Variation in physician-patient discussion of breast reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: For women with early stage breast cancer, physician-patient discussion of breast reconstruction is an essential step in their participation in the decision-making process for their treatments. This study examines sociodemographic variation of physician-patient discussion of breast reconstruction and explores the impact of this discussion on the use of breast reconstruction. METHODS: We used data from the Los Angeles Women's Study, a population-based study of women 50 years and older with breast cancer. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to estimate the impact of patient and hospital characteristics on self-reported receipt of physician-patient discussion and use of breast reconstruction. RESULTS: Of 315 post-mastectomy women, 81% and 27% reported physician-patient discussion and use of breast reconstruction, respectively. In multivariable analysis, women with an annual income <$20,000 were less likely to have physician-patient discussion than women with annual income > or =$40,000 (OR = 0.23, 95% CI 0.07-0.82). Among the subset of women with physician-patient discussion, chest wall radiation, a known characteristic associated with higher rates of reconstruction complications, became an additional significant negative predictor of reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Lower income women are at risk of not receiving physician-patient discussion of breast reconstruction. Physician-patient discussion of breast reconstruction appears to decrease the use of breast reconstruction among women with clinical characteristics associated with higher rates of reconstruction complications and failure. This highlights the need for interventions to increase physician-patient discussion of breast reconstruction among lower income women.

BRCA mutations and the risk of angiosarcoma after breast cancer treatment.

Post-breast cancer treatment-related angiosarcomas were first observed in lymphedematous extremities after mastectomy and are now being reported with increasing frequency after lumpectomy and radiation. A case history is presented of a BRCA2 carrier who had a postmastectomy chest wall angiosarcoma but had neither therapeutic radiation nor clinically evident lymphedema. The absence of established risk factors led to speculation that the BRCA2 germline mutation could be a causative factor in the development of this patient's angiosarcoma. A literature review supported this concept.

Multiagent chemotherapy and deferred radiotherapy in infants with malignant brain tumors: a report from the Children's Cancer Group.

PURPOSE: To evaluate response rate, event-free survival (EFS), and toxicity of two chemotherapeutic regimens for treatment of children younger than 36 months with malignant brain tumors and to estimate control intervals without irradiation in children with no residual tumor after initial surgery and induction chemotherapy and with delayed irradiation in patients with residual tumor or metastatic disease at diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to one of two regimens of induction chemotherapy (vincristine, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide v vincristine, carboplatin, ifosfamide, and etoposide). Maintenance chemotherapy began after induction in children without progressive disease. Children with no residual tumors after induction therapy and no metastatic disease at diagnosis were not to receive radiation therapy unless their tumors progressed. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-nine infants were enrolled. Forty-two percent of patients responded to induction chemotherapy. At 5 years from study entry, the EFS rate was 27% +/- 3%, and the survival rate was 43% +/- 3%. There was no significant difference between the two arms in terms of response rate or EFS. For medulloblastoma, supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumor, ependymoma, and rhabdoid tumors, 5-year EFS rates were 32% +/- 5%, 17% +/- 6%, and 32% +/- 6%, and 14% +/- 7%, respectively. Fifty-eight percent of patients who were alive 5 years after study entry had not received radiation therapy. CONCLUSION: Intensified induction chemotherapy resulted in a high response rate of malignant brain tumors in infants. Survival was comparable to that of previous studies, and most patients who survived did not receive radiation therapy.

Can patient comorbidities be included in clinical performance measures for radiation oncology?

PURPOSE: Patient comorbidities may affect the applicability of performance measures that are inherent in multidisciplinary cancer treatment guidelines. This article describes the distribution of common comorbid conditions by disease site and by patient and facility characteristics in patients who received radiation therapy as part of treatment for cancer of the breast, cervix, lung, prostate, and stomach, and investigates the association of comorbidities with treatment decisions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Stratified two-stage cluster sampling provided a random sample of radiation oncology facilities. Eligible patients were randomly sampled from each participating facility for each disease site, and data were abstracted from medical records. The Adult Comorbidity Evaluation Index (ACE-27) was used to measure comorbid conditions and their severity. National estimates were calculated using SUDAAN statistical software. RESULTS: Multivariable logistic regression models predicted the dependent variable "treatment changed or contraindicated due to comorbidities." The final model showed that ACE-27 was highly associated with change in treatment for patients with severe or moderate index values compared to those with none or mild (P < .001). Two other covariates, age and medical coverage, had no (age) or little (medical coverage) significant contribution to predicting treatment change in the multivariable model. Disease site was associated with treatment change after adjusting for other covariates in the model. CONCLUSIONS: ACE-27 is highly predictive of treatment modifications for patients treated for these cancers who receive radiation as part of their care. A standardized tool identifying patients who should be excluded from clinical performance measures allows more accurate use of these measures.

Treatment recommendations for locally advanced, non-small-cell lung cancer: the influence of physician and patient factors.

PURPOSE: To determine the impact of patient age, comorbidity, and physician factors on treatment recommendations for locally advanced, unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: We surveyed radiation oncologists regarding their recommendations for treatment (chemoradiation, radiation alone, chemotherapy alone, or no therapy) for hypothetical patients with Stage IIIB NSCLC who varied by age (55 vs. 80 years) and comorbid illness (none, moderate, or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD]). Multinomial logistic regression was used to assess the impact of physician and practice characteristics on radiation oncologists' treatment recommendations for three scenarios with the least agreement. RESULTS: Of 214 radiation oncologists, nearly all (99%) recommended chemoradiation for a healthy 55 year old. However, there was substantial variability in recommendations for a 55 year old with severe COPD, an 80-year-old with moderate COPD, and an 80-year-old with severe COPD. Physicians seeing a lower volume of lung cancer patients were statistically less likely to recommend radiotherapy for younger or older patients with severe COPD (both p < 0.05), but the impact was modest. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly all radiation oncologists report following the evidence-based recommendation of chemoradiation for young, otherwise healthy patients with locally advanced, unresectable NSCLC, but there is substantial variability in treatment recommendations for older or sicker patients, probably related to the lack of clinical trial data for such patients. The physician and practice characteristics we examined only weakly affected treatment recommendations. Additional clinical trial data are necessary to guide recommendations for treatment of elderly patients and patients with poor pulmonary function to optimize their management.

Inflammatory biomarkers and fatigue during radiation therapy for breast and prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Biomarkers of radiation-induced behavioral symptoms, such as fatigue, have not been identified. Studies linking inflammatory processes to fatigue in cancer survivors led us to test the hypothesis that activation of the proinflammatory cytokine network is associated with fatigue symptoms during radiation therapy for breast and prostate cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Individuals with early-stage breast (n = 28) and prostate cancer (n = 20) completed questionnaires and provided blood samples for determination of serum levels of interleukin 1beta (IL-1beta) and IL-6 at assessments conducted before, during, and after a course of radiation therapy. Serum markers of proinflammatory cytokine activity, including IL-1 receptor antagonist and C-reactive protein, were examined in a subset of participants. Random coefficient models were used to evaluate the association between changes in cytokine levels and fatigue. RESULTS: As expected, there was a significant increase in fatigue during radiation treatment. Changes in serum levels of inflammatory markers C-reactive protein and IL-1 receptor antagonist were positively associated with increases in fatigue symptoms (Ps < 0.05), although serum levels of IL-1beta and IL-6 were not associated with fatigue. These effects remained significant (Ps < 0.05) in analyses controlling for potential biobehavioral confounding factors, including age, body mass index, hormone therapy, depression, and sleep disturbance. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that activation of the proinflammatory cytokine network and associated increases in downstream biomarkers of proinflammatory cytokine activity are associated with fatigue during radiation therapy for breast and prostate cancer.

Symptom management after breast cancer treatment: is it influenced by patient characteristics?

PURPOSE: With improved patient survival from breast cancer, more interest has evolved regarding the symptoms women experience in association with breast cancer treatments. We studied the extent to which symptoms for women with incident breast cancer are addressed by their physicians and how symptom management varies with patient characteristics. METHODS: As part of the Los Angeles Women's (LAW) Study, we categorized women from a population-based study of incident breast cancer (n = 1,219) as having an unmet need if she had at least one severe symptom (any of the following: nausea/vomiting, arm problems, hot flashes, vaginal dryness, difficulty sleeping) for which she did not receive the help she wanted. Multivariable analyses predicted having any unmet need as a function of patient demographic and health characteristics. RESULTS: The prevalence of unmet need varied by the type of symptom with the highest proportion of women receiving help for nausea and vomiting (0.91) and the lowest for vaginal dryness (0.48). Black women (OR = 3.61, 95% CI: [1.57, 8.31]), and Spanish-speaking Hispanic women (OR = 2.69, 95% CI: [1.22, 5.94]) were significantly more likely than white women to report an unmet need. More black and Hispanic women compared to white women cited the doctor not thinking treatment would benefit her (P = 0.02), not appreciating how much the problem bothered her (P = 0.03), not knowing about treatments (P < 0.0001), or insurance/cost barriers (P = 0.009) as reasons for her unmet need. CONCLUSION: These results show the persistence of racial disparities in the receipt of appropriate care within the health care system.

Symptoms after breast cancer treatment: are they influenced by patient characteristics?

PURPOSE: This study examines the burden of symptoms by treatment type and patient characteristics in a population-based sample of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. METHODS: Using the Los Angeles County SEER Registry Rapid Case Ascertainment, we identified a cohort of breast cancer patients in 2000 and conducted telephone surveys in English and Spanish among participants. RESULTS: We completed interviews of 1,219 breast cancer patients and found almost half (46%) had at least one severe symptom (any of the following: nausea/vomiting, arm problems, hot flashes, vaginal dryness, difficulty sleeping) that interfered with her daily functioning or mood. Multi-variate analysis controlling for patient characteristics and treatment showed that older (OR=0.90; P<0.000), black (OR=0.50; P<0.000), Hispanic Spanish-speaking (OR=0.37; P<0.000), widowed or never married (OR=0.68; P=0.049), and working (OR=0.72; P=0.024) women were less likely to report severe symptoms than other women. Number of comorbid conditions (OR=1.21; P<0.000) and receipt of chemotherapy (OR=1.48; P=0.040) were positively associated with reporting symptoms. CONCLUSION: These findings estimate the prevalence of several mutable symptoms in breast cancer patients that can be addressed by appropriate treatments. Comorbidity is a significant predictor of symptoms, especially amongst those receiving chemotherapy. Variation in symptom reporting occurred by race/ethnicity and other sociodemographic characteristics, raising questions of different thresholds for reporting symptoms or truly fewer symptoms for some sociodemographic groups. Population-based estimates of the probability of symptoms in women with incident breast cancer can be used to provide patient education about potential outcomes following the treatment of breast cancer.

National survey of perspectives of palliative radiation therapy: role, barriers, and needs.

PURPOSE: Despite growth of palliative care programs and evidence on the effectiveness of radiotherapy in palliating cancer symptoms, radiotherapy is probably underused in this setting. Radiation and medical oncologists and palliative medicine specialists were surveyed regarding the perceived role of palliative radiotherapy and barriers to its use. METHODS: The survey was sent electronically to all physician members of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) and the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine (AAHPM) and a random sample of American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) members, with known e-mail addresses. RESULTS: Response rates were 27%, 14% and 26% for ASTRO, ASCO, and AAHPM respondents, respectively. Although most felt radiotherapy is an effective and important option for palliation of some common cancer symptoms, referrals for such therapy may be declining. Most agreed that radiation oncologists should be more involved in palliative care; however, multiple barriers were identified, such as poor reimbursement, emotional burden of care, insufficient training/knowledge, and the sense of unwillingness of others to share delivery of such services. CONCLUSIONS: Although multiple barriers limit optimal integration, most agree that there should be greater national and professional society efforts to promote the advancement of radiation oncology in the area of palliative care.

Long-term outcomes after breast conservation therapy for early stage breast cancer in a community setting.

We, as a large community practice, retrospectively reviewed our experience in treating early stage breast cancer to determine rates of breast-conserving therapy (BCT), disease outcomes after such treatment, and risk factors for local recurrence. A hospital tumor registry was used to identify breast cancer cases diagnosed between 1987 and 2003. Rates of BCT and radiotherapy were examined using primary treatment data. For subsequent disease outcomes analyses, cases were limited to only those treated between 1987 and 1994 to allow for adequate follow-up. For the subset of 521 T1-2N0 patients treated with BCT, we calculated crude rates of first failure at 8 years, with outcomes classified as local failure (LF), distant or regional node failure (DNF), dead without failure (DWF), or alive without failure (AWF). Polychotomous logistic regression was done to assess the influence of age at diagnosis, tumor grade, total radiation dose to the tumor bed, and use of systemic therapy. From 1987 to 2003, rates of BCT went from 69% to 89% and the rate of radiation after breast-conserving surgery was 90%. For the subset of 521 T1-2N0 patients treated with BCT who had at least 8 years of follow-up, median age was 58 years, 15% had grade 1 tumors, 83% had T1 tumors, 4.6% had positive margins, 83% got a total radiation dose >or=60 Gy to the tumor bed, and 51% had systemic therapy. At 8 years, 7% of patients had LF, 8% DNF, 10% were DWF, and 75% were AWF. Patient age (p = 0.076), tumor grade (p = 0.056), use of systemic therapy (p = 0.077), and radiation dose (p = 0.127) had borderline significant effects on the risk of LF versus AWF. The majority of patients in this community were treated with BCT and most received radiotherapy. Local control was excellent and comparable to that seen in large academic centers.

Breast-conserving therapy with adjuvant paclitaxel and radiation therapy: feasibility of concurrent treatment.

As commonly used, adjuvant paclitaxel after doxorubicin in high-risk breast cancer patients results in a prolonged delay of the onset of radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery. Concurrent delivery of breast irradiation with paclitaxel would allow for earlier initiation of radiation. We report on the toxicity of concurrent paclitaxel and breast irradiation after doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. Twenty-four patients were treated with concurrent breast radiation and paclitaxel. All patients received four cycles of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by four cycles of paclitaxel, 175 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. The radiation therapy started after the first cycle in 3 patients, after the second cycle in 16, and after the third in 5. The breast received 4680-5040 cGy external beam irradiation, followed by a boost of 1000-2000 cGy. Fifteen patients received supraclavicular irradiation, and a posterior axillary supplement was used in five patients. Median follow-up after completion of irradiation was 11.5 months (range 2-29 months) with 21 patients followed >or=6 months, 12 followed >or=12 months, and 7 followed >or=18 months. Using Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) acute toxicity scoring criteria, 7 patients experienced grade 1 skin and/or soft tissue reactions and 17 patients had grade 2 reactions. The average total duration of radiation treatment was 49 days (range 41-57 days). Only eight patients had radiation therapy interruptions for a median of 3.5 days (range 2-8 days): two more than 5 days. None had a chemotherapy dose reduction. One patient discontinued paclitaxel after the third cycle due to bilateral upper extremity neuropathy. No cases of pneumonitis or brachial plexopathy were seen. Concurrent treatment with every 3-week paclitaxel and breast irradiation was well tolerated. Additional study is needed to determine optimal timing, long-term toxicity, and potential benefits of concurrent radiation therapy and paclitaxel.

Treatment outcomes of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for localized prostate carcinoma: a large community-based experience.

BACKGROUND: The current study documented the implementation of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and assessed the tumor control and toxicity of such treatment in a large, multisite community practice. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed their first 222 consecutive patients with clinically localized (N0) prostate carcinoma treated with a 6-field conformal technique from October 1993 through March 2000. Standardized target definitions, dose planning constraints, and gantry angles were utilized to develop the treatment plan. Patients were categorized by low, intermediate, and high risk. Low risk was defined as T1a-T2a disease, a Gleason score < 7, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level 6, or PSA level > 10.01 ng/mL (n = 60 [27%]). High risk was defined as 2 of the above risk factors or as T3 disease, a Gleason score > 7, or a PSA level > 20 (n = 115 [52%]). Biochemical disease recurrence was defined in accordance with the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition. Urinary and bowel toxicity were graded using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group morbidity scoring system. RESULTS: The median follow-up after radiotherapy for surviving patients was 47 months (range, 0-99 months). The 2 and 5-year actuarial biochemical control rates for all patients were 84% and 78%, respectively. Using logistic regression analysis, lower dose (< 75.6 gray [Gy] vs. 75.6 Gy; P = 0.006), higher risk group (P = 0.033), higher stage (P = 0.045), and higher PSA level (P = 0.001) were significantly associated with biochemical disease recurrence. Toxicity was not significantly correlated with a higher radiotherapy dose. CONCLUSIONS: Dose escalation to 75.6 Gy using a 6-field conformal technique was feasible in the authors' community practice and resulted in acceptable toxicity and early biochemical outcomes.