Enhancing the patient and family experience during pediatric sleep studies.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Pediatric polysomnography can result in suboptimal patient and provider (physician and advanced practice provider) experiences. We embarked on a project aimed at increasing the proportion of maximal satisfaction survey scores by a minimum of 10% in 1 year without adding personnel or major expenses. METHODS: We used a Six Sigma framework, define, measure, analyze, improve, and control (DMAIC), to conduct our analysis. For measurement, we designed a project-specific survey that was given to caregivers of children who underwent PSG in February 2018 and repeated the survey after interventions in February 2019. Lean and Six Sigma quality improvement tools were used to define important processes that influence patient satisfaction, including: supplier, input, process, output, customer, and requirements (SIPOC-R); journey mapping; 1-2-4-All brainstorming; and views solicited from our center's Patient and Family Advisory Council. We analyzed the relationships between identified processes and outcomes using usual descriptive statistics. We prioritized interventions using a Kano model and a quality function deployment (QFD) technique to rank priorities for interventions. Multiple opportunities to improve patient and family satisfaction before, during, and after a pediatric polysomnography were identified. Many were simple, one-step interventions and were implemented simultaneously. For those that required substantial training and/or scheduling changes, pilots were performed and plan, do, study, act (PDSA) cycles were used to check effectiveness. RESULTS: After implementation, top box scores rose 20%, from 51% (n = 47) in 2018 to 71% (n = 50) in 2019. CONCLUSIONS: Various quality improvement techniques employed in business, engineering, and manufacturing were used to identify and address areas of improvement in the pediatric polysomnography experience.

Creation of a Patient-Centered Journey Map to Improve the Patient Experience: A Mixed Methods Approach.

OBJECTIVE: To use a mixed methods approach to focus quality improvement efforts to enhance patient experience through human-centered design. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A mixed method approach began with returned Press Ganey Medical Practice Surveys from a large, multidisciplinary, outpatient medicine practice from July 1, 2016, through June 30, 2017, using correlation and gap analysis. The second phase deployed human-centered design approaches to process map patient journeys and generate opportunities for care improvement and to generate a theoretical framework for designing optimal care experiences. RESULTS: Our outpatient medical practices have the greatest ability to improve patient experience scores by focusing on how care teams deliver and educate patients on medications, instructions for follow-up care, and explanations about problems or conditions. By leveraging communication, the expertise of our care team members, and connection between patients and care team members, we can employ a variety of observed opportunities to enhance patient experience. Specific opportunities include leveraging tools in the electronic health record, fostering connection through empathy between patients and members of the care team, and capitalizing on the expertise of nurses on the care team. CONCLUSION: A mixed methods approach to the analysis and observation of clinical care and business operations allows for the detection of opportunities with the highest potential impact for improvement when resources are constrained.