Phenotyping asthma in the elderly: allergic sensitization profile and upper airways comorbidity in patients older than 65 years.

BACKGROUND: Data about allergic rhinitis in elderly patients with asthma are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the presence of rhinitis and the role of sensitization of airborne allergens in elderly patients with asthma. METHODS: This was a multicenter cross-sectional study involving subjects at least 65 years old with asthma. Demographic features, comorbidities, and the presence of allergic respiratory disease were retrieved through interview. Skin prick tests for common allergens were performed. Associations of demographic and clinical features were evaluated in relation to asthma control and forced expiratory volume in the first second less than 80% in the total population and in the subgroup with features resembling chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. RESULTS: Of 368 elderly subjects with asthma, 101 had features resembling chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Rhinitis was present in 59.0% of subjects (allergic rhinitis in 47.6%), with an age of onset significantly different from that of asthma (49 ± 18 vs 57 ± 18 years). At least 1 sensitization was observed in 52.4% of subjects, more frequently for house dust mite (HDM; 31.8%). The prevalence of poorly and partially controlled asthma was higher in patients sensitized to airborne allergens (odds ratio 1.64, 95% confidence interval 1.03-2.61), in particular to HDM (odds ratio 1.73, 95% confidence interval 1.05-2.85). CONCLUSION: Approximately 60% of elderly subjects with asthma had rhinitis, mainly allergic and often untreated, whose onset preceded asthma symptoms by a mean of approximately 10 years. Nonallergic asthma was better controlled than allergic asthma. However, HDM sensitization was greater in subjects with asthma with features resembling chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (39% vs 28%). When restricting analysis to this group, the negative role of HDM in overall asthma control (forced expiratory volume in first second and Asthma Control Test) was significant.

Choosing wisely: practical considerations on treatment efficacy and safety of asthma in the elderly.

The prevalence of asthma in the most advanced ages is similar to that of younger ages. However, the concept that older individuals may suffer from allergic asthma has been largely denied in the past, and a common belief attributes to asthma the definition of "rare" disease. Indeed, asthma in the elderly is often underdiagnosed or diagnosed as COPD, thus leading to undertreatment of improper treatment. This is also due to the heterogeneity of clinical and functional presentations of geriatric asthma, including the partial loss of reversibility and the lower occurrence of the allergic component in this age range. The older asthmatic patients are also characterized the coexistence of comorbid conditions that, in conjunction with age-associated structural and functional changes of the lung, may contribute to complicate the management of asthma. The current review addresses the main issues related to the management of allergic asthma in the geriatric age. In particular, the paper aims at revising current pharmacological and non pharmacological treatments for allergic asthmatics of advanced ages, primarily focusing on their safety and efficacy, although most behaviors are an arbitrary extrapolation of what has been tested in young ages. In fact, age has always represented an exclusion criterion for eligibility to clinical trials. Experimental studies and real life observations specifically testing the efficacy and safety of therapeutic approaches in allergic asthma in the elderly are urgently needed.

Hospital-Provider Company Network for Home Non-Invasive Ventilation: A Feasibility Pilot Study.

This study assessed the feasibility of implementing a hybrid hospital-provider company (PC) clinical pathway for patients with chronic respiratory failure (CRF) through the adaptation and follow-up of non-invasive ventilation (NIV). Over a 3-month period, a PC physiotherapist case manager oversaw the adaptation process, making adjustments as necessary, using remote monitoring and home visits. Outcome measures, including the number of patients enrolled, serious adverse events, hospitalizations, survival rates, professional time allocation, NIV adherence, nocturnal apnea-hypopnea, and oxygen saturation, Δ arterial carbon dioxide pressure (PaCO2), dyspnea, Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), exercise tolerance, quality of life, physical activity, and patient satisfaction, were collected. The recruitment rate was 74% (nineteen patients). Commonly reported adverse events included leakage, discomfort and sleep disturbance. Predominant interventions were four home visits (3; 4) and two NIV adjustments (1; 5). The overall program time commitment averaged 43.97 h per patient (being hospital 40 ± 11% and PC 60 ± 11%). Improvements in PaCO2, dyspnea, SPPB and exercise tolerance were observed by the third month. Adherence to NIV was high, with good or very good satisfaction with its use. This study demonstrates that a hybrid hospital-PC service for NIV adaptation and follow-up is not only feasible but also shows validity, reliability, and acceptability.

Additive effect on pulmonary function and disability of intensive pulmonary rehabilitation following bronchoscopy lung volume reduction (BLVR) for severe emphysema.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is mandatory before bronchoscopy lung volume reduction (BLVR); there is scant information about its efficacy post-BLVR. We retrospectively evaluated pulmonary function (PF) and disability in patients pre/post-BLVR and its additive effect on an intensive PR program post-BLVR vs matched non-BLVR controls. We analyzed changes within BLVR patients according to presence or not of atelectasis. METHODS: We compared PF and exercise tolerance (6-min walk test, 6MWT) in 39 BLVR patients (FEV1% pred. 28.9 ±â€¯1.5; RV% pred. 236.1 ±â€¯7.7) pre-/post-BLVR, and vs. 32 controls (FEV1% pred. 32.7 ±â€¯1.5; RV % pred. 217.8 ±â€¯8.3) before and after PR. RESULTS: BLVR patients showed a greater improvement than controls in PF (difference between groups: 3.8 for FEV1% pred., p = 0.043; -20.5 for RV % pred., p = 0.02) and 6MWT response rate (12/39 vs. 1/39 subjects, p = 0.003). Both groups further improved significantly 6MWT after PR without a significant difference between groups. Atelectasis after BLVR mainly accounted for the improvement in FEV1% pred, RV% pred. and 6MWT compared to both BLVR without atelectasis and controls. CONCLUSION: BLVR improves PF (particularly RV) and exercise tolerance, patients with lobar exclusion being the best improvers. PR following BLVR yields a further improvement in exercise tolerance in both (atelectasis and non-atelectasis) subgroups.