High Prevalence and Clinical Relevance of Intrapulmonary Vascular Dilatations in Patients Undergoing TIPS Implantation.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Considerate patient selection is vital to ensure the best possible outcomes after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) insertion. However, data regarding the impact of intrapulmonary vascular dilatations (IPVDs) or hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) on the clinical course after TIPS implantation is lacking. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the relevance of IPVD and HPS in patients undergoing TIPS implantation. METHODS: Contrast enhanced echocardiography and blood gas analysis were utilized to determine presence of IPVD and HPS. Multivariable competing risk analyses were performed to evaluate cardiac decompensation (CD), hepatic decompensation (HD), and liver transplant (LTx)-free survival within 1 year of follow-up. RESULTS: Overall, 265 patients were included, of whom 136 had IPVD and 71 fulfilled the HPS criteria. Patients with IPVD had lower Freiburg index of post-TIPS survival (FIPS) scores, lower creatinine, and more often received TIPS because of variceal bleeding. Presence of IPVD was associated with a significantly higher incidence of CD (hazard ratio [HR], 1.756; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.011-3.048; P = .046) and HD (HR, 1.841; 95% CI, 1.255-2.701; P = .002). However, LTx-free survival was comparable between patients with and without IPVD (HR, 1.081; 95% CI, 0.630-1.855; P = .780). Patients with HPS displayed a trend towards more CD (HR, 1.708; 95% CI, 0.935-3.122; P = .082) and HD (HR, 1.458; 95% CI, 0.934-2.275; P = .097) that failed to reach statistical significance. LTx-free survival did not differ in those with HPS compared with patients without HPS, respectively (HR, 1.052; 95% CI, 0.577-1.921; P = .870). CONCLUSION: Screening for IPVD before TIPS implantation could help to further identify patients at higher risk of CD and HD.

No value of non-selective beta-blockers after TIPS-insertion.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Non-selective beta-blockers (NSBB) are a well-established treatment in patients with clinically significant portal hypertension. However, their potential role after insertion of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) still needs to be determined. Of note, recent studies suggested that favourable anti-inflammatory effects of NSBB might be independent from pressure reduction. This study aimed to evaluate whether NSBB-treatment is associated with amelioration of systemic inflammation (SI), hepatic decompensation and survival after TIPS-insertion. METHODS: In a retrospective study comprising 305 consecutive patients, we investigated the impact of NSBB-intake at TIPS-placement on periinterventional cirrhosis-associated complications and continued NSBB-treatment after discharge on complications including hepatic decompensation and mortality during 1-year follow-up, employing multivariable competing-risk-analyses. In a prospective cohort including 45 patients, we performed a comprehensive analysis of SI analysing 48 soluble inflammatory markers (SIMs) at baseline plus 3 and 6 months after TIPS-insertion. RESULTS: Overall, 175 (57.4%) patients received NSBB-therapy prior to TIPS-insertion; upon discharge, this decreased to 131 (22.9%), with 36 (27.5%) discontinuing NSBB within 1-year follow-up. Neither NSBB-therapy at TIPS-insertion nor treatment-continuation after discharge were associated with lower risks for hepatic decompensation, individual cirrhosis-associated complications or mortality neither in the periinterventional period nor during follow-up. Similarly, in the prospective cohort NSBB-intake was not linked to lower levels or a more prominent change of WBC, CRP or any other SIM at any of the investigated time points. CONCLUSION: NSBB-therapy at the time of TIPS-insertion and its (dis-)continuation afterwards seems to have no significant impact on SI, development of hepatic decompensation and survival.

Daily Low-Volume Paracentesis and Clinical Complications in Patients With Refractory Ascites.

Importance: The potential association of low-volume paracentesis of less than 5 L with complications in patients with ascites remains unclear, and individuals with cirrhosis and refractory ascites (RA) treated with devices like Alfapump or tunneled-intraperitoneal catheters perform daily low-volume drainage without albumin substitution. Studies indicate marked differences regarding the daily drainage volume between patients; however, it is currently unknown if this alters the clinical course. Objective: To determine whether the incidence of complications, such as hyponatremia or acute kidney injury (AKI), is associated with the daily drainage volume in patients with devices. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study of patients with liver cirrhosis, RA, and a contraindication for a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt who received either device implantation or standard of care (SOC; ie, repeated large-volume paracentesis with albumin infusion), and were hospitalized between 2012 and 2020 were included. Data were analyzed from April to October 2022. Interventions: Daily ascites volume removed. Main outcomes and Measures: The primary end points were 90-day incidence of hyponatremia and AKI. Propensity score matching was performed to match and compare patients with devices and higher or lower drainage volumes to those who received SOC. Results: Overall, 250 patients with RA receiving either device implantation (179 [72%] patients; 125 [70%] male; 54 [30%] female; mean [SD] age, 59 [11] years) or SOC (71 [28%] patients; 41 [67%] male; 20 [33%] female; mean [SD] age, 54 [8]) were included in this study. A cutoff of 1.5 L/d or more was identified to estimate hyponatremia and AKI in the included patients with devices. Drainage of 1.5 L/d or more was associated with hyponatremia and AKI, even after adjusting for various confounders (hazard ratio [HR], 2.17 [95% CI, 1.24-3.78]; P = .006; HR, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.01-2.16]; P = .04, respectively). Moreover, patients with taps of 1.5 L/d or more and less than 1.5 L/d were matched with patients receiving SOC. Those with taps of 1.5 L/d or more had a higher risk of hyponatremia and AKI compared with those receiving SOC (HR, 1.67 [95% CI, 1.06-2.68]; P = .02 and HR, 1.51 [95% CI, 1.04-2.18]; P = .03), while patients with drainage of less than 1.5 L/d did not show an increased rate of complications compared with those receiving SOC. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, clinical complications in patients with RA performing low-volume drainage without albumin infusion were associated with the daily volume drained. Based on this analysis, physicians should be cautious in patients performing drainage of 1.5 L/d or more without albumin infusion.

Markers of cell death predict therapy response in patients with cirrhosis and hepatorenal syndrome.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hepatorenal syndrome is a major complication in patients with cirrhosis and associated with high mortality. Predictive biomarkers for therapy response are largely missing. Cytokeratin18-based cell death markers are significantly elevated in patients with complications of chronic liver disease, but the role of these markers in patients with HRS treated with vasoconstrictors and albumin is unknown. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed a total of 138 patients with HRS, liver cirrhosis without HRS and acute kidney injury treated at the University Medical Center Mainz between April 2013 and July 2018. Serum levels of M30 and M65 were analyzed by ELISA and clinical data were collected. Predictive ability was assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves, logistic regression and c-statistic. Primary endpoint was response to therapy. RESULTS: M30 and M65 were significantly increased in patients with HRS compared to non-HRS controls (M30: p < 0.0001; M65: p < 0.0001). Both serum markers showed predictive ability for dialysis- and LTX-free survival but not overall survival. Logistic regression confirmed M30 and M65 as independent prognostic factors for response to therapy. A novel predictive score comprising bilirubin and M65 showed highest predictive ability to predict therapy response. CONCLUSIONS: Serum levels of M30 and M65 can robustly discriminate patients into responders and non-responders to terlipressin therapy with a good predictive ability for dialysis- and LTX-free survival in cirrhotic patients. Cell death parameters might possess clinical relevance in patients with liver cirrhosis and HRS.

Predicting overt hepatic encephalopathy after TIPS: Value of three minimal hepatic encephalopathy tests.

Background & Aims: Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a frequent and severe complication in patients after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) insertion. However, risk factors for post-TIPS HE remain poorly defined. Minimal HE (mHE) is a well-known risk factor for overt HE in patients with cirrhosis without TIPS. We aimed to evaluate three tools frequently used for diagnosing mHE for their dynamic changes and their predictive value for overt HE after TIPS. Methods: We prospectively recruited 84 consecutive patients before TIPS insertion and monitored them for 180 days for post-TIPS HE. Before TIPS insertion, the patients underwent the portosystemic encephalopathy (PSE) syndrome test, the animal naming test (ANT), and the critical flicker frequency (CFF). Patients were retested after TIPS insertion. Results: The majority of patients were male (67.9%), and the predominant indication for TIPS was refractory ascites (75%). Median age was 59 years, model for end-stage liver disease score was 12, and 66.3%, 64.6%, and 28.4% patients had evidence for mHE according to the PSE syndrome test, ANT, and CFF, respectively. Overall, 25 patients developed post-TIPS HE within 180 days after TIPS insertion. Post-TIPS incidence of overt HE was 22.2, 28.6, 45.5, and 55.6% in those with no, one, two, and three pathological tests at baseline, respectively. However, none of the three tests was significantly associated with post-TIPS HE. Of note, mean performance in all tests remained stable over time after TIPS insertion. Conclusions: PSE syndrome test, ANT and CFF, which are frequently used for diagnosing mHE have limited value for predicting HE after TIPS insertion. We could not find evidence that TIPS insertion leads to a psychometric decline in the long term. Impact and implications: This prospective observational study compared three diagnostic tests for mHE and showed the limited value of these tests for predicting overt HE in patients with cirrhosis undergoing TIPS insertion. In addition, the results suggest that cognitive performance generally remains stable after TIPS insertion. These results are important for physicians and researchers involved in the management of patients with cirrhosis undergoing TIPS procedures. The study's findings serve as a starting point for further investigations on the development of more effective strategies for predicting and managing post-TIPS HE. Clinical trial number: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04801290.

Diastolic dysfunction is associated with cardiac decompensation after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in patients with liver cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: About 20% of patients develop cardiac decompensation within the first year after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) insertion. However, risk factors for cardiac decompensation remain poorly defined. We aimed to evaluate predictors of cardiac decompensation after TIPS insertion in a large, well-defined cohort of patients with liver cirrhosis. METHODS: 234 cirrhotic patients who received a TIPS at Hannover Medical School were retrospectively followed up for one year to assess the incidence of cardiac decompensation. Echocardiographic parameters and established diagnostic criteria for cardiac impairment (e.g. by the American Society of Echocardiography/ European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (ASE/EACVI)) were investigated for an association with cardiac decompensation in a competing risk analysis. Survival was analyzed using a multivariable cox regression analysis adjusting for Freiburg index of post-TIPS survival. RESULTS: Predominant TIPS indication was ascites (83%). Median age was 59 years, median MELD-score 12% and 58% were male. Overall, 41 patients (18%) developed cardiac decompensation within one year after TIPS insertion. Diastolic dysfunction according to the ASE/EACVI was diagnosed in 26% of patients at baseline and was linked to a significantly higher risk for cardiac decompensation (p = 0.025) after TIPS. When investigating individual echocardiographic baseline parameters, only pathological E/A (<0.8 or >2) was identified as a risk factor for cardiac decompensation (p = 0.015). Mortality and liver transplantation (n = 50) were significantly higher among patients who developed cardiac decompensation (HR = 5.29, p < 0.001) as well as in patients with a pathological E/A (HR = 2.34, p = 0.006). Cardiac high-risk status (44% of patients) was strongly linked to cardiac decompensation (HR = 2.93, p = 0.002) and mortality (HR = 2.24, p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Cardiac decompensation after TIPS is a frequent and important complication and is associated with reduced survival. American Society of Echocardiography/EACVI criteria and E/A seem to be the best parameters to predict the cardiac risk in cirrhotic patients undergoing TIPS insertion.

Home-based, tunnelled peritoneal drainage system as an alternative treatment option for patients with refractory ascites.

BACKGROUND: Onset of refractory ascites is the hallmark of end-stage liver disease. If liver transplantation (LTx) is not available and contraindications for a transjugular portosystemic shunt (TIPS) are present, repeated paracentesis remains the standard of care (SOC). Home-based, tunnelled peritoneal catheters (PeCa) have been suggested as an alternative treatment option. However, data on patients with cirrhosis are scarce. AIM: To evaluate the safety of PeCa in these patients compared to SOC. METHODS: Overall, 223 patients with cirrhosis, a contraindication for TIPS and refractory ascites were included in this retrospective study. PeCa implant was performed in 152 patients, whereas 71 were treated with SOC. Analysed end points included device explant-free survival, mortality, acute kidney injury (AKI) and hyponatraemia. In the second approach, propensity score matching (PPSM) was performed to adjust for confounding factors. RESULTS: In patients with PeCa, median device explant-free survival was 74 days and 52 explants were recorded within the first 90 days. Within 90 days, patients with PeCa had lower mortality than SOC (p = 0.11), and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) incidence did not differ (p = 0.82). Regarding AKI and hyponatraemia, there was a trend towards a higher incidence in the PeCa group (p = 0.13 and p = 0.08), and the risk for rehospitalisation was higher in those with a PeCa (HR: 2.11, p = 0.04). After PPSM, mortality was lower in the PeCa group (HR:0.40; p = 0.03), whereas the incidence of SBP and hyponatraemia was comparable (p = 0.80 and p = 0.28) and AKI was more frequent in those with a PeCa (p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: The implant of PeCa allows home-based therapy of patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites and a contraindication for TIPS. However, the risk for complications has to be considered and prospective studies are needed.

Low Serum Cholinesterase Identifies Patients With Worse Outcome and Increased Mortality After TIPS.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an effective treatment for portal hypertension-related complications. However, careful selection of patients is crucial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of serum cholinesterase (CHE) for outcomes and mortality after TIPS insertion. In this multicenter study, 389 consecutive patients with cirrhosis receiving a TIPS at Hannover Medical School, University Hospital Essen, or Medical University of Vienna were included. The Hannover cohort (n = 200) was used to initially explore the role of CHE, whereas patients from Essen and Vienna served as a validation cohort (n = 189). Median age of the patients was 58 years and median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was 12. Multivariable analysis identified MELD score (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.16; P < 0.001) and CHE (HR: 0.61; P = 0.008) as independent predictors for 1-year survival. Using the Youden Index, a CHE of 2.5 kU/L was identified as optimal threshold to predict post-TIPS survival in the Hannover cohort (P < 0.001), which was confirmed in the validation cohort (P = 0.010). CHE < 2.5 kU/L was significantly associated with development of acute-on-chronic liver failure (P < 0.001) and hepatic encephalopathy (P = 0.006). Of note, CHE was also significantly linked to mortality in the subgroup of patients with refractory ascites (P = 0.001) as well as in patients with high MELD scores (P = 0.012) and with high-risk FIPS scores (P = 0.004). After propensity score matching, mortality was similar in patients with ascites and CHE < 2.5 kU/L if treated by TIPS or by paracentesis. Contrarily, in patients with CHE ≥ 2.5 kU/L survival was significantly improved by TIPS as compared to treatment with paracentesis (P < 0.001). Conclusion: CHE is significantly associated with mortality and complications after TIPS insertion. Therefore, we suggest that CHE should be evaluated as an additional parameter for selecting patients for TIPS implantation.

Safety and feasibility of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in elderly patients with liver cirrhosis and refractory ascites.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The management of patients with refractory ascites (RA) is challenging, particularly at higher age. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an established treatment for RA, but safety data in elderly patients are rare. Our aim was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of TIPS in elderly patients with RA. METHODS: Overall, 160 consecutive cirrhotic patients receiving a TIPS for RA at Hannover Medical School between 2012 and 2018 were considered for this retrospective analysis. Periinterventional complications such as acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) as well as survival were compared between patients <65 and ≥65 years. Propensity score matching was conducted to match elderly TIPS patients and patients treated with paracentesis. RESULTS: A number of 53 out of the 160 patients were ≥65 years (33%). Periinterventional course in those ≥65 years appeared to be slightly more complicated than in <65 years as reflected by a significantly longer hospital stay (p = 0.030) and more ACLF-episodes (21% vs. 9%; p = 0.044). 28-day mortality was similar between both groups (p = 0.350), whereas survival of the younger patients was significantly higher at 90 days (p = 0.029) and numerically higher at 1 year (p = 0.171). In the multivariate analysis age ≥65 years remained an independent predictor for 90-day mortality (HR: 2.58; p = 0.028), while it was not associated with 28-day and 1-year survival. Importantly, after matching for potential confounders 1-year survival was similar in elderly patients if treated with TIPS or paracentesis (p = 0.419). CONCLUSIONS: TIPS placement in elderly patients with RA appears to be slightly more complicated compared to younger individuals, but overall feasible and at least not inferior to paracentesis.