Pacing maneuvers from the aortic cusps: A useful technique during ablation of focal arrhythmias arising from the aortic root.

BACKGROUND: The ablation of arrhythmias arising near the His-bundle region in the non-coronary aortic cusp (NCAC) is challenging. Among the aortic sinuses of Valsalva, the NCAC is located between the right atrium and the left atrium. For this reason, pacing from the NCAC should result in atrial capture while pacing from the right and left coronary cusps (LCC) may result in ventricular capture. The objective of this study is to prove that atrial capture during pacing from the sinuses of Valsalva may be used to confirm a correct position in the non-coronary cusp. METHODS: A total of 30 patients with structurally normal heart undergoing left sided ablation procedures, underwent electrophysiological study of the aortic cusps. Each of the aortic valve cusps was paced with increasing outputs and analyzed offline to determine their unique electrocardiographic characteristics. RESULTS: In the NCAC, we obtained an atrial capture in 29 out of 30 patients (96.6%). The atrial capture was highly specific for a position in the NCAC (p < .001). The median output required to capture from the cusp was 10 mA (range 5-25 mA) at a pulse width of 2 ms. In the right coronary cusp (RCC) and LCC, we obtained ventricular capture in all patients (100%). The median output required to capture from the cusp was 10 mA (range 10-25 mA) in RCC and 25 mA (range 10-25 mA) in LCC at a pulse width of 2 ms. CONCLUSIONS: Atrial capture during a pacemapping from the aortic cusps can be considered proof of a correct position in NCAC.

Response to a massive SARS-CoV-2 infection in a nursing home transformed into a caring center.

BACKGROUND: The best policy to follow when nursing homes are massively hit by SARS-CoV2 is unclear. AIM: To describe COVID-19 containment in a nursing home transformed into a caring center. METHODS: Physicians and nurses were recruited. The facility was reorganized and connected with the laboratory of the reference hospital. Ultrasound was used to diagnose pneumonia. Patients needing intensive care were transferred to the reference hospital. Hydroxychloroquine/azithromycin/enoxaparin were used initially, while amiodarone/enoxaparin were used at a later phase. Under both regimens, methylprednisolone was added for severe cases. Prophylaxis was done with hydroxychloroquine initially and then with amiodarone. PERIOD COVERED: March 22-July 31, 2020. RESULTS: The facility was reorganized in two days. Ninety-two guests of the 121 (76%) and 25 personnel of 118 (21.1%) became swab test positive. Seven swab test negative patients who developed symptoms were considered to have COVID-19. Twenty-seven patients died, 23 swab test positive, 5 of whom after full recovery. Four patients needing intensive care were transferred (3 died). Mortality, peaking in April 2020, was correlated with symptoms, comorbidities, dyspnea, fatigue, stupor/coma, high neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, pro-calcitonin, and high oxygen need (p ≤ 0.001 for all). Among swab-positive staff, 3 had pneumonia and recovered. Although no comparison could be made between different treatment and prophylaxis strategies, potentially useful suggestions emerged. Mortality compared well with that of nursing homes of the same area not transformed into care centers. CONCLUSION: Nursing homes massively hit by SARS-CoV-2 can become caring centers for patients not needing intensive care.

Eosinophilic myocarditis: comprehensive update on pathophysiology, diagnosis, prognosis and management.

Hypereosinophilic syndromes are a group of disorders secondary to the accumulation of eosinophils leading to the injury of one or more organs. Among them, eosinophilic myocarditis (EM) is a rare form of inflammatory cardiomyopathy characterized by eosinophilic infiltration into myocardial tissue and subsequent release of substances with cell membrane damage and cell destruction. The degree of infiltration is thought to depend on the underlying condition, as well as the degree and duration of eosinophil exposure and ranges from mild localized disease to diffuse multifocal infiltrates associated with myocardial necrosis, thrombotic complications and endomyocardial fibrosis. The main causes of EM are hypersensitivity reactions, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, hypereosinophilic syndrome variants, infections and cancer. Clinical presentation can be variable, ranging from asymptomatic forms to life-threatening conditions, to chronic heart failure due to progression to chronic restrictive cardiomyopathy. Marked eosinophilia in peripheral blood, elevated serum eosinophilic cationic protein concentration and multimodality imaging may suggest the etiology of EM, but in most cases an endomyocardial biopsy must be performed to establish a definitive diagnosis. Systemic treatment varies greatly depending on the underlying cause, however the evidence of an eosinophilic infiltrate allows initiation of immunosuppressive therapy, which is the mainstay of treatment in idiopathic and in most forms of EM. Patients with helminthic infection benefit from anti-parasitic therapy, those with myeloid clone often need a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, while anticoagulant therapy should be undertaken in case of possible thrombotic complications.