Debunking a Surgical Myth: Do Not Touch the Temporalis.

BACKGROUND: A longstanding dictum exists to avoid surgical manipulation of the temporalis muscle out of concern for an exceedingly high rate of muscle atrophy and recurrent temporal hollowing. The authors challenge this surgical myth, considering such advice to be erroneous. The authors hypothesize that elevation of the temporalis muscle, if performed using standard muscle flap principles, will demonstrate excellent results. METHODS: To assess temporalis response to surgical manipulation, the authors reviewed patients who underwent calvarial vault remodeling by the senior author for craniosynostosis between 1988 and 2011. Nonsyndromic patients with single-suture synostosis and 5 years of follow-up were eligible for inclusion. The medical record was used to measure rates of reoperation, recurrent temporal hollowing, and persistent temporalis overcorrection. RESULTS: Of the cohort reviewed, 196 patients met inclusion criteria. Ten patients (5.1%) exhibited recurrent bitemporal constriction. One patient (0.5%) underwent a revision temporalis turnover flap, and 2 patients (1.0%) underwent soft tissue augmentation. The overall reoperation rate was 1.5%. Temporalis overcorrection, in an attempt to prophylactically rectify the expected atrophy after temporalis manipulation, persisted in 11 patients (5.6%). Three of these patients required treatment with steroid injections, Botox injections, or operative muscle debulking. The overall reoperation rate for temporalis overcorrection was 1.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' low reoperation rates for recurrent deformity, in combination with persistent temporalis overcorrection in 5.6% of patients, should dispel the myth that manipulation of the temporalis invariably results in atrophy. The muscle may be surgically manipulated, as long as plastic surgery principles are followed.

DNA Methylation at C-Reactive Protein-Associated CpG Sites May Mediate the Pathway Between Educational Attainment and Cognition.

Growing evidence has linked inflammatory processes to cognitive decline and dementia. This work examines whether an epigenetic marker of C-reactive protein (CRP), a common clinical inflammatory biomarker, may mediate the relationship between educational attainment and cognition. We first evaluated whether 53 previously reported CRP-associated DNA methylation sites (CpGs) are associated with CRP, both individually and aggregated into a methylation risk score (MRSCRP), in 3 298 participants from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS, mean age = 69.7 years). Forty-nine CpGs (92%) were associated with the natural logarithm of CRP in HRS after adjusting for age, sex, smoking, BMI, genetic ancestry, and white blood cell counts (p < .05), and each standard deviation increase in MRSCRP was associated with a 0.38 unit increase in lnCRP (p = 4.02E-99). In cross-sectional analysis, for each standard deviation increase in MRSCRP, total memory score and total cognitive score decreased, on average, by 0.28 words and 0.43 items, respectively (p < .001). Further, MRSCRP mediated 6.9% of the relationship between high school education and total memory score in a model adjusting for age, sex, and genetic ancestry (p < .05); this was attenuated to 2.4% with additional adjustment for marital status, APOE ε4 status, health behaviors, and comorbidities (p < .05). Thus, CRP-associated methylation may partially mediate the relationship between education and cognition at older ages. Further research is warranted to determine whether DNA methylation at these sites may improve current prediction models for cognitive impairment in older adults.