Biosimilars: Considerations for Payers.

Evaluating biosimilars requires payers to go beyond cost considerations: safety and efficacy, reliability of supply and logistics, and the impact of state laws on substitution and interchangeability must all be deliberated.

Excess comorbidity prevalence and cost associated with functional dyspepsia in an employed population.

BACKGROUND: Limited published data exist on the associated comorbid conditions with functional dyspepsia (FD). AIMS: This study aimed to assess the prevalence, services, and costs related to comorbid conditions associated with FD and the risk of having FD for each comorbid condition. METHODS: A retrospective database analysis was undertaken using payroll data and adjudicated claims from January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2004 among >300,000 employees. Employees with FD were compared to propensity-score-matched employees without FD (controls). Outcome measures included the prevalence, costs, and utilization of health services for comorbid conditions as defined by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and the odds ratios of having FD from a multivariate model. RESULTS: FD employees (N = 1,669) and a 50:1 matched control cohort (N = 83,450) were compared. Compared to matched controls, FD employees were more likely to have all major diagnostic categories. Moreover, 199/261 of the AHRQ's specific categories were more common in the FD cohort. Annual medical costs for the FD cohort were greater than for controls in 155/261 (59%) specific categories and significantly greater (P ≤ 0.05) in 76 categories (29%). Similarly, services were greater for 179/261 (69%) specific categories and significantly greater (P ≤ 0.05) in 110 categories (42%). In a multivariate model, esophageal disorders, gastritis and duodenitis, and abdominal pain were the most associated with having FD (odds ratios 3.8, 3.7, and 3.6, respectively). Only hypertension complications and disorders of the teeth and jaw were significantly negatively associated with FD. CONCLUSION: There is unexplained excess comorbidity associated with FD which may be a major determining factor for excess healthcare services and costs.

Functional dyspepsia impacts absenteeism and direct and indirect costs.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a common morbid condition but data are limited on the direct and indirect costs for employees with FD or on its impact on productivity. Few data on absenteeism and no objective information are available. This study aimed to assess the impact of FD on costs and effects on absenteeism and work output (productivity). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of payroll data and adjudicated health insurance medical and prescription claims collected over a 4-year study period (January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2004) from more than 300,000 employees. Data from employees with and without (controls) FD were compared using 2-part regression techniques. Outcome measures included medical (total and by place of service) and prescription costs, absenteeism, and objectively measured productivity output. RESULTS: Employees with FD (N = 1669) had greater average annual medical and prescription drug costs and indirect costs (owing to sick leave and short- and long-term disability absences) than controls (N = 274,206). Compared with controls, the FD employees incurred costs that were $5138 greater and had greater costs for each place of service (all P < .0001). The employees with FD had an additional 0.83 absence days per year and produced 12% fewer units per hour than controls (both P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Employees with FD have greater costs at all places of service and lower productivity than employees without FD.

Good research practices for measuring drug costs in cost-effectiveness analyses: a managed care perspective: the ISPOR Drug Cost Task Force report--Part III.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this report is to provide guidance and recommendations on how drug costs should be measured for cost-effectiveness analyses conducted from the perspective of a managed care organization (MCO). METHODS: The International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Task Force on Good Research Practices-Use of Drug Costs for Cost Effectiveness Analysis (DCTF) was appointed by the ISPOR Board of Directors. Members were experienced developers or users of CEA models. The DCTF met to develop core assumptions and an outline before preparing a draft report. They solicited comments on drafts from external reviewers and from the ISPOR membership at ISPOR meetings and via the ISPOR Web site. RESULTS: The cost of a drug to an MCO equals the amount it pays to the dispenser for the drug's ingredient cost and dispensing fee minus the patient copay and any rebates paid by the drug's manufacturer. The amount that an MCO reimburses for each of these components can differ substantially across a number of factors that include type of drug (single vs. multisource), dispensing site (retail vs. mail order), and site of administration (self-administered vs. physician's office). Accurately estimating the value of cost components is difficult because they are determined by proprietary and confidential contracts. CONCLUSION: Estimates of drug cost from the MCO perspective should include amounts paid for medication ingredients and dispensing fees, and net out copays, rebates, and other drug price reductions. Because of the evolving nature of drug pricing, ISPOR should publish a Web site where current DCTF costing recommendations are updated as new information becomes available.

Good research practices for measuring drug costs in cost-effectiveness analyses: a societal perspective: the ISPOR Drug Cost Task Force report--Part II.

OBJECTIVES: Major guidelines regarding the application of cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) have recommended the common and widespread use of the "societal perspective" for purposes of consistency and comparability. The objective of this Task Force subgroup report (one of six reports from the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research [ISPOR] Task Force on Good Research Practices-Use of Drug Costs for Cost Effectiveness Analysis [Drug Cost Task Force (DCTF)]) was to review the definition of this perspective, assess its specific application in measuring drug costs, identify any limitations in theory or practice, and make recommendations regarding potential improvements. METHODS: Key articles, books, and reports in the methodological literature were reviewed, summarized, and integrated into a draft review and report. This draft report was posted for review and comment by ISPOR membership. Numerous comments and suggestions were received, and the report was revised in response to them. RESULTS: The societal perspective can be defined by three conditions: 1) the inclusion of time costs, 2) the use of opportunity costs, and 3) the use of community preferences. In practice, very few, if any, published CEAs have met all of these conditions, though many claim to have taken a societal perspective. Branded drug costs have typically used actual acquisition cost rather than the much lower social opportunity costs that would reflect only short-run manufacturing and distribution costs. This practice is understandable, pragmatic, and useful to current decision-makers. Nevertheless, this use of CEA focuses on static rather than dynamic efficacy and overlooks the related incentives for innovation. CONCLUSIONS: Our key recommendation is that current CEA practice acknowledge and embrace this limitation by adopting a new standard for the reference case as one of a "limited societal" or "health systems" perspective, using acquisition drug prices while including indirect costs and community preferences. The field of pharmacoeconomics also needs to acknowledge the limitations of this perspective when it comes to important questions of research and development costs, and incentives for innovation.

Healthcare Costs and Absenteeism Among Caregivers of Adults with Partial-Onset Seizures: Analysis of Claims from an Employer Database.

BACKGROUND: Partial-onset seizures are the most common type of seizures in patients with epilepsy. In addition to the significant impact on patients, the unpredictability of seizures often also affects family members or caregivers. Caregiver burden in relation to patient treatment may help to guide treatment choices for patients. Quantitative evidence about the relationship between workplace absences, costs, and treatment burden among caregivers of patients with partial-onset seizures is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To compare direct and indirect healthcare costs and absences among employed caregivers of patients with partial-onset seizures who are receiving monotherapy or adjunctive therapy with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed data of employed caregiver spouses of patients with partial-onset seizures and paired them with the patients into 2 groups based on the patient's therapy: the monotherapy cohort or the adjunctive therapy cohort (ie, >90 days of concomitant use of ≥2 AEDs). Patients and caregivers had to have ≥12 months of continuous data after the index date. Separate 2-part regression models were used to compare direct medical and prescription costs; indirect costs (ie, sick leave, short-term and long-term disability, and workers' compensation); and differences in work absences for caregivers. RESULTS: The baseline caregivers' characteristics were similar in the monotherapy cohort (N = 238) and the adjunctive therapy cohort (N = 129). Caregivers' total direct costs were $4231 in the monotherapy cohort and $7217 in the adjunctive therapy cohort. The caregivers of patients in the monotherapy cohort were less likely to use inpatient hospital services than caregivers of patients in the adjunctive therapy cohort (1.3% vs 9.9%, respectively; P = .0016). The caregivers' total indirect costs were $912 and $1192 in the monotherapy and adjunctive therapy cohorts, respectively. Sick days were significantly lower in the monotherapy cohort (2.4 days vs 4.4 days annually; P <.0001), with an associated cost difference of $541. CONCLUSION: Caregivers of patients with partial-onset seizures in the adjunctive therapy cohort had significantly greater medical and sick day costs than caregivers in the monotherapy cohort. These findings suggest that higher treatment burden among patients with epilepsy is associated with greater direct and indirect healthcare costs for their caregivers.

Exploratory economic evaluation of patients with COPD on a combination product versus individual components (ipratropium bromide and albuterol).

A population-based, retrospective claims analysis was undertaken to explore the economic profile of a nebulized ipratropium and albuterol combination product (DuoNeb(R) [DN], DEY, L.P., Napa, Calif). This analysis was performed to review expenditures and resource utilization of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who were taking DN or generic ipratropium and albuterol (dual single agents [DSA]). Cohort selection criteria applied to the PharMetrics managed care claims database yielded 1531 patients: 468 DN and 1063 DSA. Total per-member-per-month (PMPM) expenditures were $1,840.36 for DN and $2,046.73 DSA (Delta$206.37; P=.22). Emergency department (ED) costs were $36.67 for DN and $52.84 for DSA (Delta$16.17; P=.03). Differences in regression analysis adjusted least squares means between DSA and DN were $264.62 (P=.083) for total expenditures and $20.81 (P=.03) for ED costs. Resource utilization reflected expenditure observations; ED visits were 0.93 for DN and 1.33 for DSA (P<.001). Inpatient expenditures (DN $874.97, DSA $1,105.80; Delta$230.83) represented the largest portion of total costs: 45% with DN and 54% with DSA. The DN cohort was associated with statistically fewer individuals who reported interruptions (0.78 vs 0.85; P=.003). The DN cohort did not appear to be more expensive than the DSA group, was associated with statistically lower ED expenditures, and included fewer individuals with therapy interruptions. Future analyses should include clinical data to better elucidate the full impact of DN on healthcare resources and compliance in the COPD population.

The economic impact of bipolar disorder in an employed population from an employer perspective.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the economic impact of bipolar disorder on health benefit costs and health-related work absences from an employer perspective. METHOD: Data on health benefit costs and health-related absences during 2001 and 2002 were retrieved from a database and retrospectively examined. Regression modeling measured the cost differences while controlling for potentially confounding factors. The study population consisted of employees at multiple large employers who were widely dispersed throughout the United States. These employees were grouped into 2 cohorts: (1) employees with a bipolar disorder diagnosis (primary, secondary, or tertiary ICD-9 code of 296.0x, 296.1x, 296.4x, 296.5x, 296.6x, 296.7x, or 296.8x) in 2001 and (2) employees with no bipolar disorder diagnosis during 2001 or 2002 (comparison cohort). Specific outcome measures included annual health benefit claim costs and salary-replacement payments for the following employee health benefits: health care insurance, prescription drug, sick leave, short- and long-term disability, and workers' compensation. Additional outcome measures included annual absence days due to workers' compensation, short- and long-term disability, and sick leave (separately). RESULTS: The analysis identified 761 employees (0.3%) with bipolar disorder and 229,145 eligible employees without bipolar disorder. Employees with bipolar disorder annually cost $6836 more than employees without bipolar disorder (p < .05) and were more costly in every health benefit cost category. Employees with bipolar disorder missed an average of 18.9 workdays annually, while employees without bipolar disorder missed 7.4 days annually (p < .05). CONCLUSION: The impact of bipolar disorder can be costly in the workplace, leading to increased health benefit costs and increased absenteeism.

Costs of physical and mental comorbidities among employees: a comparison of those with and without bipolar disorder.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost and utilization of health care services for various comorbid conditions among employees with bipolar disorder (BPD) and two other population cohorts: employees without BPD and employees with other mental disorders (OMD). METHODS: Retrospective database analysis on a 2-year study period, from January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2002 using adjudicated health insurance medical claims on more than 230 000 employees plus their eligible dependents. Study comparisons were performed among employees with BPD (cohort BPD), employees without BPD (cohort NBD), and employees with OMD (cohort OMD). Outcome measures included the cost and utilization of health services for various comorbid conditions as defined by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ); using 261 specific categories (SCs) and the 17 Major Diagnostic Categories (MDCs). RESULTS: Employees in cohort BPD (n = 761) had greater average annual medical and prescription drug costs than the two other employee cohorts. Costs for cohort BPD were significantly greater (p

The economic burden of gout on an employed population.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the economic burden of illness of gout in an employed population, quantifying the impact on employers annual health benefit costs for medical and prescription claims, sick leave, short- and long-term disability, and workers' compensation. METHODS: Adjudicated claims data from 300000 employees from 2001 through 2004 were utilized. T-tests were used to compare demographic data and medical costs and services by Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) diagnostic categories. Two-part models were used to determine average annual health benefit costs overall and medical costs by place of delivery. A risk stratification quintile analysis was also performed utilizing gout-specific medical and pharmaceutical costs. RESULTS: There were 1171 employees with gout identified (total n = 249 038). All demographic variables between the two groups were statistically different (p

Incurring greater health care costs: risk stratification of employees with bipolar disorder.

PURPOSE: To compare the costs of employees with bipolar disorder with other employee cohorts and to assess cost differences among employees with bipolar disorder of varying severity. METHODS: Retrospective data analysis comparing employees with bipolar disorder (cohort 1) with employees without bipolar disorder (cohort 2), employees with other mental disorders (cohort 3), and employees with no mental disorders (cohort 4). Sick leave, short-term disability, long-term disability, and workers' compensation data were used to compare annual lost time and work-absence costs from January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2002. For bipolar disorder severity and risk stratification, quintiles were identified based on total medical and prescription drug costs and analyzed for many health benefits cost categories. RESULTS: Cohort 1 was the most costly in nearly every health benefits cost category. All comparisons between cohort 1 and cohorts 2, 3, and 4 yielded significant (p ≤ .05) differences except for sick leave costs in cohorts 1 and 3. The aggregate health benefits costs for the highest-cost cohort 1 quintile were $70,616, or 21 times greater than the health benefits costs for the lowest-cost quintile ($3385). Medical comorbidity costs accounted for most of this difference ($51,495; p ≤ .05). CONCLUSION: Employees with bipolar disorder are the most costly in nearly every health benefits category, with a small minority (2.4%) accounting for 20% of the costs. Employers need to identify and target high-risk ("high cost") employees with bipolar disorder and coexisting conditions that use resources more frequently for appropriate interventions that may include early screening and diagnosis, appropriate treatment, and/or behavioral strategies for improved adherence. These strategies have the potential to improve quality of patient care and reduce costs.

Lost time, absence costs, and reduced productivity output for employees with bipolar disorder.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the incremental health-related lost work time and at-work productivity loss for employees with bipolar disorder (BPD). METHODS: Health-related absence and real productivity output of employees with BPD were compared with that of non-BPD and other employee cohorts from a large employer database using multivariate regression to control for cohort differences. RESULTS: After adjusting for confounding factors, employees with BPD had significantly higher absence costs (1,219 dollars) and 11.5 additional lost days (P<0.05) per year than those without BPD. Adjusted annual productivity output was 20% lower for the BPD group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Employees with BPD are less likely to be present for work. When present, their productivity level is similar to that of other employees, but over the course of a year, their absence rates result in significant productivity losses.

Costs and absence of HCV-infected employees by disease stage.

OBJECTIVES: Quantify the costs and absenteeism associated with stages of the Hepatitis C virus (HCV). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of the HCMS integrated database from multiple geographically diverse, US-based employers with employee information on medical, prescription, and absenteeism claims. METHODS: Employee data were extracted from July 2001-March 2013. Employees with HCV were identified by ICD-9-CM codes and classified into disease severity cohorts using diagnosis/procedure codes assigning the first date of most severe claim as the index date. Non-HCV employees (controls) were assigned random index dates. Inclusion required 6-month pre-/post-index eligibility. Medical, prescription, and absenteeism cost and time were analyzed using two-part regression (logistic/generalized linear) models, controlling for potentially confounding factors. Costs were inflation adjusted to September 2013. RESULTS: All direct costs comparisons were statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05) with mean medical costs of $1813 [SE = $3] for controls (n = 727,588), $4611 [SE = $211] for non-cirrhotic (n = 1007), $4646 [SE = $721] for compensated cirrhosis (CC, n = 87), $12,384 [SE = $1122] for decompensated cirrhosis (DCC, n = 256), $33,494 [SE = $11,753] for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, n = 17) and $97,724 [SE = $32,437] for liver transplant (LT, n = 19) cohorts. Mean short-term disability days/costs were significantly greater for the non-cirrhotic (days = 2.03 [SE = 0.36]; $299 [SE = $53]), DCC (days = 6.20 [SE = 1.36]; $763 [SE = $169]), and LT cohorts (days = 21.98 [SE = 8.21]; $2537 [SE = $972]) compared to controls (days = 1.19 [SE = 0.01]; $155 [SE = $1]). Mean sick leave costs were significantly greater for non-cirrhotic ($373 [SE = $22]) and DCC ($460 [SE = $54]) compared to controls ($327 [SE = $1]). CONCLUSIONS: Employees with HCV were shown to have greater direct and indirect costs compared to non-HCV employee controls. Costs progressively increased in the more severe HCV disease categories. Slowing or preventing disease progression may avert the costs of more severe liver disease stages and enable employees with HCV to continue as productive members of the workforce.

Annual incremental health benefit costs and absenteeism among employees with and without rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on absence time, absence payments, and other health benefit costs from the perspective of US employers. METHODS: Retrospective regression-controlled analysis of a database containing US employees' administrative health care and payroll data for those who were enrolled for at least 1 year in an employer-sponsored health insurance plan. RESULTS: Employees with RA (N = 2705) had $4687 greater average annual medical and prescription drug costs (P < 0.0001) and $525 greater (P < 0.05) indirect costs (because of sick leave, short- and long-term disability, and workers' compensation absences) than controls (N = 338,035). Compared with controls, the employees with RA used an additional 3.58 annual absence days, including 1.2 more sick leave and 1.91 more short-term disability days (both P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Employees with RA have greater costs across all benefits than employees without RA.

Chronic gout: epidemiology, disease progression, treatment and disease burden.

BACKGROUND: Gout is a painful and disabling inflammatory arthritis of increasing prevalence associated with hyperuricemia and the deposition of monosodium urate crystals in soft tissues and joints. Diagnosed gout cases have been estimated at 2.13% of the 2009 US population. The highest incidence occurs in the 65+ year age group, with males more than twice as likely to be afflicted as females. OBJECTIVE: To present the epidemiology of chronic gout and to discuss its disease burden. METHODS: This commentary is based on expert opinion and supplemented with published/presented information identified through PubMed and rheumatology associations. RESULTS: The steady rise of diagnosed gout cases can generally be linked to an aging population with multiple comorbidities, the use of certain prescription medications, and changes in diet and lifestyle. Progression to chronic gout has numerous causes such as poor compliance with, ineffectiveness of, or inability to tolerate prescribed regimens. Despite the availability of urate-lowering therapies (ULT), patients may either have contraindications to them or may not adequately respond. Patients with high flare frequency, tophi, and the inability to maintain serum urate levels below 6 mg/dL with ULT can be categorized as having chronic gout that is refractory, with a substantial disease burden. Based on lack of therapeutic options for urate-lowering for patients with chronic gout refractory to conventional therapy, the economic burden of this small but substantial population contributes disproportionately to the overall economic burden of chronic gout. Recent availability of gout-specific ICD-9-CM codes capturing the cost intense and impactful aspects of the disease - flares and tophi - is likely contribute to understanding the full health economic burden in gout. CONCLUSION: The impact of chronic gout, especially if refractory to treatment, on functionality, productivity, quality of life and health care costs can be substantial and is deserving of future research.

Add-back therapy use and its impact on LA persistence in patients with endometriosis.

OBJECTIVES: Persistence and compliance in women with endometriosis who are receiving gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRH-a) may be limited by its hypoestrogenic side effects. Use of concomitant therapy with norethindrone acetate (NA), estrogen, estrogen/progestin combinations, or other progestin (i.e., 'add-back therapy' [ABT]) is recommended to alleviate these side effects. This retrospective study evaluated ABT utilization and its effect on compliance and persistence in patients with endometriosis taking the GnRH-a leuprolide acetate (LA) depot suspension. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a large pharmacy claims database identified patients who started LA therapy from 2002 to 2004 for the treatment of endometriosis. Patients were identified as having received ABT if they started 7 days before, or within 45 days of the last LA fill. RESULTS: A total of 1285 women with endometriosis who began using LA were identified with 12 months of evaluable data: 211 (16.4%) used concomitant NA therapy, 116 (9.0%) used concomitant estrogen-based therapy, 28 (2.2%) used concomitant combination estrogen- and progestin-based therapies, 56 (4.4%) used concomitant progestin-based therapy, and 874 (68.0%) did not use any ABT. Mean (+/-SD) LA persistence in women receiving NA-based ABT was 5.83 +/- 2.98 months, compared with 4.25 +/- 2.62 months for those not using ABT (P < 0.0001). Average medication possession ratio was 0.43 +/- 0.20 for women receiving NA-based ABT versus 0.32 +/- 0.18 for those not receiving any ABT (P < 0.0001). Patients < 30 years of age were most likely to continue therapy longer and have greater compliance compared with the older age group cohorts (P < 0.01). Patients who used ABT continued to do so for 3.79 +/- 3.21 months. LIMITATIONS: Limitations of this study include those associated with the use of retrospective claims databases: It does not include any information regarding the patient's pain symptoms, disease severity, or other factors, which could correlate to compliance and persistence. CONCLUSIONS: Among women using LA therapy for endometriosis, only 32% used any type of ABT, and these patients had significantly higher persistence and compliance with LA therapy compared to no ABT user group.

The impact of gout on work absence and productivity.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this analysis was to evaluate the impact of gout, a painful inflammatory arthritis condition, on an employed population's health-related work absence and objectively measured productivity output. METHODS: Payroll, demographic, medical, pharmaceutical, sick leave, short- and long-term disability, and workers' compensation data were collected from multiple large employers with employees widely dispersed across the United States. Data were collected during the time period of 2001 to 2004 from approximately 300,000 employees. Objective productivity output data were also available for a subset of employees (captured electronically in the form of units of work processed per person). T-tests and chi-square tests were used to compare demographic data. Two-stage multivariate regression models were used to compare annual work absence and at-work productivity between employees with and without gout, while controlling for group differences in demographics, salary, other work-related variables, and comorbidities (using the Charlson Comorbidity Index). RESULTS: The annual prevalence of gout was 4.7 per 1000 employees from 2001 to 2004. Employees with gout had 4.56 more annual absence days for all categories of health-related work absence than those without gout. Objective productivity (units of work processed) results were only available for a small subsample of employees (86 with gout and 27,472 without gout). Employees with gout processed 3.51% fewer units per hour worked and 2.38% fewer units per year than employees without gout (nonsignificant at P = 0.49 and P = 0.78, respectively). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that gout has a substantial impact on work absence and may also negatively impact productivity.

A Cost Minimization Comparison of Two Surfactants-Beractant and Poractant alfa-Based Upon Prospectively Designed, Comparative Clinical Trial Data.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the pharmacoeconomic profiles of beractant (Survanta(®), Ross Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio) and poractant alfa (Curosurf(®), DEY LP, Napa, CA) via a cost-minimization analysis. METHODS: This analysis was based upon clinical data from two previously published studies (Speer C, et al. Arch Dis Child 1995;72: F8-13; and Ramanathan R, et al. Am J Perinatol 2004; 21:109-19) where investigators found significant differences in the number of doses required to achieve a similar clinical response. Our analyses employed several models based upon single-use or multiple-use of single-use vial scenarios, average wholesale pricing, and costs computed on a per-patient basis. Model 1 involved single-dose vials and mean weight of the infants (both trials). Models 2 and 3, based on individual patient weights, assessed single-dose and multiple-use of single-dose vials cost scenarios, respectively. Individual patient weights allowed for statistical evaluation in Models 2 and 3. RESULTS: Model 1 savings with poractant alfa treatment was $949.67 (53%) based upon Speer and $617.90 (46%) based upon Ramanathan. Models 2 and 3 reported savings for poractant alfa of $220.50 (20%) (P = 0.11) and $180 (20%) (P = 0.018), respectively over beractant. CONCLUSIONS: These analyses would suggest poractant alfa may offer a less costly, clinically-equivalent option. Savings may vary with vial usage and mix, patient weight distribution, and how surfactants are used in practice. Institutions utilizing surfactants may wish to examine usage patterns, dosing protocols, and patient mix to determine what potential savings may exist.