Establishment and Feasibility of an Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction Program in a Community Health System.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) remains a significant post-surgical complication of breast cancer treatment. Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) at the time of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) has shown promise in preventing BCRL. While the primary literature supporting ILR comes from academic institutions, the majority of breast cancer care in the USA occurs in the community setting. This study evaluated a preventative lymphedema program performing ILR at a community health system. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective database including all patients who underwent ALND with concurrently attempted ILR from 2019 to 2021 was retrospectively reviewed. The historical benchmark lymphedema rate was calculated through retrospective review of electronic medical records for all patients who underwent ALND without ILR from 2011 to 2021. RESULTS: Ninety patients underwent ALND with ILR, of which ILR was successful in 69 (76.7%). ILR was more likely to be aborted in smokers (p < 0.05) and those with fewer lymphatic channels (p < 0.05) or a higher body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.08). Patients with successful versus aborted ILR had lower lymphedema rates (10.9% versus 66.7%, p < 0.01) and improved Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores (8.7 versus 19.8, p = 0.25), and lower lymphedema rates than the historical benchmark (10.9% versus 50.2%, p < 0.01). Among patients with successful ILR, older patients were more likely to develop lymphedema (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Successful ILR after ALND significantly reduced the lymphedema rate when compared with patients with aborted ILR and our institution's historical benchmark. Our experience supports the efficacy of ILR and highlights the feasibility of ILR within a community health system.

Safety and factors affecting same-day discharge following mastectomy and immediate alloplastic reconstruction.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patients undergoing breast reconstruction following mastectomy are often admitted overnight. In 2020, our institution implemented a protocol change to discharge clinically stable patients immediately. In this study, we examine the safety of same-day discharge following mastectomy and reconstruction. METHODS: Our retrospective study included female adults undergoing mastectomy and immediate alloplastic reconstruction from August 2019 to January 2020, before implementation of the same-day discharge protocol, and from March 2020 to September 2021, after the protocol implementation. Independent t-test and chi-square analysis was conducted to examine statistical differences. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty-five patients were included. Forty-two patients underwent reconstruction before the protocol change (Group 1) and 243 patients underwent reconstruction after the protocol change (Group 2). Group 2 had a greater percentage of prepectoral implant placement. There was no difference in demographics, complications, readmission, or reoperation. Within Group 2, 157 patients were discharged the same day (Group 2a) and 88 patients required overnight admission (Group 2b). Group 2b had higher body mass index, higher percentage of bilateral mastectomy, and larger mastectomy weights. Despite no differences in complications, Group 2b exhibited higher rates of requiring intravenous antibiotics and reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: Patients may be safely discharged the same day following mastectomy and alloplastic reconstruction without an increase in complications.

Patient-reported outcomes among women with unilateral breast cancer undergoing breast conservation versus single or double mastectomy.

PURPOSE: More women with unilateral early stage breast cancer are electing bilateral mastectomy (BM). Many cite anxiety, fear of recurrence, and certain aesthetic desires in their decision-making. Yet conflicting data exist regarding how these factors both inform and are modulated by medical decision-making, especially among women eligible for breast conservation (BCT). This study sought to assess the trajectories of women undergoing various surgical procedures for breast cancer. METHODS: We performed a prospective longitudinal study of women with unilateral, non-hereditary breast cancer who underwent BCT, unilateral mastectomy (UM), or BM. Women completed surveys before surgery and at 1, 9, and 15 months postop. Surveys included questions about treatment preferences, decisional control, the HADS-A anxiety scale, the Fear of Relapse/Recurrence Scale (FRRS), and the BREAST-Q. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare outcomes between BCT, UM, and BM groups at each time point. RESULTS: 203 women were recruited and 177 (87.2%) completed 15-month follow-up. Of these, 101 (57.0%) underwent BCT, 33 (18.6%) underwent UM, and 43 (24.2%) underwent BM. Generalized anxiety and FRRS scores were similar between BCT, UM, and BM groups and declined uniformly after surgery. Although baseline breast satisfaction was similar between groups, at 15 months, it was significantly lower in BM patients than in BCT patients. Women who felt "very" confident and "very" informed before surgery had lower anxiety, lower fear of recurrence, better psychosocial well-being (PSWB), and greater breast satisfaction at 15 months. CONCLUSION: While patients who undergo mastectomy have less long-term breast satisfaction, all patients can expect to experience similar improvements in anxiety and PSWB. Efforts should be made to ensure that patients are informed and confident regardless of which surgery is chosen, for this is the greatest predictor of better outcomes.

Patients Undergoing Bilateral Mastectomy and Breast-Conserving Surgery Have the Lowest Levels of Regret: The WhySurg Study.

BACKGROUND: The recent data on decision regret of patients undergoing breast cancer surgery are sparse. METHODS: An electronic cross-sectional survey was distributed to Love Research Army volunteers ages 18-70 years who underwent breast cancer surgery from 2009 to 2020. Decision regret scores were compared among patients who underwent bilateral mastectomy (BM), unilateral mastectomy (UM), breast-conserving surgery (BCS), and BCS first (BCS followed by re-excision or mastectomy) and between procedures during different time periods. Multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for patient and tumor factors, was used to determine whether surgery type was associated with a regret score in the highest quartile range. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 2148 women, 1525 (71.0%) of whom reported their surgery choice and answered all questions on the regret scale. The mean age of the participants was 50 years, and the median year of surgery was 2014. The median decision regret score for all the patients was 5 (interquartile range [IQR], 0-20) on a 100-point scale. The regret score of 342 participants (22.4%) was 25 or higher (BCS, 20.2%; BCS first, 31.9%; UM, 30.8%; BM, 15.4%; p < 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, BM was associated with less regret than UM (odds ratio [OR], 0.40 (range, 0.27-0.58); p < 0.001), BCS (OR, 0.56 (range, 0.38-0.83; p = 0.003), or BCS first (OR, 0.32; range, 0.21-0.49; p < 0.001). During the three periods analyzed (2009-2012, 2013-2016, and 2017-2020), the BM and BCS patients had the lowest regret scores of all the surgical types. CONCLUSIONS: Decision regret was low among the patients undergoing breast cancer surgery but lowest among the BM patients after adjustment for clinical and tumor factors including complications.

The modern approach to the nipple-sparing mastectomy.

A modern perspective on the nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) looking at current indications as well as the most up-to-date evidence both in the literature and from our institution. There is an in-depth description of our NSM technique and an overview of alternative approaches, including the robotic technique. The complicated concept of the learning curve is addressed and ideas on how to train other NSM adopters.

The effect of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy on breast-related charges: A 5-year analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine charges following unilateral mastectomy (UM) and bilateral mastectomy (BM) for patients with unilateral breast cancer (UBC). We hypothesized that BM may be associated with fewer charges over time. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of patients with UBC treated between 2006 and 2010 with UM and BM in a large healthcare system. Institutional billing data were investigated for 5 years postoperatively to calculate the immediate and subsequent charges of all inpatient and outpatient breast-related care associated with the initial diagnosis for a subset of patients identified using propensity score matching method. RESULTS: A subset of matched patients (n = 320) undergoing UM (n = 160) or BM (n = 160) were included in this analysis. At 1 year, there was a trend toward lower total charges following UM as compared with BM (median, $125 230 vs $138 467; P = .6075). However, during years 2 to 5, total charges were significantly higher following UM vs BM ($22 128 vs $13 478; P = .0116). CONCLUSIONS: While initially higher, overall charges for BM are lower than UM between 2 and 5 years out from surgery. Further study is necessary to determine if this trend is sustained over the long term. These data can inform patient decision making regarding mastectomy for their breast cancer.

Long-term Outcomes After Pediatric Free Flap Reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Whereas free tissue transfer has evolved to minimize morbidity in adults, less is known about outcomes after free flaps in children. This study sought to assess short- and long-term outcomes after microvascular reconstruction in the pediatric population. METHODS: Short- and long-term outcomes of free tissue transfer were assessed using chart-review and quality-of-life surveys. The Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument was used to evaluate overall health, pain, and ability to participate in normal daily and more vigorous activities. Patient or parent responses were compared against normative data. RESULTS: Forty-two patients underwent 48 flap reconstructions at a mean age of 8 years. Median follow-up was 14.9 years. Indications included congenital nevi (n = 19, 42%), lymphatic/vascular malformations (n = 8, 19%), and trauma/burns (n = 6, 14%). There were 21 fasciocutaneous (44%), 19 muscle/myocutaneous (40%), 6 fascial/peritoneal (13%), and 2 osteocutaneous flaps (4%). Major flap complications were observed in 4 patients (9%), whereas major donor-site complications occurred in 2% (1 patient). Valid contact information was available for 25 patients; 16 of these completed surveys (64%). Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument scores for mobility (median, 52), sports/physical functioning (median, 56), happiness (median, 50), and pain/comfort (median, 56) were not significantly different from normative population score of 50. Similarly, median global functioning score was 99 (maximum, 100) and did not differ between flap types. DISCUSSION: Free tissue transfer in the pediatric population is reliable and well-tolerated over time. Surgeons should not hesitate to use free flaps when clinically indicated for pediatric patients.

Impact of an In-visit Decision Aid on Patient Knowledge about Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Studies have reported that breast cancer patients have limited understanding about the oncologic outcomes following contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM). We hypothesized that an in-visit decision aid (DA) would be associated with higher patient knowledge about the anticipated short and long term outcomes of CPM. METHODS: We piloted a DA which used the SCOPED: (Situation, Choices, Objectives, People, Evaluation and Decision) framework. Knowledge, dichotomized as "low" (≤3 correct) versus "high" (≥4 correct), was assessed immediately after the visit by a 5 item survey. There were 97 DA patients (response rate 62.2 %) and 114 usual care (UC) patients (response rate 71.3 %). RESULTS: Patient demographic factors were similar between the two groups. Twenty-one (21.7 %) patients in the DA group underwent CPM compared with 18 (15.8 %) in the UC group (p = 0.22). Mean and median knowledge levels were significantly higher in the DA group compared with the UC group for patients of all ages, tumor stage, race, family history, anxiety levels, worry about CBC, and surgery type. Eighty-six (78.9 %) of UC versus 35 (37.9 %) DA patients had low knowledge. Of patients who underwent CPM, 15 (83.3 %) in the UC cohort versus 5 (25.0 %) of DA patients had "low" knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge was higher in the DA group. The UC group had approximately three times the number of patients of the DA group who were at risk for making a poorly informed decision to have CPM. Future studies should assess the impact of increased knowledge on overall CPM rates.

Trends and variation in the use of nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer in the United States.

PURPOSE: For many women, nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) provides aesthetic and quality-of-life outcomes superior to skin-sparing mastectomy. Accumulating data suggest that NSM provides similar oncologic outcomes in select breast cancer patients. This study sought to determine national trends in NSM use. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Data Base, 6254 women with breast cancer who underwent NSM between 2010 and 2013 were identified. NSM rates were determined relative to the number of patients who received a mastectomy with reconstruction (n = 114,849). Associations between patient, tumor, and facility characteristics and NSM were assessed using logistic regression. RESULTS: The rate of NSM increased from 2.9 to 8.0 % between 2010 and 2013. NSM was most commonly performed in academic (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.43, p < 0.001) and high-volume (OR 1.59, p < 0.001) breast centers. There was up to a 5.8-fold variation in its delivery between geographic census regions (p < 0.001). Of 1231 hospitals, only 491 (39.9 %) reported performing at least one NSM during the study period. Half of all NSMs were performed by the top 6 % (n = 30) of NSM-performing centers. NSM was associated with small tumor size (p < 0.001), lower tumor grades (p < 0.05), and negative nodal status (p < 0.001). However, half of NSM patients had at least one tumor characteristic that diverged from current (2016) NCCN recommendations for the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The use of therapeutic NSM is increasing dramatically in the United States, despite recommendations that the procedure be used with caution. As NSM becomes increasingly common, efforts are needed to monitor its long-term oncologic outcomes and to ensure equitable access to it.

Nipple-sparing mastectomy: A contemporary perspective.

Increasing numbers of women are undergoing nipple-sparing mastectomy, and evidence to support its use for cancer treatment and prophylaxis is expanding. An understanding of technical aspects and pitfalls of the procedure is paramount to ensure that the best results are attained. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;113:883-890. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Patient satisfaction with nipple-sparing mastectomy: A prospective study of patient reported outcomes using the BREAST-Q.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to study patient-reported outcomes following nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM). METHODS: From 2008 to 2011, the BREAST-Q was administered to women undergoing NSM surgery for cancer treatment or risk-reduction prior to surgery and at 2 years after completion of reconstruction. The change in score over time and the impact of surgical indication, complication occurrence, and laterality on scores were analyzed. RESULTS: The BREAST-Q was prospectively administered to 39 women undergoing NSM for cancer treatment (n = 17) or risk-reduction (RR) (n = 22). At 2 years after operation, median overall satisfaction with breasts was 75 (IQR = 67,100). There were significant postoperative increases in scores for overall satisfaction with breasts (+8, P = 0.021) and psychosocial well-being (+14, P = 0.003). Postoperatively, RR patients had significantly higher scores for psychosocial wellness, physical impact (chest), and overall satisfaction with outcome compared to cancer treatment patients (P < 0.05). Also, increase from preoperative to postoperative psychosocial wellness was higher in the RR compared to cancer treatment patients (+17 vs. +1, P = 0.043). Complication occurrence did not significantly impact postoperative scores. CONCLUSIONS: Following NSM for cancer treatment or RR, patients demonstrated high levels of satisfaction and quality of life as measured by BREAST-Q. Satisfaction level increased 2 years following operation. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:416-422. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Advanced Age Does Not Worsen Recovery or Long-Term Morbidity After Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.

PURPOSE: Despite evidence that older women have quality-of-life outcomes similar to younger women after postmastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR), they rarely receive it. There is a perception that PMBR in older women may result in significant physical morbidity. However, the effects of age on physical morbidity after PMBR have not been studied. This study sought to assess perceptions of recovery from surgery and long-term chest and upper body morbidity in older women who receive PMBR. METHODS: Women with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage 0-III breast cancer who underwent a mastectomy with PMBR between 2005 and 2011 were surveyed to assess their functional health status (DUKE), physical well-being (BREAST-Q), and perceptions of recovery from surgery. Patients were stratified into 2 age groups: older (≥65 years) and younger (<65 years). Outcome scores were compared by mastectomy laterality, reconstruction type, and between age groups. Data were analyzed using χ² and t tests. RESULTS: One hundred eight older and 103 younger patients returned surveys (response rate, 75.4%). The median time from mastectomy to survey was 4 years (range, 1-7). Younger women were more likely to undergo bilateral mastectomy than older women (65.7% vs 32.2%, P < 0.001). Some women (66.9%) underwent implant-only reconstruction and 33.1% underwent autologous reconstruction; there were no significant differences in reconstruction type between age groups. Patients who underwent unilateral and bilateral mastectomy had similar mean BREAST-Q physical well-being scores (79.4 vs 78.9, respectively, P = 0.85). There was no difference in mean physical well-being scores between older and younger patients (80.0 vs 78.5, respectively, P = 0.61). In addition, older patients were less likely to perceive their recovery from PMBR as being difficult than younger patients, though this was not statistically significant (48.2% vs 64.3%, P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Older women who undergo PMBR have physical and upper body well-being that is similar to younger women. In addition, their perception of recovery from PMBR is at least as good as that seen in younger women. Older women contemplating PMBR should be counseled that they are not at higher risk for long-term physical and upper body morbidity from PMBR than are younger women.

The Effect of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy on Perioperative Complications in Women Undergoing Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A NSQIP Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Women with breast cancer are increasingly choosing to undergo contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) despite questionable survival benefit and limited data on added risks. Little is known about differences in perioperative complications between women who undergo bilateral mastectomy (BM) versus unilateral mastectomy (UM) with reconstruction. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program Participant Use Files (2005-2013) were used to identify women with unilateral breast cancer who underwent UM or BM with reconstruction. Adjusted 30-day complications were compared between UM and BM groups using logistic regression models. RESULTS: A total of 20,501 patients were identified, of whom 35.3 % underwent BM. Of these, 84.3 % had implant reconstruction and 15.7 % had autologous reconstruction. For all women, BM was associated with longer hospital stays (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.98-2.09, p < 0.001) and a higher transfusion rate than UM (aOR 2.52-3.06, p < 0.001). BM with implant reconstruction was associated with a modestly increased reoperation rate (aOR 1.15, p = 0.029). BM with autologous reconstruction was associated with a higher wound disruption rate (aOR 2.51, p = 0.015). Surgical site infections, prosthesis failure, and medical complications occurred at similar rates in UM and BM groups. CONCLUSIONS: CPM is associated with significant increases in some, but not all, surgical site complications. CPM does not increase the likelihood of medical complications, which are generally infrequent.

Wait times for breast surgical operations, 2003-2011: a report from the National Cancer Data Base.

BACKGROUND: Few large-scale multicenter studies have examined wait times for breast surgery and no benchmarks exist. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Data Base, we analyzed time from diagnosis to first surgery for 819,175 non-neoadjuvant AJCC stage 0-III breast cancer patients treated from 2003 to 2011. Chi-square tests and logistic regression models were used to examine factors associated with delays to surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: Seventy percent of patients underwent an initial lumpectomy (LP), 22% a mastectomy (MA), and 8% a mastectomy with reconstruction (MR). The median time from diagnosis to first surgery significantly increased by approximately 1 week for all three procedures over the study period. In a multivariate analysis, the following variables were independent predictors of a longer wait time to first surgery: increasing age, black or Hispanic race, Medicaid or no insurance, low-education communities and metropolitan areas, increasing comorbidities, stage 0 and grade 1 disease, academic/research facilities, high-volume facilities, and facilities located in the New England, Mid-Atlantic, and Pacific regions. In 2010-2011, patients who waited >30 days for surgery were 1.36 times more likely (OR = 1.36, 95% CI 1.30-1.43) to experience a delay to adjuvant chemotherapy >60 days compared with patients who were surgically treated within 30 days of diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Facility and socioeconomic factors are most strongly associated with longer wait times for breast operations, and delays to surgery are associated with delays to adjuvant chemotherapy initiation.

Nipple-sparing mastectomy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: an interim analysis and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: There are few large-scale studies that have examined outcomes for BRCA1/2 carriers who have undergone nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM). The objective of our study was to examine incidental cancers, operative complications, and locoregional recurrences in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers who underwent NSM for both risk reduction and cancer treatment. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of pathology results and outcomes of 201 BRCA1/2 carriers from two different institutions who underwent NSM from 2007 to 2014. RESULTS: NSM was performed in 397 breasts of 201 BRCA1/2 carriers. One hundred and twenty-five (62.2 %) patients had a BRCA1 mutation and 76 (37.8 %) had a BRCA2 mutation; 150 (74.6 %) patients underwent NSM for risk reduction and 51 (25.4 %) for cancer. Incidental cancers were found in four (2.7 %) of the 150 risk-reduction patients and two (3.9 %) of the 51 cancer patients. The nipple-areolar complex (NAC) was involved with cancer in three (5.8 %) patients. No prophylactic mastectomy had a positive NAC margin. There was loss of the NAC in seven breasts (1.8 %) and flap necrosis in ten (2.5 %) breasts. With a mean follow-up of 32.6 months (1-76 months), there have been four cancer events-three in cancer patients and one in a risk-reduction patient but none at the NAC. CONCLUSION: NSM in BRCA1/2 carriers is associated with a low rate of complications and locoregional recurrence but these patients require long-term follow-up in both the cancer and risk-reduction setting.

The quality-of-life benefits of breast reconstruction do not diminish with age.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Older women rarely receive post-mastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR). While there is a perception that PMBR is less beneficial in this age group, quality-of-life (QOL) data related to PMBR in older women remain scarce. METHODS: Women with AJCC stage 0-III breast cancer who underwent a mastectomy were surveyed. Respondents included 215 older women (≥ 65 years), of whom 36.0% received PMBR, and a control group of 101 younger women (< 65 years), all of whom received PMBR. Patient-reported outcomes were measured using the Duke Health Profile and the BREAST-Q. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 74.9%. An age-matched comparison of older women with and without PMBR revealed no significant differences in physical health, anxiety, or depression scores; however, PMBR was associated with greater breast satisfaction (P = 0.002) and greater breast-related psychosocial well-being (P = 0.02) than mastectomy alone. Among those who received PMBR, there was no correlation between age and breast satisfaction, psychosocial well-being, nor satisfaction with the outcome (P = 0.11, 0.21, and 0.56). CONCLUSIONS: Older women who undergo PMBR have better breast-related QOL outcomes than those who do not. Moreover, the outcomes of PMBR in older women are similar to those seen in younger women. When appropriate, older women should be encouraged to consider PMBR.

Wise-Pattern Mastectomy with an Inferior Dermal Sling: A Viable Alternative to Elliptical Mastectomy in Prosthetic-Based Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic-based postmastectomy breast reconstruction in patients with large or pendulous breasts remains challenging because of inelastic and redundant skin, with various approaches to skin reduction at the time of mastectomy. This study describes the authors' experience with a Wise-pattern inferior dermal sling approach to skin-sparing mastectomy. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed on patients who underwent immediate prosthetic-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy from 2009 to 2021. A total of 240 patients who underwent Wise-pattern skin-sparing mastectomy (WSSM) were compared with a cohort of patients who had traditional elliptical skin-sparing mastectomy (ESSM), matched for mastectomy weight, prior radiation therapy, and smoking. Ninety-day postsurgical outcomes were examined. RESULTS: The WSSM cohort had a significantly higher body mass index (30.3 kg/m 2 versus 26.9 kg/m 2 ; P < 0.0001) and mastectomy weight (831 g versus 607 g; P < 0.0001). After propensity score matching, there was no significant difference in complication or treatment rates between WSSM and ESSM breasts except for mastectomy flap necrosis (11.6% versus 5.0%; P = 0.0082). WSSM patients who had mastectomy flap necrosis did not have significantly different treatment rates of admission, return to the operating room, or explantation compared with ESSM patients. CONCLUSIONS: In the largest reported series to date, WSSM was associated with a higher rate of mastectomy flap necrosis, but this did not translate into statistically significant differences in treatment. The inferior dermal flap likely acts as a protective layer of vascularized tissue, which appears to prevent evolution of mastectomy skin flap necrosis into more serious adverse outcomes. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Oral Antibiotics Do Not Prevent Infection or Implant Loss after Immediate Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Infectious complications following implant-based postmastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR) are a significant cause of morbidity. Nationwide, antimicrobial stewardship efforts have sought to reduce the use of prophylactic antibiotics postoperatively. However, there are conflicting data regarding the utility of extended antibiotic prophylaxis (EAP) after PMBR, and many surgeons continue to prescribe them. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective study of 1077 women who underwent immediate prosthetic PMBR from January of 2008 to May of 2020. All patients received intravenous antibiotics preoperatively and up to 24 hours postoperatively. Before October of 2016, patients were also prescribed oral antibiotics until drain removal; thereafter, this practice was abandoned. Ninety-day outcomes were compared between EAP-positive and EAP-negative patients. Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to assess the efficacy of EAP in preventing infection-related complications. RESULTS: There were 1004 breasts in the EAP-positive group and 683 in the EAP-negative group. Three hundred sixty-one reconstructions (21.4%) were prepectoral. Multivariable analysis demonstrated no difference in surgical-site infection (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.25; P = 0.38), admission (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.41 to 1.48; P = 0.44), reoperation (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.48; P = 0.97), or explantation rates (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.71; P = 0.81) between the EAP groups. The EAP-positive group was more likely to develop Gram-negative infections ( P < 0.001). Thirteen EAP-positive women (2.0%) developed allergic reactions, and four (0.6%) developed Clostridium difficile colitis attributable to the EAP. CONCLUSIONS: EAP after PMBR did not improve outcomes. Although use of EAP did not appear to worsen clinical outcomes, marked differences in the microbiology of associated infections may render them more difficult to treat. Moreover, a small but significant proportion of women experienced adverse reactions to the EAP. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.