Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 26
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Intern Med ; 166(2): 81-88, 2017 Jan 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27842386

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite the widespread adoption of patient-centered medical homes into primary care practice, the evidence supporting their effect on health care outcomes has come primarily from geographically localized and well-integrated health systems. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between medication adherence and medical homes in a national patient and provider population, given the strong ties between adherence to chronic disease medications and health care quality and spending. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Claims from a large national health insurer. PATIENTS: Patients initiating therapy with common medications for chronic diseases (diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia) between 2011 and 2013. MEASUREMENTS: Medication adherence in the 12 months after treatment initiation was compared among patients cared for by providers practicing in National Committee for Quality Assurance-recognized patient-centered medical homes and propensity score-matched control practices in the same Primary Care Service Areas. Linear mixed models were used to examine the association between medical homes and adherence. RESULTS: Of 313 765 patients meeting study criteria, 18 611 (5.9%) received care in patient-centered medical homes. Mean rates of adherence were 64% among medical home patients and 59% among control patients. Among 4660 matched control and medical home practices, medication adherence was significantly higher in medical homes (2.2% [95% CI, 1.5% to 2.9%]). The association between medical homes and better adherence did not differ significantly by disease state (diabetes, 3.0% [CI, 1.5% to 4.6%]; hypertension, 3.2% [CI, 2.2% to 4.2%]; hyperlipidemia, 1.5% [CI, 0.6% to 2.5%]). LIMITATION: Clinical outcomes related to medication adherence were not assessed. CONCLUSION: Receipt of care in a patient-centered medical home is associated with better adherence, a vital measure of health care quality, among patients initiating treatment with medications for common high-cost chronic diseases. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: CVS Health.


Assuntos
Doença Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Adesão à Medicação , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/normas , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Hiperlipidemias/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Med Care ; 55(1): 64-73, 2017 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27635600

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: With rising health spending, predicting costs is essential to identify patients for interventions. Many of the existing approaches have moderate predictive ability, which may result, in part, from not considering potentially meaningful changes in spending over time. Group-based trajectory modeling could be used to classify patients into dynamic long-term spending patterns. OBJECTIVES: To classify patients by their spending patterns over a 1-year period and to assess the ability of models to predict patients in the highest spending trajectory and the top 5% of annual spending using prior-year predictors. SUBJECTS: We identified all fully insured adult members enrolled in a large US nationwide insurer and used medical and prescription data from 2009 to 2011. RESEARCH DESIGN: Group-based trajectory modeling was used to classify patients by their spending patterns over a 1-year period. We assessed the predictive ability of models that categorized patients in the top fifth percentile of annual spending and in the highest spending trajectory, using logistic regression and split-sample validation. Models were estimated using investigator-specified variables and a proprietary risk-adjustment method. RESULTS: Among 998,651 patients, in the best-performing model, prediction was strong for patients in the highest trajectory group (C-statistic: 0.86; R: 0.47). The C-statistic of being in the top fifth percentile of spending in the best-performing model was 0.82 (R: 0.26). Approaches using nonproprietary investigator-specified methods performed almost as well as other risk-adjustment methods (C-statistic: 0.81 vs. 0.82). CONCLUSIONS: Trajectory modeling may be a useful way to predict costly patients that could be implementable by payers to improve cost-containment efforts.


Assuntos
Controle de Custos/métodos , Prescrições de Medicamentos/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Gastos em Saúde/tendências , Seguro Saúde/economia , Adulto , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição de Risco/métodos
3.
Med Care ; 53(12): 1050-7, 2015 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26565524

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Methods of estimating race/ethnicity using administrative data are increasingly used to examine and target disparities; however, there has been no validation of these methods using clinically relevant outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of the indirect method of race/ethnicity identification based on place of residence and surname for assessing clinically relevant outcomes. DATA SOURCES: A total of 2387 participants in the Post-MI Free Rx Event and Economic Evaluation (MI FREEE) trial who had both self-reported and Bayesian Improved Surname Geocoding method (BISG)-estimated race/ethnicity information available. STUDY DESIGN: We used tests of interaction to compare differences in the effect of providing full drug coverage for post-MI medications on adherence and rates of major vascular events or revascularization for white and nonwhite patients based upon self-reported and indirect racial/ethnic assignment. RESULTS: The impact of full coverage on clinical events differed substantially when based upon self-identified race (HR=0.97 for whites, HR=0.65 for nonwhites; interaction P-value=0.05); however, it did not differ among race/ethnicity groups classified using indirect methods (HR=0.87 for white and nonwhites; interaction P-value=0.83). The impact on adherence was the same for self-reported and BISG-estimated race/ethnicity for 2 of the 3 medication classes studied. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitatively and qualitatively different results were obtained when indirectly estimated race/ethnicity was used, suggesting that these techniques may not accurately describe aspects of race/ethnicity related to actual health behaviors.


Assuntos
Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapêutico , Coleta de Dados/métodos , Etnicidade , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/tratamento farmacológico , Grupos Raciais , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Teorema de Bayes , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Mapeamento Geográfico , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , Masculino , Adesão à Medicação/etnologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Nomes , Características de Residência , Autorrelato , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Resultado do Tratamento , População Branca
4.
Am Heart J ; 163(4): 617-23.e1, 2012 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22520528

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Left ventriculography provided the first imaging of left ventricular function and was historically performed as part of coronary angiography despite a small but significant risk of complications. Because modern noninvasive imaging techniques are more accurate and carry smaller risks, the routine use of left ventriculography is of questionable utility. We sought to analyze the frequency that left ventriculography was performed during coronary angiography in patients with and without a recent alternative assessment of left ventricular function. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of insurance claims data from the Aetna health care benefits database including all adults who underwent coronary angiography in 2007. The primary outcome was the concomitant use of left ventriculography during coronary angiography. RESULTS: Of 96,235 patients who underwent coronary angiography, left ventriculography was performed in 78,705 (81.8%). Use of left ventriculography was high in all subgroups, with greatest use in younger patients, those with a diagnosis of coronary disease, and those in the Southern United States. In the population who had undergone a very recent ejection fraction assessment by another modality (within 30 days) and who had had no intervening diagnosis of new heart failure, myocardial infarction, hypotension, or shock (37,149 patients), left ventriculography was performed in 32,798 patients (88%)-a rate higher than in the overall cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Left ventriculography was performed in most coronary angiography cases and often when an alternative imaging modality had been recently completed. New clinical practice guidelines should be considered to decrease the overuse of this invasive test.


Assuntos
Angiografia Coronária , Imagem do Acúmulo Cardíaco de Comporta/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Volume Sistólico , Função Ventricular Esquerda
5.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 21(12): 1350-8, 2012 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22807266

RESUMO

PURPOSE: A new meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MCV4) was introduced in 2005. Shortly after, case reports of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), a serious demyelinating disease, began to be reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. In 2006, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Food and Drug Administration requested the evaluation of GBS risk after MCV4 vaccination. We conducted a study to assess the risk of GBS after MCV4 vaccination using health plan administrative and claims data together with the review of primary medical records of potential cases. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study among 12.6 million 11- to 21-year-old members of five US health plans with a total membership of 50 million. Automated enrollment and medical claims data from March 2005 through August 2008 were used to identify the population, the vaccinations administered, and the medical services associated with possible GBS. Medical records were reviewed and adjudicated by a neurologist panel to confirm cases of GBS. The study used distributed data analysis methods that minimized sharing of protected health information. RESULTS: We confirmed 99 GBS cases during 18,322,800 person-years (5.4/1,000,000 person-years). More than 1.4 million MCV4 vaccinations were observed. No confirmed cases of GBS occurred within 6 weeks after vaccination. The upper 95% CI for the attributable risk of GBS associated with MCV4 is estimated as 1.5 cases per 1,000,000 doses. CONCLUSIONS: Among members of five US health plans, MCV4 vaccination was not associated with increased GBS risk.


Assuntos
Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/etiologia , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Vacinas Meningocócicas/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Risco , Vacinas Conjugadas/efeitos adversos
6.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 25(1): 113-121, 2019 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30589630

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The approval of new oral disease-modifying drugs (DMDs), such as fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate (DMF), and teriflunamide, has considerably expanded treatment options for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). However, data describing the use of these agents in routine clinical practice are limited. OBJECTIVE: To describe time trends and identify factors associated with oral DMD treatment initiation and switching among individuals with MS. METHODS: Using data from a large sample of commercially insured patients, we evaluated changes over time in the proportion of MS patients who initiated treatment with an oral DMD and who switched from an injectable DMD to an oral DMD between 2009 and 2014 in the United States. We evaluated predictors of oral DMD use using conditional logistic regression in 2 groups matched on calendar time: oral DMD initiators matched to injectable DMDs initiators and oral DMD switchers matched to those who switched to a second injectable DMD. RESULTS: Our cohort included 7,576 individuals who initiated a DMD and 1,342 who switched DMDs, of which oral DMDs accounted for 6% and 39%, respectively. Oral DMD initiation and switching steadily increased from 5% to 16% and 35% to 84%, respectively, between 2011 and 2014, with DMF being the most commonly used agent. Of the potential predictors with clinical significance, a recent neurologist consultation (OR = 1.60; 95% CI = 1.20-2.15) and emergency department visit (OR = 1.43; 95% CI = 1.01-2.01) were significantly associated with oral DMD initiation. History of depression was noted to be a potential predictor of oral DMD initiation; however, the estimate for this predictor did not reach statistical significance (OR = 1.35; 95% CI = 0.99-1.84). No clinically relevant factors measured in our data were associated with switching to an oral DMD. CONCLUSIONS: Oral DMDs were found to be routinely used as second-line treatment. However, we identified few factors predictive of oral DMD initiation or switching, which implies that their selection is driven by patient and/or physician preferences. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by CVS Caremark through an unrestricted research grant to Brigham and Women's Hospital. Shrank and Matlin were employees of, and shareholders in, CVS Health at the time of the study; they report no financial interests in products or services that are related to the subject of this study. Spettell is an employee of, and shareholder in, Aetna. Chitnis serves on clinical trial advisory boards for Novartis and Genzyme-Sanofi; has consulted for Bayer, Biogen Idec, Celgene, Novartis, Merck-Serono, and Genentech-Roche; and has received research support from NIH, National Multiple Sclerosis Society, Peabody Foundation, Consortium for MS Centers, Guthy Jackson Charitable Foundation, EMD-Serono, Novartis Biogen, and Verily. Desai reports receiving a research grant from Merck for unrelated work. Gagne is principal investigator of a research grant from Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation to the Brigham and Women's Hospital and has received grant support from Eli Lilly, all for unrelated work. He is also a consultant to Aetion and Optum. Minden reports grants from Biogen and other fees from Genentech, EMD Serano, Avanir, and Novartis, unrelated to this study. The other authors have no conflicts to report. This study was presented as a poster at the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology 32nd Annual Meeting; August 25-28, 2016; Dublin, Ireland.


Assuntos
Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Seguro de Serviços Farmacêuticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Esclerose Múltipla/tratamento farmacológico , Preferência do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Administração Oral , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Crotonatos/administração & dosagem , Crotonatos/uso terapêutico , Fumarato de Dimetilo/administração & dosagem , Fumarato de Dimetilo/uso terapêutico , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Cloridrato de Fingolimode/administração & dosagem , Cloridrato de Fingolimode/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Hidroxibutiratos , Imunossupressores/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nitrilas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Toluidinas/administração & dosagem , Toluidinas/uso terapêutico , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
7.
J Palliat Med ; 22(11): 1324-1330, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31180268

RESUMO

Background: In 2004, Aetna, a national health insurer, launched the Aetna Compassionate Care Program (ACCP) targeting members diagnosed with an advanced illness with a view to increase access to palliative care and hospice services. Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of ACCP on health care utilization and hospice enrollment among enrolled members. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study comparing participants in ACCP to a matched control group using a propensity score method. The study group consisted of Aetna Medicare Advantage members who participated in the ACCP between January 2014 and June 2015. Potential control group members were those who were not identified by the predictive model nor were referred to the ACCP program through other means. The primary outcomes of interest were hospice use measured as percent of members electing hospice and median number of days in hospice; health care utilization and medical costs measured as rates and medical costs associated with acute inpatient admissions, emergency room, primary care, and specialty visits in the 30 and 90 days before death. Results: Participants in the ACCP program were 36% more likely to enroll in hospice (79% vs. 58%, p < 0.0001) and had reduced acute inpatient medical costs ($4169 vs. $5863, p < 0.0001) driven primarily by fewer inpatient admissions (860 vs. 1017, p < 0.0001) in the last 90 days of life. Conclusions: Advanced illness case management programs such as ACCP can improve access to hospice and improve patient outcomes while reducing unnecessary admissions in the last 90 days of life.


Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Enfermagem de Cuidados Paliativos na Terminalidade da Vida , Medicare Part C , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Gastos em Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Estados Unidos
8.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 17(12): 1226-34, 2008 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18956428

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We describe a multi-center post-marketing safety study that uses distributed data methods to minimize the need for covered entities to share protected health information (PHI). Implementation has addressed several issues relevant to creation of a large scale post-marketing drug safety surveillance system envisioned by the FDA's Sentinel Initiative. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) following meningococcal conjugate vaccination incorporates the data and analytic expertise of five research organizations closely affiliated with US health insurers. The study uses administrative claims data, plus review of full text medical records to adjudicate the status of individuals with a diagnosis code for GBS (ICD9 357.0). A distributed network approach is used to create the analysis files and to perform most aspects of the analysis, allowing nearly all of the data to remain behind institutional firewalls. Pooled analysis files transferred to a central site will contain one record per person for approximately 0.2% of the study population, and contain PHI limited to the month and year of GBS onset for cases or the index date for matched controls. RESULTS: The first planned data extraction identified over 9 million eligible adolescents in the target age range of 11-21 years. They contributed an average of 14 months of eligible time on study over 27 months of calendar time. MCV4 vaccination coverage levels exceeded 20% among 17-18-year olds and 16% among 11-13 and 14-16-year-old age groups by the second quarter of 2007. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the feasibility of using a distributed data network approach to perform large scale post-marketing safety analyses and is scalable to include additional organizations and data sources. We believe these results can inform the development of a large national surveillance system.


Assuntos
Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/induzido quimicamente , Vacinas Meningocócicas/efeitos adversos , Modelos Estatísticos , Vigilância de Produtos Comercializados , Projetos de Pesquisa , Adolescente , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Meningocócicas/uso terapêutico , Projetos de Pesquisa/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
9.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 24(5): 469-477, 2018 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29694288

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Efforts at predicting long-term adherence to medications have been focused on patients filling typical month-long supplies of medication. However, prediction remains difficult for patients filling longer initial supplies, a practice that is becoming increasingly common as a method to enhance medication adherence. OBJECTIVES: To (a) extend methods involving short-term filling behaviors and (b) develop novel variables to predict adherence in a cohort of patients receiving longer initial prescriptions. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we used claims from a large national insurer to identify patients initiating a 90-day supply of oral medications for diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia (i.e., statins). Patients were included in the cohort if they had continuous database enrollment in the 180 days before and 365 days after medication initiation. Adherence was measured in the subsequent 12 months using the proportion of days covered metric. In total, 125 demographic, clinical, and medication characteristics at baseline and in the first 30-120 days after initiation were used to predict adherence using logistic regression models. We used 10-fold cross-validation to assess predictive accuracy by discrimination (c-statistic) measures. RESULTS: In total, 32,249 patients met the inclusion criteria, including 14,930 patients initiating statins, 12,887 patients initiating antihypertensives, and 4,432 patients initiating oral hypoglycemics. Prediction using only baseline variables was relatively poor (cross-validated c-statistic = 0.644). Including indicators of acute clinical conditions, health resource utilization, and short-term medication filling in the first 120 days greatly improved predictive ability (0.823). A model that incorporated all baseline characteristics and predictors within the first 120 days after medication initiation more accurately predicted future adherence (0.832). The best performing model that included all 125 baseline and postbaseline characteristics had strong predictive ability (0.837), suggesting the utility of measuring these novel postbaseline variables in this population. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that long-term, 12-month adherence in patients filling longer supplies of medication can be strongly predicted using a combination of clinical, health resource utilization, and medication filling characteristics before and after treatment initiation. DISCLOSURES: This work was supported by an unrestricted grant from CVS Health to Brigham and Women's Hospital. Shrank and Matlin were employees and shareholders at CVS Health at the time of this study; they report no financial interests in products or services that are related to this subject. Spettell is an employee of, and shareholder in, Aetna. This research was previously presented at the 2016 Annual Conference of the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology; August 25-28, 2016; Dublin, Ireland.


Assuntos
Doença Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Hiperlipidemias/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Assistência de Longa Duração/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos
10.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 23(4): 494-502, 2017 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28345442

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Attempts to predict who is at risk of future nonadherence have largely focused on predictions at the time of therapy initiation; however, these users are only a small proportion of all patients on therapy at any point in time. Methods to predict nonadherence for established medication users, which have not been previously described in the literature, would be helpful to guide efforts to enhance the use of evidence-based therapies. OBJECTIVE: To test approaches for adherence prediction among prevalent statin users, namely the use of short-term filling behavior, investigator-specified predictors from medical and pharmacy administrative claims, and the empirical selection of potential predictors using the high-dimensional propensity score variable selection algorithm. METHODS: Medical and prescription claims data from a large national health insurer were used to create a cohort of patients who filled statin medication prescriptions in January 2012. We defined 6 groups of adherence predictors and estimated 10 main models to predict medication adherence in the full cohort. The same was done for the population stratified based on the days supply of the index statin prescription (≤ 30 days vs. > 30 days). RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 93,777 individuals, 58.4% of which were adherent to statins during follow-up. The use of 3 pre-index adherence predictors alone achieved a c-statistic of 0.70. Investigator-specified and empirically selected pharmacy, medical, and demographic variables did substantially worse (0.57-0.60). The use of 3 indicators of post-index adherence achieved a higher c-statistic than the best-performing model using pre-index information (0.74 vs. 0.72). The addition of 3 pre-index adherence predictors further improved discrimination (0.78). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis demonstrated the ability to predict adherence among medication users using filling behavior before and immediately after an index prescription fill. DISCLOSURES: This work was supported by an unrestricted grant from CVS Health to Brigham and Women's Hospital. Shrank, Brennan, and Matlin were employees and shareholders at CVS Health at the time of this manuscript preparation; they report no financial interests in products or services that are related to the subject of the manuscript. Franklin has received consulting fees from Aetion. Chourdry has received grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, PhRMA Foundation, Merck, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, and MediSafe. Spettell is an employee of, and shareholder in, Aetna. The other authors have nothing to disclose. Krumme, Choudhry, Tong, and Franklin contributed to the study design, interpretation of results, and manuscript drafting. Tong prepared and analyzed the data. Isaman, Spettell, Shrank, Brennan, and Matlin provided interpretation of results and critical manuscript revisions.


Assuntos
Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Cooperação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Previsões , Humanos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Adesão à Medicação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Estatísticos , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Socioeconômicos
11.
JAMA Intern Med ; 177(8): 1093-1101, 2017 08 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28654972

RESUMO

Importance: Adherence to medications prescribed after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is low. Wireless technology and behavioral economic approaches have shown promise in improving health behaviors. Objective: To determine whether a system of medication reminders using financial incentives and social support delays subsequent vascular events in patients following AMI compared with usual care. Design, Setting, and Participants: Two-arm, randomized clinical trial with a 12-month intervention conducted from 2013 through 2016. Investigators were blinded to study group, but participants were not. Design was a health plan-intermediated intervention for members of several health plans. We recruited 1509 participants from 7179 contacted AMI survivors (insured with 5 large US insurers nationally or with Medicare fee-for-service at the University of Pennsylvania Health System). Patients aged 18 to 80 years were eligible if currently prescribed at least 2 of 4 study medications (statin, aspirin, ß-blocker, antiplatelet agent), and were hospital inpatients for 1 to 180 days and discharged home with a principal diagnosis of AMI. Interventions: Patients were randomized 2:1 to an intervention using electronic pill bottles combined with lottery incentives and social support for medication adherence (1003 patients), or to usual care (506 patients). Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome was time to first vascular rehospitalization or death. Secondary outcomes were time to first all-cause rehospitalization, total number of repeated hospitalizations, medication adherence, and total medical costs. Results: A total of 35.5% of participants were female (n = 536); mean (SD) age was 61.0 (10.3) years. There were no statistically significant differences between study arms in time to first rehospitalization for a vascular event or death (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.52; P = .84), time to first all-cause rehospitalization (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.09; P = .27), or total number of repeated hospitalizations (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.48; P = .79). Mean (SD) medication adherence did not differ between control (0.42 [0.39]) and intervention (0.46 [0.39]) (difference, 0.04; 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.09; P = .10). Mean (SD) medical costs in 12 months following enrollment did not differ between control ($29 811 [$74 850]) and intervention ($24 038 [$66 915]) (difference, -$5773; 95% CI, -$13 682 to $2137; P = .15). Conclusions and Relevance: A compound intervention integrating wireless pill bottles, lottery-based incentives, and social support did not significantly improve medication adherence or vascular readmission outcomes for AMI survivors. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01800201.


Assuntos
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta , Aspirina , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases , Motivação , Infarto do Miocárdio , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária , Sistemas de Alerta , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/economia , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapêutico , Assistência ao Convalescente/economia , Assistência ao Convalescente/métodos , Assistência ao Convalescente/organização & administração , Idoso , Aspirina/economia , Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/economia , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Medicare , Conduta do Tratamento Medicamentoso/organização & administração , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/tratamento farmacológico , Infarto do Miocárdio/economia , Infarto do Miocárdio/psicologia , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/economia , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Sistemas de Alerta/economia , Sistemas de Alerta/estatística & dados numéricos , Apoio Social , Estados Unidos
12.
Am J Prev Med ; 28(3): 285-90, 2005 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15766617

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Low Chlamydia trachomatis screening rates create an opportunity to test innovative continuing medical education (CME) programs. Few studies of Internet-based physician learning have been evaluated with objective data on practice patterns. DESIGN: This randomized controlled trial tested a multicomponent Internet CME (mCME) intervention for increasing chlamydia screening of at-risk women aged 16 to 26 years. SETTING: Eligible physician offices had > or =20 patients at risk for chlamydia as defined by the Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS), had at least one primary care physician (internal medicine, family medicine/general practice, pediatrics) with Internet access, and participated in the study managed care organization. The 191 randomized primary care offices represented 20 states. INTERVENTION: The intervention, available from February to December 2001, consisted of four case-based learning modules, was tailored in real time to each physician based on theory of behavior change, and included office-level feedback of chlamydia screening rates. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: HEDIS chlamydia screening rates for the pre-intervention (2000) and post-intervention (2002) periods. RESULTS: Pre-intervention screening rates for the intervention and comparison offices were 18.9% and 16.2% (p =0.135). Post-intervention screening rates for the intervention and comparison offices were 15.5% and 12.4%, respectively (p =0.044, adjusting for baseline performance). CONCLUSIONS: The substantial decline in chlamydia screening rates observed in the comparison offices was significantly attenuated for the intervention offices. The mCME favorably influenced chlamydia screening by primary care physicians.


Assuntos
Infecções por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Chlamydia trachomatis/patogenicidade , Educação Médica Continuada/métodos , Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Internet , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Medicina , Especialização , Estados Unidos
13.
Am J Manag Care ; 21(2): e141-51, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26065105

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The dramatic rise in healthcare expenditures calls for innovative and scalable strategies to achieve measurable, near-term improvements in health. Our objective was to determine whether a remotely delivered behavioral health intervention could improve medical health, reduce hospital admissions, and lower cost of care for individuals with a recent cardiovascular event. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective observational cohort study included members of a commercial health plan referred to participate in AbilTo's Cardiac Health Program. AbilTo is a national provider of telehealth, behavioral change programs for high risk medical populations. METHODS: The program is an 8-week behavioral health intervention delivered by a licensed clinical social worker and a behavioral coach via phone or secure video. RESULTS: Among the 201 intervention and 180 comparison subjects, the study found that program participants had significantly fewer all-cause hospital admissions in 6 months (293 per 1000 persons/year vs 493 per 1000 persons/year in the comparison group) resulting in an adjusted percent reduction of 31% (P = .03), and significantly fewer total hospital days (1455 days per 1000 persons/year vs 3933 per 1000 persons/year) with an adjusted percent decline of 48% (P = .01). This resulted in an overall savings in the cost of care even after accounting for total program costs. CONCLUSIONS: Successful patient engagement in a national, remotely delivered behavioral health intervention can reduce medical utilization in a targeted cardiac population. A restored focus on tackling barriers to behavior change in order to improve medical health is an effective, achievable population health strategy for reducing health costs in the United States.


Assuntos
Terapia Comportamental/métodos , Doenças Cardiovasculares/terapia , Redução de Custos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Telemedicina/métodos , Adulto , Terapia Comportamental/economia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/psicologia , Feminino , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Gastos em Saúde , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/economia , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos , Telemedicina/economia , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
14.
Health Serv Res ; 38(4): 1081-102, 2003 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12968818

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Multiple factors limit identification of patients with depression from administrative data. However, administrative data drives many quality measurement systems, including the Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS). METHODS: We investigated two algorithms for identification of physician-recognized depression. The study sample was drawn from primary care physician member panels of a large managed care organization. All members were continuously enrolled between January 1 and December 31, 1997. Algorithm 1 required at least two criteria in any combination: (1) an outpatient diagnosis of depression or (2) a pharmacy claim for an antidepressant Algorithm 2 included the same criteria as algorithm 1, but required a diagnosis of depression for all patients. With algorithm 1, we identified the medical records of a stratified, random subset of patients with and without depression (n = 465). We also identified patients of primary care physicians with a minimum of 10 depressed members by algorithm 1 (n = 32,819) and algorithm 2 (n = 6,837). RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values were: Algorithm 1: 95 percent, 65 percent, 49 percent; Algorithm 2: 52 percent, 88 percent, 60 percent. Compared to algorithm 1, profiles from algorithm 2 revealed higher rates of follow-up visits (43 percent, 55 percent) and appropriate antidepressant dosage acutely (82 percent, 90 percent) and chronically (83 percent, 91 percent) (p < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Both algorithms had high false positive rates. Denominator construction (algorithm 1 versus 2) contributed significantly to variability in measured quality. Our findings raise concern about interpreting depression quality reports based upon administrative data.


Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo/diagnóstico , Medicina de Família e Comunidade/normas , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Algoritmos , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Coleta de Dados , Transtorno Depressivo/tratamento farmacológico , Transtorno Depressivo/epidemiologia , Medicina de Família e Comunidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Planos de Assistência de Saúde para Empregados/normas , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde/métodos , Humanos , Classificação Internacional de Doenças , Programas de Assistência Gerenciada/normas , Mid-Atlantic Region/epidemiologia , New England/epidemiologia , Cooperação do Paciente , Prevalência , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
15.
Acad Med ; 77(9): 929, 2002 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12228099

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To design an individualized Web-based continuing medical education (CME) program to improve practicing physicians' chlamydial screening rates. DESCRIPTION: Often unrecognized and untreated, chlamydial infections in young women may cause pelvic inflammatory disease, infertility, and ectopic pregnancy and facilitate the acquisition of HIV. The National Committee for Quality Assurance in 2001 reported chlamydia screening rates to be 23.6% for 16-20-year-olds and 18.3% for 21-26-year-olds. In a collaborative project an academic medical center and a large national managed care organization have developed four tailored Web-based modules for primary care physicians with the goal of improving rates of screening for chlamydia. Each module includes: (1) individual office chlamydial screening rates; (2) interactive cases with real-time comparison of answers with those of peers; (3) a toolbox of office support materials, including patient education materials and guideline summaries; and (4) real-time tailoring of the Web pages based on physicians' interactions with module. Readiness to change and barriers impeding change are assessed during interaction with the module and multiple pathways are created in real time for each physician. Physicians' perceptions of the prevalence of chlamydia in their patient populations and the rate of sexual activity among adolescent girls are also assessed. These variables have been correlated in other studies with low rates of chlamydial screening. Inaccurate perceptions of these variables are considered to constitute a precontemplative stage of change. Specific messages are designed to facilitate increased awareness of chlamydia prevalence, level of sexual activity, and the consequences of failure to screen. For physicians who are aware of the nature and scope of the problems related to chlamydia, messages are tailored to assist them in reducing barriers to screening. A randomized trial of a national sample of primary care physicians is being conducted to determine the effectiveness of this intervention in improving physicians' chlamydial screening rates in sexually active women 16-26 years of age. DISCUSSION: While the Internet offers an educational distribution system accessible to practicing physicians, most CME online programs are text-based and infrequently interactive or guideline-based. It is unlikely that these programs have broad impact on physicians' practice patterns. Neither the broad capacities of Web technologies nor the evidence of effective methods for influencing physicians' practice patterns has influenced the design of most CME programs. The innovative course described above provides individual office feedback on performance, compares physicians' responses with those of their peers, gathers responses to determine physicians' readiness to change practices, and provides branching pathways "on-the-fly" individualized to these responses. The module format is easily adapted to other diseases, able to be linked in an automated fashion to administrative data files, and relatively low in cost to support.


Assuntos
Infecções por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Educação a Distância/métodos , Educação Médica Continuada/métodos , Planejamento em Saúde , Internet , Padrões de Prática Médica , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Gravidez
16.
J Med Internet Res ; 5(3): e20, 2003.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14517111

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The World Wide Web has led to the rapid growth of medical information and continuing medical educational offerings. Ease of access and availability at any time are advantages of the World Wide Web. Existing physician-education sites have often been designed and developed without systematic application of evidence and cognitive-educational theories; little rigorous evaluation has been conducted to determine which design factors are most effective in facilitating improvements in physician performance and patient-health outcomes that might occur as a result of physician participation in Web-based education. Theory and evidence-based Web design principles include the use of: needs assessment, multimodal strategies, interactivity, clinical cases, tailoring, credible evidence-based content, audit and feedback, and patient-education materials. Ease of use and design to support the lowest common technology denominator are also important. OBJECTIVE: Using these principles, design and develop a Web site including multimodal strategies for improving chlamydial-screening rates among primary care physicians. METHODS: We used office-practice data in needs assessment and as an audit/feedback tool. In the intervention introduced in 4 phases over 11 months, we provided a series of interactive, tailored, case vignettes with feedback on peer answers. We included a quality-improvement toolbox including clinical practice guidelines and printable patient education materials. RESULTS: In the formative evaluation of the first 2 chlamydia modules, data regarding the recruitment, enrollment, participation, and reminders have been examined. Preliminary evaluation data from a randomized, controlled trial has tested the effectiveness of this intervention in improving chlamydia screening rates with a significant increase in intervention physicians' chlamydia knowledge, attitude, and skills compared to those of a control group. CONCLUSIONS: The application of theory in the development and evaluation of a Web-based continuing medical education intervention offers valuable insight into World Wide Web technology's influence on physician performance and the quality of medical care.


Assuntos
Instrução por Computador/métodos , Educação Médica Continuada/métodos , Internet , Médicos , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Medicina Preventiva/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Chlamydia/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Internet/tendências , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação das Necessidades , Medicina Preventiva/tendências , Prática Privada/tendências , Aprendizagem Baseada em Problemas/métodos
17.
Am J Manag Care ; 20(10): 794-801, 2014 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25365682

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of quality of care across retail clinics in a geographically diverse population has not been undertaken to date. We sought to evaluate and compare the quality of care for otitis media, pharyngitis, and urinary tract infection received in retail medical clinics in CVS pharmacies ("MinuteClinics" [MCs]), ambulatory care facilities (ACFs), and emergency departments (EDs). METHODS: We used 14 measures constructed from RAND Corporation's Quality Assurance Tools and guidelines from the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Academy of Family Physicians, and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Our cohort was drawn from Aetna medical and prescription claims, 2009-2012. Members were matched on visit date, condition, and propensity score. Generalized estimating equations were used to compare quality across clinic type, overall, and by index condition. RESULTS: We matched 75,886 episodes of care, of which 20,153 were eligible for at least 1 quality measure. MCs performed better than EDs and ACFs in 7 measures. In a multivariable model, MCs performed better than ACFs and EDs across all quality measures ([OR 0.42; 95% CI, 0.40-0.45; P < .0001; ACF vs MC] [OR 0.29; 95% CI, 0.27-0.31; P < .0001; ED vs MC]). Results for each condition were significant at P < .0001. CONCLUSIONS: Quality of care for these conditions based on widely accepted objective measures was superior in MinuteClinics compared with ACFs and EDs.


Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/normas , Otite Média/terapia , Faringite/terapia , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Infecções Urinárias/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Farmácias/normas , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Adulto Jovem
18.
Am J Med ; 127(11): 1075-1082.e1, 2014 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24859719

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban have been approved for use in patients with atrial fibrillation based upon randomized trials demonstrating their comparable or superior efficacy and safety relative to warfarin. Little is known about their adoption into clinical practice, whether utilization is consistent with the controlled trials on which their approval was based, and how their use has affected health spending for patients and insurers. METHODS: We used medical and prescription claims data from a large insurer to identify patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who were prescribed an oral anticoagulant in 2010-2013. We plotted trends in medication initiation over time, assessed corresponding insurer and patient out-of-pocket spending, and evaluated the cumulative number and cost of anticoagulants. We identified predictors of novel anticoagulant initiation using multivariable logistic models. Finally, we estimated the difference in total drug expenditures over 6 months for patients initiating warfarin versus a novel anticoagulant. RESULTS: There were 6893 patients with atrial fibrillation that initiated an oral anticoagulant during the study period. By the end of the study period, novel anticoagulants accounted for 62% of new prescriptions and 98% of anticoagulant-related drug costs. Female sex, lower household income, and higher CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASC, and HAS-BLED scores were significantly associated with lower odds of receiving a novel anticoagulant (P <.001 for each). Average combined patient and insurer anticoagulant spending in the first 6 months after initiation was more than $900 greater for patients initiating a novel anticoagulant. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates rapid adoption of novel anticoagulants into clinical practice, particularly among patients with lower CHADS2 and HAS-BLED scores, and high health care cost consequences. These findings provide important directions for future comparative and cost-effectiveness research.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/economia , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Benzimidazóis/economia , Benzimidazóis/uso terapêutico , Dabigatrana , Bases de Dados Factuais , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos , Inibidores do Fator Xa/economia , Inibidores do Fator Xa/uso terapêutico , Honorários Farmacêuticos , Feminino , Humanos , Renda , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Morfolinas/economia , Morfolinas/uso terapêutico , Análise Multivariada , Pirazóis/economia , Pirazóis/uso terapêutico , Piridonas/economia , Piridonas/uso terapêutico , Medição de Risco , Rivaroxabana , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores Sexuais , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Tiofenos/economia , Tiofenos/uso terapêutico , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Vitamina K/antagonistas & inibidores , Varfarina/economia , Varfarina/uso terapêutico , Adulto Jovem , beta-Alanina/análogos & derivados , beta-Alanina/economia , beta-Alanina/uso terapêutico
19.
JAMA Intern Med ; 174(12): 1955-62, 2014 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25347323

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: Although many classes of oral glucose-lowering medications have been approved for use, little comparative effectiveness evidence exists to guide initial selection of therapy for diabetes mellitus. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of initial oral glucose-lowering agent class on subsequent need for treatment intensification and 4 short-term adverse clinical events. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This study was a retrospective cohort study of patients who were fully insured members of Aetna (a large national health insurer) who had been prescribed an oral glucose-lowering medication from July 1, 2009, through June 30, 2013. Individuals newly prescribed an oral glucose-lowering agent who filled a second prescription for a medication in the same class and with a dosage at or above the World Health Organization's defined daily dose within 90 days of the end-of-day's supply of the first prescription were studied. Individuals with interim prescriptions for other oral glucose-lowering medications were excluded. EXPOSURES: Initiation of treatment with metformin, a sulfonylurea, a thiazolidinedione, or a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Time to addition of a second oral agent or insulin, each component separately, hypoglycemia, other diabetes-related emergency department visits, and cardiovascular events. RESULTS: A total of 15 516 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 8964 (57.8%) started therapy with metformin. In unadjusted analyses, use of medications other than metformin was significantly associated with an increased risk of adding a second oral agent only, insulin only, and a second agent or insulin (P < .001 for all). In propensity score and multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models, initiation of therapy with sulfonylureas (hazard ratio [HR], 1.68; 95% CI, 1.57-1.79), thiazolidinediones (HR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.43-1.80), and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.47-1.79) was associated with an increased hazard of intensification. Alternatives to metformin were not associated with a reduced risk of hypoglycemia, emergency department visits, or cardiovascular events. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Despite guidelines, only 57.8% of individuals began diabetes treatment with metformin. Beginning treatment with metformin was associated with reduced subsequent treatment intensification, without differences in rates of hypoglycemia or other adverse clinical events. These findings have significant implications for quality of life and medication costs.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus/tratamento farmacológico , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Metformina/uso terapêutico , Assistência Centrada no Paciente , Administração Oral , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Pesquisa Comparativa da Efetividade , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV/uso terapêutico , Esquema de Medicação , Prescrições de Medicamentos/normas , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Metformina/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/métodos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Pontuação de Propensão , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Compostos de Sulfonilureia/uso terapêutico , Tiazolidinedionas/uso terapêutico
20.
PLoS One ; 8(11): e79611, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24223977

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Medication nonadherence costs $300 billion annually in the US. Medicare Advantage plans have a financial incentive to increase medication adherence among members because the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) now awards substantive bonus payments to such plans, based in part on population adherence to chronic medications. We sought to build an individualized surveillance model that detects early which beneficiaries will fall below the CMS adherence threshold. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of over 210,000 beneficiaries initiating statins, in a database of private insurance claims, from 2008-2011. A logistic regression model was constructed to use statin adherence from initiation to day 90 to predict beneficiaries who would not meet the CMS measure of proportion of days covered 0.8 or above, from day 91 to 365. The model controlled for 15 additional characteristics. In a sensitivity analysis, we varied the number of days of adherence data used for prediction. RESULTS: Lower adherence in the first 90 days was the strongest predictor of one-year nonadherence, with an odds ratio of 25.0 (95% confidence interval 23.7-26.5) for poor adherence at one year. The model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.80. Sensitivity analysis revealed that predictions of comparable accuracy could be made only 40 days after statin initiation. When members with 30-day supplies for their first statin fill had predictions made at 40 days, and members with 90-day supplies for their first fill had predictions made at 100 days, poor adherence could be predicted with 86% positive predictive value. CONCLUSIONS: To preserve their Medicare Star ratings, plan managers should identify or develop effective programs to improve adherence. An individualized surveillance approach can be used to target members who would most benefit, recognizing the tradeoff between improved model performance over time and the advantage of earlier detection.


Assuntos
Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Medicare Part C/economia , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Estatísticos , Reembolso de Incentivo , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa