Nursing Team Workload and the Apache Index of Gravity of Patients Post Liver Transplantation: A Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation is a complex treatment that demands a high workload from the nursing team. This study evaluated the nursing workload and its relationship with the severity of patients after liver transplantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study, with a review of 286 medical records of liver transplant patients from January 2014 to June 2018 in a hospital in southern Brazil was performed. Demographic and clinical characteristics were analyzed, as well as the outcome and the scores Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), Nursing Activity Score (NAS), and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV (APACHE IV). RESULTS: Men represented 68.9% of the sample, the mean age was 57.6 years (±10), and the MELD and APACHE IV scores respectively showed means of 24.3 (±5.6) and 58.9 (±23.7). The length of stay in the intensive care unit was 5 days (range, 3-7) and mortality was 9.1%. There was a gradual reduction in the mean NAS in 24 hours (94.9 ± 18.5), 48 hours (87.2 ± 17.0), 72 hours (83.3 ± 19.6) and at discharge (82.3 ± 18.0). Associations of NAS with MELD (P ˂ .05), APACHE IV (P ˂ .001), length of stay in the intensive care unit (P ˂ .001), and death outcome (P ˂ .001) were observed. The greatest workload was in checking vital signs, water balance, and administrative tasks (P ˂ .001). CONCLUSIONS: The nursing workload in the postoperative period of liver transplantation exceeds what is recommended and is related to the severity of the patients.

Resting energy expenditure in cirrhotic patients with and without hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of malnutrition in patients with independent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) varies from 20% to 50%, is related to important complications and has a direct impact on the prognosis. Determination of the resting energy expenditure (REE) has become an important parameter in this population, as it allows therapeutic adjustments to recover their nutritional status. The REE in cirrhosis, with and without HCC, is not clearly defined, and requires the identification and definition of the best nutritional approach. AIM: To evaluate the REE of patients with cirrhosis, with and without HCC. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study evaluating the REE of 118 patients, 33 with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma and a control group of 85 patients with cirrhosis without HCC, using indirect calorimetry (IC), bioimpedance, and predictive formulas. RESULTS: The REE determined by IC in cirrhotic patients with HCC was 1643 ± 364 and in those without HCC was 1526 ± 277 (P = 0.064). The REE value as assessed by bioimpedance was 1529 ± 501 for those with HCC and 1660 ± 385 for those without HCC (P = 0.136). When comparing the values of REE determined by IC and predictive formulas in cirrhotics with HCC, it was observed that only the formulas of the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)/World Health Organization (WHO) (1985) and Cunningham (1980) presented values similar to those determined by IC. When comparing the REE values determined by IC and predictive formulas in cirrhotics without HCC, it was observed that the formulas of Schofield (1985), FAO/WHO (1985), WHO (2000), Institute of Medicine (IOM) (2005) and Katch and McArdie (1996) presented values similar to those determined by IC. CONCLUSION: The FAO/WHO formula (1985) could be used for cirrhotic patients with or without HCC; as it is the one with the values closest to those obtained by IC in these cirrhotic patients.