Clonidine for pain-related distress in Aboriginal children on a penicillin regimen to prevent recurrence of rheumatic fever.

CONTEXT: Indigenous children and adolescents in Australia and globally bear the burden of acute rheumatic fever (ARF). It has been virtually eliminated in well-resourced, developed settings. ARF is an autoimmune response to infection with group A Streptococcus. The mainstay of management is long-acting intramuscular penicillin injections to prevent recurrence of ARF and development of rheumatic heart disease (RHD), comprising valvular pathology and attendant complications. In Australia, penicillin injections are currently prescribed every 28 days for 5-10 years after diagnosis of ARF, depending on cardiac involvement. Adherence to this regimen reduces ARF recurrences and RHD progression. 'Days at risk' of ARF recurrence are calculated as the number of days after day 28 that an injection is not received. Adherence to the injection schedule has been reported as difficult in most global locations due to the painful nature of the injections, the long timeframes of the prescription, young age of patients, access problems and costs in some locations. The newly updated Australian guideline on the prevention, diagnosis and management of ARF and RHD has a chapter dedicated to secondary prophylaxis. This chapter takes into account cultural considerations and advises on ways to minimise pain and distress of injections in children such as pain gate strategies, distraction techniques and concurrent injection of local anaesthetic. ISSUES: Some children continue to find the injection regimen traumatising despite strategies to reduce pain and fear. Clinicians providing the injections to children also find the injecting episodes distressing if pain is not effectively minimised. An Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Service in a remote setting in northern Australia addressed the issue of severe trauma of injection episodes experienced by an Aboriginal boy aged 7 years. Usual strategies were not effective, so advice was sought from an expert anaesthetist at a tertiary hospital. As a result, oral clonidine 3 µg/kg was trialled 45 minutes prior to the penicillin injection. Procedural coaching and monitoring protocols specific to administration of clonidine in children under their care were created by the health service. The initial dose of clonidine was delivered with the child as an inpatient. LESSONS LEARNED: Clonidine was successful in reducing pain related distress and facilitating adherence to the penicillin regimen. Subsequent doses were delivered and monitored in a remote setting by nurses. After 18 months, the boy no longer required clonidine due to his increased coping capacity. A second child was recognised with similar trauma and has been taking clonidine for pre-procedural sedation for 6 months with good effect and no adverse effects. An additional child was similarly prescribed clonidine without success. Failure in that instance was attributed to lack of procedural coaching and receiving the initial dose of clonidine in an emergency department in hurried circumstances. Individualised child-focused and culturally appropriate care in remote settings is feasible: in this instance team planning for use of clonidine and procedural coaching when other measures have failed. However, for children with RHD, or other comorbidities, advice from the child's treating cardiologist is required prior to prescribing clonidine due to possible adverse consequences. These include hypotension and atrioventricular block, which could lead to haemodynamic compromise in the setting of moderate to severe RHD.

Improving Access to Safe Anesthetic Care in Rural and Remote Communities in Affluent Countries.

Inadequate access to anesthesia and surgical services is often considered to be a problem of low- and middle-income countries. However, affluent nations, including Canada, Australia, and the United States, also face shortages of anesthesia and surgical care in rural and remote communities. Inadequate services often disproportionately affect indigenous populations. A lack of anesthesia care providers has been identified as a major contributing factor to the shortfall of surgical and obstetrical care in rural and remote areas of these countries. This report summarizes the challenges facing the provision of anesthesia services in rural and remote regions. The current landscape of anesthesia providers and their training is described. We also explore innovative strategies and emerging technologies that could better support physician-led anesthesia care teams working in rural and remote areas. Ultimately, we believe that it is the responsibility of specialist anesthesiologists and academic health sciences centers to facilitate access to high-quality care through partnership with other stakeholders. Professional medical organizations also play an important role in ensuring the quality of care and continuing professional development. Enhanced collaboration between academic anesthesiologists and other stakeholders is required to meet the challenge issued by the World Health Organization to ensure access to essential anesthesia and surgical services for all.

Low uptake of Aboriginal interpreters in healthcare: exploration of current use in Australia's Northern Territory.

BACKGROUND: In Australia's Northern Territory, most Aboriginal people primarily speak an Aboriginal language. Poor communication between healthcare providers and Aboriginal people results in adverse outcomes including death. This study aimed to identify remediable barriers to utilisation of Aboriginal Interpreter services at the Northern Territory's tertiary hospital, which currently manages over 25,000 Aboriginal inpatients annually. METHODS: This is a multi-method study using key stakeholder discussions, medical file audit, bookings data from the Aboriginal Interpreter Service 2000-2015 and an online cross-sectional staff survey. The Donabedian framework was used to categorise findings into structure, process and outcome. RESULTS: Six key stakeholder meetings each with approximately 15 participants were conducted. A key structural barrier identified was lack of onsite interpreters. Interpreter bookings data revealed that only 7603 requests were made during the 15-year period, with completion of requests decreasing from 337/362 (93.1%) in 2003-4 to 649/831 (78.1%) in 2014-15 (p < 0.001). Non-completion was more common for minority languages (p < 0.001). Medical files of 103 Aboriginal inpatients were audited. Language was documented for 13/103 (12.6%). Up to 60/103 (58.3%) spoke an Aboriginal language primarily. Of 422 staff who participated in the survey, 18.0% had not received 'cultural competency' training; of those who did, 58/222 (26.2%) indicated it was insufficient. The Aboriginal Interpreter Service effectiveness was reported to be good by 209/368 (56.8%), but only 101/367 (27.5%) found it timely. Key process barriers identified by staff included booking complexities, time constraints, inadequate delivery of tools and training, and greater convenience of unofficial interpreters. CONCLUSION: We identified multiple structural and process barriers resulting in the outcomes of poor language documentation and low rates of interpreter bookings. Findings are now informing interventions to improve communication.

Telemedicine in the Northern Territory: an assessment of patient perceptions in the preoperative anaesthetic clinic.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated patient perceptions of a virtual preoperative anaesthesia evaluation clinic linking Royal Darwin Hospital to Katherine Hospital. DESIGN: Descriptive study, cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Regional and rural areas of Northern Territory, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Sample includes 27 respondents, five Indigenous, 18 non-Indigenous and four unknown. INTERVENTIONS: Introduction of a preoperative anaesthesia evaluation clinic. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We designed a 10-item, 5-point Likert scale questionnaire assessing patient perceptions in four domains: (i) technical quality; (ii) perceived efficacy; (iii) affective patient experience; and (iv) patient preference. Qualitative responses are also reported. RESULTS: Twenty-seven out of 35 patients (77%) completed the questionnaire. Ninety-eight per cent were in positive agreement on technical quality with a mean score of 1.35 (SD: 0.53); Ninety-five per cent on perceived efficacy, 1.35 (SD: 0.65); Eighty-four per cent in negative agreement on affective patient experience (negative perception item), 4.19 (SD: 1.07); Eighty-one per cent in negative agreement on patient preference (negative perception item), 4.23 (SD: 1.14). There were no significant differences in the answers between Indigenous (five patients) and non-Indigenous patients (18 patients). CONCLUSION: Our study confirms the acceptability of telemedicine in the remote assessment of preoperative patients in the Northern Territory, with positive perceptions in all four domains.

Functional evaluation and practice survey to guide purchasing of intravenous cannulae.

BACKGROUND: There are wide variations in the physical designs and attributes between different brands of intravenous cannulae that makes product selection and purchasing difficult. In a systematic assessment to guide purchasing, we assessed two cannulae - Cannula P and I. We proposed that the results of in-vitro performance testing of the cannulae would be associated with preference after clinical comparison. METHODS: We designed an observer-blinded randomised head-to-head trial between the 18, 20 and 22 gauge versions of Cannula P and I. Our primary end-point was pressure (mmHg) generated during various flow rates and our secondary end-point was the force (Newton) required to slide the catheter away from the needle. This was followed by a prospective electronic survey following a two-week clinical trial period. RESULTS: The mean difference in resistance between Cannula P and I was: 307 mmHg.L-1.hr-1 (95% CI: 289-325, p < 0.001) for 22G; 135 mmHg.L-1.hr-1 (95% CI: 125-144, p < 0.001) for 20G; and 27 mmHg.L-1.hr-1 (95% CI: 26-28, p < 0.001) for 18G. The mean difference in the force needed to displace the catheter away from its needle was: 1.41 N (95% CI: 1.09-1.73, p < 0.001) for 22G; 0.19 N (95% CI: -0.04-0.41, p = 0.12) for 20G; and 1.96 N (95% CI: 1.40-2.52, p < 0.001) for 18G. After a trial period, all 16 anaesthetist who had used both cannulae preferred Cannula I to P. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation process described here could help hospitals improve efficient product selection and purchasing decisions for intravenous cannulae.

Comparison of Profiles of First Nations and Non-First Nations Children With Bronchiectasis Over Two 5-Year Periods in the Northern Territory, Australia.

BACKGROUND: Although the burden of bronchiectasis is recognized globally, pediatric data are limited, particularly on trends over the years. Also, no published data exists regarding whether vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency and human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) infection, both found to be related to severe bronchiectasis in First Nations adults, also are important in children with bronchiectasis. RESEARCH QUESTION: Among children with bronchiectasis, (1) have the clinical and BAL profiles changed between two 5-year periods (period 1, 2007-2011; period 2, 2012-2016) and (b) are vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency, HTLV-1 infection, or both associated with radiologic severity of bronchiectasis? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We analyzed the data from children with bronchiectasis prospectively enrolled at Royal Darwin Hospital, Australia, at the first diagnosis; that is, no child was included in both periods. Data collected include demographics, BAL, routine investigation bloods, and high-resolution CT scan of the chest evaluated using the Bhalla and modified Bhalla scores. RESULTS: The median age of the 299 children was 2.2 years (interquartile range, 1.5-3.7 years). One hundred sixty-eight (56%) were male and most were First Nations (92%). Overall, bronchiectasis was high over time, particularly among First Nations children. In the later period, numbers of non-First Nations children more than tripled, but did not reach statistical significance. In period 2 compared with period 1, fewer First Nations children demonstrated chronic cough (period 1, 61%; period 2, 47%; P = .03), and were younger, First Nations children were less likely to have received azithromycin (period 1, 42%; period 2, 21%; P < .001), and the BAL fluid of First Nations children showed lower Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis infection. HTLV-1 infection was not detected, and vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency did not correlate with severity of bronchiectasis. INTERPRETATION: Bronchiectasis remains high particularly among First Nations children. Important changes in their profiles that arguably reflect improvements were present, but overall, the profiles remained similar. Although vitamin D deficiency was uncommon, its role in children with bronchiectasis requires further evaluation. HTLV-1 infection was nonexistent and is unlikely to play any role in First Nations children with bronchiectasis.

Do combined upper airway cultures identify lower airway infections in children with chronic cough?

BACKGROUND: Obtaining lower airway specimens is important for guiding therapy in chronic lung infection but is difficult in young children unable to expectorate. While culture-based studies have assessed the diagnostic accuracy of nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal specimens for identifying lower airway infection, none have used both together. We compared respiratory bacterial pathogens cultured from nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cultures as the "gold standard" to better inform the diagnosis of lower airway infection in children with chronic wet cough. METHODS: Nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs and BAL fluid specimens were collected concurrently from consecutive children undergoing flexible bronchoscopy for chronic cough and cultured for bacterial pathogens. RESULTS: In cultures from 309 children (median age, 2.3 years) with chronic endobronchial suppuration, all main pathogens detected (Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Moraxella catarrhalis) were more prevalent in nasopharyngeal than oropharyngeal swabs (37%, 34%, and 23% vs 21%, 6.2%, and 3.2%, respectively). Positive and negative predictive values for lower airway infection by any of these three pathogens were 63% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 55, 70) and 85% (95% CI, 78, 91) for nasopharyngeal swabs, 65% (95% CI, 54, 75), and 66% (95% CI, 59, 72) for oropharyngeal swabs, and 61% (95% CI, 54,68), and 88% (95% CI, 81, 93) for both swabs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Neither nasopharyngeal nor oropharyngeal swabs, alone or in combination, reliably predicted lower airway infection in children with chronic wet cough. Although upper airway specimens may be useful for bacterial carriage studies and monitoring antimicrobial resistance, their clinical utility in pediatric chronic lung disorders of endobronchial suppuration is limited.

Dental extraction in a child with chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura: are preoperative platelet transfusions necessary?

Thresholds for platelet counts in patients at risk for bleeding are often used before surgery. We present a case report of a 13-year-old female with chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura for dental extraction with a platelet count of 4 × 10 L. Usually, therapies including platelet infusions, IV immunoglobulin, or corticosteroids would be used to increase platelet numbers. In this patient, rather than using any of these prophylactic therapies preoperatively, we used a "watchful waiting" strategy with a multidisciplinary team, the use of tranexamic acid and the aforementioned therapies available only as "rescue" agents.

The Bali bombing: the Royal Darwin Hospital response.

After the Bali bombing on 12 October 2002, injured Australians were evacuated to Darwin. The first patients arrived at the Royal Darwin Hospital (RDH) 26 hours after the blasts. RDH assessed and resuscitated 61 patients (including 20 intensive care patients, with 15 requiring ventilation, 19 surgery and more than 20 escharotomies). RDH evacuated 48 patients to burns centres around Australia within 36 hours of the first patient arrivals at the hospital and 62 hours after the bomb blasts. The response was successful, but improvements are needed in coordination between the different groups involved in such operations.