Outcomes for Children With Vascular Ring Repair Using a Simple Surgical Approach.

INTRODUCTION: Vascular Rings (VRs) are congenital malformations of the aortic arch that can compress the trachea and esophagus producing symptoms. Approximately, 5%-10% of patients experience persistent symptoms postrepair and 9% require reintervention. There are various approaches to repair-simple ligation and division of the ring or more complex procedures. Our objective was to describe outcomes for VR repair using a "simple" surgical approach. METHODS: We identified patients who underwent VR repair from 2012 to 2022 at our institution. Clinical and surgical data, demographics, intraoperative, and postoperative outcomes were extracted from their electronic medical records. Outcomes were analyzed and regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for residual symptoms after repair. RESULTS: Ninety three patients with VR repair were included. Prevalence of symptoms were reduced following surgery (80% preoperative versus 13% postoperative, P 0.03). Tracheomalacia also decreased from 16% to 7% postrepair. No deaths were reported in our cohort and 2% of our patients required reintervention. Multivariable regression analysis showed that preoperative tracheomalacia was associated with having persistent symptoms after VR repair (odds ratio 6.2, 95% CI 1.02-37.6). CONCLUSIONS: Our institutional experience using a simple surgical approach showed a significant decrease in symptoms, a very low reintervention rate and no mortality. Preoperative tracheomalacia can be a risk factor for persistent symptoms postrepair. We believe a simple surgical approach for children with complete VR repair can be effective in relieving symptoms.

Central ECMO cannulation for severe dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker overdose.

Calcium channel blocker (CCB) toxicity carries a high mortality and is the sixth most fatal drug class reported to US poison centers. Amlodipine overdose is characterized by a life-threatening arterial vasodilation that compromises organ perfusion. The management of CCB intoxication is focused on maintaining adequate organ perfusion. In cases refractory to medical therapies, hemodynamic support with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is warranted necessitating higher flows than usual to compensate for the vasodilation and requiring central cannulation. We present a case of a 12-year-old with severe dihydropyridine CCB ingestion, refractory to medical management and successfully treated with central ECMO cannulation. The patient was discharged home with no significant disability. Central ECMO cannulation may be helpful to facilitate adequate flows in vasodilatory shock such as CCB overdose.

Pediatric Cardiac Xenotransplantation: Recommendations for the Ethical Design of Clinical Trials.

For children with complex congenital heart problems, cardiac allotransplantation is sometimes the best therapeutic option. However, availability of hearts for pediatric patients is limited, resulting in a long and growing waitlist, and a high mortality rate while waiting. Cardiac xenotransplantation has been proposed as one therapeutic alternative for neonates and infants, either in lieu of allotransplantation or as a bridge until an allograft becomes available. Scientific and clinical developments in xenotransplantation appear likely to permit cardiac xenotransplantation clinical trials in adults in the coming years. The ethical issues around xenotransplantation of the heart and other organs and tissues have recently been examined, but to date, only limited literature is available on the ethical issues that are attendant with pediatric heart xenotransplantation. Here, we summarize the ethical issues, focusing on (1) whether cardiac xenotransplantation should proceed in adults or children first, (2) pediatric recipient selection for initial xenotransplantation trials, (3) special problems regarding informed consent in this context, and (4) related psychosocial and public perception considerations. We conclude with specific recommendations regarding ethically informed design of pediatric heart xenotransplantation trials.

Standardization of the Norwood Procedure Improves Outcomes in a Medium-Sized Volume Center.

The Norwood operation has become common practice to palliate patients with hypoplastic left heart structures. Surgical technique and postoperative care have improved; yet, there remains significant attrition prior to stage II palliation. The objective of this study is to report outcomes before and after standardizing our approach to the Norwood operation. Patients who underwent the Norwood operation at Children's of Alabama were identified, those who underwent hybrid palliation operations were excluded. Pre- (2015-2020) and post- (2020-January 2023) standardization groups were compared and outcomes analyzed. Ninety-one patients were included (pre-standardization 44 (48.3%) and 47 (51.7%) post-standardization). There were no differences in baseline and intraoperative characteristics at Norwood between the pre- and post-standardization groups. Compared with pre-standardization, post-standardization was associated with decreased time to extubation (OR 0.87, 95%CI 0.79-0.96), inotrope duration (OR 0.92, 95%CI 0.86-0.98) and hospital length of stay (OR 0.98, 95%CI 0.96-0.99). There was a trend toward decreased cardiac arrest, reintervention rates, and interstage mortality for the post-standardization group. A standardized approach to complex neonatal cardiac operations such as the Norwood procedure may improve morbidity and decrease hospital resource utilization. We recommend establishing protocols at an institutional level to optimize outcomes in such high-risk patient populations.

Hybrid Thrombectomy and Central Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Massive Pulmonary Embolism in a Child.

We describe a hybrid thrombectomy and central extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for a child in cardiogenic shock due to a massive pulmonary embolism.

The American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) 2023 Expert Consensus Document: Recommendation for the care of children with trisomy 13 or trisomy 18 and a congenital heart defect.

OBJECTIVES: Recommendations for surgical repair of a congenital heart defect in children with trisomy 13 or trisomy 18 remain controversial, are subject to biases, and are largely unsupported with limited empirical data. This has created significant distrust and uncertainty among parents and could potentially lead to suboptimal care for patients. A working group, representing several clinical specialties involved with the care of these children, developed recommendations to assist in the decision-making process for congenital heart defect care in this population. The goal of these recommendations is to provide families and their health care teams with a framework for clinical decision making based on the literature and expert opinions. METHODS: This project was performed under the auspices of the AATS Congenital Heart Surgery Evidence-Based Medicine Taskforce. A Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison/Control, Outcome process was used to generate preliminary statements and recommendations to address various aspects related to cardiac surgery in children with trisomy 13 or trisomy 18. Delphi methodology was then used iteratively to generate consensus among the group using a structured communication process. RESULTS: Nine recommendations were developed from a set of initial statements that arose from the Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison/Control, Outcome process methodology following the groups' review of more than 500 articles. These recommendations were adjudicated by this group of experts using a modified Delphi process in a reproducible fashion and make up the current publication. The Class (strength) of recommendations was usually Class IIa (moderate benefit), and the overall level (quality) of evidence was level C-limited data. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first set of recommendations collated by an expert multidisciplinary group to address specific issues around indications for surgical intervention in children with trisomy 13 or trisomy 18 with congenital heart defect. Based on our analysis of recent data, we recommend that decisions should not be based solely on the presence of trisomy but, instead, should be made on a case-by-case basis, considering both the severity of the baby's heart disease as well as the presence of other anomalies. These recommendations offer a framework to assist parents and clinicians in surgical decision making for children who have trisomy 13 or trisomy 18 with congenital heart defect.