Recovery Programs for People With Mental Illness in Taiwan: A Feasibility Study.

IMPORTANCE: Most recovery programs have been developed in Western countries. This study explores the cultural adaptation of a recovery program to a non-Western country. OBJECTIVE: To test the feasibility of a recovery group developed for people with mental illness in Taiwan. DESIGN: Mixed-methods feasibility study. SETTING: Community psychiatric rehabilitation center in southern Taiwan. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-four people with mental illness living in the community. INTERVENTION: The authors designed a recovery group based on the Pathways to Recovery program and the mental health recovery literature. The curriculum included two phases: recovery profile and recovery plan. The group gathered for a 1-hr session once a week for 18 wk. OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Outcomes were assessed preintervention, mid-intervention, and postintervention. Data collected included Stages of Recovery Scale (SRS) scores, course assessments, and course discussions. RESULTS: Most participants were satisfied with the recovery program and its implementation. Scores on the Social Functioning/Role Performance subscale of the SRS showed a medium to large effect size (r = .36) for the Recovery Stage 1-3 subsample (n = 16). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: This study affirmed the feasibility of a recovery group for people with mental illness in Taiwan. Prospective randomized controlled trials should be used to verify recovery groups' effectiveness. WHAT THIS ARTICLE ADDS: Recovery programs tailored to people with mental illness in non-Western countries may need more examples and longer sessions to enable participants to fully understand and implement the concepts of recovery.

Occupational evaluation of community-based psychiatric rehabilitation outcomes in individuals with severe mental illnesses: A ten-year retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of research on the effect of community-based psychiatric rehabilitation programs (CBPRs) in individuals with severe mental illness. This research used data from a retrospective study to examine the effect of a CBPR in a community rehabilitation center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical outcomes measures from a retrospective study were collected. Outcome measures were the Allen Cognitive Level Screen assessment, Purdue Pegboard Test, Chu's Attention Test, and Activities of Daily Living Rating Scale-III (ADLRS-III) before and immediately after 12 months of intervention. RESULTS: The 141 participants with mental illness were an average age of 35.29 years (SD = 8.75). The retrospective review of medical records showed 46 people dropped out within 12 months, and 95 people continued to participate in the rehabilitation program for 1 year. After 1 year of community rehabilitation, there was a trend for the participants who completed the intervention to improve on the ADLRS-III, Purdue Pegboard Test, and Chu's Attention Test. Participants who performed better on the occupational assessment were more likely to transit to the employment status. CONCLUSION: This study found the benefits of CBPR in work-related intervention for people with mental illness. Occupational assessments are relevant for studying changes in functional outcomes in people with mental illness receiving community-based rehabilitation.