Clinical Efficacy of Pre-Hospital Electrocardiogram Transmission in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Rapid reperfusion by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) is an established strategy for the treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Pre-hospital electrocardiogram (PH-ECG) transmission by the emergency medical services (EMS) facilitates timely reperfusion in these patients. However, evidence regarding the clinical benefits of PH-ECG in individual hospitals is limited.This retrospective, observational study investigated the clinical efficacy of PH-ECG in STEMI patients who underwent pPCI. Of a total of 382 consecutive STEMI patients, 237 were enrolled in the study and divided into 2 groups: a PH-ECG group (n = 77) and non-PH-ECG group (n = 160). Door-to-balloon time (D2BT) was significantly shorter in the PH-ECG group (66 [52-80] min), compared to the non-PH-ECG group (70 [57-88] minutes, P = 0.01). The 30-day all-cause mortality rate was 6% in the PH-ECG group, which was significantly lower than that in the non-PH-ECG group (16%) (P = 0.037, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.15-0.98). This trend was particularly evident in severely ill patients when stratified by GRACE score.The use of PH-ECG improved the survival rate of STEMI patients undergoing pPCI due to the improved pre-arrival preparation based on the EMS information. Coordination between EMS and PCI-capable institutes is essential for the management of PH-ECG.

Effects of glycemic control on in-hospital mortality among acute heart failure patients with reduced, mid-range, and preserved ejection fraction.

The relationship between glycemic control and outcome in patients with heart failure (HF) remains contentious. A recent study showed that patients with HF with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) more frequently had comorbid diabetes relative to other patients. Herein, we examined the association between glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and in-hospital mortality in acute HF patients with reduced, mid-range, and preserved EF. A multicenter retrospective study was conducted on 5205 consecutive patients with acute HF. Potential risk factors for in-hospital mortality were selected by univariate analyses; then, multivariate Cox regression analysis with backward stepwise selection was performed to identify significant factors. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank testing were used to compare in-hospital mortality between groups. Across the study cohort, 44% (2288 patients) had reduced EF, 20% had mid-range EF, and 36% had preserved EF. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 4.6%, with no significant differences among the HF patients with reduced, mid-range, and preserved EF groups. For patients with HFmrEF, higher HbA1c level was a significant risk factor for in-hospital mortality (hazard ratio 1.387; 95% confidence interval 1.014-1.899; P = 0.041). In contrast, HbA1c was not an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality in HF patients with preserved or reduced EF. In conclusion, HbA1c is an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality in acute HF patients with mid-range EF, but not in those with preserved or reduced EF. Elucidation of the pathophysiological mechanisms behind these findings could facilitate the development of more effective individualized therapies for acute HF.

Impact of Indoxyl Sulfate on Coronary Plaques in Patients on Hemodialysis.

Serum indoxyl sulfate (IS; a uremic toxin) levels, which are significantly higher in patients with chronic kidney disease, including those undergoing hemodialysis, than in the robust, are associated with both cardiovascular disease (CVD) and CVD-related mortality. Furthermore, coronary artery calcium (CAC) is an independent predictor of cardiovascular events in patients undergoing hemodialysis. This study aimed to interpret the association between serum IS levels and coronary plaque burden (CPB) or CAC.A total of 30 consecutive patients on hemodialysis, who underwent 320-row coronary multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) angiography for suspected coronary artery disease, were enrolled in this prospective study. Coronary artery percent atheroma volume (a CPB marker) and percent calcium volume (a CAC marker) assessed using MDCT were evaluated. Furthermore, various oxidative and inflammatory markers typified by serum IS levels at a dialysis-free day were measured. Using these data, we investigated correlation between the inflammatory marker IS and CPB or CAC.Multivariable analysis indicated that serum IS levels were positively correlated with CAC [partial regression coefficient, 2.89; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.35-5.43; P = 0.03] but not with CPB, even after adjustment for cofounders. Composite cardiovascular events, namely, as all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, disabling stroke, and hospital admission for other cardiovascular events, were reported to be 50% in all patients (95% CI, 32.1-67.9).In patients undergoing hemodialysis, serum IS levels were significantly associated with CAC but not with CPB.

Association of Dyslipidemia and Sex With Coronary Artery Calcium Assessed by Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography.

Previous studies reporting that statin increases coronary artery calcium (CAC) were conducted exclusively on patients with statin as a prevention, regardless of the presence or absence of dyslipidemia. The impact of sex on CAC has not been fully evaluated. We aimed to determine the association of dyslipidemia and sex with CAC using 320-row multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT).Of the 356 consecutive patients who underwent coronary MDCT, 251 patients were enrolled, after excluding those with prior stenting and/or coronary bypass grafting or images showing motion artifacts. The primary outcome measures were the percent calcium volume (PCV) and percent atheroma volume (PAV) per coronary vessel.Multivariable analyses indicated that PCV was significantly higher in dyslipidemia patients without statins than in the subjects without dyslipidemia [partial regression coefficient (PRC): 2.59, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83 to 4.34, P = 0.004]. In contrast, PCV was similar in dyslipidemia patients taking statins and those without dyslipidemia (PRC: -1.09, 95% CI: -2.82 to 0.65, P = 0.22). There was no significant difference in PCV between men and women, although women exhibited a significantly lower PAV (PRC: -2.87, 95% CI: -4.54 to -1.20, P = 0.001).In low-risk patients, these results could be translated into hypotheses, which should be tested in future prospective studies. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in CAC between men and women, but women had lower PAV than men.

Effects of Long-Acting Loop Diuretics in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction Patients With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

There have been no reports evaluating the impact of long-acting loop diuretics (LLD) on the outcome of heart failure (HF) and arrhythmia treatment in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients implanted with a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device.This was a prospective, single-blind, randomized crossover study. We allocated 21 consecutive CRT implanted patients into 2 groups. The furosemide group received furosemide as a first treatment and azosemide as a second treatment. The azosemide group received this treatment in the reverse order. The first treatment was given to each group for 6 months and the second treatment continued for an additional 6 months. We combined the data of each medication regimen in each group and analyzed it at baseline, 6 months, and 1 year. The primary endpoints were the variation of fluid index and thoracic impedance measured by CRT at 6 months.The baseline characteristics were similar for both groups. The difference in the primary endpoints was not statistically significant between the 2 medication arms (fluid index: -29.6 ± 64.4 versus 16.2 ± 48.2; P = 0.22, thoracic impedance: -0.49 ± 17.8 versus 2.45 ± 12.5; P = 0.56). Likewise, the clinical outcome of HF and the CRT derived parameters in both arms were comparable.HFrEF patients taking LLD after CRT implantation might be comparable to those taking short-acting loop diuretics in the treatment of HF and HF-associated arrhythmias.

Correlation of Pre- and In-Hospital Systolic Blood Pressure in Acute Heart Failure Patients and the Prognostic Implications　- Report From the Tokyo Cardiac Care Unit Network Emergency Medical Service Database.

BACKGROUND: Systolic blood pressure (SBP) is an important prognostic indicator for patients with acute heart failure (AHF). However, its changes and the effects in the different phases of the acute management process are not well known.Methods and Results:The Tokyo CCU Network prospectively collects on-site information about AHF from emergency medical services (EMS) and the emergency room (ER). The association between in-hospital death and SBP at 2 different time points (on-site SBP [measured by EMS] and in-hospital SBP [measured at the ER; ER-SBP]) was analyzed. From 2010 to 2012, a total of 5,669 patients were registered and stratified into groups according to both their on-site SBP and ER-SBP: >160 mmHg; 100-160 mmHg; and <100 mmHg. In-hospital mortality rates increased when both on-site SBP and ER-SBP were low. After multivariate adjustment, both SBPs were inversely associated with in-hospital death. Notably, the risk for patients with ER-SBP of 100-160 mmHg (intermediate risk) differed according to their on-site SBP; those with on-site SBP <100 or 100-160 mmHg were at higher risk (OR, 7.39; 95% CI, 4.00-13.6 and OR, 2.73; 95% CI, 1.83-4.08, respectively [P<0.001 for both]) than patients with on-site SBP >160 mmHg. CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring changes in SBP assisted risk stratification of AHF patients, particularly patients with intermediate ER-SBP measurements. (Circ J 2016; 80: 2473-2481).

Validation of a New Scoring Method to Assess the Efficacy of Rapid Initiation and Titration of Combination Pharmacotherapy for Patients Hospitalized with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure with Reduced and Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Background: Despite the encouragement of early initiation and titration of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for the treatment of heart failure (HF), most patients do not receive an adequate type and dose of pharmacotherapy in the real world. Objectives: This study aimed to determine the efficacy of titrating composite GDMT in patients with HF with reduced and mildly reduced ejection fraction and to identify patient conditions that may benefit from titration of GDMT. Methods: This was a two-center, retrospective study of consecutive patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Patients were classified into two groups according to a scoring scale determined by combination and doses of four types of HF agents (ACEis/ARBs/ARNis, BBs, MRAs, and SGLT2is) at discharge. A score of 5 or greater was defined as titrated GDMT, and a score of 4 or less was regarded as sub-optimal medical therapy (MT). Results: A total of 979 ADHF patients were screened. After 553 patients were excluded based on exclusion criteria, 426 patients (90 patients in the titrated GDMT group and 336 patients in the sub-optimal MT group) were enrolled for the analysis. The median follow-up period was 612 (453-798) days. Following statistical adjustment using the propensity score weighting method, the 2-year composite endpoint (composite of cardiac death and HF rehospitalization) rate was significantly lower in the titrated GDMT group, at 19%, compared with the sub-optimal MT group: 31% (score 3-4 points) and 43% (score 0-2 points). Subgroup analysis indicated a marked benefit of titrated GDMT in particular patient subgroups: age < 80 years, BMI 19.0-24.9, eGFR > 20 mL/min/1.73 m2, and serum potassium level ≤ 5.5 mmol/L. Conclusions: Prompt initiation and dose adjustment of multiple HF medications, with careful monitoring of the patient's physiologic and laboratory values, is a prerequisite for improving the prognosis of patients with heart failure.

Incidence and predictors for late target lesion revascularization after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation.

BACKGROUND: In long-term follow-up after drug-eluting stents (DES) implantation, late target lesion revascularization (TLR) is occasionally required. However, the incidence and predictors for late TLR with DES have not been fully investigated. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between August 2004 and March 2005, 249 consecutive patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) at our institution. Angiographic follow-up data were obtained in 228 patients (91.6%) with 274 lesions (91.6%) at 8 months. TLR incidence was evaluated up to 5 years. The 5-year clinical follow-up data were obtained in 222 patients (97.4%) with 264 lesions (96.4%). The incidence of early TLR before 1 year was 16.7%, and that of late TLR (1-5 years) was 8.3% (2.1% per year). Multivariate analysis indicated that significant predictors for late TLR were insulin-treated diabetes mellitus (DM) (odds ratio (OR) 10.88, P=0.001), stent fracture (OR 27.24, P=0.012), and age (OR 0.94, P=0.026). No association was observed between late TLR and lesion characteristics, including parameters measured by quantitative coronary angiography other than stent fracture, at baseline, post procedure, and follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Late TLR after SES implantation occurred in approximately 2.1% of lesions per year after the first year without attenuation up to 5 years. Significant predictors for late TLR were insulin-treated DM, stent fracture and younger age. Careful long-term follow-up after SES implantation might be recommended.

Efficacy of everolimus eluting stent implantation in patients with calcified coronary culprit lesions: two-year angiographic and three-year clinical results from the SPIRIT II study.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the impact of treatment with drug-eluting stents (DES) on calcified coronary lesions. This analysis sought to assess the safety and efficacy of the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting stent (EES) in patients with calcified or noncalcified culprit lesions. METHODS: The study population consisted of 212 patients with 247 lesions, who were treated with EES alone. Target lesions were angiographically classified as none/mild, moderate, or severe grades of calcification. The population was divided into two groups: those with at least one target lesion moderately or severely calcified (the calcified group: 68 patients with 75 calcified lesions) and those with all target lesions having mild or no calcification (the noncalcified group: 144 patients). Six-month and 2-year angiographic follow-up and clinical follow-up up to 3 years were completed. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics were not significantly different between both groups. When compared with the noncalcified group, the calcified group had significantly higher rates of 6-month in-stent angiographic binary restenosis (ABR, 4.3% vs. 0%, P = 0.03) and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR, 5.9% vs. 0%, P = 0.01), resulting in numerically higher major cardiac adverse events (MACE, 5.9% vs. 1.4%, P = 0.09). At 2 years, when compared with the noncalcified group, the calcified group presented higher in-stent ABR (7.4% vs. 0%, P = 0.08) and ID-TLR (7.8% vs. 1.5%, P = 0.03), resulting in numerically higher MACE (10.9% vs. 4.4%, P = 0.12). At 3 years, ID-TLR tended to be higher in the calcified group than in the noncalcified group (8.6% vs. 2.4%, P = 0.11), resulting in numerically higher MACE (12.1% vs. 4.7%, P = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: The MACE rates in patients treated with EES for calcified lesions were higher than in those for noncalcified lesions, but remained lower than the results of previously reported stent studies. EES implantation in patients with calcified culprit lesions was safe and associated with favorable reduction of restenosis and repeat revascularization. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

MAHOROBA, first-in-man study: 6-month results of a biodegradable polymer sustained release tacrolimus-eluting stent in de novo coronary stenoses.

AIMS: To report the 4-month angiographic and 6-month clinical follow-up in first-in-man study using the tacrolimus-eluting bioabsorbable polymer-coated cobalt-chromium MAHOROBA stent. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 47 patients with either stable angina or unstable angina, or silent myocardial ischaemia, based on a de novo coronary stenosis that could be covered by a single 18 mm stent in a native coronary artery with a diameter between 3.0 and 3.5 mm were enrolled at three sites. The primary endpoint was in-stent late loss at 4 months. The secondary endpoints include %volume obstruction of the stents assessed by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) at 4 months and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 6 months. Forty-seven patients were enrolled. Procedural success was achieved in 97.9%. At 4-month follow-up, in-stent late loss was 0.99 +/- 0.46 mm, whereas in-stent %volume obstruction in IVUS was 34.8 +/- 15.8%. At 6 months, there were no deaths, but 2 patients suffered from a myocardial infarction and 11 patients required ischaemia-driven repeat revascularization. The composite MACE rate was 23.4%. CONCLUSION: This tacrolimus-eluting stent failed to prevent neointimal hyperplasia, despite the theoretical advantages of the tacrolimus, which has less inhibitory effects on endothelial cells than smooth muscle cells.

Safety and efficacy of uninterrupted treatment with edoxaban or warfarin during the peri-procedural period of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: The real-world safety and efficacy of uninterrupted anticoagulation treatment with edoxaban (EDX) or warfarin (WFR) during the peri-procedural period of catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) are yet to be investigated. METHODS: We conducted a two-center experience, observational study to retrospectively investigate consecutive patients who underwent CA for AF and received EDX or WFR. We examined the incidence of thromboembolic and bleeding complications during the peri-procedural period. RESULTS: The EDX and WFR groups included 153 and 103 patients, respectively (total: 256 patients). Demise or thromboembolic events did not occur in either of the groups. The incidence of major bleeding in the EDX and WFR groups was 0.7% and 2.9%, respectively. The total incidence of major/minor bleeding in the EDX and WFR groups was 7.8% and 8.7%, respectively. Of note, the incidence of bleeding complications in the uninterrupted WFR strategy group was markedly high in patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 (75%) or a HAS-BLED score ≥3 (60%). Patients with eGFR ≥30 and a HAS-BLED score ≤2 had a lower incidence of bleeding (<10%), regardless of the administered anticoagulation drug (EDX or WFR). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the safety and efficacy of uninterrupted anticoagulation therapy using EDX or WFR in real-world patients undergoing CA for AF. Patients with severely impaired renal function and/or a higher bleeding risk during uninterrupted therapy with WFR were at a prominent risk of bleeding. Therefore, particular attention should be paid in the treatment of these patients.

Clinical and angiographic outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention with sirolimus-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention for hemodialysis patients has been hampered by the high rate of adverse cardiac events. Our aim was to investigate whether sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) improve clinical outcomes of hemodialysis patients compared with bare-metal stents (BMSs). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 123 consecutive patients on hemodialysis therapy treated with either an SES or BMS. There were 56 patients with 68 lesions treated with SESs between August 2004 and April 2006 (SES group) and 67 patients with 71 lesions treated with BMSs 4 years before approval of SESs in Japan (BMS group). PREDICTOR: SES and BMS implantation for hemodialysis patients with coronary artery disease. OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS: Follow-up angiography was performed at 6 to 8 months and clinical follow-up was obtained at 9 months after the procedure. Late lumen loss and major adverse cardiac events, including all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and target-lesion revascularization, were investigated. RESULTS: Clinical follow-up was obtained in all patients. Angiographic follow-up was obtained in 50 patients (89.3%) in the SES group and 50 patients (74.6%) in the BMS group. The SES group had more complex lesions than the BMS group. Quantitative angiographic analysis showed a significant difference for in-stent late lumen loss (SES, 0.62 +/- 0.75 mm; BMS, 1.07 +/- 0.75 mm; P = 0.003). Of angiographic restenosis lesions analyzed, a focal restenotic pattern was observed more frequently in the SES group than the BMS group (SES, 87.5%; BMS, 23.8%; P < 0.001). The rate of major adverse cardiac events was significantly lower in the SES group (n = 14; 25.0%) than the BMS group (n = 26; 38.9%; log-rank P = 0.02). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study design, small sample size, and a single-center study. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and angiographic data in the present study suggest that SESs are more effective than BMSs in hemodialysis patients.

Different prognostic associations of beta-blockers and diuretics in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction with versus without high blood pressure.

OBJECTIVE: No agents have been proven to improve survival in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but the phenotypic diversity of HFpEF suggests it may be possible to identify specific HFpEF phenotypes that will benefit from certain treatments. This study compared the risk factors for and prognostic impacts of treatments on in-hospital mortality between HFpEF patients with (+) and without (-) high blood pressure (HBP). METHODS: Data on 2238 consecutive HFpEF patients were extracted from Tokyo CCU Network data registry and analysed. HFpEF was defined as an ejection fraction greater than or equal to 50%; HBP was defined as elevated systolic blood pressure (>140 mmHg) at admission. Potential risk factors for in-hospital mortality were selected by univariate analyses and those with P < 0.10 were used in multivariate Cox regression analysis with forward selection (likelihood ratio) to identify significant factors. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was significantly lower for HFpEF + HBP than HFpEF - HBP patients (log-rank, P < 0.001). Independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality in HFpEF + HBP patients were older age (hazard ratio 1.069) and in-hospital treatment without beta-blockers (hazard ratio 7.946), whereas older age (hazard ratio 1.035), higher C-reactive protein (hazard ratio 1.047), higher B-type natriuretic peptide (hazard ratio 1.000) and in-hospital treatment without diuretics (hazard ratio 4.201) were identified as independent risk factors in HFpEF - HBP patients. CONCLUSION: There were significant differences in prognostic factors, including beta-blocker and diuretic treatments, for in-hospital mortality between HFpEF patients with and without HBP. These findings suggest possible individualized therapies for patients with HFpEF.

A novel approach for quantitative analysis of intracoronary optical coherence tomography: high inter-observer agreement with computer-assisted contour detection.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine observer-related variability of quantitative optical coherence tomography (OCT) derived measurements from both in vitro and in vivo pullback data. BACKGROUND: Intravascular OCT is a new imaging modality using infrared light and offering 10 times higher image resolution (15 microm) compared to intravascular ultrasound. The quantitative analysis of in vivo intracoronary OCT imaging is complicated by the presence of blood, motion artifacts and the large quantity of information that has to be processed. METHODS: We developed a standardized, automated quantification process for intracoronary OCT pullback data with inter-observer variability assessed both in vitro by using postmortem human coronary arteries and in vivo by studying simple and complex coronary pathology and outcomes following stent implantation. The consensus between measurements by two observers was analyzed using the intraclass and interclass correlation coefficient and the reliability coefficients. Bland-Altman plots were generated to assess the relationship between variability and absolute measurements. RESULTS: In vitro OCT assessment was performed in nine postmortem coronary arteries. The time needed for semiautomated contour detection of a 15-mm long coronary segment was approximately 40 min. The absolute and relative difference between lumen area measurements derived from two observers was low [0.02 +/- 0.10 mm(2); (0.3 +/- 0.5)% respectively] with excellent correlation confirmed by linear regression analysis (R(2) = 0.99; P < 0.001). Similarly, in vivo measurements demonstrated a high correlation with the main source of inter-observer variation occurring as a result of coronary dissection and motion artifact. The absolute and relative difference between measurements were 0.11 +/- 0.33 mm(2) (1.57 +/- 0.05)% for lumen area (R(2) = 0.98; P < 0.001), 0.17 +/- 0.68 mm(2) (1.44 +/- 0.08)% for stent area (R(2) = 0.94; P < 0.001), and 0.26 +/- 0.72 mm(2) (14.08 +/- 0.37)% for neointimal area (R(2) = 0.78; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Highly accurate computer-assisted quantitative analysis ofintracoronary OCT pullbacks is feasible with low inter-observer variability. The presented approach allows for observer independent analysis of detailed vessel structures, and may be a valuable tool for future longitudinal studies incorporating OCT.

Impact of Triggering Events on Outcomes of Acute Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: The onset of acute heart failure is known to be associated with increased physical activity and other specific behaviors that can trigger hemodynamic deterioration. This analysis aimed to describe the distribution of triggers in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure, and investigate their effects on in-hospital outcomes. METHODS: Consecutive patients hospitalized for acute heart failure between 2010 and 2014 were registered in a multicenter data registration system (72 institutions within Tokyo, Japan). Baseline demographics and in-hospital mortality were extracted from 17,473 patients. Patients with a trigger were grouped based on their triggering event: those with onset during (a) physical activity; (b) sleeping; (c) eating or watching television; (d) bathing or excretion (use of restrooms); and (e) engaging in other activities. These patients were compared with patients without identifiable triggers. Multiple imputation was used for missing data. RESULTS: Patients were predominantly men (57.1%), with a mean age of 76.0 ± 13.0 years; a triggering event was present in 49.1%. No significant difference in baseline characteristics was noted between groups except for younger age, higher blood pressure, and prevalence of signs of congestion in the trigger-positive group. In-hospital mortality rate was 7.9%. Presence of triggers was positively associated with a reduced risk of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.70-0.90; P = .0003). In a delta-adjusted pattern mixture model, the effect of a triggering event on in-hospital mortality remained consistently significant. CONCLUSION: Triggering events for acute heart failure can provide additional information for risk prediction. Efforts to identify the triggers should be made to classify patients according to risk group.

Impact of stent type and prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy on long-term clinical outcomes in hemodialysis patients with coronary artery disease.

The aim of this study was to address 7-year clinical outcomes and impact of prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after coronary stenting in hemodialysis patients. Our study included 123 consecutive hemodialysis patients who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention with a drug-eluting stent (DES) or bare-metal stent (BMS) (DES: 64, BMS: 59) in our institution. We compared long-term clinical outcomes following DES with BMS implantation as well as clinical outcomes in patients on DAPT for ≥1 year (DAPT on group, 89) with those on DAPT for <1 year (DAPT off group, 34). We evaluated bleeding events and major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and stent thrombosis. At 1 year after stenting, the incidence of MACE was significantly lower in the DES group than in the BMS group (DES versus BMS: 33.2 versus 51.8%; p = 0.045). However, this advantage of DES disappeared by the 7th year (DES versus BMS: 66.0 versus 70.0%; p = 0.42). The cumulative incidence of MACE beyond 1 year was significantly higher in the DAPT on group than in the DAPT off group (DAPT on versus DAPT off: 51.3 versus 18.5%; p = 0.047). The bleeding events in the DAPT on group were 5.1 times greater than in the DAPT off group (DAPT on versus DAPT off: 16.4 versus 3.2%; p = 0.06). Use of DES and prolonged DAPT did not improve 7-year clinical outcomes in hemodialysis patients with coronary artery disease.

Mismatch between right- and left-sided filling pressures in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: Mismatch between right- and left-sided filling pressures is poorly understood in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively analyzed 170 patients with HFpEF (EF≥40%) who underwent right heart catheterization. Low match (right atrial pressure [RAP] < 10 mm Hg and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure [PCWP] < 22 mm Hg) was 76%, high match (RAP ≥ 10 mm Hg and PCWP ≥ 22 mm Hg) was 6.5%, high-R mismatch (RAP ≥ 10 mm Hg and PCWP < 22 mm Hg) was 12%, and high-L mismatch (RAP < 10 mm Hg and PCWP ≥ 22 mm Hg) was 5.9%. Elevated PCWP was a significant predictor of the composite endpoint of death or HF hospitalization within 12months (hazard ratio 5.40, 95% confidence interval 2.17-12.5, p<0.001). Elevated RAP was not significantly associated with worse outcomes. Pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) and diastolic pressure (PADP) showed strong correlations with PCWP (PASP, r=0.738, p<0.001; PADP, r=0.834, p<0.001; RAP, r=0.638, p<0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Discordance exists between right- and left-sided filling pressures in HFpEF. Physicians may utilize pulmonary artery pressure to evaluate left-sided filling pressure, which is a significant predictor of prognosis.

Hemodynamic correlates of nutritional indexes in heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition in heart failure (HF) is related to altered intestinal function, which could be due to hemodynamic changes. We investigated the usefulness of novel nutritional indexes in relation to hemodynamic parameters. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 139 HF patients with reduced ejection fraction who underwent right heart catheterization. We investigated correlations between right side pressures and nutritional indexes, which include controlling nutritional (CONUT) score and geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to investigate the prognostic accuracy of CONUT score and GNRI for a composite of death or HF hospitalization in 12 months. Logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate whether hemodynamic correlates were associated with malnutrition, which was defined based on CONUT sore or GNRI. RESULTS: Higher right side pressures were positively correlated with worse nutritional status according to CONUT score, but were negatively correlated with worse nutritional status according to GNRI. Area under ROC curve for the composite endpoint was 0.746 in CONUT score and 0.576 in GNRI. The composite endpoint occurred in 40% of CONUT score≥3 and in 11% of CONUT score<3 (p<0.001). These relationships were also investigated with GNRI (40% of GNRI<95 vs. 17% of GNRI≥95, p=0.002). In multivariate analysis, higher right atrial pressure was significantly associated with higher CONUT score, while no hemodynamic parameter was related to GNRI. CONCLUSIONS: CONUT score was associated with right side congestion, while no association between GNRI and right side congestion was noted. CONUT score had better predictive value than GNRI.

Identifying novel phenotypes of acute heart failure using cluster analysis of clinical variables.

BACKGROUND: Acute heart failure (AHF) is a heterogeneous disease caused by various cardiovascular (CV) pathophysiology and multiple non-CV comorbidities. We aimed to identify clinically important subgroups to improve our understanding of the pathophysiology of AHF and inform clinical decision-making. METHODS: We evaluated detailed clinical data of 345 consecutive AHF patients using non-hierarchical cluster analysis of 77 variables, including age, sex, HF etiology, comorbidities, physical findings, laboratory data, electrocardiogram, echocardiogram and treatment during hospitalization. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to estimate the association between the clusters and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Three clusters were identified. Cluster 1 (n=108) represented "vascular failure". This cluster had the highest average systolic blood pressure at admission and lung congestion with type 2 respiratory failure. Cluster 2 (n=89) represented "cardiac and renal failure". They had the lowest ejection fraction (EF) and worst renal function. Cluster 3 (n=148) comprised mostly older patients and had the highest prevalence of atrial fibrillation and preserved EF. Death or HF hospitalization within 12-month occurred in 23% of Cluster 1, 36% of Cluster 2 and 36% of Cluster 3 (p=0.034). Compared with Cluster 1, risk of death or HF hospitalization was 1.74 (95% CI, 1.03-2.95, p=0.037) for Cluster 2 and 1.82 (95% CI, 1.13-2.93, p=0.014) for Cluster 3. CONCLUSIONS: Cluster analysis may be effective in producing clinically relevant categories of AHF, and may suggest underlying pathophysiology and potential utility in predicting clinical outcomes.

Comparison of three-year clinical outcome of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents versus bare metal stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (from the RESEARCH and T-SEARCH Registries).

Sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) recently proved to be superior to bare metal stents (BMSs) in decreasing the need for repeat revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) at 1 year. Whether this also holds for paclitaxel-eluting stents (PESs) is currently unclear and the long-term relatively efficacy of the 2 drug-eluting stents is currently unknown. We investigated the 3-year efficacy of SESs and PESs versus BMSs in patients with STEMI. Primary angioplasty was performed in a consecutive group of 505 patients (BMSs in 183, SESs in 186, PESs in 136). At 3 years, the cumulative mortality rate was comparable in the 3 groups: 13.3% in the BMS group, 11.5% in the SES group, and 12.4% in the PES group (nonsignificant for all). The rate of target vessel revascularization (TVR) was 12.0% in the BMS group compared with 8.0% and 7.7% in the SES and PES groups, respectively (p = 0.12 for BMS vs SES, 0.30 for BMS vs PES, 0.62 for SES vs PES). The cumulative incidence of death, MI, or TVR was 25.5% in the BMS group compared with 17.9% and 20.6% in the SES and PES groups, respectively (p = 0.06 for BMS vs SES, 0.32 for BMS vs PES, 0.45 for SES vs PES). Angiographic stent thrombosis occurred in 2.4% of all patients (BMS 1.6%, SES 2.7%, PES 2.9%). In conclusion, in this relatively small consecutive patient cohort, the use of SESs and PESs was no longer associated with significantly lower rates of TVR and major adverse cardiace events in patients with STEMI after 3 years of follow-up. A high frequency of stent thrombosis was observed in the 2 drug-eluting stent groups.