Intraoperative digital breast tomosynthesis using a dedicated device is more accurate than standard intraoperative mammography for identifying positive margins.

AIM: To compare a standard intra-operative mammography (IM) device with digital breast tomosynthesis using a dedicated device (Mozart system) in the evaluation of surgical margins at first excision. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study received institutional review board approval and written informed consent was obtained from participants. From January 2018 to December 2018, a prospective analysis of the images of IM device and intra-operative digital breast tomosynthesis with a dedicated device (Mozart system) in n=89 breast cancer patients (average patients age: 58 years, age range: 35-76 years) was undertaken. Images were evaluated by two expert breast radiologists independently of each other and blinded to each other's interpretation, who indicated the positive cases requiring surgical re-excision intra-operatively. RESULTS: Mean cancer size was 12.5±4.5 mm. Radiological signs of the lesions were microcalcifications (n=71), nodules (n=10), and architectural distortions (n=8). A total of 20/89 (17%) patients underwent intra-operative re-excision for positive margins. Intra-operative digital breast tomosynthesis with a dedicated device and IM showed discrepancies in 15/89 cases (17%). Mozart system results informed the necessity to perform a re-excision (n=15). Overall, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed and area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.82 for the Mozart system versus 0.65 for IM. ROC analysis of radiological findings with microcalcifications showed an AUC of 0.92 for the Mozart system versus 0.74 for IM, whereas AUC in cases with no microcalcifications were 0.87 and 0.75, respectively. CONCLUSION: Intra-operative digital breast tomosynthesis with a dedicated device provides more information (better accuracy) than IM and facilitated a reduction in re-excision rates.

Sonoelastographic Findings of Carpal Tunnel Injection.

PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were to compare sonoelastographic color findings of the perineural area between carpal tunnel syndrome patients and healthy volunteers, and to analyze elastographic findings in that area before and immediately after intracarpal tunnel injection in carpal tunnel syndrome patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied both hands of 15 healthy volunteers (7 men, 8 women; mean age: 60.1 years, range: 41 - 88 years) and 72 hands from 70 patients with symptomatic carpal tunnel syndrome (24 men, 46 women; mean age: 54.2 years, range: 24 - 83 years). Sonoelastographic color distribution was assessed in the perineural area between the median nerve and adjacent flexor tendons. The color elastograms were graded using the following system: Grade 1 as red (softest), grade 2 as yellow (soft), grade 3 as green (hard), grade 4 as blue (hardest). The patients were treated with corticosteroid injection and were reassessed with sonoelastography immediately after the injection. RESULTS: The median color grading in the perineural area of carpal tunnel syndrome patients was grade 3 (3.1 ±â€Š0.3, mean ±â€Š95 % Cl), which was stiffer than that of healthy volunteers (grade 1, 1.9 ±â€Š0.4) (p < 0.0001). Immediately after injection, the diffusion of the injected fluid was observed as having a softer appearance (grade 1, 1.4 ±â€Š0.2) (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The perineural area surrounding the median nerve in carpal tunnel syndrome patients was stiffer than that in healthy volunteers. Diffusion of the injected fluid in the carpal tunnel was seen as a softer finding after injection in real time using sonoelastography.

Estimation of percentage breast tissue density: comparison between digital mammography (2D full field digital mammography) and digital breast tomosynthesis according to different BI-RADS categories.

OBJECTIVE: To compare breast density estimated from two-dimensional full-field digital mammography (2D FFDM) and from digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) according to different Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) categories, using automated software. METHODS: Institutional review board approval and written informed patient consent were obtained. DBT and 2D FFDM were performed in the same patients to allow within-patient comparison. A total of 160 consecutive patients (mean age: 50±14 years; mean body mass index: 22±3) were included to create paired data sets of 40 patients for each BI-RADS category. Automatic software (MedDensity(©), developed by Giulio Tagliafico) was used to compare the percentage breast density between DBT and 2D FFDM. The estimated breast percentage density obtained using DBT and 2D FFDM was examined for correlation with the radiologists' visual BI-RADS density classification. RESULTS: The 2D FFDM differed from DBT by 16.0% in BI-RADS Category 1, by 11.9% in Category 2, by 3.5% in Category 3 and by 18.1% in Category 4. These differences were highly significant (p<0.0001). There was a good correlation between the BI-RADS categories and the density evaluated using 2D FFDM and DBT (r=0.56, p<0.01 and r=0.48, p<0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: Using DBT, breast density values were lower than those obtained using 2D FFDM, with a non-linear relationship across the BI-RADS categories. These data are relevant for clinical practice and research studies using density in determining the risk. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: On DBT, breast density values were lower than with 2D FFDM, with a non-linear relationship across the classical BI-RADS categories.