Applications of the water drinking test in glaucoma management.

Intraocular pressure (IOP) peaks and means have been considered important factors for glaucoma onset and progression. However, peak IOP detection depends only on appropriated IOP checks at office visits, whereas the mean IOP requires longitudinal IOP data collection and may be affected by the interval between visits. Also, IOP peak assessment is necessary to verify if the peak pressure of a given patient is in target range, to evaluate glaucoma suspect risk, the efficacy of hypotensive drugs and to detect early loss of IOP control. The water-drinking test has gained significant attention in recent years as an important tool to evaluate IOP peaks and instability. The main objective of this review was to present new findings and to discuss the applicability of the water-drinking test in glaucoma management.

Reproducibility of the water drinking test in treated glaucomatous patients.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the reproducibility of intraocular pressure peaks and fluctuation elicited during the water drinking test in treated glaucomatous patients with a long follow-up interval. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study in a tertiary care practice. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-four treated primary open-angle glaucoma patients. METHODS: All patients underwent the water drinking test performed in two consecutive visits without any change in the therapeutic regimen. The mean interval between tests was 4.85 (range: 3-6) months. Reproducibility of peak and fluctuation during the water drinking test was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients. Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess the agreement of intraocular pressure peaks and fluctuation measured between two consecutive tests. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intraclass correlation and agreement of intraocular pressure peaks and fluctuation between visits. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline intraocular pressure values (mean ± standard deviation, 11.73 ± 2.36 and 11.61 ± 2.71 mmHg; P = 0.72) and peaks (14.55 ± 3.41 and 15.02 ± 3.66 mmHg, respectively; P = 0.163) detected during the water drinking test between the first and second visits. There was also no significant difference between the average intraocular pressure fluctuation values (2.82 ± 1.99 and 3.41 ± 2.54 mmHg, respectively; P = 0.135). Intraocular pressure peaks and fluctuation presented intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.85 (P < 0.001) and 0.50 (P < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate excellent reproducibility of intraocular pressure peaks during the water drinking test. Intraocular pressure fluctuation did not reveal good reproducibility, though. These results emphasize the applicability of this test to assess treatment efficacy in daily practice and interventional studies.

Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty as a Substitute for Medications in Patients with Mild-to-moderate Glaucoma in the Brazilian Public Health System.

PRCIS: Selective laser trabeculoplasty can be used as a substitute for medications in patients with mild-to-moderate glaucoma, reducing the cost of eye drop distribution in the Brazilian public health system. PURPOSE: To observe the effectiveness of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) as a substitute for eye drops in patients with open angle glaucoma in the Brazilian Public Health System. MATERIALS AND METHODS: SLT was performed bilaterally after medication washout. This is a prospective interventional study comparing intraocular pressure (IOP) when using eye drops at baseline (post-washout), and at 12-month follow-up after SLT. Medication was added if the target IOP was not achieved, following the Brazilian Public Health System eye drops protocol, based on medication costs. Absolute (without eye drops) and qualified (with eye drops) success were measured with IOP ≤ 21, IOP ≤ 18, IOP ≤ 15 and IOP ≤ 12 mm Hg. Besides IOP evolution, the ability to reduce IOP (in %), and eye drops reduction were evaluated. RESULTS: Ninety-two eyes of 46 patients were included, 70 eyes with mild glaucoma and 22 with moderate glaucoma; the mean number of eye drops was 2.26±1.06 (82.6% were using a prostaglandin analogue), and post-washout IOP of 21.10±5.24 mm Hg. There was relative success at IOP ≤18 mm Hg, where the mild group had greater success than the moderate group (88.1% vs. 71.4%, P =0.824). The average IOP reductions were 23.04% and 25.74% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. The average number of eye drops was 1.02, with 1.1% using a prostaglandin analogue. Furthermore, 68.19% of the patients had a decrease in the quantity of eye drops used. CONCLUSION: SLT is effective in reducing IOP and replacing eye drops in patients in the Brazilian Public Health System. Moreover, there was a significant reduction in the use of prostaglandin analogues.

Comparison of intraocular pressure profiles during the water drinking test and the modified diurnal tension curve.

OBJECTIVES: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) during the water drinking test (WDT) and modified diurnal tension curve (mDTC) in open-angle glaucoma (OAG) patients, using multimodal, observer-masked tonometry. METHODS: Open-angle glaucoma subjects were prospectively enroled, excluding those who had undergone glaucoma filtration or laser surgery. Two-hourly mDTC Goldmann applanation (GAT) and rebound tonometry (RT) was performed between 8:00 and 16:00, and every 15 min for 45 min after ingestion of 800mls of water. Blood pressure, heart rate, pupillometry measurements, and optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) were also recorded. RESULTS: Forty-two subjects' right eyes were included. 48% were using topical glaucoma medication. Mean baseline IOP was 14.9 ± 4.52 mmHg, with mean visual field mean deviation (±SD) -5.05 ± 5.45 dB. Strong association was found between maximum IOP during mDTC and WDT (r = 0.90, 95% CI 0.82-0.95 p < 0.0001) with agreement (mDTC-WDT) bias -0.82 mmHg, 95% LoA -1.46 to -0.18. During the WDT, mean systolic blood pressure (±SD) increased from 140.0 ± 20.0 to 153.3 ± 24.0 mmHg (p < 0.0001), mean heart rate ( ± SD) reduced from 69.5 ± 11.3 bpm to 63.6 ± 10.0 bpm (p < 0.0001), and temporal iridocorneal angle increased from 29.2 ± 6.0° to 29.6 ± 5.2° (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: This study presents repeated, observer-masked IOP data showing strong correlation between maximum IOP during mDTC and WDT using multimodal tonometry. This supports WDT as a meaningful alternative to mDTC when investigating diurnal IOP characteristics in clinic, with reduced time requirements and associated costs.

Reproducibility of intraocular pressure peak and fluctuation of the water-drinking test.

BACKGROUND: The water-drinking test has been used as a stress test to evaluate the drainage system of the eye. However, in order to be clinically applicable,a test must provide reproducible results with consistent measurements. This study was performed to verify the reproducibility of intraocular pressure peaks and fluctuation detected during the water-drinking test in patients with ocular hypertension and open-angle glaucoma. DESIGN: A prospective analysis of patients in a tertiary care unit for glaucoma treatment. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-four ocular hypertension and 64 open-angle glaucoma patients not under treatment. METHODS: The water-drinking test was performed in 2 consecutive days by the same examiners in patients not under treatment. Reproducibility was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Peak and fluctuation of intraocular pressure obtained with the water-drinking test were analysed for reproducibility. RESULTS: Eighty-eight eyes from 24 ocular hypertension and 64 open-angle glaucoma patients not under treatment were evaluated. Test and retest intraocular pressure peak values were 28.38 ± 4.64 and 28.38 ± 4.56 mmHg, respectively (P = 1.00). Test and retest intraocular pressure fluctuation values were 5.75 ± 3.9 and 4.99 ± 2.7 mmHg, respectively (P = 0.06). Based on intraclass coefficient, reproducibility was excellent for peak intraocular pressure (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.79) and fair for intraocular pressure fluctuation (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.37). CONCLUSION: Intraocular pressure peaks detected during the water-drinking test presented excellent reproducibility, whereas the reproducibility of fluctuation was considered fair.

The influence of topical anesthetic and fluorescein on non-contact tonometry measurements using ultra-high-speed dynamic Scheimpflug.

This study aimed to investigate the effects of topical anesthetic and fluorescein drops on intraocular pressure (IOP), central corneal thickness (CCT) and biomechanical properties as measured by Corvis ST (CST-Oculus; Wezlar, Germany) in healthy eyes. A cross-sectional observational study was conducted on 46 healthy patients. The CST measurements were obtained before and immediately after the instillation of topical anesthetic and fluorescein drops. Pre-post instillation data were statistically analyzed. IOP measurements were compared to Goldmann's Applanation Tonometry (GAT), which was also performed after drops instillation. Biomechanical parameters analyzed included applanation 1 velocity, applanation 2 velocity, applanation 1 time, applanation 2 time, whole eye movement, deflection amplitude, and stiffness parameter at first applanation. A statistically significant difference in IOP, both for non-corrected IOP (IOPnct) and biomechanically corrected IOP (bIOP), was observed before and after the instillation of eyedrops. Despite this statistical significance, the observed difference lacked clinical relevance. The IOPnct demonstrated a significant difference pre and post-anesthetic and fluorescein instillation compared to GAT (14.99 ± 2.27 mmHg pre-instillation and 14.62 ± 2.50 mmHg post-instillation, versus 13.98 ± 2.04 mmHg, with p-values of 0.0014 and 0.0490, respectively). Comparable findings were noted when justaposing bIOP to GAT (14.53 ± 2.10 mmHg pre-instillation and 13.15 ± 2.25 mmHg post-instillation, against 13.98 ± 2.04 mmHg, with p-values of 0.0391 and 0.0022, respectively). Additionally, CCT measurements revealed a statistically significant elevation following the administration of topical anesthetic and fluorescein drops (from 544.64 ± 39.85 µm to 586.74 ± 41.71 µm, p < 0.01. None of the analyzed biomechanical parameters showed statistically significant differences after drops instillation. While the administration of topical anesthetic and fluorescein drops induced a statistically significant alteration in both IOPnct and bIOP readings, these changes were not clinically consequential. Furthermore, a notable statistical rise was observed in CCT measurements post-drops instillation, as determined by CST. Yet, corneal biomechanical parameters remained unaffected.

Examination of the performance of different pointwise linear regression progression criteria to detect glaucomatous visual field change.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the performance of five different trend analysis criteria for the detection of glaucomatous progression and to determine the most frequently and rapidly progressing locations of the visual field. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. PARTICIPANTS OR SAMPLES: Treated glaucoma patients with ≥ 8 Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA)-standard 24-2 visual field tests. METHODS: Progression was determined using trend analysis. Five different criteria were used: (A) ≥ 1 significantly progressing point; (B) ≥ 2 significantly progressing points; (C) ≥ 2 progressing points located in the same hemifield; (D) at least two adjacent progressing points located in the same hemifield; (E) ≥ 2 progressing points in the same Garway-Heath map sector. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of progressing eyes and false-positive results. RESULTS: We included 587 patients. The number of eyes reaching a progression end-point using each criterion was: A = 300 (51%); B = 212 (36%); C = 194 (33%); D = 170 (29%); and E = 186 (31%) (P ≤ 0.03). The numbers of eyes with positive slopes were: A = 13 (4.3%); B = 3 (1.4%); C = 3 (1.5%); D = 2 (1.1%); and E = 3 (1.6%) (P = 0.06). The global slopes for progressing eyes were more negative in Groups B, C and D than in Group A (P = 0.004). The visual field locations that progressed more often were those in the nasal field adjacent to the horizontal midline. CONCLUSIONS: Pointwise linear regression criteria that take into account the retinal nerve fibre layer anatomy enhances the specificity of trend analysis for the detection glaucomatous visual field progression.

Patterns of Visual Field Loss in Early, Moderate, and Severe Stages of Open Angle Glaucoma.

PRCIS: Even in the early stages of glaucomatous visual field defects (VFDs), 49% of the defects occurred in both hemifields and 28% involved the central 5 degrees of the visual field (VF), which may have prognostic values. PURPOSE: The aim was to determine the patterns of glaucomatous VFDs in early, moderate and severe stages of primary open angle glaucoma, using the Glaucoma Staging Application. METHODS: According to the Modified University of Sao Paulo Glaucoma Visual Field Staging System Classification, patients with early, moderate and advanced VFDs were selected by the Glaucoma Staging Application using all databases of the Humphrey Visual Field Analyser of a glaucoma referral practice. We analyzed one VF of the 100 patients included in each group. The analysis consisted of classifying all exams regarding the location of the defects, the hemifields involved, and the connection to the blind spot. RESULTS: We analyzed 300 VF. In the Early group, 27% of the VFDs are connected to the physiological blind spot, 64% in the Moderate group, and 95% in the Severe group ( P <0.01). In the Early group, 28% of the defects involved the central 5 degrees of the fixation, 59% in the Moderate and 88% in the Severe group. In the Early group, 49% of the defects involved both hemifields, 80% in the Moderate and 80% in the Severe group. CONCLUSION: With increasing glaucoma severity, VFD showed a more central pattern, connected to the blind spot, and involved both hemifields. In early disease, both hemifields were commonly affected and more than a quarter of VFD involved the central 5 degrees close to fixation. Careful monitoring of the central VF in glaucoma is suggested.

Peak Intraocular Pressure Time during Water Drinking Test and Its Relationship with Glaucoma Severity.

PURPOSE: To investigate the association between the time of occurrence of intraocular pressure (IOP) peaks during the water-drinking test (WDT) and visual field damage in a cohort of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients. METHODS: In this retrospective, cross-sectional study, 98 eyes from 49 consecutive POAG patients were followed in a referral clinical practice. The relationship between the time when IOP peaks occurred during the WDT and the visual field mean deviation (MD) assessed with 24-2 visual field was tested with mixed-effects models. RESULTS: MD value was significantly associated with the time of IOP peak occurrence (P = 0.020) when adjusting for the number of medications, but not with the IOP peak values (P = 0.238). CONCLUSION: The time of IOP peaks occurrence during the WDT was associated with glaucoma severity among treated POAG patients.

Intraocular Peak Pressure in Patients Under Treatment With Fixed Combination of Bimatoprost/Timolol/Brimonidine Once Daily Versus Twice Daily.

PRCIS: We investigate the efficacy of triple-fixed-combination of bimatoprost/brimonidine/timolol once and twice a day, demonstrating higher intraocular pressure reduction with once-a-day use, and discuss possible implications based on previous literature. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of a fixed combination bimatoprost-timolol-brimonidine (Triplenex) instilled once-daily with twice-daily in primary open angle glaucoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomized clinical trial at a public eye care institution. Thirty patients with primary open angle glaucoma were followed up for 3 months. The right and left eyes of these patients were randomly assigned to once-daily (10:00 pm ) or twice-daily (10:00 am ; 10:00 pm ) regimens of fixed combination bimatoprost-timolol-brimonidine. Intraocular pressure peaks were obtained with the water drinking test before the introduction of this medication (basal WDT0), 1 month (WDT1), 2 months (WDT2), and 3 months (WDT3) after starting the use of the fixed combination of bimatoprost/timolol/brimonidine (Triplenex). Variation from peak intraocular pressure at WDT3 to peak at WDT0 was compared within groups of 2 versus once-daily regimen. RESULTS: Sixty eyes of 30 patients (age: 70.67±9.70 y) were included in this study. Baseline clinical characteristics were comparable between groups. The mean reduction in peak intraocular pressure from WDT0 to WDT3 was 6.1±6.1 mm Hg (30.5%) in the eyes receiving 1 drop per day and 4.3±5.7 mm Hg (21.5%) in the eyes receiving 2 drops per day ( P =0.023). Mean reduction in peak intraocular pressure considering all WDT was also higher in the group with once-a-day treatment (5.90±6.03 vs. 4.46±4.28 mm Hg, P =0.006). CONCLUSION: Fixed combination of bimatoprost 0.01%, brimonidine tartrate 0.15%, and timolol maleate 0.5% once-a-day is more effective in reducing peak intraocular pressure as measured by the WDT than twice-a-day dosing.

Efficacy and Safety of the Susanna Glaucoma Drainage Device After 1 Year of Follow-up.

PRECIS: This study found a rate of failure of 13.6% of the new Susanna Glaucoma Drainage Device (SGDD) after 1 year of follow-up. Severe complications occurred in 1 patient (4.5%). PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the success and complications rates of the SGDD implant in refractory glaucoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study. Medical records from all consecutive refractory glaucoma patients (failed trabeculectomies with the use of adjunctive mitomycin) followed in a private clinical practice were included in the study. All patients had undergone SGDD implant surgery from September 2016 to July 2019 were included. All surgeries were done by the same surgeon (R.S.). Primary outcome was surgical failure, defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) >18 mm Hg and/or <20% IOP reduction from baseline, IOP<5 mm Hg, reoperation for glaucoma, need of implant removal or loss of light perception vision. Secondary outcomes included mean IOP, use of supplemental medical therapy, and complications. RESULTS: In all, 22 eyes were analyzed. Mean patient age was 63±15 years (range: 27 to 87 y). Mean IOP decreased from 23±7 to 11±8 mm Hg (P<0.001, paired t test) at an average of 18±9 months after the tube implant. The mean SD number of glaucoma medications was reduced from 3.3±1 to 1.5±1.2 at the last postoperative visit (P<0.01, paired t test). No early postoperative complications occurred. There was 1 case of late persistent hypotony in a patient with previous endocyclophotocoagulation that was solved with tube ligature with silk 8-0. Failure because of high IOP occurred in 2 cases. There was no extrusion or erosion of the tube and the plate. CONCLUSION: The SGDD presented a 13.6% failure rate (86.4% success rate) with very few complications, being an efficient and safe alternative for refractory glaucoma.

Variability and Power to Detect Progression of Different Visual Field Patterns.

PURPOSE: To compare the variability and ability to detect visual field (VF) progression of 24-2, central 12 locations of the 24-2 and 10-2 VF tests in eyes with abnormal VFs. DESIGN: Retrospective, multisite cohort. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 52 806 24-2 and 11 966 10-2 VF tests from 7307 eyes from the Glaucoma Research Network database were analyzed. Only eyes with ≥ 5 visits and ≥ 2 years of follow-up were included. METHODS: Linear regression models were used to calculate the rates of mean deviation (MD) change (slopes), whereas their residuals were used to assess variability across the entire MD range. Computer simulations (n = 10 000) based on real MD residuals of our sample were performed to estimate power to detect significant progression (P < 5%) at various rates of MD change. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time required to detect progression. RESULTS: For all 3 patterns, the MD variability was highest within the -5 to -20 decibel (dB) range and consistently lower with the 10-2 compared with 24-2 or central 24-2. Overall, time to detect confirmed significant progression at 80% power was the lowest with 10-2 VF, with a decrease of 14.6% to 18.5% when compared with 24-2 and a decrease of 22.9% to 26.5% when compared with central 24-2. CONCLUSIONS: Time to detect central VF progression was reduced with 10-2 MD compared with 24-2 and C24-2 MD in glaucoma eyes in this large dataset, in part because 10-2 tests had lower variability. These findings contribute to current evidence of the potential value of 10-2 testing in the clinical management of patients with glaucoma and in clinical trial design.

The relationship between intraocular pressure reduction and rates of progressive visual field loss in eyes with optic disc hemorrhage.

PURPOSE: To evaluate rates of visual field progression in eyes with optic disc hemorrhages and the effect of intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction on these rates. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 510 eyes of 348 patients with glaucoma who were recruited from the Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study (DIGS) and followed for an average of 8.2 years. METHODS: Eyes were followed annually with clinical examination, standard automated perimetry visual fields, and optic disc stereophotographs. The presence of optic disc hemorrhages was determined on the basis of masked evaluation of optic disc stereophotographs. Evaluation of rates of visual field change during follow-up was performed using the visual field index (VFI). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The evaluation of the effect of optic disc hemorrhages on rates of visual field progression was performed using random coefficient models. Estimates of rates of change for individual eyes were obtained by best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP). RESULTS: During follow-up, 97 (19%) of the eyes had at least 1 episode of disc hemorrhage. The overall rate of VFI change in eyes with hemorrhages was significantly faster than in eyes without hemorrhages (-0.88%/year vs. -0.38%/year, respectively, P<0.001). The difference in rates of visual field loss pre- and post-hemorrhage was significantly related to the reduction of IOP in the post-hemorrhage period compared with the pre-hemorrhage period (r = -0.61; P<0.001). Each 1 mmHg of IOP reduction was associated with a difference of 0.31%/year in the rate of VFI change. CONCLUSIONS: There was a beneficial effect of treatment in slowing rates of progressive visual field loss in eyes with optic disc hemorrhage. Further research should elucidate the reasons why some patients with hemorrhages respond well to IOP reduction and others seem to continue to progress despite a significant reduction in IOP levels. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Agreement for detecting glaucoma progression with the GDx guided progression analysis, automated perimetry, and optic disc photography.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of the GDx Variable Corneal Compensation (VCC) Guided Progression Analysis (GPA) software for detecting glaucomatous progression. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 453 eyes from 252 individuals followed for an average of 46+/-14 months as part of the Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study. At baseline, 29% of the eyes were classified as glaucomatous, 67% of the eyes were classified as suspects, and 5% of the eyes were classified as healthy. METHODS: Images were obtained annually with the GDx VCC and analyzed for progression using the Fast Mode of the GDx GPA software. Progression using conventional methods was determined by the GPA software for standard automated achromatic perimetry (SAP) and by masked assessment of optic disc stereophotographs by expert graders. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios (LRs) for detection of glaucoma progression using the GDx GPA were calculated with SAP and optic disc stereophotographs used as reference standards. Agreement among the different methods was reported using the AC(1) coefficient. RESULTS: Thirty-four of the 431 glaucoma and glaucoma suspect eyes (8%) showed progression by SAP or optic disc stereophotographs. The GDx GPA detected 17 of these eyes for a sensitivity of 50%. Fourteen eyes showed progression only by the GDx GPA with a specificity of 96%. Positive and negative LRs were 12.5 and 0.5, respectively. None of the healthy eyes showed progression by the GDx GPA, with a specificity of 100% in this group. Inter-method agreement (AC(1) coefficient and 95% confidence intervals) for non-progressing and progressing eyes was 0.96 (0.94-0.97) and 0.44 (0.28-0.61), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The GDx GPA detected glaucoma progression in a significant number of cases showing progression by conventional methods, with high specificity and high positive LRs. Estimates of the accuracy for detecting progression suggest that the GDx GPA could be used to complement clinical evaluation in the detection of longitudinal change in glaucoma.

Detection of Progression With 10-2 Standard Automated Perimetry: Development and Validation of an Event-Based Algorithm.

PURPOSE: To describe the development of a new algorithm for detecting progressive changes in 10-2 visual field (VF) tests using event-based analysis and to test its validity in a second, independent glaucoma cohort. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: Patients with established open-angle glaucoma from the Macular Assessment and Progression Study (MAPS; development cohort, n = 151), and the African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study (ADAGES; validation cohort, n = 52) were evaluated. The 10-2 VF results from MAPS were obtained during 4 test-retest sessions within a 4-month period. For the validation analysis, 10-2 VF results from ADAGES performed on at least 5 visits were used. The event-based pointwise changes on 10-2 tests in the validation cohort were determined using 2 progression criteria: at least 3 progressing VF locations on 2 or 3 consecutive tests ("possible" or "likely" progression). Linear mixed-effects models were used to evaluate VF progression. RESULTS: In the validation cohort, the mean (SD) follow-up time was 2.3 (0.7) years. The number of eyes experiencing 10-2 VF progression based on "possible" and "likely" progression was 36 (54.5%) and 11 (16.6%), respectively. Eyes experiencing "possible" progression had MD changes (-0.60 dB/year [95% confidence interval (CI): -0.93 to -0.28]) faster than those not meeting this criterion (P < .001), whereas for those with "likely" progression the difference was -0.91 dB/year (95% CI: -1.26 to -0.56, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: A new event-based progression algorithm using the 10-2 VF can identify eyes experiencing more rapid MD progression and may be used as a tool to assess progressive macular functional changes in glaucoma.

Choroidal expansion during the water drinking test.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the correlation between intraocular pressure (IOP) rise, ocular pulse amplitude (OPA), and choroidal thickness (ChT) during the water drinking test (WDT). METHODS: Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients were submitted to the WDT followed by serial IOP measurements using dynamic contour tonometry (DCT), Goldman tonometry (GAT), and ChT measurements using ultrasonographic A and B-scan (USG). A control group not submitted to the test was also evaluated using DCT, GAT, and USG. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated in the control group in order to assess the reproducibility of measurements. Spearman's coefficient (rho) was used to assess the correlation between the variables. RESULTS: Thirty eyes were included in the study. There was a significant IOP rise during the WDT using both GAT and DCT (p < 0.001). The OPA and ChT measurements also increased significantly (p < 0.001). Spearman's correlation between the OPA values and ChT measurements was significant and moderate (rho = 0.40, p = 0.005). The average increase of OPA and ChT measurements occurred 15 min before the IOP rise. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant increase of OPA and ChT measurements followed by an IOP rise during the WDT. Increased choroidal volume due to hemodynamic forces may be enrolled in the mechanism of IOP elevation during this stress test.

Agreement between stress intraocular pressure and long-term intraocular pressure measurements in primary open angle glaucoma.

PURPOSE: The aim of this paper is to study the correlation between the intraocular pressure peaks and fluctuation detected during the water drinking test and the same parameters observed during long-term follow up. METHODS: This prospective cohort study enrolled 22 eyes of 22 newly diagnosed primary open angle glaucoma patients. After an initial complete ophthalmological examination, patients were started on antiglaucoma medication and returned 4 weeks later to perform the water drinking test. Thereafter,patients were evaluated at least eight times within a period of 6-12 months. The intraocular pressure peaks and fluctuation detected during the water drinking stress test were compared with those observed during regular office visits. Spearman's correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman Plots were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 54.3 +/- 8.2 years (+/-SD), 59% were women, and average mean deviation -10.2 +/- 4.5 dB. The mean follow-up period was 8.2 +/- 2.0 months. The average intraocular pressure peaks and fluctuation during the water drinking test were 20.0 +/- 2.9 mmHg and 40 +/- 10%, respectively, and 18.1 +/- 2.8 mmHg and 30 +/- 10% during follow up. Spearman's correlation coefficients were significant and strong between the intraocular pressure peaks and fluctuation detected during the water drinking test and during the follow-up period (P < 0.001, rho = 0.76 and 0.82,respectively). There was good agreement between the variables. CONCLUSION: The intraocular pressure peaks and fluctuation detected during the water drinking test showed significant correlation and agreement with the pressures observed during follow-up visits. Stress tests could be used to estimate long-term intraocular pressure variation.

Mobile Telephone Use and Reaction Time in Drivers With Glaucoma.

Importance: Combining mobile telephone use with driving is not unusual. However, distracted driving limits driving performance because of limited capacity for persons to divide attention. Objectives: To investigate the frequency of mobile telephone use while driving and to assess whether patients with glaucoma had a disproportionate decrease in driving performance while conversing on a mobile telephone compared with healthy participants. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cross-sectional study of surveys collected from 112 patients with glaucoma and 70 control participants investigating mobile telephone use while driving. A randomly selected subgroup of 37 patients with glaucoma and 28 controls drove in a driving simulator to investigate peripheral event detection performance during distracted driving at the Visual Performance Laboratory, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. Data collection was performed from December 1, 2016, through April 30, 2017. Exposures: Participants answered a survey and submitted to a driving simulation test with and without mobile telephone use. Main Outcomes and Measures: Survey answers were collected, and distracted driving performance, assessed by reaction time to peripheral stimuli, was analyzed. Results: Of the 182 participants who answered the survey, the 112 participants with glaucoma included 56 women (50.0%) and had a mean (SD) age of 73.6 (9.6) years. The 70 controls included 49 women (70.0%) and had a mean (SD) age of 68.4 (10.9) years. When asked about mobile telephone use while driving, 30 patients with glaucoma (26.8%) admitted rarely using and 2 (1.8%) sometimes using it. In the control group, 20 participants (28.6%) admitted rarely using and 2 (2.9%) sometimes using the telephone while driving (P = .80). Reaction times to peripheral stimuli were significantly longer among patients with glaucoma compared with controls during mobile telephone use (median [interquartile range], 1.86 [1.42-2.29] seconds vs 1.14 [0.98-1.59] seconds; P = .02). Compared with driving performance while not using a mobile telephone, the mean (SD) increase of 0.85 (0.60) second in reaction time while conversing on the mobile telephone among patients with glaucoma was significantly greater than the mean (SD) increase of 0.68 (0.83) second for controls (P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: This study's findings indicate that patients with glaucoma use mobile telephones while driving as frequently as healthy participants. However, the findings also suggest that patients with glaucoma may experience a greater decline than healthy participants in their ability to detect peripheral events while driving when also talking on a mobile telephone. Patients with glaucoma should be informed that they may have a higher driving risk that may be worsened by distractions, such as mobile telephone use.

Correlation between the water drinking test and modified diurnal tension curve in untreated glaucomatous eyes.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the correlation and agreement between the intraocular pressure peaks detected during the water drinking test and the modified diurnal tension curve in untreated glaucomatous eyes. INTRODUCTION: It has been suggested that the intraocular pressure peaks detected during the water drinking test predict the peaks observed during a 24-hour diurnal tension curve. A more feasible and practical test for assessing intraocular pressure peaks in glaucomatous eyes during office hours would be of great clinical utility. METHODS: This was a prospective study involving open angle glaucoma patients without anti-glaucoma medication submitted to the modified diurnal tension curve and water drinking test on the same day. The intraocular pressure peaks during the water drinking test and the modified diurnal tension curve were reported and compared. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the correlation and agreement between intraocular pressure peak measurements. RESULTS: The correlation between intraocular pressure peaks during the water drinking test and modified diurnal tension curve was significant and strong (Pearson's Correlation Coefficient r=0.780, p<0.0001). Limited agreement was observed between these measurements. Eighty-two percent of intraocular pressure peaks were higher during the water drinking test than the modified diurnal tension curve. DISCUSSION: These findings suggest that the water drinking test may be used as tool to assess risk factors for glaucomatous patients. CONCLUSION: Intraocular pressure peaks detected during the water drinking test could be used in clinical practice to both estimate the peaks observed during the modified diurnal tension curve and assess the status of the eye's outflow facility.

Efficacy and safety of trabeculectomy with mitomycin C for childhood glaucoma: a study of results with long-term follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of trabeculectomy with mitomycin C in the management of childhood glaucoma. INTRODUCTION: The use of antifibrotic agents enhances the success of trabeculectomy performed in both adults and children. METHODS: A retrospective chart review (1991-2001) of 114 patients (114 eyes) from 0-14 years of age with congenital or developmental glaucoma. These patients underwent trabeculectomy with mitomycin but had not been previously treated with any antifibrotic agent. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 57.36+/-51.14 months (range: 0.5-168 months). Treatment was considered successful in 63 eyes (55.26%), with a mean intraocular pressure of 12.11+/-3.98 mmHg. For patients categorized as successfully treated, the mean follow-up time was 61.16+/-26.13 months (range 12-113 months). A post-surgical intraocular pressure of <16 was observed in 47 eyes. The life-table success rates for intraocular pressure control at 24, 36, 48, and 60 months were 90.2%, 78.7%, 60.7% and 50.8%, respectively. The cumulative probability of failure was 40.8% at 12 months. Following surgery, endophthalmitis appeared in eight eyes (4.88%) after an average 36.96 months (range: 1.7-106 months). Other complications included expulsive hemorrhage, flat anterior chamber and bleb leak. DISCUSSION: It has been reported in pediatric patients that trabeculectomy without adjunctive antimetabolites achieves a successful outcome in 30% to 50% of cases. In our study, treatment was considered successful in 63 eyes (55.26%) within 61.16+/-26.13 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Trabeculectomy with mitomycin is safe and effective for short-term or long-term treatment of congenital or developmental glaucoma. The frequency of bleb-related endophthalmitis was no higher in these patients than that described in adults.