Dynamics of anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies after renal transplantation and their impact on graft outcome.

The purpose of this study was to sequentially monitor anti-HLA antibodies and correlate the results with antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), graft survival (GS), and graft function (GF). We collected sera from 111 kidney transplant recipients on transplant days 0, 7, 14, 30, 60, 90, 180, and 360 and analyzed PRA levels by ELISA. DSAs were analyzed by single-antigen beads in rejecting kidneys. At pre-transplant, 79.3% of the patients were non-sensitized (PRA = 0%) and 20.7% were sensitized (PRA > 1%). After transplant, patients were grouped by PRA profile: no anti-HLA antibodies pre- or post-transplant (group HLApre-/post-; n = 80); de novo anti-HLA antibodies post-transplant (group HLApre-/post+; n = 8); sensitized pre-transplant/increased PRA post-transplant (group HLApre+/post↑; n = 9); and sensitized pre-transplant/decreased PRA post-transplant (group HLApre+/post↓; n = 14). De novo anti-HLA antibodies were detected at 7-180 d. In sensitized patients, PRA levels changed within the first 30 d post-transplant. Incidence of AMR was higher in HLApre-/post+ and HLApre+/post↑ than in HLApre-/post-, and HLApre+/post↓ (p < 0.001) groups. One-yr death-censored GS was 36% in group HLApre+/post↑, compared with 98%, 88% and 100% in groups HLApre-/post-, HLApre-/post+, and HLApre+/post↓, respectively (p < 0.001). Excluding first-year graft losses, GF and GS were similar among the groups. In conclusion, post-transplant antibody monitoring can identify recipients at higher risk of AMR.

Desensitization using IVIG alone for living-donor kidney transplant: impact on donor-specific antibodies.

INTRODUCTION: Sensitization to human leukocyte antigen is a barrier to. Few data have been published on desensitization using polyvalent human intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) alone. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the of 45 patients with a positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDCXM) or flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) against living donors from January 2003 to December 2014. Of these, 12 were excluded. Patients received monthly IVIG infusions (2 g/kg) only until they had a negative T-cell and B-cell FCXM. RESULTS: During the 33 patients, 22 (66.7%) underwent living donor kidney transplantation, 7 (21.2%) received a deceased donor graft, and 4 (12.1%) did not undergo transplantation. The median class I and II panel reactive antibodies for these patients were 80.5% (range 61%-95%) and 83.0% (range 42%-94%), respectively. Patients (81.8%) had a positive T-cell and/or B-cell CDCXM and 4 (18.2%) had a positive T-cell and/or B-cell FCXM. Patients underwent transplantation after a median of 6 (range 3-16). The median donor-specific antibody mean fluorescence intensity sum was 5057 (range 2246-11,691) before and 1389 (range 934-2492) after desensitization (p = 0.0001). Mean patient follow-up time after transplantation was 60.5 (SD, 36.8) months. Nine patients (45.0%). Death-censored graft survival at 1, 3, and 5 years after transplant was 86.4, 86.4, and 79.2%, respectively and patient survival was 95.5, 95.5, and 83.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Desensitization using IVIG alone is an effective strategy, allowing successful transplantation in 87.9% of these highly sensitized patients.

Home blood pressure (BP) monitoring in kidney transplant recipients is more adequate to monitor BP than office BP.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is highly prevalent among kidney transplantation recipients and considered as an important cardiovascular risk factor influencing patient survival and kidney graft survival. Aim. Compare the blood pressure (BP) control in kidney transplant patients through the use of home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) is more comparable with the results of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring compared to the measurement of office blood pressure. METHODS: From March 2008 to April 2009 prospectively were evaluated 183 kidney transplant recipients with time after transplantation between 1 and 10 years. Patients underwent three methods for measuring BP: office blood pressure measurement (oBP), HBPM and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). RESULTS: In total, 183 patients were evaluated, among them 94 were men (54%) and 89 women (46%). The average age was 50 ± 11 years. The average time of transplant was 57 ± 32 months. Ninety-nine patients received grafts from deceased donors (54%) and 84 were recipients of living donors (46%). When assessed using oBP, 56.3% presented with uncontrolled and 43.7% with adequate control of BP with an average of 138.9/82.3 ± 17.8/12.1 mmHg. However, when measured by HBPM, 55.2% of subjects were controlled and 44.8% presented with uncontrolled BP with an average of 131.1/78.5 ± 17.4/8.9 mmHg. Using the ABPM, we observed that 63.9% of subjects were controlled and 36.1% of patients presented uncontrolled BP with an average 128.8/80.5 ± 12.5/8.1 mmHg. We found that the two methods (oBP and HBPM) have a significant agreement, but the HBPM has a higher agreement that oBP, confirmed P = 0.026. We found that there is no symmetry in the data for both methods with McNemar test. The correlation index of Pearson linear methods for the ABPM with the other two methods were 0.494 for office measurement and 0.768 for HBPM, best value of HBPM with ABPM. Comparing the errors of the two methods by paired t-test, we obtained the descriptive level of 0.837. Looking at the receiver operating characteristic curve for BP measurements in each method, we observed that oBP is lower than those obtained by HBPM in relation to ABPM. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the results obtained with HBPM were closer to the ABPM results than those obtained with BP obtained at oBP, being more sensitive to detect poor control of hypertension in renal transplant recipients.

Desensitization using IVIG alone for living-donor kidney transplant: impact on donor-specific antibodies / Dessensibilização usando somente IgIV para transplante renal com doador vivo: impacto nos anticorpos específicos contra o doador

Abstract Introduction: Sensitization to human leukocyte antigen is a barrier to. Few data have been published on desensitization using polyvalent human intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) alone. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the of 45 patients with a positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDCXM) or flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) against living donors from January 2003 to December 2014. Of these, 12 were excluded. Patients received monthly IVIG infusions (2 g/kg) only until they had a negative T-cell and B-cell FCXM. Results: During the 33 patients, 22 (66.7%) underwent living donor kidney transplantation, 7 (21.2%) received a deceased donor graft, and 4 (12.1%) did not undergo transplantation. The median class I and II panel reactive antibodies for these patients were 80.5% (range 61%-95%) and 83.0% (range 42%-94%), respectively. Patients (81.8%) had a positive T-cell and/or B-cell CDCXM and 4 (18.2%) had a positive T-cell and/or B-cell FCXM. Patients underwent transplantation after a median of 6 (range 3-16). The median donor-specific antibody mean fluorescence intensity sum was 5057 (range 2246-11,691) before and 1389 (range 934-2492) after desensitization (p = 0.0001). Mean patient follow-up time after transplantation was 60.5 (SD, 36.8) months. Nine patients (45.0%). Death-censored graft survival at 1, 3, and 5 years after transplant was 86.4, 86.4, and 79.2%, respectively and patient survival was 95.5, 95.5, and 83.7%, respectively. Conclusions: Desensitization using IVIG alone is an effective strategy, allowing successful transplantation in 87.9% of these highly sensitized patients.

Resumo Introdução: Sensibilização HLA é uma barreira ao transplante em pacientes sensibilizados. Há poucos dados publicados sobre dessensibilização utilizando somente imunoglobulina intravenosa humana polivalente (IgIV). Métodos: Revisamos retrospectivamente prontuários de 45 pacientes com prova cruzada positiva por citotoxicidade dependente do complemento (CDCXM) ou citometria de fluxo (FCXM) contra doadores vivos, de Janeiro/2003-Dezembro/2014. Destes, excluímos 12. 33 pacientes receberam infusões mensais de IgIV (2 g/kg) apenas até apresentarem FCXM células T e B negativa. Resultados: Durante dessensibilização, 22 pacientes (66,7%) realizaram transplante renal com doador vivo, 7 (21,2%) receberam enxerto de doador falecido, 4 (12,1%) não realizaram transplante. A mediana do painel de reatividade de anticorpos classes I e II para estes pacientes foi 80,5% (intervalo 61%-95%) e 83,0% (intervalo 42%-94%), respectivamente. 18 pacientes (81,8%) apresentaram CDCXM célula T e/ou B positiva; 4 (18,2%) apresentaram FCXM célula T e/ou B positiva. Pacientes realizaram transplante após mediana de 6 (intervalo 3-16) infusões. A mediana da somatória da intensidade média de fluorescência do anticorpo específico contra o doador foi 5057 (intervalo 2246-11.691) antes e 1389 (intervalo 934-2492) após dessensibilização (p = 0,0001). O tempo médio de acompanhamento do paciente pós transplante foi 60,5 (DP, 36,8) meses. Nove pacientes (45,0%) não apresentaram rejeição e 6 (27,3%) apresentaram rejeição mediada por anticorpos. Sobrevida do enxerto censurada para óbito em 1, 3, 5 anos após transplante foi 86,4; 86,4; 79,2%, respectivamente, e sobrevida do paciente foi 95,5; 95,5; 83,7%, respectivamente. Conclusões: Dessensibilização utilizando apenas IgIV é uma estratégia eficaz, permitindo transplante bem-sucedido em 87,9% destes pacientes altamente sensibilizados.

The impact of pretransplant donor-specific antibodies on graft outcome in renal transplantation: a six-year follow-up study.

OBJECTIVE: The significance of pretransplant, donor-specific antibodies on long-term patient outcomes is a subject of debate. This study evaluated the impact and the presence or absence of donor-specific antibodies after kidney transplantation on short- and long-term graft outcomes. METHODS: We analyzed the frequency and dynamics of pretransplant donor-specific antibodies following renal transplantation from a randomized trial that was conducted from 2002 to 2004 and correlated these findings with patient outcomes through 2009. Transplants were performed against a complement-dependent T- and B-negative crossmatch. Pre- and posttransplant sera were available from 94 of the 118 patients (80%). Antibodies were detected using a solid-phase (Luminex®), single-bead assay, and all tests were performed simultaneously. RESULTS: Sixteen patients exhibited pretransplant donor-specific antibodies, but only 3 of these patients (19%) developed antibody-mediated rejection and 2 of them experienced early graft losses. Excluding these 2 losses, 6 of 14 patients exhibited donor-specific antibodies at the final follow-up exam, whereas 8 of these patients (57%) exhibited complete clearance of the donor-specific antibodies. Five other patients developed ''de novo'' posttransplant donor-specific antibodies. Death-censored graft survival was similar in patients with pretransplant donor-specific and non-donor-specific antibodies after a mean follow-up period of 70 months. CONCLUSION: Pretransplant donor-specific antibodies with a negative complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch are associated with a risk for the development of antibody-mediated rejection, although survival rates are similar when patients transpose the first months after receiving the graft. Our data also suggest that early posttransplant donor-specific antibody monitoring should increase knowledge of antibody dynamics and their impact on long-term graft outcome.

The impact of pretransplant donor-specific antibodies on graft outcome in renal transplantation: a six-year follow-up study

OBJECTIVE: The significance of pretransplant, donor-specific antibodies on long-term patient outcomes is a subject of debate. This study evaluated the impact and the presence or absence of donor-specific antibodies after kidney transplantation on short- and long-term graft outcomes. METHODS: We analyzed the frequency and dynamics of pretransplant donor-specific antibodies following renal transplantation from a randomized trial that was conducted from 2002 to 2004 and correlated these findings with patient outcomes through 2009. Transplants were performed against a complement-dependent T- and B-negative crossmatch. Pre- and posttransplant sera were available from 94 of the 118 patients (80%). Antibodies were detected using a solid-phase (LuminexH), single-bead assay, and all tests were performed simultaneously. RESULTS: Sixteen patients exhibited pretransplant donor-specific antibodies, but only 3 of these patients (19%) developed antibody-mediated rejection and 2 of them experienced early graft losses. Excluding these 2 losses, 6 of 14 patients exhibited donor-specific antibodies at the final follow-up exam, whereas 8 of these patients (57%) exhibited complete clearance of the donor-specific antibodies. Five other patients developed ''de novo'' posttransplant donor-specific antibodies. Death-censored graft survival was similar in patients with pretransplant donor-specific and non-donor-specific antibodies after a mean follow-up period of 70 months. CONCLUSION: Pretransplant donor-specific antibodies with a negative complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch are associated with a risk for the development of antibody-mediated rejection, although survival rates are similar when patients transpose the first months after receiving the graft. Our data also suggest that early posttransplant donor-specific antibody monitoring should increase knowledge of antibody dynamics and their impact on long-term graft outcome.

Relevância da monitorização dos anticorpos anti-HLA após o transplante renal: estudo clínico e anatomopatológico / Relevance of anti-HLA monitoring after kidney transplantation: Clinical and anatomopathological study

INTRODUÇÃO: O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar prospectivamente os anticorpos anti-HLA após o transplante renal e associar estes achados com episódios de rejeição aguda, marcação por C4d e sobrevida do enxerto. MÉTODOS: Foram avaliados 926 soros de 111 pacientes no primeiro ano pós-transplante ou até a perda do enxerto. Os anticorpos foram analisados por PRA-ELISA (Panel Reactive Antibodies by Enzyme Linked Immuno Sorbent Assay). Anticorpos anti-HLA doador-específicos foram detectados por provas-cruzadas e caracterizados pelo método de microesferas marcadas com antígenos HLA. Episódios de rejeição aguda foram classificados conforme os Critérios de Banff 97, atualizados em 2003. RESULTADOS: Conforme o PRA-ELISA pós-transplante os pacientes foram classificados em 5 Grupos: Grupo A (n=80): sem evidência de anticorpos pré e pós-transplante; Grupo B (n=8): pacientes com anticorpos de novo; Grupo C (n=5): pacientes sensibilizados que permaneceram com mesmo nível de PRA-ELISA; Grupo D (n=4): pacientes sensibilizados que elevaram o nível de PRA-ELISA e Grupo E (n=14): pacientes sensibilizados que diminuíram o nível de PRA-ELISA durante o primeiro ano pós-transplante. A incidência de rejeição aguda foi de 23,4%. Pacientes dos Grupos B, C e D apresentaram mais episódios de rejeição aguda (respectivamente, 57%; 60% e 100%) que os dos Grupos A (18%) e E (7%), (p<0,001). Rejeições ocorridas no Grupo A foram histologicamente menos severas do que as dos outros Grupos (p=0,03) e com menor incidência de C4d+ (p<0,001). Entre os pacientes com rejeição aguda, 44% deles apresentaram anticorpos no momento da rejeição, sendo que em 90% dos casos esses anticorpos foram doadorespecíficos. Rejeição mediada por células, ou seja, sem anticorpos e com C4d-, ocorreu em 56% dos casos. A incidência global de rejeição mediada por anticorpos (RMA) foi de 11%. A sobrevida do enxerto censurada para óbito foi menor em pacientes com rejeição aguda (p<0,001), especialmente naqueles com anticorpos...

INTRODUCTION: The aim was to follow prospectively anti-HLA antibodies (Abs) after kidney transplantation and to evaluate their association with acute rejection episodes, C4d staining and graft survival. METHODS: We analyzed 926 sera from 111 transplanted patients until graft lost or during 1 year posttransplant. The antibodies were analyzed using Panel Reactive Antibodies by Enzyme Linked Immuno Sorbent Assay (PRA-ELISA). Donor-specific antibodies (DSA) were detected by crossmatch tests and characterized by single antigen beads. Acute rejections (AR) were classified by Banff 97 criteria, updated in 2003. RESULTS: According to post-transplant PRAELISA the patients were classified in 5 groups: Group A (n=80): no evidence of Abs pre and post-transplant; Group B (n=8): patients with Abs de novo; Group C (n=5): sensitized patients who sustained the same PRA-ELISA levels; Group D (n=4): sensitized patients who increased PRA-ELISA levels and Group E (n=14): sensitized patients who decreased PRA-ELISA levels during the first year. The overall incidence of acute rejection was 23,4%. Patients from Groups B, C and D had more AR (respectively, 57%; 60% and 100%) than patients from Groups A (18%) and E (7%), (p<0.001). Patients from Group A had lower Banff scores than other groups (p=0.03) and lower rates of C4d positivity on AR biopsies (p<0.001). Among patients with AR, 44% of them had antibodies which appeared/increased during the AR episodes, and 90% were DSA. AR were pure cell-mediated (C4d-/Abs-) in 56% of the cases. The overall incidence of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) was 11%. One-year censored graft survival was lower in patients with AR (p<0.001), specially in those with DSA (p<0.001), C4d+ (p=0.003), and AMR (p<0.003). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that monitoring of anti- HLA antibodies post-transplantation is an useful tool for the diagnosis of antibody-mediated responses, and has prognostic implications in terms of graft survival.