Hyperkalaemia in Cardiological Patients: New Solutions for an Old Problem.

Hyperkalaemia is one of the most common electrolyte disorders in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). The true burden of hyperkalaemia in the real-world setting can be difficult to assess, but in population-based cohort studies up to 4 in 10 patients developed hyperkalaemia. In addition to drugs interfering with potassium metabolism and food intake, several conditions can cause or worsen hyperkalaemia, such as advanced age, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease. Mortality, cardiovascular morbidity, and hospitalisation are higher in patients with hyperkalaemia. Hyperkalaemia represents a major contraindication or a withholding cause for disease-modifying therapies like renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors (RAASi), mainly mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. Hyperkalaemia can be also classified as acute and chronic, according to the onset. Acute hyperkalaemia is often a life-threatening emergency requiring immediate treatment to avoid lethal arrhythmias. Therapy goal is cell membrane stabilisation by calcium administration, cellular intake, shift of extracellular potassium to the intracellular space (insulin, beta-adrenergic agents, sodium bicarbonate), and increased elimination with diuretics or dialysis. Chronic hyperkalaemia was often managed with dietary counselling to prevent potassium-rich food intake and tapering of potassium-increasing drugs, mostly RAASi. Sodium polystyrene sulphonate, a potassium binder, was the only therapeutic option. Recently, new drugs such as patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate give new opportunities for the treatment of hyperkalaemia, as they proved to be safe, well tolerated, and effective. Aim of this review is to describe the burden of hyperkalaemia in cardiovascular patients, its direct and indirect effects, and the therapeutic options now available in the acute and chronic setting.

Role of glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists in obesity and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) currently represents the majority of all heart failure cases in the community. Glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists represent a class of medications used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus and, in some cases, obesity. This class includes semaglutide. In the available data from the Semaglutide Treatment Effect in People with Obesity (STEP) trials that were done, looking at weight loss effects of semaglutide, there was a 30-40% reduction in C-reactive protein levels, and that suggests that there is a significant anti-inflammatory effect. Recently, the STEP-HFpEF trial enrolled 529 non-diabetic patients with HFpEF and obesity who were randomly assigned to once-weekly semaglutide (2.4 mg) or placebo for 52 weeks. A statistically significant improvement in the quality of life score and in weight loss was observed. Statistically significant improvements were also seen in the 6 min walk distance, levels of C-reactive protein, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels. Interestingly, the Semaglutide Effects on Cardiovascular Outcomes in People with Overweight or Obesity trial has shown that semaglutide produced a consistent reduction of around 20% vs. placebo across major cardiovascular event endpoints over the ∼3-year follow-up in patients with overweight or obesity and cardiovascular disease but not diabetes.

The Key Role of a Psychoactive Substance Use History in Comprehensive Cardiovascular Risk Assessment, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention.

BACKGROUND: Psychoactive substances have toxic effects resulting different cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular organ damage. Through a variety of mechanisms, they can trigger the onset of various forms of cardiovascular disease: acute or chronic, transient or permanent, subclinical or symptomatic. Hence, a thorough knowledge of the patient's drug habits is essential for a more complete clinical-etiopathogenetic diagnosis and consequent therapeutic, preventive, and rehabilitative management. SUMMARY: The prime reason for taking a psychoactive substance use history in the cardiovascular context is to identify those people who use substances (whether habitual or occasional users, symptomatic or not) and adequately assess their overall cardiovascular risk profile in terms of "user status" and type of substance(s) used. A psychoactive substance history could also alert the physician to suspect, and eventually diagnose, cardiovascular disease related to the intake of psychoactive substances, so optimizing the medical management of users. This anamnesis could finally assess the likelihood of patients persisting in the habit as a user or relapse, while maintaining high their cardiovascular risk profile. Taking such a history should be mandatory when a causal connection is suspected between intake of psychoactive substances and the observed symptoms or pathology, regardless of whether the individual is a declared user or not. KEY MESSAGES: The purpose of this article was to provide practical information on when, how, and why to perform a psychoactive substance use history.

Prevalence and predictive role of hypertriglyceridemia in statin-treated patients at very high risk: Insights from the START study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Elevated triglyceride (TG) levels seem to identify subjects at increased cardiovascular risk, independent of LDL-C levels. We sought to evaluate the predictive role of hypertriglyceridemia, defined as TG levels ≥150 mg/dl, in very high risk (VHR) patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) treated with statins. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using the data from the STable Coronary Artery Diseases RegisTry (START) study, an Italian nationwide registry, we assessed the association between the TG levels and baseline clinical characteristics, pharmacological treatment and major adverse cardio-cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 1 year in a large cohort of statin-treated patients at VHR. Of the 4751 consecutive patients with CCS enrolled in the registry and classified as VHR, 2652 (55.8%) had TG values available (mean 120.6 ± 54.9) and were treated with at least a statin at baseline: 2019 (76.1%) with TG < 150 and 633 (23.9%) with TG ≥ 150 mg/dl. At 1 year from enrolment, MACCE occurred in 168 (6.3%) patients, without differences between the two groups of TG (5.9 vs 7.6%; p = 0.14). At multivariable analysis, hypertriglyceridemia did not result as independent predictor of the MACCE (hazard ratio: 1.16; 95% confidence intervals: 0.82-1.64; p = 0.42). CONCLUSIONS: In the present large, nationwide cohort of consecutive CCS patients at VHR with statin-controlled LDL-C levels, hypertriglyceridemia was present in around 24% of cases and did not result as predictor of MACCE at 1 year. Further studies with a longer follow-up and larger sample size are needed to better define the prognostic role of TG levels when intensive LDL lowering therapies are used.

Cardiovascular prevention: Mediterranean or low-fat diet?

The international scientific community has long agreed on the fact that a low-fat diet is actually able to bring benefits to cardiovascular health and beyond. By low-fat diet, experts mean a diet where the average calories assimilated daily are made up of no more than 30% fat. The Mediterranean Diet, on the other hand, identifies a nutritional model inspired by the traditional eating habits of the countries bordering the Mediterranean Sea. It began to be studied scientifically in the 1950s and it is still today one of the diets that have a positive impact on our health when associated with correct lifestyles. Although epidemiological and mechanistic studies show similar results, there is no evidence from large-scale, long-term clinical trials on the efficacy of the Mediterranean Diet compared with another active group, particularly in secondary prevention. A convincing response has been obtained from the recent CORDIOPREV study (CORonary Diet Intervention with Olive oil and cardiovascular PREVention) which randomized ∼1000 patients with documented coronary artery disease to a Mediterranean Diet or a low-fat dietary intervention. In a 7-year follow-up, the Mediterranean Diet was superior to the low-fat diet in the prevention of major cardiovascular events.

Polygenic risk score and age: an extra help in the cardiovascular prevention of the young?

All major guidelines recommend assessing the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) using risk scores. In fact, it has been shown that their use at the population level increases the accuracy of event prediction and facilitates the choice of strategies to be adopted in primary prevention. In fact, their use in clinical practice is far from optimal and their predictive ability on an individual level is not excellent. Our genetic heritage is substantially stable from birth and determines a 'baseline risk' on which external influences act. Genetic information therefore has the potential to be an early predictor of risk. Common diseases such as diabetes mellitus, ASCVD and neurodegenerative diseases are conditioned by different genetic variants with small individual effects, so that a reliable risk prediction requires careful examination of the aggregate impact of these multiple variants. The polygenic risk score (PRS) is a tool that potentially enables this complex assessment and provides a new opportunity to explore our risk of developing common diseases, including coronary artery disease (CAD). In the future, it is possible that a specific PRS could be used as an independent CAD screening tool, but this requires a detailed assessment of the practical implications, including the population to be investigated, and the consequent interventions that would then be offered.

Nonresponse to Acute Vasodilator Challenge and Prognosis in Heart Failure With Pulmonary Hypertension.

BACKGROUND: An acute vasodilator challenge is recommended in patients with heart failure and pulmonary hypertension during heart transplant evaluation. The aim of the study was to assess which hemodynamic parameters are associated with nonresponsiveness to the challenge. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study is a retrospective analysis of 402 patients with heart failure with pulmonary hypertension who underwent right heart catheterization and a pulmonary vasodilator challenge. Among the 140 who fulfilled the transplant guidelines eligibility criteria for the vasodilator challenge, 38 were responders and 102 nonresponders. At multivariable analysis, a diastolic blood pressure of <70 mm Hg, pulmonary vascular resistance of >5 Woods units, and pulmonary artery compliance of <1.2 mL/mm Hg were independently associated with poor response to vasodilator challenge (all P < .001). The presence of any 2 of these 3 conditions was associated with a 90% probability of being a nonresponder. The covariate-adjusted hemodynamic predictors of death in the entire population were a low baseline systolic blood pressure (P = .0017) and a low baseline right ventricular stroke work index (P = .0395). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with heart failure and pulmonary hypertension, low pulmonary arterial compliance, high pulmonary vascular resistance, and low diastolic blood pressure predict the nonresponsiveness to acute vasodilator challenge whilst a poor right ventricular function predicts a dismal prognosis.

Comparing the Prognostic Impact of Prediabetes with Diabetes in a Nationwide Cohort of Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndromes: An Analysis of the START Registry.

AIMS: Using data from the nationwide prospective START registry that enrolled a large cohort of patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS), we aimed to investigate whether the presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) and pre-DM independently affected the risk of cardiovascular events at 1-year follow-up. METHODS: We assessed the impact of DM and pre-DM on all-cause mortality and a composite of all-cause mortality and hospitalization for cardiovascular causes at 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: Among the 3,778 patients with available fasting plasma glucose data at study entry, 37% were classified as DM, 25% as pre-DM, and 38% as no DM. At 1 year, patients with DM had higher rates of all-cause death (p = 0.004) and death/cardiovascular hospitalization (p = 0.003) than those with pre-DM or without DM. Conversely, no significant differences in the adverse event rate were found between patients with pre-DM and those without DM. At unadjusted Cox analysis, DM resulted as a predictor of both death for any cause (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.41; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.34-4.34; p = 0.003) and all-cause death/hospitalization for cardiovascular causes (HR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.02-1.62; p = 0.03). However, DM did not result as an independent predictor of either endpoint at multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of 1-year major events among patients with CCS and pre-DM is comparable to that of patients with CCS and normoglycemic status and is lower than that of patients with DM.

Is physical activity always good for you? The physical activity paradox.

Regular physical activity is a known protective factor for the prevention of non-communicable diseases such as cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, breast, and colon cancer. Physical activity also has benefits for mental health, delays the onset of dementia, contributes to the maintenance of an adequate body weight and to general well-being. Research on physical activity has mainly focused on leisure and total time, and less on the activity in the workplace. The current guidelines actually recommend physical activity in any form and do not distinguish between the different areas, e.g. physical activity carried out during leisure time, at home or at work. However, new evidence suggests a contrast between the health effects of physical activity in leisure time vs. that in the workplace. In particular, while physical activity, even of high intensity in leisure time, has been associated with positive health outcomes, adverse consequences have been documented for physical activity in the workplace, both in terms of cardiovascular diseases, work absences due to illness and mortality from all causes. These contrasting effects of physical activity in leisure time compared to that in the workplace constitute the so-called 'physical activity paradox'.

Which patients with atrial fibrillation undergo an ablation procedure today in Europe? A report from the ESC-EHRA-EORP Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Long-Term and Atrial Fibrillation General Pilot Registries.

AIMS: Rhythm control management in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) may be unequal across Europe. The aim of this study was to investigate how selective the patient cohort referred for AF ablation is, as compared to the general AF population in Europe, and to describe the governing mechanisms for such selection. METHODS AND RESULTS: Descriptive comparative statistical analyses of the baseline characteristics were performed between the cohorts of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Long-Term (ESC EORP AFA-LT) registry, designed to provide a picture of contemporary real-world AF ablation, and the AF population from the AF-General (ESC EORP AF-Gen) pilot registry. Data collection was performed using a web-based system. In the AFA and in the Atrial Fibrillation General (AFG) pilot registries, 3593 and 3049 patients were enrolled, respectively. Patients who underwent AF ablation were younger, more commonly male, and had significantly less comorbidities. Atrial Fibrillation Ablation patients often presented without comorbidities, resulting in a lower risk of stroke (CHA2DS2-VASc ≥5: 2.9% vs. 24.5%, all P < 0.001) and bleeding (HAS-BLED ≥2: 8.5% vs. 40.5%, P < 0.001) but with European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) scores >1 and more prevalent AF-related symptoms such as palpitations, fatigue, and weakness (all P < 0.001) as compared to the general AF patients. Atrial Fibrillation Ablation patients were significantly more often male, had higher left ventricular ejection fraction (59.5% vs. 52.4%) and smaller left atrial size on echocardiogram (P < 0.001 each). CONCLUSION: The comparison of the patient cohorts in the AFA and AFG registries showed that AF ablation in European clinical practice is mostly performed in relatively young, symptomatic and relatively healthy patients.

Prevention after acute coronary syndrome the 'less is more' philosophy.

In the cardiology field, in recent years, we have witnessed an exponential increase in the use of both invasive and non-invasive instrument diagnostics. Particularly after an acute coronary syndrome, instrumental examinations, especially non-invasive ones, are often prescribed inappropriately until they almost completely replace the clinical evaluation. Their correct use, on the contrary, would require the choice of a test to be prescribed according to the epidemiological and clinical context of the individual patient. The strategy of early diagnosis, obtainable through instrumental screening and borrowed from oncological pathologies, was transferred 'tout court' in the cardiovascular field without any scientific basis, replacing the pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention, such as the appropriate lifestyle, aimed at reducing cardiovascular risk factors. The guidelines of the main scientific societies define the most appropriate paths in the management of the coronary heart disease patients, both in the immediate post-acute phase and in the chronic phase. Although the guidelines sometimes show an excessive simplification of clinical problems, in an age in which the control of health expenditure has become a priority the correctness of the indications is an indispensable objective, being incontrovertible that a test is indicated only when an instrumental examination is able to modify the diagnostic-therapeutic path and the outcome of the patient.

Referral from vascular surgery to cardiovascular rehabilitation and related outcomes in patients with peripheral arterial disease: the THINKPAD-RELOADED survey.

The utilization of cardiovascular rehabilitation (CR) programmes in patients with Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease (LEPAD) is generally poor, with limited evidence of current policies for referral. The aim of the study was to evaluate, within a cohesive network of CR and vascular surgery facilities with facilitated referral process, the clinical characteristic of LEPAD patients referred to CR and related outcomes, as compared to patients not referred. The present is an observational prospective study of consecutive patients recruited at vascular surgery facilities. Out of 329 patients observed, the average referral rate to CR was 34% (28% and 39% in patients with and without recent peripheral revascularization, p<0.05). LEPAD patients entering the CR programme were similar to those who did not according to sex, age, the vascular surgery setting of evaluation, and localization of arterial lesions. Patients with moderate intermittent claudication and patients with acute limb ischemia as index event were more represented among those who attended CR (41% vs 21% and 9% vs 2% respectively, p<0.05). Patients referred to CR had five times more episodes of acute coronary syndrome and heart failure as complication of the index event. The cardiovascular risk profile (obesity 29.5% vs 11%, p<0.05; hypercholesterolemia 80% vs 61%, p<0.05) was much worse in LEPAD patients referred to CR, but conversely, they better achieved secondary prevention targets, particularly for blood pressure control (97% vs 57%, p<0.05). All-cause 2-year mortality in the whole patients' population was 6%. Patients entering the CR programme displayed less events (13.5% vs 37.7%, p<0.05), mainly death (3.1% vs 11.3%, p<0.05) and limb-related events (4.2% vs 15.2%, p<0.05). The results of our study suggest that when a cohesive network of vascular surgery and CR facilities becomes available, the referral rate to rehabilitation may increase up to one third of eligible patients. Patients with higher comorbidity and cardiovascular risk seem to have priority in the referral process, nevertheless those with peripheral revascularization are still underestimated. Entering CR may ensure better cardiovascular risk profile and cardiovascular prognosis in LEPAD patients, and consequently the systematic adoption of this care model needs to be strongly recommended and facilitated.

Similar predictive value of six-minute walking distance and B-type natriuretic peptide in heart failure with reduced to mid-range ejection fraction.

The prognostic insights of heart failure (HF) with mid-range (40-49%) ejection fraction (HFmrEF) are not fully elucidated. We investigated whether the six-minutes walking test (6MWT) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) are predictive of outcome across the spectrum of LV systolic dysfunction and whether the HFmrEF cut-off impacts the risk stratification abilities of these tests. We studied 538 outpatients, aged 70±12 years, 28% females, with stable chronic HF and EF<50%, 349 with HFmrEF and 189 with HFrEF. End-points were all-cause and cardiac death. HFrEF patients were more often male, with ischemic etiology, severe symptoms, higher BNP levels, and cardiac mortality than HFmrEF subjects. During 32 (15-46) months follow-up, 123 (23%) patients died, 95 (18%) for cardiac causes. Cut-offs of 125 pg/ml for BNP and 360 meters for 6MWT distance were associated with lower all-cause (10% vs 38%, p<0.001 and 10% vs 26%, p<0.001, respectively) and cardiac mortality (6% vs 36%, p<0.001 and 8% vs 23%, p<0.001, respectively). BNP (HR 2.144, 95%CI, 1.403-3.276) and 6MWT walked distance (HR 1.923, 95%CI, 1.195-3.096) independently predicted outcome, after adjustment for age, gender, obesity, kidney dysfunction, ischemic etiology, NYHA class, unlike the 40% LVEF threshold. Model discrimination and survival differences were significant across LVEF strata. Higher BNP levels and shorter walked distance combined identified patients (26% overall) at particularly poor prognosis in both phenotype groups. Despite differences between HFmrEF and HFrEF patients in clinical and biomarker profile, BNP levels and 6MWT walked distance retain prognostic value over the entire spectrum of LV systolic dysfunction.

Refined 4-group classification of left ventricular hypertrophy based on ventricular concentricity and volume dilatation outlines distinct noninvasive hemodynamic profiles in a large contemporary echocardiographic population.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) may reflect a wide variety of physiologic and pathologic conditions. Thus, it can be misleading to consider all LVH to be homogenous or similar. Refined 4-group classification of LVH based on ventricular concentricity and dilatation may be identified. To determine whether the 4-group classification of LVH identified distinct phenotypes, we compared their association with various noninvasive markers of cardiac stress. METHODS: Cohort of unselected adult outpatients referred to a seven tertiary care echocardiographic laboratory for any indication in a 2-week period. We evaluated the LV geometric patterns using validated echocardiographic indexation methods and partition values. RESULTS: Standard echocardiography was performed in 1137 consecutive subjects, and LVH was found in 42%. The newly proposed 4-group classification of LVH was applicable in 88% of patients. The most common pattern resulted in concentric LVH (19%). The worst functional and hemodynamic profile was associated with eccentric LVH and those with mixed LVH had a higher prevalence of reduced EF than those with concentric LVH (P < .001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: The new 4-group classification of LVH system showed distinct differences in cardiac function and noninvasive hemodynamics allowing clinicians to distinguish different LV hemodynamic stress adaptations in patients with LVH.

Cardiac Prevention and Rehabilitation "3.0": From acute to chronic phase. Position Paper of the ltalian Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation (GICR-IACPR).

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is the subspecialty of clinical cardiology dedicated to the treatment of cardiac patients, early and in the long term after an acute event. The aim of CR is to improve both quality of life and prognosis through prognostic stratification, clinical stabilization and optimization of therapy (pharmacological and non), management of comorbidities, treatment of disability, as well as through the provision and reinforcement of secondary prevention interventions and maintenaince of adherence to treatment. The mission of CR has changed over time. Once centered on the acute phase, aimed primarily at short-term survival, the healthcare of cardiac patients now increasingly involves the chronic phase where the challenge is to guarantee continuity and quality of care in the medium and long-term. The aim of the present position paper is to provide the state-of-the-art of CR in Italy, discussing its trengths and weaknesses as well as future perspectives.

Pulmonary hemodynamics in heart failure patients with reduced or preserved ejection fraction and pulmonary hypertension: Similarities and disparities.

OBJECTIVE: The current understanding of pulmonary hypertension (PH) due to left ventricular diseases does not distinguish heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) from HF and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), in terms of pulmonary hemodynamics. The value of pulmonary vascular compliance (PCa) and diastolic pulmonary gradient (DPG) as predictors of survival in either HF syndrome is controversial. The aims of our study were to compare the pulmonary hemodynamics in the two HF phenotypes, given similar values of pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP), and to evaluate the impact of PCa and DPG on survival. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 168 PH-HFrEF and 86 PH-HFpEF patients. The independent association of PCa and DPG with prognosis was assessed by means of a Cox proportional hazard model. All cause survival was analyzed over an average follow-up period of 50 months. RESULTS: PH-HFpEF patients had a significantly higher DPG than PH-HFrEF patients (6.1±7.1 vs 1.8±4.5 mmHg, adjusted P=.025). PCa was similar in PH-HFpEF and PH-HFrEF. PCa was a significant predictor of survival, according to previously described preset cutoffs (2.15 mL/mmHg in HFrEF and 1.1 mL/mmHg in HFpEF) and based on a continuous scale; whereas DPG had no impact on survival in both patients groups. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that for similar levels of PAWP, pulmonary circulation may be stiffer in patients with HFpEF-PH than patients with HFrEF-PH, leading to higher DPGs. Nonetheless, PCa rather than DPG emerged as the stronger predictor of survival in both left-sided PH phenotypes.

Prognostic effects of rosuvastatin in patients with co-existing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic heart failure: A sub-analysis of GISSI-HF trial.

OBJECTIVES: Rising evidences showed a possible protective role of statins in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We aimed to evaluate in a post-hoc analysis of the GISSI-HF trial the prognostic effect of the use of rosuvastatin in patients with co-existing COPD and HF, assuming that the anti-inflammatory properties of these drugs may imply a potential beneficial effect in these associated chronic inflammatory conditions. METHODS: We analyzed patients with chronic HF and history of COPD deriving from the GISSI-HF study. Of all 4574 patients eligible to statin, 1060 ambulatory patients with HF and concomitant COPD were enrolled and randomly assigned to rosuvastatin 10 mg daily (538 patients) or placebo (522 patients). The primary end-point was to compare all cause death rate in patients randomized to rosuvastatin or placebo. Further, we assessed the effects of rosuvastatin (10 mg daily) on cardiovascular (CV) death, non-CV death and hospital admissions. Median follow-up was 3.9 years with an interquartile range (IQR) of 3.0-4.4. RESULTS: During the follow-up 438 (41.3%) patients died, 304 (28.6%) for CV death and 687 (64.8%) had at least one hospitalization. The two patient groups had similar outcome, irrespective of randomization, in terms of all-cause mortality (log-rank test p = 0.30) CV, non CV-death (p = 0.88 and 0.09 respectively) and all-cause hospitalization (p = 0.82). Cox regression analysis did not show a favorable association between the use of statin and the examined end-points both on unadjusted and adjusted models. CONCLUSIONS: Statin use is not associated with a beneficial effects on all cause, CV, non CV mortality and hospitalization in patients with coexistent chronic HF and history of COPD. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00336336.

Prevalence and Prognostic Impact of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure: Data from the GISSI-HF Trial.

OBJECTIVES: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common comorbidity in patients with heart failure (HF). We aimed to assess its prevalence, characterization and long-term prognostic impact in the GISSI-HF population. METHODS: The study randomized 6,975 ambulatory HF patients to either n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids or placebo. We performed a retrospective analysis of clinical characteristics and outcomes of the 1,533 patients diagnosed with COPD (22%). RESULTS: COPD was associated with a worse clinical presentation and an increased burden of comorbidities. At a median follow-up of 3.9 years, COPD was found to be an independent predictor of both predefined primary study end points, including all-cause mortality (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.15-1.43, p < 0.0001) and all-cause mortality or hospitalization for cardiovascular reasons (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.10-1.30, p < 0.0001). Both cardiovascular (HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.05-1.36, p = 0.007) and noncardiovascular mortality (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.26-1.94, p < 0.0001) were significantly increased in COPD-HF patients, as well as hospitalizations for any reason (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.14-1.34, p < 0.0001), for cardiovascular reasons (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06-1.27, p = 0.002) and for HF (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.14-1.43, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: COPD is an independent predictor of mortality and hospitalizations in ambulatory HF patients. Increased awareness and improved management of COPD may reduce the burden of this morbidity to patients with HF.

ANMCO/GICR-IACPR/SICI-GISE Consensus Document: the clinical management of chronic ischaemic cardiomyopathy.

Stable coronary artery disease (CAD) is a clinical entity of great epidemiological importance. It is becoming increasingly common due to the longer life expectancy, being strictly related to age and to advances in diagnostic techniques and pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions. Stable CAD encompasses a variety of clinical and anatomic presentations, making the identification of its clinical and anatomical features challenging. Therapeutic interventions should be defined on an individual basis according to the patient's risk profile. To this aim, management flow charts have been reviewed based on sustainability and appropriateness derived from recent evidence. Special emphasis has been placed on non-pharmacological interventions, stressing the importance of lifestyle changes, including smoking cessation, regular physical activity, and diet. Adherence to therapy as an emerging risk factor is also discussed.

Cardiopulmonary rehabilitation in patiens with heart failure and chronic pulmonary disease.

The epidemiology of chronic heart failure (CHF) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are well known. Each of these conditions has an important impact on quality of life and functional status and on healthcare consumption. Through shared risk factors and pathophysiological mechanisms CHF and COPD coexist more frequently than expected from the respective populations observed by the pulmonologist or cardiologist. This has important prognostic and therapeutic implications. Several registry-based studies and post-hoc analyses of large randomized controlled trials evaluating COPD as a comorbidity in CHF outpatients have highlighted the negative prognostic impact of the comorbidity in terms of constraint in use of recommended treatments. Among them, the cardiopulmonary rehabilitation may play a significant role. Even in these patients, in fact, a rehabilitative approach focused on physical training programs can positively impact functional autonomy, exercise tolerance and quality of life.