Evaluation of the Osteoinductive Effect of PDGF-BB Associated With Different Carriers in Bone Regeneration in Bone Surgical Defects in Rats.

PURPOSE: Extensive bone defects in maxillofacial region can be corrected with autograft. However the disadvantages of this type of therapy lead to the search for new bone substitutes. Thus, we evaluated the biological behavior and osteoinductive platelet-derived growth factor type BB (PDGF-BB) associated with different carriers, by histological analysis and immunohistochemical histometric critical defects performed in rat calvaria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Critical defects were created with 5-mm diameter calvaria of rats. Each defect was randomly divided into 8 experimental groups, evaluated at 15 and 30 postoperative days for histomorphometry and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: The results showed new bone formation in all groups, independent of postoperative time. At 30 days, the beta-tricalcium phosphate matrix (TCP) group just did not differ from bone matrix mineralized bovine (BIO) group in the new bone formation (P = 0.1403). In none of the groups' analyzed biomaterials, growth factor stimulated increase in bone formation (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: With the methodology used, the growth factor associated with the tested biomaterials did not induce new bone formation.

Comparative Assessment of the Effect of Ibuprofen and Etodolac on Edema, Trismus, and Pain in Lower Third Molar Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of ibuprofen (IBU) and etodolac (ETO) for controlling pain, edema, and trismus after extraction of lower third molars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty adolescents and adults with 2 impacted mandibular-third molars (in similar positions) were selected for the study. Patients were randomly assigned either to the IBU group (600 mg of IBU 3 times a day for 3 days) or to the ETO group (300 mg of ETO 3 times a day for 3 days). Drugs were administered immediately after dental extraction. RESULTS: During the first 2 days after extraction, swelling was more pronounced in the IBU group than in the ETO group (P = .033). Seven days after surgery, there was no difference in the degree of edema between the groups. At the 2- and 7-day evaluation points, mouth opening was significantly more reduced in the IBU group than in the ETO group (P < .05). After the first 6 hours, the ETO group had more effective pain relief (P < .05), but after this time point, both groups reported similar degrees of relief. Compared with the IBU group, the ETO group had a lower need for administration of additional rescue analgesics. CONCLUSIONS: After extraction of impacted lower third molars, we found that swelling, trismus, and pain were more effectively controlled with ETO than with IBU.

Immunohistochemistry evaluation of BMP-2 with ß-tricalcium phosphate matrix, polylactic and polyglycolic acid gel, and calcium phosphate cement in rats.

PURPOSE: The installation of implants has become a routine procedure in the clinic. However, it takes time and adequate bone thickness, and for that, tissue engineering has made efforts to develop substitutes for autografts, in view of certain disadvantages of this material. The decision to choose the most suitable graft material for each case is an important step in the success of bone reconstruction. This study was to verify, by means of immunohistochemical study, that the addition of bone morphogenetic protein had some influence on biomaterials commercially available, taking into account the formation of mineralized tissue, bone replacement, and the amount of degradation of biomaterials. METHODS: The sample consisted of 72 rats that were divided into eight treatment groups, in which two defects of 5 mm were made in each animal calvaria. Euthanasia was performed at 5, 15, and 30 days postop. RESULTS: A histologic and histometric analysis was performed to quantitate the area of mineralized tissue formed, the area of newly formed bone, and the area of degradation of the biomaterials. Data were analyzed with multiple comparisons of means by Tukey contrasts, and significant difference was assigned at the level of P < 0.05. The proteins used for immunohistochemical analysis accounted for the process of formation, mineralization, and bone resorption and was performed using ordinal qualitative analysis, where from assigning scores. CONCLUSIONS: Bone morphogenetic protein 2 was shown to be effective as an inducer of bone formation process independent biomaterial used mainly for accelerating the resorption process of the framework.