for ALK-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In a global phase II study, patients who experience disease progression despite prior treatment with ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) was assessed. Herein, we report real-world clinical outcomes of lorlatinib-treated patients with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC who were heavily pretreated and progressed on first- and second-generation ALK-TKIs, in a Taiwanese population under the lorlatinib expanded access program (EAP). METHODS: This multicenter observational study examined the effectiveness and safety of ALK-positive advanced NSCLC patients that progressed from previous second-generation ALK-TKI therapy and received lorlatinib treatment subsequently. Patients who received lorlatinib treatment under EAP between Jul 2017 and Sep 2019 were eligible. Patients were followed for at least one year from the first lorlatinib treatment until study completion. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were eligible for safety analysis (male: 46.0 %; median age: 52.8 [27.5-78.3] years; brain metastases: 81.0 %). Fifty-four patients with more than one-month lorlatinib treatment were included in the effectiveness analysis. Prior to lorlatinib treatment, 10 patients (18.5 %) received one ALK-TKI, 27 (50.0 %) received two ALK-TKIs, and 17 (31.5 %) received three or more ALK-TKIs. The overall median rwPFS was 9.2 months (95 % confidence interval: 5.3-21.1). The best overall response rate (n = 51) was 13.7 %, with a disease control rate of 80.4 %. CONCLUSION: Lorlatinib exhibits substantial activity and tolerability when used clinically in a later-line setting in a Taiwanese population with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC.

Different treatment efficacies and T790M acquisition of EGFR-TKIs on NSCLC patients with variable Del-19 subtypes of EGFR.

EGFR exon 19 deletion (Del-19) comprises multiple advanced NSCLC subtypes. EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) efficacy and T790M acquisition in various Del-19 subtypes is unknown. We prospectively collected tissue samples from patients harboring NSCLC with Del-19 between 2006 and 2020. We evaluated EGFR-TKI treatment effectiveness among the different Del-19 subtypes. We collected 1391 NSCLC samples from 892 patients with Del-19, and the most common subtype was del E746-A750 (67.5%). 741 patients had taken first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs. There were no significant differences in response rates between patients with different Del-19 subtypes (P = .630). Patients with indel E746 had the longest median PFS (14.6 months), but those with non-LRE deletions had the shortest PFS (8.9 months; P = .002). For OS analysis, patients with indel E746 also had the longest OS (34.1 months), but those with non-LRE deletions had the shortest OS (21.1 months; P = .046). Patients with different Del-19 subtypes showed no significant differences in the T790M acquisition rates (P = .443). Among the 151 patients with acquired T790M who received third-generation EGFR-TKIs, the Del-19 subtype was not associated with different RR and PFS. In vitro cellular viability and activation of the EGFR pathway analysis were consistent with the clinical findings. In conclusion, compared with del E746-A750, indel E746 was associated with longer PFS and OS, but the non-LRE subtype was correlated with shorter survival prognosis. There were no significant differences in the acquired T790M rate and treatment effectiveness of subsequent third-generation EGFR-TKIs between various Del-19 subgroups.

LncRNA SLCO4A1-AS1 suppresses lung cancer progression by sequestering the TOX4-NTSR1 signaling axis.

BACKGROUND: Metastasis is a multistep process involving the migration and invasion of cancer cells and is a hallmark of cancer malignancy. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) play critical roles in the regulation of metastasis. This study aims to elucidate the role of the lncRNA solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 4A1-antisense 1 (SLCO4A1-AS1) in metastasis and its underlying regulatory mechanisms. METHODS: A comprehensive analysis of the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database were used to identify metastasis-associated lncRNAs. Transwell migration and invasion assays, and a tail vein-injection mouse model were used to assess the migration and invasion of cancer cells in vitro and in vivo, respectively. High-throughput screening methods, including MASS Spectrometry and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), were used to identify the downstream targets of SLCO4A1-AS1. Reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), western blotting, RNA pull-down, RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIp) assays were conducted to identify and validate the underlying regulatory mechanisms of SLCO4A1-AS1. RESULTS: SLCO4A1-AS1 reduced cancer cell migration and invasion by disrupting cytoskeleton filaments, and was associated with longer overall survival in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. SLCO4A1-AS1 directly interacted with the DNA-binding protein, TOX High Mobility Group Box Family Member 4 (TOX4), to inhibit TOX4-induced migration and invasion. Furthermore, RNA-seq revealed that neurotensin receptor 1 (NTSR1) is a novel and convergent downstream target of SLCO4A1-AS1 and TOX4. Mechanistically, SLCO4A1-AS1 functions as a decoy of TOX4 by interrupting its interaction with the NTSR1 promoter and preventing NTSR1 transcription. Functionally, NTSR1 promotes cancer cell migration and invasion through cytoskeletal remodeling, and knockdown of NTSR1 significantly inhibits TOX4-induced migration and invasion. CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrated that SLCO4A1-AS1 antagonizes TOX4/NTSR1 signaling, underscoring its pivotal role in lung cancer cell migration and invasion. These findings hold promise for the development of novel therapeutic strategies targeting the SLCO4A1-AS1/TOX4/NTSR1 axis as a potential avenue for effective therapeutic intervention in lung cancer.

Lung adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation: Molecular markers testing and treatment outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Among the histologic types of lung cancer, adenocarcinoma is the most common. Moreover, lung adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation (LANED) is a rare histologic character. So far, the clinical significance remains unclear. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We searched for the patients diagnosed with LANED from the electronic pathology database between January 2000 and June 2020 in a tertiary hospital. The tumor specimens were reviewed by a pathologist to confirm the diagnosis. EGFR mutation, ALK translocation, as well as programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and rearranged during transfection (RET) expression were tested in the specimens of LANED. The clinical data were also collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 10 patients diagnosed with LANED were included. Most were male (80%) and ever smokers (70%). The median age was 71.5 years old. At diagnosis, most had tumors harboring no EGFR mutation (70%), negative ALK translocation (88.9%), and without PD-L1 expression (90%). All specimens tested by immunohistochemical staining for RET expression (n = 9) showed positive results. Among the 10 patients, five underwent operation (stage I, n = 4; stage II, n = 1). The patient with stage II disease had recurrence 11 months later. For patients with advanced stages (stage III, n = 1; stage IV, n = 4), the treatment modalities varied and the overall survival ranged from 11.0 to 46.7 months. CONCLUSION: LANED might be associated with a high proportion of RET expression, whereas EGFR mutation, ALK alteration, and PD-L1 expression were uncommon. Further large-scale prospective studies on molecular testing profile and clinical significance of LANED are warranted.

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Activity in Patients with NSCLC Harboring Uncommon EGFR Mutations: A Retrospective International Cohort Study (UpSwinG).

BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKIs) are standard of care for patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with common mutations (Del19 or L858R); however, 7%-23% of NSCLC tumors harbor uncommon EGFR mutations. These mutations are highly heterogeneous, and developments in detection techniques are helping to identify mutations with little or no clinical data. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective, global, multi-center study (NCT04179890), existing health records were identified for consecutive EGFR TKI-naïve patients with uncommon EGFR mutations (T790M, ex20ins, major uncommon [G719X, L861Q, or S768I], or "other" mutations; compound mutations) treated with erlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib, or osimertinib in first or second line. Endpoints included time-to-treatment failure (TTF), objective response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Overall, 246 patients (median age: 69.5 years; Asian: 84%) were included from 9 countries. Most patients (92%) received an EGFR TKI as first-line therapy; 54%, 43% and 3% received afatinib, first-generation TKIs, and osimertinib, respectively. Median TTF and OS with EGFR TKIs were 9.9 and 24.4 months; ORR was 43%. In patients treated with first-line chemotherapy (n = 20), median TTF and ORR were 6.6 months and 41%. Outcomes were most favorable in patients with major uncommon or compound mutations. Overall, TTF was 11.3 months with afatinib and 8.8 months with first-generation EGFR TKIs across mutation categories. In most mutation categories, median OS was >2 years. CONCLUSION: In a real-world setting, EGFR TKIs were the preferred treatment option in patients with uncommon EGFR mutations; strongest outcomes were seen in patients with major uncommon and compound mutations.

Assessing tumor angiogenesis using dynamic contrast-enhanced integrated magnetic resonance-positron emission tomography in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Angiogenesis assessment is important for personalized therapeutic intervention in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study investigated whether radiologic parameters obtained by dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-integrated magnetic resonance-positron emission tomography (MR-PET) could be used to quantitatively assess tumor angiogenesis in NSCLC. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included 75 patients with NSCLC who underwent DCE-integrated MR-PET at diagnosis. The following parameters were analyzed: metabolic tumor volume (MTV), maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), reverse reflux rate constant (kep), volume transfer constant (Ktrans), blood plasma volume fraction (vp), extracellular extravascular volume fraction (ve), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and initial area under the time-to-signal intensity curve at 60 s post enhancement (iAUC60). Serum biomarkers of tumor angiogenesis, including vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A), angiogenin, and angiopoietin-1, were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays simultaneously. RESULTS: Serum VEGF-A (p = 0.002), angiogenin (p = 0.023), and Ang-1 (p <  0.001) concentrations were significantly elevated in NSCLC patients compared with healthy individuals. MR-PET parameters, including MTV, Ktrans, and kep, showed strong linear correlations (p <  0.001) with serum angiogenesis-related biomarkers. Serum VEGF-A concentrations (p = 0.004), MTV values (p <  0.001), and kep values (p = 0.029) were significantly higher in patients with advanced-stage disease (stage III or IV) than in those with early-stage disease (stage I or II). Patients with initial higher values of angiogenesis-related MR-PET parameters, including MTV > 30 cm3 (p = 0.046), Ktrans > 200 10- 3/min (p = 0.069), and kep > 900 10- 3/min (p = 0.048), may have benefited from angiogenesis inhibitor therapy, which thus led to significantly longer overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings suggest that DCE-integrated MR-PET provides a reliable, non-invasive, quantitative assessment of tumor angiogenesis; can guide the use of angiogenesis inhibitors toward longer survival; and will play an important role in the personalized treatment of NSCLC.

Efficacy and Safety of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography-Derived Augmented Fluoroscopy Combined with Endobronchial Ultrasound in Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions.

BACKGROUND: The diagnostic yield of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) using radial endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) remains challenging without navigation systems. Cone-beam computed tomography-derived augmented fluoroscopy (CBCT-AF) represents a recently developed technique, and its clinical utility remains to be investigated. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic yield of transbronchial biopsy (TBB) using a combination of CBCT-AF and radial EBUS. METHODS: We recruited consecutive patients with PPLs who underwent radial EBUS-guided TBB, with or without AF, between October 2018 and July 2019. Following propensity score 1:1 matching, we recorded the procedure-related data and measured their efficacy and safety. RESULTS: While 72 patients received EBUS-plus-AF, 235 patients received EBUS only. We included 53 paired patients following propensity score matching. The median size of lesions was 2.8 and 2.9 cm in the EBUS-plus-AF group and EBUS-only group, respectively. Diagnostic yield was higher in the former group (75.5 vs. 52.8%; p = 0.015). The diagnostic yield for the EBUS-plus-AF group was significantly higher for lesions ≤30 mm (73.5 vs. 36.1%; p = 0.002). Moreover, there was no significant difference in the complication rates (3.8 vs. 5.7%; p = 1.000). Twenty-four nodules (45.3%) were invisible by fluoroscopy in the EBUS-plus-AF group. All of them were identifiable on CBCT images and successfully annotated for AF. The mean radiation dose of total procedure, CBCT, and fluoroscopy was 19.59, 16.4, and 3.17 Gy cm2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: TBB using a combination of CBCT-AF and EBUS resulted in a satisfactory diagnostic yield and safety.

Detecting small pulmonary nodules with spiral ultrashort echo time sequences in 1.5 T MRI.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated ultrashort echo time (UTE) sequences in 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for small lung nodule detection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 120 patients with 165 small lung nodules before video-associated thoracoscopic resection were enrolled. MRI sequences included conventional volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE, scan time 16 s), spiral UTE (TE 0.05 ms) with free-breathing (scan time 3.5-5 min), and breath-hold sequences (scan time 20 s). Chest CT provided a standard reference for nodule size and morphology. Nodule detection sensitivity was evaluated on a lobe-by-lobe basis. RESULTS: The nodule detection rate was significantly higher in spiral UTE free-breathing (> 78%, p < 0.05) and breath-hold sequences (> 75%, p < 0.05) compared with conventional VIBE (> 55%), reaching 100% when nodule size was > 16 mm, and reaching 95% when nodules were in solid morphology, regardless of size. The inter-sequence reliability between free-breathing and breath-hold spiral UTE was good (κ > 0.80). Inter-reader agreement was also high (κ > 0.77) for spiral UTE sequences. Nodule size measurements were consistent between CT and spiral UTE MRI, with a minimal bias up to 0.2 mm. DISCUSSION: Spiral UTE sequences detect small lung nodules that warrant surgery, offers realistic scan times for clinical work, and could be implemented as part of routine lung MRI.

Experience from Asian centers in a named-patient-use program for afatinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who had progressed following prior therapies, including patients with uncommon EGFR mutations.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated outcomes among patients with advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated at Asian centers participating in the global named-patient-use (NPU) program for afatinib. METHODS: Patients had progressed after initial benefit with erlotinib or gefitinib, and/or had an EGFR or HER2 mutation, had no other treatment options, and were ineligible for afatinib trials. The recommended starting dose of afatinib was 50 mg/day. Dose modifications were allowed, and afatinib was continued as long as deemed beneficial. Response and survival information was provided voluntarily. Safety reporting was mandatory. RESULTS: 2242 patients (26% aged ≥ 70 years, 96% with adenocarcinoma) received afatinib at centers in 10 Asian countries. Most were heavily pre-treated, including prior treatment with erlotinib or gefitinib. Of 1281 patients tested, 1240 had EGFR mutations (common: 1034/1101; uncommon: 117/1101). There were no new safety signals, the most common adverse events being rash and diarrhea. Objective response rate (ORR) was 24% overall (n = 431 with data available), 27% for patients with common EGFR mutations (n = 230) and 28% for those with uncommon mutations (n = 32); median time to treatment failure (TTF) in these groups was 7.6 months (n = 1550), 6.4 months (n = 692) and 8.4 months (n = 83), respectively. In patients with EGFR exon 20 insertions (n = 23) and HER2 mutations (n = 12), median TTF exceeded 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Patient outcomes in this study were similar to those reported in the analysis of the global NPU. Afatinib achieved clinical benefits in patients with refractory NSCLC. ORR and TTF were similar between patients with tumors harboring uncommon and common EGFR mutations.

Ramucirumab or placebo plus erlotinib in EGFR-mutated, metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: East Asian subset of RELAY.

In the global phase III RELAY study, ramucirumab plus erlotinib (RAM + ERL) demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) to placebo plus erlotinib (PL + ERL) in untreated patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (hazard ratio (HR) [95% CI]: 0.59 [0.46-0.76]). This prespecified analysis assessed RAM + ERL efficacy and safety in the RELAY subset enrolled in East Asia (Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, Hong Kong). Randomized (1:1) patients received oral ERL (150 mg/d) plus intravenous RAM (10 mg/kg) or PL Q2W. Primary endpoint was PFS (investigator-assessed). Key secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), overall survival (OS), and safety. Exploratory endpoints included biomarker analyses and time to second progression (PFS2). Median PFS was 19.4 vs 12.5 mo for RAM + ERL (n = 166) vs PL + ERL (n = 170) (HR: 0.636 [0.485-0.833]; P = .0009). The 1-y PFS rate was 72.4% vs 52.2%, respectively. PFS benefit was consistent in most subgroups, including by EGFR mutation (Ex19del, Ex21.L858R). ORR and DCR were similar in both arms, but median DoR was longer with RAM + ERL. OS and PFS2 were immature at data cut-off (censoring rates, 81.2%-84.3% and 64.1%-70.5%, respectively). Grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events were more frequent with RAM + ERL (70.7%) than PL + ERL (49.4%). Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation were similar in both arms (RAM + ERL, 13.3%; PL + ERL, 12.9%), as were post-progression EGFR T790M mutation rates (43%; 50%). With superior PFS over PL + ERL and safety consistent with the overall RELAY population, RAM + ERL is a viable treatment option for EGFR-mutated metastatic NSCLC in East Asia.

Association of Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression with Fusion Variants and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Lung Adenocarcinoma Receiving Crizotinib.

BACKGROUND: Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is associated with clinical outcomes of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, whether PD-L1 expression plays a role in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive lung ADC is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the impact of PD-L1 in patients with ALK-positive lung ADC receiving crizotinib. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PD-L1 expression was identified by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction was used for ALK variant detection, and immunofluorescence-based multiplex staining was applied for exploring immune cells in tumor microenvironments. RESULTS: A total of 78 patients with ALK-positive advanced ADC were enrolled in our study, of whom 52 received crizotinib. Compared with EGFR/ALK wild-type tumors, PD-L1 expression was lower in ALK-positive ADC. ALK fusion variants were identified in 32 patients, and those with variant 3 and 5 (short variants) had higher PD-L1 expression than those with other variants. The crizotinib objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) was better in tumors with negative PD-L1 expression (ORR/PFS in PD-L1 0% vs. 1%-49% vs. 50%-100%: 60.7%/11.8 months vs. 38.5%/6.5 months vs. 36.4%/4.0 months, p = .007/.022). The multivariate Cox proportional hazards model revealed that PD-L1 0% (vs. ≥1%) was an independent factor for longer PFS (adjusted hazard ratio 0.322, 95% confidence interval 0.160-0.650, p = .002). Multiplex IHC in three cases showed a varied extent of immune cell infiltrations in tumors with different PD-L1 expression. CONCLUSION: Positive PD-L1 expression was associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes in patients with ALK-positive lung ADC receiving crizotinib. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Not all lung adenocarcinoma with sensitizing driver mutations experienced durable responses to small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Similar to the negative impact of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in epidermal growth factor receptor mutant tumors treated with TKIs, this study demonstrated that positive PD-L1 expression was also associated with worse response rate and shorter progression-free survival of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive adenocarcinoma treated with crizotinib. Among different ALK fusion partners, tumors with short variants (V3 and V5) had higher PD-L1 compared with long variants (V1, V2, and V6). Testing PD-L1 before initiating crizotinib for ALK-positive lung cancer could be a simple method to provide important prognostic information.

Clinical factors associated with treatment toxicity of pemetrexed plus platinum in elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study was to explore the clinical factors associated with treatment toxicities of pemetrexed plus platinum in elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Chemo-naive patients aged ≥ 70 with advanced NSCLC treated with pemetrexed plus platinum were included. Medical records were reviewed and clinical data, including age, gender, smoking status, comorbidities, EGFR mutation status, chemotherapy regimens, previous use of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors, treatment-related hematologic, renal, and hepatic toxicities, and treatment responses, were analyzed. Comorbidity conditions were evaluated by using the Simplified Comorbidity Score (SCS) and Charlson Comorbidity Index Score (CCIS). RESULTS: A total of 144 patients were included. In the univariate analysis, patients with SCS >9 (p = 0.006) and cigarette smoking (p = 0.028) were associated with a significantly higher rate of grade 3/4 neutropenia than their counterpart. Carboplatin use was associated with a higher rate of grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia than cisplatin use (p = 0.028). In the multivariate analysis, SCS >9 was associated with a significantly higher risk of anemia of any grade (odds ratio [OR]: 2.72, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09-6.77). Carboplatin use was associated a higher risk of any grade (OR: 4.61, 95% CI: 1.07-19.90) and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (OR: 7.37, 95% CI: 1.36-39.92). No clinical factors were found to be associated with hepatic and renal toxicities. CONCLUSION: High SCS and carboplatin use were associated with hematological toxicities with pemetrexed plus platinum use in elderly patients with NSCLC.

Ramucirumab plus erlotinib in patients with untreated, EGFR-mutated, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (RELAY): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Dual blockade of the EGFR and VEGF pathways in EGFR-mutated metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is supported by preclinical and clinical data, yet the approach is not widely implemented. RELAY assessed erlotinib, an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) standard of care, plus ramucirumab, a human IgG1 VEGFR2 antagonist, or placebo in patients with untreated EGFR-mutated metastatic NSCLC. METHODS: This is a worldwide, double-blind, phase 3 trial done in 100 hospitals, clinics, and medical centres in 13 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older (20 years or older in Japan and Taiwan) at the time of study entry, had stage IV NSCLC, with an EGFR exon 19 deletion (ex19del) or exon 21 substitution (Leu858Arg) mutation, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and no CNS metastases. We randomly assigned eligible patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive oral erlotinib (150 mg/day) plus either intravenous ramucirumab (10 mg/kg) or matching placebo once every 2 weeks. Randomisation was done by an interactive web response system with a computer-generated sequence and stratified by sex, geographical region, EGFR mutation type, and EGFR testing method. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02411448, and is ongoing for long-term survival follow-up. FINDINGS: Between Jan 28, 2016, and Feb 1, 2018, 449 eligible patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to treatment with ramucirumab plus erlotinib (n=224) or placebo plus erlotinib (n=225). Median duration of follow-up was 20·7 months (IQR 15·8-27·2). At the time of primary analysis, progression-free survival was significantly longer in the ramucirumab plus erlotinib group (19·4 months [95% CI 15·4-21·6]) than in the placebo plus erlotinib group (12·4 months [11·0-13·5]), with a stratified hazard ratio of 0·59 (95% CI 0·46-0·76; p<0·0001). Grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 159 (72%) of 221 patients in the ramucirumab plus erlotinib group versus 121 (54%) of 225 in the placebo plus erlotinib group. The most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events in the ramucirumab plus erlotinib group were hypertension (52 [24%]; grade 3 only) and dermatitis acneiform (33 [15%]), and in the placebo plus erlotinib group were dermatitis acneiform (20 [9%]) and increased alanine aminotransferase (17 [8%]). Treatment-emergent serious adverse events were reported in 65 (29%) of 221 patients in the ramucirumab plus erlotinib group and 47 (21%) of 225 in the placebo plus erlotinib group. The most common serious adverse events of any grade in the ramucirumab plus erlotinib group were pneumonia (seven [3%]) and cellulitis and pneumothorax (four [2%], each); the most common in the placebo plus erlotinib group were pyrexia (four [2%]) and pneumothorax (three [1%]). One on-study treatment-related death due to an adverse event occurred (haemothorax after a thoracic drainage procedure for a pleural empyema) in the ramucirumab plus erlotinib group. INTERPRETATION: Ramucirumab plus erlotinib demonstrated superior progression-free survival compared with placebo plus erlotinib in patients with untreated EGFR-mutated metastatic NSCLC. Safety was consistent with the safety profiles of the individual compounds in advanced lung cancer. The RELAY regimen is a viable new treatment option for the initial treatment of EGFR-mutated metastatic NSCLC. FUNDING: Eli Lilly.

Acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors is mediated by the reactivation of STC2/JUN/AXL signaling in lung cancer.

Constitutive activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling pathway is implicated in the initiation and progression of lung cancer. EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-targeted therapy has become the standard treatment for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, acquired resistance to these agents remains a major obstacle for managing NSCLC. Here, we investigated a novel strategy to overcome EGFR TKI resistance by targeting the stanniocalcin 2 (STC2)-JUN-AXL pathway. We revealed that STC2 was expressed at significantly higher levels in EGFR TKI-resistant cells. Further, clinical analysis showed that STC2 expression was increased after the development of EGFR TKI resistance and that higher levels were correlated with shorter progression-free survival in EGFR TKI-treated lung cancer patients. Moreover, STC2 overexpression in EGFR TKI-sensitive cells resulted in EGFR TKI resistance. Conversely, genetic silencing of STC2 rendered EGFR TKI-resistant cells more sensitive to EGFR TKIs. Mechanically, STC2 enhanced AXL promoter activity by increasing the phosphorylation of c-Jun, which is an indispensable transcription factor that transactivates AXL. STC2 promoted activation of the JUN-AXL-extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling axis in lung cancer cells. Pharmacological or genetic inhibition of AXL-ERK activity inhibited STC2-mediated EGFR TKI resistance. We also demonstrated that PE2988 cells, a C797S-independent osimertinib-resistant primary cancer cell line from a lung cancer patient, responded to combined AXL inhibitor and osimertinib treatment. In conclusion, our research indicates that STC2 overexpression is important for acquired resistance to EGFR TKIs and that STC2-JUN-AXL-ERK signaling might be a potential therapeutic target to overcome resistance to EGFR TKIs.

Clinical outcomes and secondary epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation among first-line gefitinib, erlotinib and afatinib-treated non-small cell lung cancer patients with activating EGFR mutations.

Gefitinib, erlotinib and afatinib are approved for first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) bearing an activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. However, the clinical outcomes among the three EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are still controversial. We aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes and secondary EGFR T790M mutation among the three EGFR TKIs. From May 2014 to January 2016, a total of 301 patients received treatment with gefitinib, erlotinib or afatinib, for first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC with an activating EGFR mutation, based on their clinicians' choice. The median overall survival (OS) was 37.0 months. Although the baseline characteristics of patients were unequal, progression-free survival and OS did not differ among the 3 groups. Multivariate analysis found that gefitinib (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.29, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-9.46, p = 0.027), EGFR TKI treatment duration more than 13 months (aOR 3.16, 95% CI, 1.20-8.33, p = 0.020), male (aOR 3.25, 95% CI, 1.10-9.66, p = 0.034), initial liver metastasis (aOR 4.97, 95% CI 1.18-20.96, p = 0.029) and uncommon EGFR mutation (aOR 0.14, 95% CI, 0.02-0.97, compared to EGFR deletion 19, p = 0.047) were independent factors for secondary T790M mutation. In real-world practice, choosing first line EGFR TKI based on the patients' clinical characteristics yielded good clinical outcomes. First-line gefitinib, longer EGFR TKI treatment duration, male, initial liver metastasis and uncommon EGFR mutations may be independent factors for secondary EGFR T790M mutation.

Cranial Irradiation for Patients with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Mutant Lung Cancer Who Have Brain Metastases in the Era of a New Generation of EGFR Inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Immediate whole brain radiation (WBRT) has been the standard for patients with lung cancer with brain metastases. The study aims to evaluate the effect of immediate cranial irradiation in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant lung cancer in the era of a new generation of EGFR inhibitors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records of 198 patients with EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer and brain metastases at initial metastatic diagnosis were reviewed. Patients were categorized into four groups: immediate WBRT, immediate cranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), delayed radiation upon progression of cranial lesions (DRT), and never cranial irradiation (NRT). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival related to EGFR inhibitors were analyzed. RESULTS: The SRS group had the fewest brain metastases and fewest extracranial lesions, and the DRT and NRT groups had the smallest brain metastases. Median survival were 18.5, 55.7, 21.1, and 18.2 months for the WBRT, SRS, DRT, and NRT groups, respectively. Patients who had received EGFR T790M inhibitors survived longer (41.1 vs. 19.8 months). In multivariate analysis, the OS of patients in the SRS group was longer than that in the NRT group (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.315). Patients who had fewer extracranial lesions and who had received EGFR T790M inhibitor treatments also survived longer (aHR: 0.442 and 0.357, respectively). CONCLUSION: Immediate stereotactic radiosurgery but not whole brain radiation was associated with longer survival. Because of patient heterogeneity and the introduction of EGFR T790M inhibitors, the timing and modality of cranial irradiation should be determined individually, and cranial irradiation may be omitted for selected patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Immediate whole brain radiation has been the standard for patients with lung cancer with brain metastases. In this study, it was observed that, for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant advanced lung cancer who had brain metastases, there was no difference in survival between patients who never received cranial irradiation and those who received whole brain radiation immediately. Patients who received immediate stereotactic radiosurgery or who had ever received EGFR T790M inhibitors survived longer. Patients who received immediate stereotactic radiosurgery have fewer brain metastases. These findings suggest that the timing and modality of cranial irradiation should be determined individually, and cranial irradiation may be omitted in selected patients.

Clinical factors associated with treatment outcomes in EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases: a case-control observational study.

BACKGROUND: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations often develop brain metastases. Treatment with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has shown the effectiveness; however, knowledge of the clinical factors associated with outcomes in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations remains limited. METHODS: Treatment-naive patients diagnosed with advanced non-squamous NSCLC with brain metastases harboring EGFR mutations and treated with an EGFR-TKI as first-line therapy were enrolled with analysis of their medical records. RESULTS: A total of 134 advanced NSCLC patients with brain metastases harboring EGFR mutations received an EGFR-TKI (gefitinib: 62, erlotinib: 49, and afatinib: 23) as the first-line therapy. Sixty-nine had exon 19 deletions (51.5%), and 56 (41.8%) had L858R mutations. There was no statistically significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) among the EGFR-TKIs. Significantly shorter OS was noted in patients with multiple brain metastases (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.43, p = 0.007), uncommon EGFR mutations (HR: 3.75, p = 0.009), and liver metastases. Thirty-eight patients (29.1%) received brain radiotherapy for brain metastases before disease progression, and had a significantly longer time until intracranial progression. However, the brain radiotherapy had no statistically significant impact on PFS or OS. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with uncommon mutations, multiple brain metastases, and concomitant liver metastases tended to have shorter OS. Brain radiotherapy could delay the time to intracranial disease progression but had no impact on survival. The different first-line EGFR-TKIs achieved similar treatment responses in terms of PFS and OS in the EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with brain metastases.