Does Tumor Size Affect Surgical Outcomes of Transoral Robotic Thyroidectomy for Patients with Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma? A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Transoral robotic thyroidectomy (TORT) for differentiated thyroid carcinoma is increasing in popularity. However, studies are limited to small tumors. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of TORT for papillary thyroid carcinomas smaller than 1 cm and 1 cm or larger. METHODS: The study analyzed 269 patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma who underwent TORT at Korea University Hospital, Korea between January 2001 and December 2017. Surgical outcomes and postoperative complications were compared. RESULTS: Group 1 (tumor < 1 cm) had 215 patients, and group 2 (tumor ≥ 1 cm) had 54 patients. The majority of the patients underwent lobectomy (95.8% in group 1 and 87.0% in group 2; p = 0.339) and unilateral central neck dissection (96.3% in group 1 and 88.9% in group 2; p = 0.024). The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of gender, age, body mass index, thyroiditis status, Da Vinci model. or operative procedure. The majority of the tumors in group 1 (73%) had T1a staging, whereas the majority of the tumors in group 2 were stage T1b or T3a (44.4% in each group; p = 0.000). Most of the patients in group 1 had N0 staging (59.1%), whereas most of the patients in group 2 had N1a staging (55.6%; p = 0.026). The mean operative time was significantly longer in group 2 (198.0 ± 34.2 min in group 1 vs. 215.7 ± 49.3 min in group 2; p = 0.015). The two groups did not differ significantly regarding length of stay, postoperative pain score, or thyroglobulin level. No patients experienced locoregional or distant recurrence. No statistically significant difference in overall complications was observed (p = 0.214). CONCLUSIONS: Transoral robotic thyroidectomy is a safe and effective procedure and may be a feasible option for patients with papillary thyroid carcinomas larger than 1 cm.

Retroperitoneal pelvic packing in the management of hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures: a level I trauma center experience.

BACKGROUND: Our objective is to evaluate the mortality and outcomes of hemodynamically unstable patients with pelvic fractures treated with a protocol that directs the patient to either early pelvic angiography or early retroperitoneal pelvic packing. METHOD: This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected database at a local trauma center. Hemodynamically unstable pelvic fracture patients received treatment according to our hospital protocol during two different time periods. Before June 2008, these patients underwent early angiography (ANGIO group, n=13), and from June 2008 onward, these patients underwent early pelvic packing and subsequent angiography if there was continued hemorrhage from the pelvis (PACKING group, n=11). The mechanism of injury, physiologic parameters, blood transfusion requirements, time to intervention, trauma scores, and mortality were recorded. RESULTS: Mean time to intervention in the ANGIO group was longer than that in the PACKING group, although this was not statistically significant (139.5 minutes vs. 78.8 minutes, respectively, p=0.248). Mortality in the ANGIO group was higher than that in the PACKING group; however, this was also not significant (69.2% vs. 36.3%, p=0.107). After univariate analysis, factors associated with mortality included systolic blood pressure, Glasgow Coma Score, Injury Severity Score, Revised Trauma Score, Trauma and Injury Severity Score, pH, and base excess. In the PACKING group, one patient died of uncontrolled hemorrhage from a liver laceration. In the ANGIO group, three patients died of uncontrolled hemorrhage from the pelvic fracture. CONCLUSION: Early experience in our institution suggests that early pelvic packing with subsequent angiography if needed is as good as angiography with embolization in treating patients with hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures.

Retroperitoneal pelvic packing for haemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures in children and adolescents: a level-one trauma-centre experience.

PURPOSE: This study aims to review the outcomes of haemodynamically unstable paediatric patients with pelvic fractures undergoing protocol intervention of retroperitoneal pelvic packing (RPP) with external fixation and angiography. METHODS: From 2004 to 2011, consecutive patients younger than 19 years treated in our centre for haemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures were retrospectively reviewed. From 2008, protocol intervention triad of external fixation, RPP, and angiography with embolization was implemented. RESULTS: Before 2008, only 2 boys with fall injuries received intervention. One received initial angiography showing extravasation near iliac bifurcation. Laparotomy proceeded without embolization for multiple visceral injuries, but he succumbed postoperatively. The other had persistent bleeding after external fixation but became stabilized after embolization. After 2008 protocol implementation, 5 youngsters received the triad of interventions for unstable pelvic fractures. Mean age was 15.4 yrs. The mean injury severity score was 42 (18-66) with 62.5% mean probability of survival (6.8-98.8%). The mean operating time for RPP was 23 mins (20-35 mins). One boy died of rapid exanguination intraoperatively. The other 4 youngsters recovered for rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: Fall from heights is a major cause for severe pelvic injuries in our locality. RPP is a simple effective procedure to include in protocol intervention for pelvic fractures. This case series suggests it helps improve haemostasis and survival in unstable young patients, although larger cohorts will be necessary to validate this.