Regulation of estrogen receptor beta activity and implications in health and disease.

Together with the estrogen receptor (ER) alpha, estrogen receptor beta (ER beta ) mediates many of the physiological effects of estrogens. As ER beta is crucially involved in a variety of important physiological processes, its activity should be tightly regulated. ER beta regulation is achieved by hormone binding as well as by posttranslational modifications of the receptor. Furthermore, ER beta expression levels are under circadian control and can be regulated by DNA methylation of the ER beta promoter region. There are also a number of factors that can interfere with ER beta activity, such as phytoestrogens, endocrine disruptive chemicals, and growth factors. In this article, we outline different mechanisms of ER beta regulation and how they are implicated in various diseases. We also discuss how these insights might help to specifically target ER beta in drug design.

The transcription factor aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator functions as an estrogen receptor beta-selective coactivator, and its recruitment to alternative pathways mediates antiestrogenic effects of dioxin.

The biological effects of dioxins are mediated by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) and its dimerization partner, the AhR nuclear translocator (ARNT), and include interference with hormonal signaling pathways like the response to estrogens. The effects of estrogens are mediated by two estrogen receptor (ER) isoforms, ERalpha and ERbeta, which belong to the family of nuclear receptors. We have previously shown that ARNT can act as coactivator of the ERs. In this study, we show that recruitment of ARNT to AhR or hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha signaling pathways as well as small interfering RNA-mediated down-regulation of ARNT levels lead to a reduction in ER transcriptional activity. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation assays, we demonstrate that this decrease coincides with reduced recruitment of ARNT to estradiol-regulated promoters. We show further that coactivation by ARNT as well as inhibition by dioxin acts stronger on ERbeta than on ERalpha activity. Additionally, we demonstrate that the effects of ARNT are dependent on the A/B domain of the ERs with the A/B domain of ERbeta being considerably stronger in mediating the coactivating effects of ARNT. Taken together, our studies show that recruitment of ARNT to the AhR after dioxin treatment can account for the antiestrogenic effect of dioxins. Moreover, we show for the first time that the inhibitory effects of dioxin are more pronounced on ERbeta than on ERalpha.

3-Methylcholanthrene displays dual effects on estrogen receptor (ER) alpha and ER beta signaling in a cell-type specific fashion.

The biological effects of 17beta-estradiol (E(2)) are mediated by the two estrogen receptor (ER) isoforms ERalpha and ERbeta. These receptors are ligand-inducible transcription factors that belong to the nuclear receptor superfamily. These receptors are also targets for a broad range of natural and synthetic compounds that induce ER activity, including dietary compounds, pharmaceuticals, and various types of environmental pollutants such as bisphenols and polychlorinated hydroxy-biphenyls. Here, we study the effect of the combustion byproduct 3-methylcholanthrene (3-MC) on ERalpha and ERbeta. 3-MC is a compound identified previously as an activator of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR). Activation of AhR is traditionally associated with an inhibition of the E(2) signaling network. In this study, we demonstrate that 3-MC is a cell-specific activator or inhibitor of E(2) signaling pathways. We show that 3-MC acts as a repressor in some cells, presumably via the AhR, whereas it is a potent activator of ER activity in other cells. It is interesting that we demonstrate that the estrogenic effects of 3-MC are dependent on the ability of cells to metabolize parental 3-MC to alternative compounds. In summary, our results suggest that exposure to AhR ligands like 3-MC can lead to either activation or repression of E(2) signaling, depending on the cellular context.

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligands 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and 3-methylcholanthrene regulate distinct genetic networks.

The two estrogen receptor isoforms ERα and ERß mediate biological effects of estrogens, but are also targets for endocrine disruptive chemicals (EDCs), compounds that interfere with hormonal signaling. 3-Methylcholanthrene (3-MC) and dioxin (TCDD) are EDCs and prototypical aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) agonists, and can inhibit ER signaling. However, in contrast to TCDD, 3-MC gives rise to metabolites with estrogenic properties. We compared gene expression profiles in HepG2 cells after exposure to 3-MC, TCDD, and the synthetic estrogen diethylstilbestrol (DES). Interestingly, we observed little overlap between the genetic networks activated by 3-MC and TCDD, two compounds sometimes considered as interchangeable AhR ligands. Like DES, 3-MC induced a number of ER-regulated genes and lead to recruitment of ERα to the promoters of such genes. Interestingly, in contrast to DES, the estrogenic effects exerted by 3-MC were exclusively observed in ERα, but not in ERß-expressing cells, suggesting ER isoform selectivity of 3-MC-derived metabolites.

Epigenetic regulation of glucose transporter 4 by estrogen receptor ß.

Glucose transporter 4 (Glut4) is an important regulator of cellular glucose uptake in adipose tissue and skeletal muscle. The estrogen receptors α and ß (ERα and ERß) have been shown to regulate Glut4. However, the regulatory mechanisms are unclear, and there are conflicting results about the effects of the two ER isoforms on Glut4 activity. In this study we investigated how the lack of either ER isoform affects Glut4 expression in differentiated mouse embryonic fibroblasts. Our results demonstrate that Glut4 transcription is markedly reduced in cells lacking ERß, both basally and upon induction by liver X receptor. These changes in Glut4 expression could not be explained by the lack of ERß as ligand-activated transcription factor. They were rather brought about by hypermethylation of one single CpG in the Glut4 promoter in the ERß-deficient cells. This CpG is part of an Sp1-binding site, and Sp1 binding was reduced by its methylation. Treatment with Sp1 inhibitor diminished Glut4 expression in wild-type, but not in ERß-deficient cells, suggesting that reduced recruitment of Sp1 to the Glut4 promoter is responsible for the differences in Glut4 expression. Reintroduction of ERß into ERß-deficient cells partly restored Glut4 transcription and stabilized low DNA methylation after treatment with the DNA demethylating agent 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine. Our findings demonstrate the involvement of DNA methylation in Glut4 regulation and imply a novel function for ERß in mediating epigenetic events and thereby regulating gene expression.

AhR and ARNT modulate ER signaling.

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), in complex with its binding partner ARNT, mediates the cellular response to xenobiotic compounds such as the environmental pollutant dioxin. In addition, the AhR has important regulatory roles in normal physiology. For instance, there is extensive data showing an intricate relationship between the AhR and estrogen receptor (ER) pathways. This review focuses on the regulatory roles of AhR and ARNT, beyond the response to xenobiotics. In particular, the effects of AhR agonists on the estrogen signaling pathways and the role of ARNT as a modulator of ER activity are discussed.

Endocrine disruptive chemicals: mechanisms of action and involvement in metabolic disorders.

Endocrine disruption refers to the ability of chemicals to interfere with hormonal systems, and has raised considerable concern in recent years. Endocrine disruptive chemicals (EDCs) pose a documented risk to wildlife and have the potential to negatively influence human health. This review focuses on the molecular mechanisms of endocrine disruption and the possible involvement of EDCs in metabolic disorders. The first part describes the role of aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) and nuclear receptors (NRs) in mediating effects of EDCs, in particular, how cross-talk between AhR and NR pathways can lead to endocrine disruption. The second part deals with how these receptors are involved in metabolic functions and how their targeting by EDCs can lead to disturbances in glucose and fat metabolism. The article illustrates that, although there is accumulating data on molecular mechanisms of EDC action as well as on EDC involvement in metabolic disorders, there is still a great demand for data that can unite the mechanistic and the toxicological/epidemiological observations.