Compliance with sedation analgesia protocols: Do clinical pharmacists have an impact?

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVES: The agreement between prescribed sedation objectives and sedation pump syringe rate adaptation is not optimal. Delays in adjustment of sedation doses are associated with an increased patient length of stay in the intensive care unit. Our objectives were to assess compliance with the approved sedation protocol and to evaluate the impact of a clinical pharmacist daily controlling sedation and analgesia scores and pump syringe rates on patients' outcomes in a critical care unit. METHODS: Prospective before/after study involving 60 adult patients divided into two groups (non-intervention and intervention groups) who received mechanical ventilation and continuous infusions of sedative and analgesic drugs in an intensive care unit. In both groups, data were collected daily in 30 mechanically ventilated patients receiving a sedation/analgesia regimen during a 3-month period according to a standardized protocol. A pharmacist was in charge of intervening with physicians when the local sedation analgesia protocol was not followed. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of demographic characteristics except a higher proportion of men in the intervention group (70% vs 40%, P = .019). In the control group, sedation and analgesia objectives were not prescribed in more than half the cases. Pharmacist intervention reduced sedation duration (5 [2-11] vs 2 [1-5.5] days, P = .019). The cumulative delay in adaptation of the sedation analgesia electric syringe pump was significantly decreased in the intervention group (8 [0-29.5] vs 28.5 hours [11.1-68.4], P = .034). Total doses of sedatives (midazolam, propofol) and analgesics (sufentanil, remifentanil) per patient were decreased in the intervention group compared to the control group (respectively, P = .24, P = .0009, P = .0013 and P = .0007). CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacist intervention can decrease the sedation duration and the total dose of sedation medications and reinforce adherence to sedation/analgesia guidelines.

Drug incompatibilities in intravenous therapy: evaluation and proposition of preventive tools in intensive care and hematology units.

PURPOSE: Physicochemical incompatibility (PCI) between drugs infused together is frequent, but under-recognized. PCI can lead to drug inactivity, catheter occlusion, embolism or inflammatory reactions. The aims of this work were to identify most frequent and relevant drug incompatibilities and to review and develop strategies for their prevention. METHOD: This was an observational prospective survey conducted between January and March 2015 in an intensive care unit (ICU) and in September 2014 in a hematology sterile unit (HSU). Drugs administered to patients were recorded and their compatibility assessed based on published compatibility data. RESULTS: Drug incompatibilities accounted for 12% (23/189) and 17% (116/686) of drug pairs infused in the ICU and the HSU, respectively. Pantoprazole was the most frequent drug implied in PCI. Regarding drug classes, anti-infective agents and gastrointestinal drugs were the most frequently implied. Among the incompatible pairs, 78% and 61% implicated a drug with extreme pH in the ICU and HSU, respectively. The tools proposed to reduce the frequency of PCI included: compatibility cross-tables, labeling of drugs with extreme pH and optimized administration schedules. CONCLUSIONS: Given the frequency and the potential for severe consequences of PCI, pharmacists have a role to play in raising awareness of nurses and practitioners, and proposing adequate tools and solutions to reduce their incidence.

Pazopanib pharmacokinetically guided dose optimization in three cancer patients with gastrointestinal resection.

PURPOSE: Pazopanib is approved in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and soft-tissue sarcoma at a flat-fixed dose despite a large pharmacokinetics interindividual variability and a narrow therapeutic index. To our knowledge, pazopanib exposure in patients with gastrointestinal resections (GIR) has not been described. This report focuses on feasibility of pharmacokinetics-guided dose escalation in these patients and clinical implications for their management. METHOD: A retrospective data collection was performed for three patients with GIR treated with pazopanib, including pazopanib plasma concentrations (high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection) and treatment adherence (Girerd score). CASE PRESENTATION: First patient (55-year-old man, RCC, gastric bypass surgery) pazopanib Cmin,ss at day 39 was 4.1 mg/L. Dose escalation to 1800 mg/day fractionated allowed to reach Cmin,ss of 18.5 mg/L (target threshold in RCC patients: 20.5 mg/L). Patient 2 (50-year-old woman, metastatic myxofibrosarcoma, gastric band) showed Cmin,ss of 4.0 mg/L at day 13. In patient 3 (49-year-old man, gastric malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor, gastrectomy), Cmin,ss at day 13 was 2.7 mg/L. For these two patients, intake with food and dose fractioning only slightly increased pazopanib Cmin,ss to 12.0 mg/L and 6.5 mg/L, respectively (therapeutic threshold in sarcoma patients: 27 mg/L). Treatment adherence was good in all patients. CONCLUSION: Optimal pazopanib exposure cannot be achieved in patients with GIR, and thus, other therapeutic strategies should be encouraged. Pretherapeutic assessment seems crucial to evaluate factors as bariatric surgery that may impact pazopanib concentrations. Therapeutic drug monitoring could be helpful to optimize pazopanib response in these patients.

[Haematopoietic stem cell donation from minor donor: Respecting laws, assessing fitness, delivering information and good care (SFGM-TC)]. / Don de cellules souches hématopoïétiques à partir d'un donneur mineur : cadre réglementaire, information, évaluation de l'aptitude au don et parcours (SFGM-TC).

Haematopoietic stem cell collection from paediatric donors is a common and life-saving practice, as evidenced by the fact that there is a growing annual number of cases of transplants from minor donors among SFGM-TC centers over the last decade. Still, medical use of human tissue from a healthy and underage donor requires proper regulations and medical management. The guidelines below aim at underlining the importance of pondering the legal, medical and ethical aspects of using stem cells from healthy paediatric donors and stress out the importance of obtaining informed consent at the time of assessing HLA compatibility. Combined medical and psychological assessments are required before the donation, as well as one month later and one year later to ensure of the child's physical and mental wellbeing. Bone marrow harvest under general anaesthetics remains the preferred method of collection for children. Peripheral blood stem cell collection should only be considered for children who will not require a central venous access for collection. We aim at offering guidelines centered on the healthy child donating stem cells and his/her wellbeing, and these should be regularly reviewed as medical practices evolve.

Assessment of the clinical relevance of pharmacists' interventions performed during medication review in a rheumatology ward.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacists contribute to reduce the number of medication errors during medication review. Nevertheless, few French studies report the potential clinical impact of pharmacists' interventions performed after detecting drug-related problems. The objective was to evaluate the clinical relevance of pharmacists' interventions in a rheumatology ward from medical and pharmaceutical perspectives. METHOD: The analysis was conducted on pharmacists' interventions performed between January 1 and December 31, 2015 in a French teaching hospital. Similar pharmacists' interventions were grouped in one item and they were analysed according to 11 drug categories. The clinical significance of pharmacists' interventions was considered independently by a pharmacist and a rheumatologist using a validated French scale that categorises drug-related problems from minor to catastrophic. The agreement between the two professionals was analysed using the weighted kappa coefficient. RESULTS: Of 1313 prescriptions reviewed, 461 pharmacists' interventions (171 items) were formulated for drug-related problems with an acceptance rate of 67.2%. Of the 418 interventions selected for clinical significance analysis, 235 interventions (56.2%) for the physician and 400 interventions (95.7%) for the pharmacist were at least significant. The two professionals evaluated equally the clinical relevance of 90 items (50.6%). The categories with the most similarities were the analgesics/anti-inflammatory drugs (78.1%), the antidiabetics (75.0%) and the anticoagulants (71.4%). The agreement was estimated by a weighted kappa coefficient of 0.29. CONCLUSION: This work highlights the positive clinical relevance of pharmacists' interventions in rheumatology and the importance of medico-pharmaceutical collaboration to prevent medication errors.