High-Throughput, Sensitive LC-MS Quantification of Biotherapeutics and Biomarkers Using Antibody-Free, Peptide-Level, Multiple-Mechanism Enrichment via Strategic Regulation of pH and Ionic and Solvent Strengths.

Sensitive and high-throughput measurement of biotherapeutics and biomarkers in plasma and tissues is critical for protein-drug development. Enrichment of target signature peptide (SP) after sample digestion permits sensitive LC-MS-based protein quantification and carries several prominent advantages over protein-level enrichment; however, developing high-quality antipeptide antibodies is challenging. Here we describe a novel, antibody-free, peptide-level-enrichment technique enabling high-throughput, sensitive, and robust quantification of proteins in biomatrices, by highly selective removal of matrix peptides and components via cation-exchange (CX) reversed-phase (RP) SPE with strategically regulated pH and ionic and organic strengths. Multiple-mechanism washing and elution achieved highly selective separation despite the low plate number of the SPE cartridge. We first investigated the adsorption-desorption behaviors of peptides on CX-RP sorbent and the coexisting, perplexing effects of pH, and ionic and organic strengths on the selectivity for SP enrichment, which has not been previously characterized. We demonstrated that the selectivity for separating target SPs from matrix peptides was closely associated with buffer pH relative to the pI of the SP, and pH values of pI - 2, pI, and pI + 2 respectively provided exceptional specificity for the ionic wash, the hydrophobic wash, and selective elution. Furthermore, desorption of peptides from the mixed-mode sorbent showed exponential and linear dependence, respectively, on organic-solvent percentage and salt percentage. On the basis of these findings, we established a streamlined procedure for rapid and robust method development. Quantification of biotherapeutics, targets, and biomarkers in plasma and tissues was used as the model system. Selective enrichment of target SPs was achieved along with elimination of 87-95% of matrix peptides, which improved the LOQ by 20-fold (e.g., 2 ng per gram of tissue). Application was demonstrated by sensitive quantification of time courses of mAb (T84.66) and target (CEA) in plasma and tumor tissues from a low-dose mouse PK study. For the first time, down-regulation of membrane-associated antigen following mAb treatment was observed. The CX-RP enrichment is robust, high-throughput, and universally applicable and thus is highly valuable for ultrasensitive, large-scale measurement of target protein in plasma and tissues.

Are Biotransformation Studies of Therapeutic Proteins Needed? Scientific Considerations and Technical Challenges.

For therapeutic proteins, the currently established standard development path generally does not foresee biotransformation studies by default because it is well known that the clearance of therapeutic proteins proceeds via degradation to small peptides and individual amino acids. In contrast to small molecules, there is no general need to identify enzymes involved in biotransformation because this information is not relevant for drug-drug interaction assessment and for understanding the clearance of a therapeutic protein. Nevertheless, there are good reasons to embark on biotransformation studies, especially for complex therapeutic proteins. Typical triggers are unexpected rapid clearance, species differences in clearance not following the typical allometric relationship, a mismatch in the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) relationship, and the need to understand observed differences between the results of multiple bioanalytical methods (e.g., total vs. target-binding competent antibody concentrations). Early on during compound optimization, knowledge on protein biotransformation may help to design more stable drug candidates with favorable in vivo PK properties. Understanding the biotransformation of a therapeutic protein may also support designing and understanding the bioanalytical assay and ultimately the PK/PD assessment. Especially in cases where biotransformation products are pharmacologically active, quantification and assessment of their contribution to the overall pharmacological effect can be important for establishing a PK/PD relationship and extrapolation to humans. With the increasing number of complex therapeutic protein formats, the need for understanding the biotransformation of therapeutic proteins becomes more urgent. This article provides an overview on biotransformation processes, proteases involved, strategic considerations, regulatory guidelines, literature examples for in vitro and in vivo biotransformation, and technical approaches to study protein biotransformation. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Understanding the biotransformation of complex therapeutic proteins can be crucial for establishing a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship. This article will highlight scientific, strategic, regulatory, and technological features of protein biotransformation.

Generation, Characterization, and Quantitative Bioanalysis of Drug/Anti-drug Antibody Immune Complexes to Facilitate Dedicated In Vivo Studies.

PURPOSE: Immunogenicity against biotherapeutics can lead to the formation of drug/anti-drug-antibody (ADA) immune complexes (ICs) with potential impact on safety and drug pharmacokinetics (PK). This work aimed to generate defined drug/ADA ICs, characterized by quantitative (bio) analytical methods for dedicated determination of IC sizes and IC profile changes in serum to facilitate future in vivo studies. METHODS: Defined ICs were generated and extensively characterized with chromatographic, biophysical and imaging methods. Quantification of drug fully complexed with ADAs (drug in ICs) was performed with an acid dissociation ELISA. Sequential coupling of SEC and ELISA enabled the reconstruction of IC patterns and thus analysis of IC species in serum. RESULTS: Characterization of generated ICs identified cyclic dimers, tetramers, hexamers, and larger ICs of drug and ADA as main IC species. The developed acid dissociation ELISA enabled a total quantification of drug fully complexed with ADAs. Multiplexing of SEC and ELISA allowed unbiased reconstruction of IC oligomeric states in serum. CONCLUSIONS: The developed in vitro IC model system has been properly characterized by biophysical and bioanalytical methods. The specificity of the developed methods enable discrimination between different oligomeric states of ICs and can be bench marking for future in vivo studies with ICs.

In Vivo Biotransformation of the Fusion Protein Tetranectin-Apolipoprotein A1 Analyzed by Ligand-Binding Mass Spectrometry Combined with Quantitation by ELISA.

The in vivo biotransformation of a novel fusion protein tetranectin/apolipoprotein A1 (TN-ApoA1) was investigated by ligand-binding mass spectrometry (LB-MS) in support of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). The main focus was on catabolites formed by proteolysis of the fusion protein in rabbit following intravenous administration of lipidated TN-ApoA1. The drug and its catabolites were isolated from rabbit plasma by immunocapture with a monoclonal antibody (mAb) binding to the fusion region of TN-ApoA1. The captured drug and catabolites were released from the streptavidin-coated magnetic beads, separated by monolithic RP capillary HPLC, and online detected by high-resolution mass spectrometry. In addition, the same extract was digested with LysN to confirm or further narrow down the structure of the found catabolites. Two pharmacologically active catabolites were identified with conserved fusion region. The major catabolite [3-285] was formed by truncation of AP at the N-terminus and the minor catabolite [29-270] by truncations of either side of the TN-ApoA1 sequence. Since the ELISA determined the sum of TN-ApoA1, along with its two main catabolites, the individual PK profiles of all three components could be derived by applying their mass peak composition for each sampling point. Parent drug accounted for 25% of drug-related material, whereas that of the catabolites [3-285] and [29-270] accounted for 66% and 9%, respectively. This result could be obtained without catabolite specific ELISAs or quantitative LC-MS assays. It was also confirmed that all relevant functional molecules of TN-ApoA1 in the plasma samples were quantified by the ELISA, which provided a good relationship for pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evaluations.

Biodistribution of Drug/ADA Complexes: The Impact of Immune Complex Formation on Antibody Distribution.

The clinical use of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for the treatment of cancer, inflammation, and other indications has been successfully established. A critical aspect of drug-antibody pharmacokinetics is immunogenicity, which triggers an immune response via an anti-drug antibody (ADA) and forms drug/ADA immune complexes (ICs). As a consequence, there may be a reduced efficacy upon neutralization by ADA or an accelerated drug clearance. It is therefore important to understand immunogenicity in biological therapies. A drug-like immunoglobulin G (IgG) was radiolabeled with tritium, and ICs were formed using polyclonal ADA, directed against the complementary-determining region of the drug-IgG, to investigate in vivo biodistribution in rodents. It was demonstrated that 65% of the radioactive IC dose was excreted within the first 24 h, compared with only 6% in the control group who received non-complexed 3H-drug. Autoradiographic imaging at the early time point indicated a deposition of immune complexes in the liver, lung, and spleen indicated by an increased radioactivity signal. A biodistribution study confirmed the results and revealed further insights regarding excretion and plasma profiles. It is assumed that the immune complexes are readily taken up by the reticuloendothelial system. The ICs are degraded proteolytically, and the released radioactively labeled amino acids are redistributed throughout the body. These are mainly renally excreted as indicated by urine measurements or incorporated into protein synthesis. These biodistribution studies using tritium-labeled immune complexes described in this article underline the importance of understanding the immunogenicity induced by therapeutic proteins and the resulting influence on biological behavior.

Phase 1, first-in-human study of TYRP1-TCB (RO7293583), a novel TYRP1-targeting CD3 T-cell engager, in metastatic melanoma: active drug monitoring to assess the impact of immune response on drug exposure.

Introduction: Although checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) have improved outcomes for patients with metastatic melanoma, those progressing on CPIs have limited therapeutic options. To address this unmet need and overcome CPI resistance mechanisms, novel immunotherapies, such as T-cell engaging agents, are being developed. The use of these agents has sometimes been limited by the immune response mounted against them in the form of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), which is challenging to predict preclinically and can lead to neutralization of the drug and loss of efficacy. Methods: TYRP1-TCB (RO7293583; RG6232) is a T-cell engaging bispecific (TCB) antibody that targets tyrosinase-related protein 1 (TYRP1), which is expressed in many melanomas, thereby directing T cells to kill TYRP1-expressing tumor cells. Preclinical studies show TYRP1-TCB to have potent anti-tumor activity. This first-in-human (FIH) phase 1 dose-escalation study characterized the safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose/optimal biological dose, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of TYRP1-TCB in patients with metastatic melanoma (NCT04551352). Results: Twenty participants with cutaneous, uveal, or mucosal TYRP1-positive melanoma received TYRP1-TCB in escalating doses (0.045 to 0.4 mg). All participants experienced ≥1 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE); two participants experienced grade 3 TRAEs. The most common toxicities were grade 1-2 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and rash. Fractionated dosing mitigated CRS and was associated with lower levels of interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Measurement of active drug (dual TYPR1- and CD3-binding) PK rapidly identified loss of active drug exposure in all participants treated with 0.4 mg in a flat dosing schedule for ≥3 cycles. Loss of exposure was associated with development of ADAs towards both the TYRP1 and CD3 domains. A total drug PK assay, measuring free and ADA-bound forms, demonstrated that TYRP1-TCB-ADA immune complexes were present in participant samples, but showed no drug activity in vitro. Discussion: This study provides important insights into how the use of active drug PK assays, coupled with mechanistic follow-up, can inform and enable ongoing benefit/risk assessment for individuals participating in FIH dose-escalation trials. Translational studies that lead to a better understanding of the underlying biology of cognate T- and B-cell interactions, ultimately resulting in ADA development to novel biotherapeutics, are needed.

Direct bioanalysis or indirect calculation of target engagement and free drug exposure: do we apply double standards?

Analysis of "free" drug/target concentrations is important to set up appropriate pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models, to evaluate active-drug exposure and target engagement. Such "free-analyte" determination could be done by direct bioanalysis using an appropriate "free-analyte" assay. Development of "free" assays is often considered challenging from a technological and regulatory perspective. The application of a "total-total" approach, where the "free-analyte" concentration is determined mathematically, is considered a more convenient option. In this perspective, we examine and discuss the challenges of this "total-total" approach, from the affinity data, the importance of applying an appropriate "total" assay, the impact of additional binding partners and the variability of the total drug/target assays and their impact on the quality and variability of the final "free-analyte" dataset.

High ionic strength dissociation assay reduces dimeric target interference in immunogenicity testing.

Aim: The presence of di-/multi-meric forms of soluble target in biological samples can interfere in anti-drug antibody (ADA) assays, leading to increased background values and potentially false positivity. The authors investigated the use of the high ionic strength dissociation assay (HISDA) to reduce target interference in two different ADA assays. Results: Interference caused by homodimeric FAP was successfully eliminated to enable cut point determination after applying HISDA. Biochemical experiments confirmed the dissociation of homodimeric FAP after treatment with high ionic strength conditions. Conclusion: HISDA is a promising approach to simultaneously achieve high drug tolerance and reduced interference by noncovalently bound dimeric target molecules in ADA assays without extensive optimization, which is particularly advantageous in routine use.

2022 White Paper on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis: Enzyme Assay Validation, BAV for Primary End Points, Vaccine Functional Assays, Cytometry in Tissue, LBA in Rare Matrices, Complex NAb Assays, Spectral Cytometry, Endogenous Analytes, Extracellular Vesicles Part 2 - Recommendations on Biomarkers/CDx, Flow Cytometry, Ligand-Binding Assays Development & Validation; Emerging Technologies; Critical Reagents Deep Characterization.

The 16th Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (16th WRIB) took place in Atlanta, GA, USA on September 26-30, 2022. Over 1000 professionals representing pharma/biotech companies, CROs, and multiple regulatory agencies convened to actively discuss the most current topics of interest in bioanalysis. The 16th WRIB included 3 Main Workshops and 7 Specialized Workshops that together spanned 1 week in order to allow exhaustive and thorough coverage of all major issues in bioanalysis, biomarkers, immunogenicity, gene therapy, cell therapy and vaccines. Moreover, in-depth workshops on ICH M10 BMV final guideline (focused on this guideline training, interpretation, adoption and transition); mass spectrometry innovation (focused on novel technologies, novel modalities, and novel challenges); and flow cytometry bioanalysis (rising of the 3rd most common/important technology in bioanalytical labs) were the special features of the 16th edition. As in previous years, WRIB continued to gather a wide diversity of international, industry opinion leaders and regulatory authority experts working on both small and large molecules as well as gene, cell therapies and vaccines to facilitate sharing and discussions focused on improving quality, increasing regulatory compliance, and achieving scientific excellence on bioanalytical issues. This 2022 White Paper encompasses recommendations emerging from the extensive discussions held during the workshop and is aimed to provide the bioanalytical community with key information and practical solutions on topics and issues addressed, in an effort to enable advances in scientific excellence, improved quality and better regulatory compliance. Due to its length, the 2022 edition of this comprehensive White Paper has been divided into three parts for editorial reasons. This publication (Part 2) covers the recommendations on LBA, Biomarkers/CDx and Cytometry. Part 1 (Mass Spectrometry and ICH M10) and Part 3 (Gene Therapy, Cell therapy, Vaccines and Biotherapeutics Immunogenicity) are published in volume 15 of Bioanalysis, issues 16 and 14 (2023), respectively.

Development of tetravalent IgG1 dual targeting IGF-1R-EGFR antibodies with potent tumor inhibition.

In this study we present novel bispecific antibodies that simultaneously target the insulin-like growth factor receptor type I (IGF-1R) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). For this purpose disulfide stabilized scFv domains of the EGFR/ADCC antibody GA201 were fused via serine-glycine connectors to the C-terminus of the heavy (XGFR2) or light chain (XGFR4), or the N-termini of the light (XGFR5) or heavy chain (XGFR3) of the IGF-1R antibody R1507 as parental IgG1 antibody. The resulting bispecific IGF-1R-EGFR antibodies XGFR2, XGFR3 and XGFR4 were successfully generated with yields and stability comparable to conventional IgG1 antibodies. They effectively inhibited IGF-1R and EGFR phosphorylation and 3D proliferation of H322M and H460M2 tumor cells, induced strong down-modulation of IGF-1R as well as enhanced EGFR down-modulation compared to the parental EGFR antibody GA201 and were ADCC competent. The bispecific XGFR derivatives showed a strong format dependent influence of N- or C-terminal heavy and light chain scFv attachment on ADCC activity and an increase in receptor downregulation over the parental combination in vitro. XGFR2 and XGFR4 were selected for in vivo evaluation and showed potent anti-tumoral efficacy comparable to the combination of monospecific IGF-1R and EGFR antibodies in subcutaneous BxPC3 and H322M xenograft models. In summary, we have managed to overcome issues of stability and productivity of bispecific antibodies, discovered important antibody fusion protein design related differences on ADCC activity and receptor downmodulation and show that IGF-1R-EGFR antibodies represent an attractive therapeutic strategy to simultaneously target two key components de-regulated in multiple cancer types, with the ultimate goal to avoid the formation of resistance to therapy.

Novel isoelectric target depletion (ITaD) protocol reduces the need for specific reagents for immunogenicity testing.

Background: The development of immunogenicity assays for clinical drug candidates targeting soluble proteins is challenging when the soluble target might produce either false-positive or false-negative signals in bridging anti-drug antibody screening assays. A generic soluble target removal protocol that uses a pH-dependent depletion was evaluated. Results: An anti-drug antibody bridging assay with a pH-dependent soluble target depletion step was successfully developed. Endogenous target levels of ∼600 nM could be depleted below 8 pM. The assay was highly drug tolerant and met regulatory requirements. Conclusion: A reagent-independent target depletion protocol can be used for immunogenicity testing in the presence of a soluble target. The generic protocol circumvents common depletion or masking protocols.

Validation of a method to analyze size distribution of crovalimab-complement C5-eculizumab complexes in human serum.

Background: Crovalimab is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting human complement C5. Patients switching from eculizumab to crovalimab are expected to form drug-target-drug complexes (DTDCs), since these antibodies each bind to a different epitope on complement C5. An analytical method to evaluate the size distribution of these DTDCs was developed and validated. Methods: Human serum samples were separated by size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) into eight fractions, and the concentration of crovalimab in each fraction was measured by ELISA. We evaluated SEC, ELISA and the combination of both methods (SEC-ELISA). Results: Predetermined validation acceptance criteria were met. Conclusion: The DTDC assay method was successfully validated. It enables us to evaluate the impact of DTDCs on clinical outcomes.

Comparison of assay formats used for the detection of pre-existing anti-drug antibodies against monoclonal antibodies.

Aim: Assessment of pre-existing anti-drug antibody (preADA) reactivity at early drug development stages can be beneficial for candidate selection. We investigated the applicability of a generic immune-complex anti-drug antibody (ADA) assay for early preADA assessment as an easily available alternative to the commonly used ADA bridging assay. Results: The results confirmed the expected assay difference regarding isotype detectability. Tested drug candidates were identified as preADA-reactive using the immune-complex ADA assay despite its limitation of not being able to detect IgM-type preADAs. Conclusion: We recommend a purpose-driven use of the two assay formats. For the purpose of ranking different Pro329Gly mutation-bearing drug candidates, the immune-complex ADA assay is preferred in the phase before selecting a drug for clinical development.

Conference Report from the European Bioanalysis Forum Workshop: toward harmonized implementation of the ICH M10 guideline.

In this report, the European Bioanalysis Forum shares the proposals for harmonized implementation of the ICH M10 guideline on bioanalytical method validation and study sample analysis from the ICH M10 workshop. The focus of the discussions was to understand new, changed or still ambiguous regulatory expectations in the guideline, as identified in feedback from the pre-workshop surveys or during the workshop. The proposals from the workshop aim at stimulating and helping a harmonized implementation of the guideline, and using our community as a sounding board during and after implementation to highlight areas of misalignment and to create a platform for continued sharing with the regulatory authorities in an effort to contribute to industry and regulators developing similar interpretations on guideline expectations.

An Alternative Data Transformation Approach for ADA Cut Point Determination: Why Not Use a Weibull Transformation?

The testing of protein drug candidates for inducing the generation of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) plays a fundamental role in drug development. The basis of the testing strategy includes a screening assay followed by a confirmatory test. Screening assay cut points (CP) are calculated mainly based on two approaches, either non-parametric, when the data set does not appear normally distributed, or parametric, in the case of a normal distribution. A normal distribution of data is preferred and may be achieved after outlier exclusion and, if necessary, transformation of the data. The authors present a Weibull transformation and a comparison with a decision tree-based approach that was tested on 10 data sets (healthy human volunteer matrix, different projects). Emphasis is placed on a transformation calculation that can be easily reproduced to make it accessible to non-mathematicians. The cut point value and the effect on the false positive rate as well as the number of excluded samples of both methods are compared.

The impact of immunogenicity on therapeutic antibody pharmacokinetics: A preclinical evaluation of the effect of immune complex formation and antibody effector function on clearance.

The occurrence of an immune response against therapeutic proteins poses a major risk for the development of biologics and for successful treatment of patients. Generation of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) can lead to formation of immune complexes (ICs), consisting of drug and ADAs, with potential impact on safety, efficacy and exposure. Here, we focus on the effects of IC formation, i.e., specific IC sizes, ADA and drug properties, on drug pharmacokinetics. Pre-formed IC preparations of an IgG1 drug (with wild type or with an ablated effector function at the Fc domain) and different ADA surrogates (directed against the complementarity-determining regions or Fc domain of the drug) were administered to rats and collected serum was analyzed to determine the total drug concentration. A combination of size-exclusion chromatography and ELISA enabled a size-specific evaluation of IC profiles in serum and their changes over time. Within five minutes, total drug concentration decreased by ~20-60% when the drug was complexed. Independent of the ADA surrogate and drug variant used, increasing IC size led to increased clearance. Comparing ICs formed with the same ADA surrogate but different IgG1 variants, we observed that complexed drug with a wildtype Fc domain showed faster clearance compared to immune effector function modified drug. Data generated in this study indicated that clearance of drug due to ADA generation is driven by size and structure of the formed ICs, but also by the immune effector functions of the Fc domains of IgGs.Abbreviations Ab: antibody, ADA: anti-drug antibody, AUC: area under the curve, Bi: biotin, CDR: complementary-determining region, cmax: maximal concentration, Dig: digoxigenin, ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, Fc: fragment crystallizable, FcRn: neonatal Fc receptor, HMW: high molecular weight, IC: immune complex, IC-QC: immune complex quality control, IgG: immunoglobulin G, mAb: monoclonal antibody, mADA: monoclonal ADA, pAb: polyclonal antibody, pADA: polyclonal ADA, PD: pharmacodynamics; PK: pharmacokinetic, QC: quality control, SEC: size-exclusion chromatography, WT: wildtype.

Increasing robustness, reliability and storage stability of critical reagents by freeze-drying.

Aim: Stabilization of critical reagents by freeze-drying would facilitate storage and transportation at ambient temperatures, and simultaneously enable constant reagent performance for long-term bioanalytical support throughout drug development. Freeze-drying as a generic process for stable performance and storage of critical reagents was investigated by establishing an universal formulation buffer and lyophilization process. Results: Using a storage-labile model protein, formulation buffers were evaluated to preserve reagent integrity during the freeze-drying process, and to retain functional performance after temperature stress. Application to critical reagents used in pharmacokinetics and anti-drug antibodies assays demonstrated stable functional performance of the reagents after 11 month at +40°C. Conclusion: Stabilization and storage of critical assay reagents by freeze-drying is an attractive alternative to traditional deep freezing.

Recommendations and discussion points on immunogenicity, biomarkers, automation/technology and protein-MS from the 2021 European Bioanalysis Forum Focus Workshops.

During the first half of 2021, and due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic preventing in-person meetings, the European Bioanalysis Forum organized four workshops as live interactive online meetings. The themes discussed at the workshops were carefully selected to match the cyberspace dynamics of the meeting format. The first workshop was a training day on challenges related to immunogenicity. The second one focused on biomarkers and continued the important discussion on integrating the principles of Context of Use (CoU) in biomarker research. The third workshop was dedicated to technology, that is, cutting-edge development in cell-based and ligand-binding assays and automation strategies. The fourth was on progress and the continued scientific and regulatory challenges related to peptide and protein analysis with MS. In all four workshops, the European Bioanalysis Forum included a mixture of scientific and regulatory themes, while reminding the audience of important strategic aspects and our responsibility toward the patient.

2020 White Paper on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis: Vaccine Assay Validation, qPCR Assay Validation, QC for CAR-T Flow Cytometry, NAb Assay Harmonization and ELISpot Validation (Part 3 - Recommendations on Immunogenicity Assay Strategies, NAb Assays, Biosimilars and FDA/EMA Immunogenicity Guidance/Guideline, Gene & Cell Therapy and Vaccine Assays).

The 14th edition of the Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (14th WRIB) was held virtually on June 15-29, 2020 with an attendance of over 1000 representatives from pharmaceutical/biopharmaceutical companies, biotechnology companies, contract research organizations, and regulatory agencies worldwide. The 14th WRIB included three Main Workshops, seven Specialized Workshops that together spanned 11 days in order to allow exhaustive and thorough coverage of all major issues in bioanalysis, biomarkers, immunogenicity, gene therapy and vaccine. Moreover, a comprehensive vaccine assays track; an enhanced cytometry track and updated Industry/Regulators consensus on BMV of biotherapeutics by LCMS were special features in 2020. As in previous years, this year's WRIB continued to gather a wide diversity of international industry opinion leaders and regulatory authority experts working on both small and large molecules to facilitate sharing and discussions focused on improving quality, increasing regulatory compliance and achieving scientific excellence on bioanalytical issues. This 2020 White Paper encompasses recommendations emerging from the extensive discussions held during the workshop and is aimed to provide the Global Bioanalytical Community with key information and practical solutions on topics and issues addressed, in an effort to enable advances in scientific excellence, improved quality and better regulatory compliance. Due to its length, the 2020 edition of this comprehensive White Paper has been divided into three parts for editorial reasons. This publication (Part 3) covers the recommendations on Vaccine, Gene/Cell Therapy, NAb Harmonization and Immunogenicity). Part 1 (Innovation in Small Molecules, Hybrid LBA/LCMS & Regulated Bioanalysis), Part 2A (BAV, PK LBA, Flow Cytometry Validation and Cytometry Innovation) and Part 2B (Regulatory Input) are published in volume 13 of Bioanalysis, issues 4 and 5 (2020), respectively.

Toward comparability of anti-drug antibody assays: is the amount of anti-drug antibody-reagent complexes at cut-point (CP-ARC) the missing piece?

Immunogenicity testing is a mandatory and critical activity during the development of therapeutic proteins. Multiple regulatory guidelines provide clear recommendations on appropriate immunogenicity testing strategies and required bioanalytical assay performances. Unfortunately, it is still generally accepted that a comparison of the immunogenicity of different compounds is not possible due to apparent performance differences of the used bioanalytical methods. In this perspective, we propose the 'cut-point anti-drug antibody-reagents complex' (CP-ARC) concept for technical comparability of the bioanalytical methods. The feasibility and implementation in routine assay development is discussed as well as the potential improvement of reporting of bioanalytical immunogenicity data to allow comparison across drugs. Scientific sound comparability of the bioanalytical methods is the first step toward comparability of clinical immunogenicity.