Efficacy of the traction method for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: a randomized controlled trial (with videos).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To overcome the technical difficulties associated with gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), a novel traction device that can alter the direction of traction was developed. This study compared the efficacy and safety of conventional ESD versus those of traction-assisted gastric ESD. METHODS: Patients with a single gastric epithelial neoplasm were randomized to receive conventional (n = 75) or traction-assisted (n = 73) gastric ESD. The primary outcome was ESD procedure time. RESULTS: There were no differences between the conventional and traction-assisted groups with respect to treatment results or adverse events. The mean procedure time was similar for both groups (78.9 vs 88.3 minutes, respectively; P = .3); however, times for the traction device tended to be shorter for lesions in the lesser curvature of the upper or middle stomach (84.6 vs 123.2 minutes; P = .057). CONCLUSIONS: Traction-assisted ESD for lesions in the lesser curvature of the upper or middle stomach were shorter, thereby reducing the procedure time of conventional ESD. (Clinical trial registration: University Hospital Medial Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, identifier 000044450.).

Lusutrombopag Reduces the Risk of Hemoperitoneum Caused by Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Compared with Platelet Transfusion.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with liver cirrhosis develop thrombocytopenia and an increased risk of bleeding events after invasive procedures. Lusutrombopag, a thrombopoietin receptor agonist, can increase the platelet count. This study assessed whether lusutrombopag reduces the risk of hemoperitoneum following percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma, compared with platelet transfusion. METHODS: Participants in the present study comprised patients with severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count <50,000/µL) enrolled between November 2012 and March 2020, excluding patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenia or anticoagulant use. Hemoperitoneum rate, hemostasis rate, hemoglobin reduction rate, rate of achieving a platelet count ≥50,000/µL, and increases in platelet count and factors contributing to hemoperitoneum were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: This study enrolled 41 patients, comprising 18 patients administered lusutrombopag and 23 patients who received platelet transfusion. The major hemoperitoneum rate after RFA was tend to be lower in the lusutrombopag group (0%) than in the platelet transfusion group (21.7%). All of the major hemoperitoneum was observed in the platelet transfusion group. Hemoglobin reduction rate was lower in the lusutrombopag group (-0.17%) than in the platelet transfusion group (6.79%, p = 0.013). Hemostasis rate was lower in the lusutrombopag group (0%) than in the platelet transfusion group (21.7%, p = 0.045). The rate of achievement of platelet counts ≥50,000/µL the day after RFA was higher in the lusutrombopag group (100%) than in the platelet transfusion group (60.9%, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Lusutrombopag may be able to perform RFA more safely with respect to the hemoperitoneum caused by percutaneous radiofrequency ablation compared with platelet transfusion.

Endoscopic N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate and ethanolamine oleate injection is equivalent to balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration for preventing gastric variceal bleeding.

OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) is effective for temporary hemostasis, but EIS and balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) have been reported as effective for secondary prophylaxis of gastric varices (GV) bleeding. This study retrospectively compared EIS and BRTO in patients with GV in terms of the efficacy for secondary prevention of GV bleeding and effects on liver function. METHODS: From our database of patients with GV who underwent EIS or BRTO between February 2011 and April 2020, a total of 42 patients with GV were retrospectively enrolled. The primary endpoint was the bleeding rate from GV, which was compared between EIS and BRTO groups. Secondary endpoints were liver function after treatment and rebleeding rate from EV, compared between EIS and BRTO groups. Rebleeding rates from GV and EV and liver function after treatment were also compared between EIS-ethanolamine oleate (EO)/histoacryl (HA) and EIS-HA groups. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved for all EIS cases, but two cases were unsuccessful in the BRTO group and underwent additional EIS. No significant differences in bleeding rates or endoscopic findings for GV improvement were seen between EIS and BRTO groups. Liver function also showed no significant difference in the amount of change after treatment between groups. CONCLUSION: EIS therapy appears effective for GV in terms of preventing GV rebleeding and effects on liver function after treatment. EIS appears to represent an effective treatment for GV.

Multicenter randomized control study of the efficacy of SO clip in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). (SO clip study in colorectal ESD): Randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) allows the en bloc resection of colorectal epithelial tumors regardless of size. Although ESD is minimally invasive and yields favorable outcomes, it is technically difficult and requires a long procedure time. In addition, colorectal ESD is associated with a particularly high risk of complications, due to the thin bowel wall, bowel flexion, and peristalsis.Direct visualization of the submucosal layer by traction of the lesion after mucosal dissection would make ESD performance easier. S-O clips traction lesions toward the lumen, facilitating direct visualization of the submucosal layer, resulting in efficient dissection due to the traction effect and adequate dissection depth. Use of this traction device can contribute to shortening the procedure time and reducing the risk of complications. This multicenter randomized controlled trial will evaluate the usefulness of the S-O clip in colorectal ESD and assess the procedure time and frequency of complications associated with the procedure. METHODS/DESIGN: This multicenter, randomized control trial will enroll 200 patients at 4 hospitals in Japan undergoing ESD for colorectal epithelial tumors. Patients who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomized to undergo ESD using S-O clips or conventional ESD. Patients will be randomized by a computer-generated random sequence with stratification by operator experience (trainee or expert), tumor location (colon/rectum), and institution. The primary endpoint will be ESD procedure time, defined as the time from the start of the local injection into the submucosal layer to the end of dissection. Other outcomes will include the rates of procedural complications, en bloc resection and cure. DISCUSSION: ESD using the S-O clip is expected to shorten procedure time, reduce the incidence of adverse events, and standardize the procedure. This study may resolve clinical questions about whether ESD using the S-O clip traction device is more effective and safer than conventional ESD.

Traction method versus conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasms: A randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an advanced therapeutic technique for en bloc resection of superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms. Although gastric ESD is minimally invasive and provides favorable outcomes, it is technically difficult and requires a long procedure time for dissection. The traction-assisted approach overcomes some of the difficulties of gastric ESD, but its ability to reduce the procedure time remains unclear. The traction-assisted approach using dental floss and a clip did not reduce procedure time in the total population, but it reduced procedure time for lesions limited to the greater curvature of the upper or middle of the stomach. Although the traction direction of the clip-with-line method may be limited to the oral side via the cardia, EndoTrac ESD may provide flexible traction at any time during the procedure. This prospective randomized control study has been designed to compare the efficacy and safety of EndoTrac and conventional gastric ESD. METHODS/DESIGN: This multicenter, randomized control trial will enroll 150 patients at 2 hospitals in Japan undergoing EndoTrac or conventional ESD for gastric epithelial neoplasia. Patients with a single gastric epithelial neoplasm who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomized to EndoTrac or conventional ESD. Patients will be randomized by a computer-generated random sequence with stratification by operator experience, tumor size, tumor location, and institution. The primary endpoint will be ESD procedure time, defined as the time from the start of the submucosal injection to the completion of resection. Other outcomes will include the rates of adverse events and pathological curability. DISCUSSION: The ability of EndoTrac ESD to reduce the long procedure time and/or adverse events observed with conventional ESD can not only reduce physical stress on the patient, but can also reduce length of hospital stay and medical costs. Reduced technical difficulty will contribute to the widespread adoption of this ESD technique worldwide. TRIAL REGISTRATION: University Hospital Medial Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR), ID: 000044450; Registered on June 6, 2021.https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000050485. PROTOCOL VERSION NUMBER: 1.1, March 1, 2022. Patient enrolment began on June 6, 2021 and is expected to be completed by July 19, 2025.

Migration of a pancreatic duct stent into the peritoneal cavity during chemotherapy for pancreatic malignant lymphoma.

A 68-year-old man with epigastric pain was admitted for acute pancreatitis and obstructive jaundice caused by Primary pancreatic malignant lymphoma. Computed tomography showed diffuse enlargement of the whole pancreas and dilation of the main pancreatic duct and bile duct. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was performed to decompress these dilated ducts. After two courses of chemotherapy, follow-up computed tomography incidentally revealed migration of the pancreatic duct stent, which had perforated the contralateral duodenal wall to enter the peritoneal cavity. In the present case, pancreatic duct stent deviation was attributed to tumor shrinkage resulting from chemotherapy. In addition, stent migration into the peritoneal cavity occurred due to repeated mechanical manipulation of the pancreatic duct stent, presumably leading to partial ulceration of the duodenal wall and delayed wound healing during chemotherapy. This case may provide valuable information on the migration of pancreatic duct stents as a rare, stent-related late complication during chemotherapy.

Migration of a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrojejunostomy Tube into the Colon with Small Intestinal Telescoping.

Continuous duodenal levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel delivery by a gastrostomy infusion system improves control of Parkinson's disease. The overall complication rates of percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy were reported to be 41% and 59% for immediate and delayed adverse events, respectively. A 72-year-old woman underwent percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy using the delivery system noted above. Abdominal pain and vomiting occurred 3 months later. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy showed a longitudinal ulcer extending from the lower gastric body to the ileum end, with small intestinal telescoping. Colonoscopy showed a large bezoar of food residue that was attached around the tip of the tube, reaching the ascending colon, which may have acted as an anchor. Thus, the gastric antrum and small intestine were shortened with telescoping. This complication was resolved by crushing the bezoar with forceps during colonoscopy and can be prevented by consuming a fiber-free diet and periodic exchanges of the tube using esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

The Real-World Safety and Efficacy of Daclatasvir and Asunaprevir for Elderly Patients.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although daclatasvir with asunaprevir was approved in Japan for interferon ineligible or intolerant patients, patients aged ≥75 years were excluded in the phase III trial. The present study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this therapy for elderly patients aged ≥75 years and to clarify whether an extremely high sustained virological response (SVR) rate can be achieved, even in a real-world setting when patients with resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) to nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A) inhibitors or prior simeprevir failure are excluded. METHODS: Daclatasvir (60 mg) and asunaprevir (100 mg) were orally administered daily for 24 weeks. Patients without pre-existing NS5A RASs and simeprevir failure were enrolled in this study. RESULTS: Overall, 110 patients were treated. The median age was 73 years old. The SVR rates of total patients, those aged ≥75 years, and those aged ＜75 years were 97% (107/110), 98% (46/47), and 97% (61/63), respectively. The treatment of two patients (2%) was discontinued because of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Daclatasvir with asunaprevir was a safe treatment, even in patients aged ≥75 years. When patients without pre-existing NS5A RASs and prior simeprevir failure were selected, an extremely high SVR rate could be achieved irrespective of age.