RESUMO
PURPOSE: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) granulocytes are associated with bacterial meningitis, but information on its diagnostic value is limited and primarily based on retrospective studies. Therefore, we assessed the diagnostic accuracy of CSF granulocytes. METHODS: We analyzed CSF granulocytes (index test) from all consecutive patients in two prospective cohort studies in the Netherlands. Both studies included patients ≥ 16 years, suspected of a central nervous system (CNS) infection, who underwent a diagnostic lumbar puncture. All episodes with elevated CSF leukocytes (≥ 5 cells per mm3) were selected and categorized by clinical diagnosis (reference standard). RESULTS: Of 1261 episodes, 625 (50%) had elevated CSF leukocytes and 541 (87%) were included. 117 of 541 (22%) were diagnosed with bacterial meningitis, 144 (27%) with viral meningoencephalitis, 49 (9%) with other CNS infections, 76 (14%) with CNS autoimmune disorders, 93 (17%) with other neurological diseases and 62 (11%) with systemic diseases. The area under the curve to discriminate bacterial meningitis from other diagnoses was 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95-0.98) for CSF granulocyte count and 0.93 (95% CI 0.91-0.96) for CSF granulocyte percentage. CSF granulocyte predominance occurred in all diagnostic categories. A cutoff at 50% CSF granulocytes gave a sensitivity of 94% (95% CI 90-98), specificity of 80% (95% CI 76-84), negative predictive value of 98% (95% CI 97-99) and positive predictive value of 57% (95% CI 52-62). CONCLUSION: CSF granulocytes have a high diagnostic accuracy for bacterial meningitis in patients suspected of a CNS infection. CSF granulocyte predominance occurred in all diagnostic categories, limiting its value in clinical practice.
Assuntos
Infecções do Sistema Nervoso Central , Granulócitos , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções do Sistema Nervoso Central/líquido cefalorraquidiano , Infecções do Sistema Nervoso Central/diagnóstico , Idoso , Meningites Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Meningites Bacterianas/líquido cefalorraquidiano , Países Baixos , Adulto Jovem , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/citologia , Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/química , Adolescente , Contagem de Leucócitos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou maisRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine diagnostic accuracy of inflammatory markers in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for the diagnosis of central nervous system (CNS) infections and specifically bacterial meningitis. METHODS: We analyzed 12 cytokines, chemokines, and acute phase reactants in CSF and plasma of 738 patients with suspected neurological infection included in a multicenter prospective cohort. We determined diagnostic accuracy for predicting any CNS infection and bacterial meningitis. RESULTS: We included 738 episodes between 2017 and 2022, split into a derivation (n = 450) and validation cohort (n = 288). Of these patients, 224 (30%) were diagnosed with CNS infection, of which 81 (11%) with bacterial meningitis, 107 (14%) with viral meningitis or encephalitis, and 35 patients (5%) with another CNS infection. Diagnostic accuracy of CRP, IL-6, and Il-1ß in CSF was high, especially for diagnosing bacterial meningitis. Combining these biomarkers in a multivariable model increased accuracy and provided excellent discrimination between bacterial meningitis and all other disorders (AUC = 0.99), outperforming all individual biomarkers as well as CSF leukocytes (AUC = 0.97). When applied to the population of patients with a CSF leukocyte count of 5-1000 cells/mm3, accuracy of the model also provided a high diagnostic accuracy (AUC model = 0.97 vs. AUC CSF leukocytes = 0.80) with 100% sensitivity and 92% specificity. These results remained robust in a temporal validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Inflammatory biomarkers in CSF are able to differentiate CNS infections and especially bacterial meningitis from other disorders. When these biomarkers are combined, their diagnostic accuracy exceeds that of CSF leukocytes alone and as such these markers have added value to current clinical practice.