Adaptations to Indiana's 21st Century Cures-funded recovery coaching initiative in the wake of COVID-19.

This brief commentary discusses how provider organizations from Indiana's Recovery Coach and Peer Support Initiative (RCPSI) adapted their practices in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and associated restrictions. The RCPSI, which is funded through the 21st Century Cures Act, placed peer recovery coaches (PRCs) in emergency departments (EDs) to link opioid overdose patients to medication for opioid use disorder. This commentary discusses how COVID-19 restrictions increased use of telehealth to replace in-person PRC contacts with patients, affected the timing of initial PRC contacts with patients, and led to allowances for Medicaid billing of recovery coach support sessions conducted via telehealth. Future research should further determine the effects of these changes on PRC services in the ED.

Peer recovery services for persons returning from prison: Pilot randomized clinical trial investigation of SUPPORT.

Previously incarcerated persons with substance use disorder (SUD) need recovery supports, given the overrepresentation of this population in prison and community supervision. Peer support programs have the potential to fill gaps in postrelease support for persons with SUD. To assess the effectiveness of peer support approaches, this pilot study randomized access to peer recovery coaches within a well-established community reentry program. We examined several proximal outcomes to determine potential mechanisms of action, along with several exploratory outcomes. While attrition due to re-incarceration, death, and program disengagement was high, our findings suggest that those who received peer recovery coach support in the reentry program had recovery-based improvements, including improved self-reported mental and physical health and reductions in substance use behaviors. The treatment group also saw improvements in measures of treatment motivation and self-efficacy. Both groups saw similar positive trends in some outcomes, likely due to the relative success of the well-established reentry program regardless of the inclusion of peer support coaches. This study contributes lessons learned and potential mechanisms of action to limited research on the effectiveness of peer recovery supports for reentry populations with SUD.