Education for Registered Nurses Completing Preoperative Anesthesia Interviews: A Quality Improvement Project.

PURPOSE: This quality improvement project implemented job-related education for registered nurses (RNs) completing preoperative anesthesia interviews (PAIs) to increase their knowledge and confidence, improve completeness of documented preoperative interviews, and decrease day of surgery (DOS) cancellations. DESIGN: Pre/post implementation design and retrospective chart review. METHODS: An educational module on PAIs was created and RNs working in the pre-admission testing (PAT) clinic were asked to complete the module. Pre and post implementation data was collected on RN knowledge and confidence, assessment completeness, and DOS cancellations. FINDINGS: Knowledge and confidence increases were not statistically significant, although several interview components within PAI documentation improved with statistical significance. Overall DOS cancellations, although not statistically significant, were found to decrease, 1.3% to 1.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Registered nurses' knowledge, confidence and PAI completeness improved after completing the educational module with anesthetic considerations. Patients seen at the PAT clinic for PAIs before the DOS allowed for patient optimization and education leading to decreased preventable DOS cancellations.

Preoperative Preparation and Guidelines for Cannabis-Using Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery.

PURPOSE: Appropriate preoperative screening techniques are needed to safely provide anesthesia to increasing numbers of cannabis using surgical patients. DESIGN: This was a quasi-experimental quality improvement project. METHODS: Preoperative identification of cannabis users by registered nurses (RNs) and certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs) was compared to baseline identification rates. CRNAs' compliance with evidenced base guidelines was recorded. Perioperative medication requirements were recorded and compared between cannabis-users and noncannabis users. FINDINGS: Identification of cannabis users by CRNAs conducting preanesthetic assessments increased from 4.08% to 14.36% while RN identification improved from 11.22% to 13.81%. Compliance with identification guidelines was 69.2% among CRNAs. There were no differences in anesthetic requirements, complications, or postanesthesia care unit (PACU) length of stay between cannabis users and nonusers. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative identification of cannabis users allows for safer, more effective perioperative care by CRNAs, registered nurses, and surgical staff.

Sustainability of an Operating Room to Pediatric Postanesthesia Care Unit Handoff Tool.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this quality improvement (QI) project was to reintroduce and assess the feasibility of a standardized, electronic health record (EHR) handoff tool and to evaluate the sustainability of a structured, team-based approach in a pediatric postanesthesia care unit (PACU). DESIGN: This QI project used an observational pre-post design using two separate convenience samples of handoffs and perianesthesia providers. METHODS: A standardized EHR handoff tool was reintroduced for operating room to pediatric PACU handoff communication. Handoffs between anesthesia providers, surgery team members, and PACU nurses were observed pre- and postreintroduction of the EHR handoff tool. Anesthesia providers and PACU RNs received training for giving and receiving handoffs and were provided directions on locating the EHR handoff tool. A bedside audit of items communicated for the six handoff phases (introductions, situation, background, assessment, recommendations, and questions), handoff duration, team member participation, and handoff tool utilization were performed for 149 handoffs pre- and 146 handoffs postimplementation. To evaluate sustainability, the audits were compared to postimplementation data from the 2014 pilot handoff project. FINDINGS: Following reintroduction, EHR handoff tool use increased from 4% to 19%. There was a statistically significant increase in items communicated for three of the six handoff phases when using the EHR tool (P < .05). There was no statistically significant increase in handoff duration (mean = 3.66 minutes, SD = 1.57 minutes) with the EHR handoff tool. Surgical team member presence for the team-based handoff increased from 90.7% pre to 95.9% post. Provider compliance with the team-based handoff approach, which includes a PACU RN, surgical team member, and anesthesia team member present for handoff, was sustained and increased 6 years postimplementation. Feedback from anesthesia providers and PACU RNs indicated mixed reports of satisfaction with the EHR tool, perceived handoff efficiency, and consistency in both giving and receiving handoff. Adherence to five of the six structured handoff phases, except introductions, was sustained and even improved 6 years following implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence-based practice for handoff communication supports the use of a team approach and standardized EHR handoff tools. The reintroduction of a standardized EHR handoff tool improved the completeness of information transfer, yet did not lead to widespread adoption nor improved user satisfaction. There is an ongoing need to identify adoptable and sustainable perioperative handoff methods.

Improving Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists' Adherence to a Standardized Intraoperative Lung Protective Ventilation Protocol.

PURPOSE: The use of lung protective ventilation (LPV) during general anesthesia is an effective strategy among certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs) to reduce and prevent the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications. The purpose of this project was to implement a LPV protocol, assess CRNA provider adherence, and investigate differences in ventilation parameters and postoperative oxygen requirements. DESIGN: This quality improvement project was conducted using a pre- and postimplementation design. METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing robotic laparoscopic abdominal surgery and 35 CRNAs at a community hospital participated. An evidence-based intraoperative LPV protocol was developed, CRNA education was provided, and the protocol was implemented. Pre- and postimplementation, CRNA knowledge, and confidence were assessed. Ventilation data were collected at 1-minute intervals intraoperatively and oxygen requirements were recorded in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). FINDINGS: Use of intraoperative LPV strategies increased 2.4%. Overall CRNA knowledge (P = .588), confidence (P = .031), and practice (P < .001) improved from pre- to postimplementation. Driving pressures decreased from pre- to postimplementation (P < .001). Supplemental oxygen use on admission to the PACU decreased from 93.3% to 70.0%. CONCLUSIONS: Educational interventions and implementation of a standardized protocol can improve the use of intraoperative LPV strategies and patient outcomes.

How do we improve blood product administration audit rates.

BACKGROUND: Failure to comply with institutional and national standards for blood product administration poses patient safety risks. Monitoring adherence to blood product administration policy is important for maintaining patient safety and ensuring regulatory agency compliance. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This post-implementation quality improvement project evaluated an electronic paging system that was developed to facilitate perioperative blood product administration audits. RESULTS: Of the 57 audits conducted, 55 (96.5%) audits were fully completed. Anesthesia providers verified the patient name and medical record number (MRN) on the patient's armband with the product ID tag in 36.5% (n = 20) of audits. Anesthesia providers ensured the name and MRN on the armband matched the compatibility label on the blood product in 23% (n = 23) of audits. DISCUSSION: Ongoing surveillance of blood product administration practices is needed to monitor adherence to blood product administration policy, promote patient safety, and avoid imminent financial consequences from noncompliance to national regulatory standards.

Creation and Implementation of a Preoperative Malignant Hyperthermia Screening Tool.

BACKGROUND: Malignant hyperthermia (MH) is a potentially lethal pharmacogenetic disorder triggered by certain anesthetic agents. There is currently no standardized preoperative screening tool utilized to identify MH-susceptible individuals. LOCAL PROBLEM: This quality improvement (QI) project aimed to enhance preoperative screening for MH susceptibility (MHS) by implementing an evidence-based screening tool for surgical patients at 2 sites. METHODS: This prospective descriptive QI project evaluated the success of implementing an MHS screening tool preoperatively and its impact on the anesthesia plan. INTERVENTIONS: Anesthesia professionals included the screening tool in their preoperative interview for surgical patients so that positively screened patients could receive MH prevention measures. RESULTS: A total of 95 patients at site A and 234 patients at site B were screened using the MH tool, a cumulative total of 21 patients were positively screened, and 1 anesthetic plan was altered. CONCLUSIONS: This MHS screening tool has the potential to prevent MH episodes when used consistently by staff.

Standardized Perioperative Note to Improve Perioperative Management of Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.

PURPOSE: Over 3 million people have a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) in the United States. Without an organization-wide, standardized approach to the perioperative management of patients with CIEDs, communication errors and subsequent periods of unintentional deactivation and management can leave patients vulnerable to untreated, life-threatening arrhythmias. The purpose of this quality improvement project was to refine the standardized approach for perioperative management of patients with CIEDs at a large academic medical center. DESIGN: A pre-post implementation design with two independent groups. METHODS: Patients with preexisting permanent CIEDs (n = 405) undergoing surgical and nonsurgical procedures with anesthesia were included. A preprocedure note was revised and implemented in the electronic health record for patients with CIEDs to include information about the device type, perioperative plan, and contact information for technical support. FINDINGS: When the preprocedure note was used, completion of the perioperative plan and contact information increased significantly (P < .001) and the number of undocumented interventions that occurred with CIEDs in the intraoperative period (magnet use, preoperative reprogramming, and postoperative reprogramming) was significantly reduced (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: While documentation of the preprocedure note and intraoperative interventions increased, ongoing perioperative management improvements for patients with CIEDs are needed.

Improving Waste Segregation in the Operating Room to Decrease Overhead Cost.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Operating rooms (ORs) disproportionally contribute 20% to 33% of hospital waste nationwide and therefore have a major impact on hospital waste management. Seventy percent of general OR waste is incorrectly eliminated as clinical waste, which compounds unnecessary financial burden and produces negative environmental impact. The primary purpose of this quality improvement (QI) project was to evaluate the effectiveness of waste segregation education for OR anesthesia staff on improving waste segregation compliance in the OR. METHODS: A waste segregation QI project was implemented at a 19-OR hospital. Sharps bins in each OR were monitored for weight in pounds and 6 ORs were monitored for percent compliance both pre- and post-institution of a waste segregation education. In addition, a waste segregation knowledge assessment, waste segregation barriers assessment, and a demographic survey were administered to anesthesia staff. Twenty-two certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs), 13 anesthesiologists, and 4 anesthesia technicians responded to the initial surveys and assessments while 30 of these original 39 participants (77%) responded following the educational intervention. A cost analysis was calculated pre- and post-implementation by multiplying total weight of the sharps bins by the price per pound of sharps. RESULTS: Twenty-three percent of participants reported having formal waste segregation training. Survey responses revealed that the greatest barrier to waste segregation involved bin location (56.4%), followed by lack of time to segregate (25.6%), lack of knowledge of what content goes in the bin (25.6%), and lack of incentive (25.6%). A waste segregation knowledge assessment showed improvement from pre- ( M = 9.18, SD = 1.66) to post-implementation ( M = 9.90, SD = 1.64). Pre-implementation sharps bin compliance was 50.70% while post-implementation bin compliance improved to 58.44%. A 27.64% decrease in sharps disposal cost occurred following implementation, which is estimated to produce a $2964 cost savings per year. CONCLUSIONS: Waste segregation education for anesthesia staff increased their waste management knowledge, improved sharps waste bin compliance, and produced an overall cost savings.

The Development and Validation of an Objective Assessment Tool for Performing Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks.

The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a regional anesthesia technique used as part of a multimodal pain management plan in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. There are numerous approaches and techniques described in the literature, resulting in a lack of consistency in block performance. This potentially reduces efficacy while increasing risk to the patient. Competency assessment tools have been shown to lower patient risk and improve outcomes by improving provider skill. Checklists are used as formative and summative assessment tools throughout healthcare education, however, there is no validated tool for ultrasound-guided TAP blocks. The purpose of this evidence-based project was to develop a checklist using a modified Delphi method. The primary outcome measure was validation of the assessment tool, established by an expert panel consensus and guided by Messick's validity framework. A 43-item checklist was validated by six certified registered nurse anesthesiologists throughout the United States with expertise in regional anesthesia. Three rounds of feedback were required to exceed the threshold of consensus (0.8), establishing a method of evaluation that may allow future research in educational settings through improved skill assessment among providers performing TAP blocks.